Brief History
|
The Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada (Brazilian Journal of Applied Linguistics) was created in 2001, initially as a semiannual, printed journal of the Graduate Program in Linguistic Studies at the Faculty of Letters of the Federal University of Minas Gerais. In 2010, the publication became quarterly. In 2015, the print format was discontinued and the journal became exclusively electronic, in accordance with open access policies. In 2023, the journal adopted a continuous publication model while maintaining four issues per year. In 2025, it started following research communication in the Open Science modus operandi. RBLA has the mission of promoting research in the field of Applied Linguistics, publishing original papers that report on the many phenomena related to real-life language issues, language learning, or language use in diverse contexts. Articles that understand Applied Linguistics as mere application of linguistic theories are not accepted by the journal. It is currently directed by Prof. Junot de Oliveira Maia (UFMG). RBLA was classified as A1 in the 2021–2024 quadrennium of Qualis Periódicos (CAPES). |
Open Access
|
RBLA follows the Open Access model, allowing virtual access without restrictions (including financial) to all scientific texts published by the journal. Open Access is the condition in which the copyright holder of an academic work grants usage rights to third parties through an open license (Creative Commons Attribution, CC-BY), allowing immediate free access to the work and authorizing any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, research, or link articles in full, track them for indexing, transmit them as data to software, or use them for any other legal purpose, provided that the original work is properly cited. |
Compliance with Open Science
|
RBLA follows the Diamond Open Access model and the research communication in the Open Science modus operandi. When submitting their contributions, authors are required to complete and send the Open Science Compliance Form. |
Ethics in Publication
|
RBLA relies on the Code of Conduct and Best Practices of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and on the “Guide to Best Practices for Strengthening Ethics in Scientific Publishing” of the SciELO Network to guide the conduct of editors, reviewers, and authors. The journal does not accept unethical behavior of any kind and does not tolerate any form of plagiarism. The journal follows the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) regarding the criteria that constitute authorship, namely: “1. Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work […]; 2. Drafting the work or reviewing it critically for important intellectual content; […] 4. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved” (ICMJE, “Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals”, 2025, p. 2). EDITOR DUTIES Decision of publication: the editors are responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published, guided by the reviews issued by the peer reviewers and by the policies established by the journal’s Editorial Board and Editor-in-Chief. These policies must comply with current legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. For decision-making, the editors may confer with the Editorial Board. Transparency and respect: editors must evaluate submitted manuscripts without regard to the authors’ race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy. Confidentiality: the editor and other members of the editorial team must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript, except to reviewers and Editorial Board members. Disclosure and conflict of interest: editors must not use unpublished material disclosed in a submitted manuscript in their own research without the author’s explicit and written consent. Editors must recuse themselves from evaluating manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest due to competitive or collaborative issues, as well as other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions associated with the manuscripts. Involvement and cooperation in investigations: editors must take appropriate and necessary measures when presented with ethical complaints regarding a submitted manuscript or published article. REVIEWER DUTIES Contribution to editorial decisions: reviewers’ assessment assist the editor in making editorial decisions and, through communication with the author, can help improve the article. Punctuality: any reviewer who does not feel qualified to analyze the article or knows that an immediate review will not be possible must notify the editor immediately. Confidentiality: works received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shared or discussed with others. Objectivity standards: reviews must be conducted objectively. Reviewers must express their viewpoints clearly and support them with arguments. Regarding sources: reviewers must identify relevant published works that have not been cited by the authors. The reviewer must bring to the editor’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript in question and any other published article they are aware of. Disclosure and conflict of interest: privileged information or ideas obtained by the reviewer through reading the manuscripts should be kept confidential and should not be used for personal gain. The reviewer must not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest due to competitive or collaborative issues, as well as other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions associated with the manuscripts. Regarding the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI): AI tools are legitimate for assisting in the preparation of reviews, but reviewers must be aware that they assume full responsibility for their use. Therefore, they must be extremely attentive to the content and judgements contained in their reviews. Naturally, to safeguard the authors’ rights and the originality of their manuscripts, any excerpt from the text submitted for review, however short, should not be copied into the AI used. Generally, AI should only serve as support for proofreading the review or organizing the reviewer’s own ideas. If used in this way, it is essential that the reviewer indicates in their evaluation which AI was employed and for what purpose. AUTHOR DUTIES General guidelines: authors of papers reporting original research must present an accurate account of the work done, as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Complementary data must be presented accurately in the article. The document must contain sufficient details and references to allow others to understand and evaluate the relevance of the work. Fraudulent or intentionally imprecise declarations constitute unethical conduct and are unacceptable. Originality and plagiarism: authors must ensure their work is entirely original and, if they use the work and/or text of others, that they are properly cited. Plagiarism, in all its forms, constitutes unethical editorial conduct and is unacceptable, including those who engage in the practice of self-plagiarism. Multiple, redundant, and simultaneous publication: an author should not publish manuscripts that describe essentially the same research in more than one journal. Sending the same manuscript to more than one journal at a time and/or publishing the same article in more than one journal constitutes unethical editorial conduct and is unacceptable. Regarding sources: the work of other authors must always be acknowledged. Authors should cite the publications that were important in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained in private, such as in a conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, should not be used or reported without the explicit written permission of the source. Information obtained through confidential services, such as manuscript arbitration or grant applications, should not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services. Authorship: authorship of the work is restricted to those who made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who made significant contributions should be listed as coauthors. People who participated in certain aspects of the research project should be listed as collaborators. The lead author must guarantee that all coauthors are included in the article. The lead author must also ensure that all coauthors have seen and approved the final version of the manuscript and have agreed with its submission for publication. Disclosure and conflicts of interest: all authors must disclose in the manuscript any conflict, financial or of another nature, that may influence the results or interpretation of the text. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed. Fundamental errors in published work: when an author finds a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work, it is their obligation to immediately inform the journal editor or Editorial team and cooperate with the editor to correct the article.
DUTIES OF THE EDITORIAL TEAM Our articles are peer-reviewed to ensure the quality of scientific publication. |
Focus and Scope
|
RBLA focuses on promoting research in the field of Applied Linguistics through the publication of original articles that address the phenomena related to real-life language use. Its work ranges from reflections on language teaching and learning to contemporary social issues where language occupies a central role. We emphasize that articles that understand Applied Linguistics as mere application of linguistic theories are not accepted by the journal, nor are those that restrict their discussion to the field of education without considering aspects inherent to the field of language. Interviews are accepted, provided they contain bibliographic references and a document authorizing the disclosure of the piece by the interviewee. |
Digital Preservation
|
RBLA follows the standards defined in the SciELO Program Digital Preservation Policy. The journal is preserved by the UFMG Periodicals Portal, which, hosted on the Open Journal System, uses the LOCKSS system, allowing the participating journals to create permanent publication archives for preservation and restauration. |
Indexing Sources
Bibliographic Information
|
Websites and Social Media
Preprints
|
The Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada accepts submissions of preprints from the following servers: SciELO Preprints, arXiv, bioRxiv, and medRxiv. The acceptance of preprints from other servers will be reviewed by the journal’s editors. A preprint is defined as a manuscript ready to be submitted to a journal, which is deposited in trusted preprint servers before or in parallel with submission to a journal. The use of preprints is an option and choice of the authors. This condition must be communicated at the time of submission, without any detriment to the contribution. |
Peer Review Process
|
The submitted work is first evaluated by the team of editorial assistants, composed of doctoral students in the field affiliated with different Applied Linguistics graduate programs in Brazil and abroad. In this initial stage, the assessment focuses on determining whether the article should proceed to peer review, considering its adherence to the journal’s guidelines, as well as to its focus and scope. Notably, this is the moment when any possibility of plagiarism related to the article is investigated, either through software verification or through individual investigation by the assistants. Once approved, the articles are sent to two peer reviewers. In case of divergence in the reviews, the editor responsible for the text has the autonomy to make the decision they deem coherent, which may range from requesting a third review to deciding on approval or rejection based on the reviews received. Therefore, it will be up to the editor-in-chief or the associate editors to deliberate on the approval, rejection, or request for modifications to the manuscript. Copies of the reviews will be forwarded to the authors, with instructions for adjustments to the work, if necessary. Works that do not fit the journal’s guidelines and policies or have pending mandatory documents will be returned to the authors before they can be considered for peer review. Data and concepts presented in the papers, as well as their accuracy and that of the references, are the sole responsibility of the authors. Double-blind peer review is adopted for all contributions, including preprints. The peer review will be open when, and only when, the author(s) and reviewers express their desire to do so. To this end, the author(s) must indicate their agreement in the Open Science Compliance Form (Supplementary Document WITHOUT WHICH THE ARTICLE WILL NOT BE EVALUATED). The reviewer, in turn, must indicate their choice in the review form. The final version of the article, published by the journal, contains the name of the editor responsible for the peer review. |
Open Data
|
RBLA encourages its authors to make all content (data, program codes, and other materials) underlying the manuscript available in a data repository, before or at the time of publication. Exceptions are allowed in cases involving legal and ethical issues. Information regarding the availability (or non-availability) of the content underlying the contribution must be included in the Open Science Compliance Form (a document to be completed and attached as a supplementary file at the time of submission, WITHOUT WHICH THE ARTICLE WILL NOT BE EVALUATED). For more information on the availability of research data, see the “Guide to promoting the opening, transparency and reproducibility of research published by SciELO journals”. For guidance on how to cite research data and repositories, access the “Guidelines for research data citation”. For a list of the repositories recommended by SciELO, access the “List of repositories for research data deposit”. |
Fee Charge
|
RBLA does not charge its authors any fees for the submission, processing, or publication of their contributions. |
Ethics and Misconduct Policy, Erratum, and Retraction
|
At the time of submission to RBLA, authors must declare that the contribution is original and has not been published, fully or partially, in any other medium, whether print or electronic, even in another language; nor has it been submitted to another journal simultaneously for review. The authors also commit to informing the journal when they detect any error or inaccuracy in their paper, at any stage of its processing or after its publication, and to collaborating with the editors to make the appropriate correction or retraction to the text, when necessary. In the case of coauthored work, authors must send the supplementary document signed or with digital confirmation, declaring each author’s responsibility for the content, according to the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the Brazilian Copyright Law (Law No. 9,610, of February 19, 1998, art. 15, § 1). RBLA considers as authors those who significantly contributed to research development, data interpretation, and preparation of the text. All collaborators who do not meet these criteria, including master’s, doctoral and postdoctoral supervisors, should not be included as authors and may instead be mentioned in the “Acknowledgments” section. Authors must have authorization from the research participants to disclose the produced data, even if anonymity is guaranteed. Authors must observe CNS Resolution No. 674/2022 regarding whether there is a need for assessment through the CEP/Conep System. Studies that directly or indirectly involve human beings and do not fall under the exemption cases foreseen in art. 26 of the aforementioned Resolution must present, at the time of submission, the approval from the Research Ethics Committee (Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa – CEP), including the CAAE number, or from other equivalent research ethics institutions. Exceptional cases, duly informed and justified by the authors, will be assessed by the journal’s Editorial Board. The articles resulting from dissertations and theses must explicitly indicate this condition so as not to constitute self-plagiarism. Written and oral papers by other authors, whether published or not, must be cited and referenced according to the Brazilian Association of Technical Standards (ABNT). EDITORS’ AND REVIEWERS’ ETHICAL COMMITMENTS Editors and reviewers commit to reviewing the articles submitted to the journal in an ethical and objective manner and for its intellectual content, without discrimination based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, geographical origin, or political thought. They also commit to handling the submissions to which they have access confidentially, not disclosing their content or data, either fully or partially, in any way, prior to publication. The papers will only be subject to evaluation or discussion with third parties with the express authorization of the journal’s editor-in-chief. If the reviewer identifies that the submitted work presents important content that has been previously published – by the author or by third parties −, whether statements, arguments, or reproduction of excerpts, they must inform the editors directly, and the authors must arrange for that content to be adequately referenced according to ABNT standards. When there is substantial similarity or indication that the article under review has already been published in another journal, the reviewers must inform the editors that the article breaches the journal’s ethical principles. Any deviations or other cases not foreseen in this declaration must be reported to the journal’s editor-in-chief, who will take the necessary measures to resolve the issue presented, based on the COPE guidelines and the “Guide to Best Practices for Strengthening Ethics in Scientific Publishing” of the SciELO Network. To ensure the integrity of its content, RBLA publishes Errata, Addenda, and Retractions, according to the case presented and based on the following documents prepared by the SciELO Network: |
Conflict of Interest Policy
|
RBLA follows the guidelines of the “Disclosure of Financial and Non-Financial Relationships and Activities, and Conflicts of Interest”, by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), regarding conflicts of interest. Conflicts of interest can be of a personal, commercial, political, academic, or financial nature. They can occur when authors, reviewers, or editors have interests that may influence the preparation or review of manuscripts. If there are, even potentially, conflicts of interest that may have influenced the work, the author(s) must report them in a signed supplementary document at the time of submission. If the manuscript is approved, the declaration of conflict of interest will be published at the end. It is the duty of the reviewers and editors involved in the review process to declare any conflict of interest related to the manuscript or its authors. Reviewers must decline to review manuscripts if they identify, even potentially, a conflict of interest regarding the work or its authors. Reviewers must not disclose data from the manuscripts prior to their publication. |
Adoption of similarity verification software
|
RBLA submits all received manuscripts to a similarity check through the Check for Plagiarism software, in a step that precedes peer review. The journal does not tolerate any form of plagiarism. Articles originating from dissertations and theses must explicitly indicate this condition so as not to constitute self-plagiarism. If a submitted article is proven to be plagiarized, the submission will be immediately rejected. Under no circumstances will RBLA accept articles that have been previously published on other platforms, except in the case of preprints, as mentioned in this declaration. |
Use of Artificial Intelligence resources
|
RBLA does not recognize the authorship of texts generated through artificial intelligence tools and may use resources such as ZeroGPT to try to identify such occurrences. AI tools may, however, be used ethically, as support for improving writing; as a resource for copyediting or standardization; as an aid in the creation of illustrations, graphs, tables, and charts, among other similar uses. RBLA does not recommend the use of AI for analysis or reflections, which must be carried out by the authors. Authors must report in the manuscript any and all use of AI and will be fully responsible for the content presented. For this purpose, they must follow the “Guide to the Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools and Resources” of the SciELO Network. According to the CNPQ’s Policy on Integrity in Scientific Activity, the authors must also send, at the time of submission, a supplementary document declaring whether and how AI resources were employed in the preparation and execution of the work. |
Issues of Sex and Gender
|
The editorial team of RBLA, as well as the authors who publish in the journal, must always observe the Sex and Gender Equity in Research – SAGER guidelines in the case of experimental/quantitative research. The SAGER guidelines comprise a set of guidelines that orient the reporting of information on sex and gender in the study design, data analysis, results, and interpretation of findings. In addition, RBLA observes the gender equity policy in the composition of its board of reviewers. |
Ethics Committee
|
Authors must observe CNS Resolution No. 674/2022 regarding whether there is a need for assessment through the CEP/Conep System. Studies that directly or indirectly involve human beings and do not fall under the exemption cases foreseen in art. 26 of the aforementioned Resolution must present, at the time of submission, the analysis from the Research Ethics Committee (Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa – CEP), including the CAAE number, or from other equivalent research ethics institutions. Exceptional cases, duly informed and justified by the authors, will be analyzed by the journal’s Editorial Board. |
Copyright
|
Authors of articles published by RBLA retain the copyright to their work licensed under the Creative Commons BY Attribution 4.0 License, which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restrictions, on the condition that the original work is properly cited. |
Intellectual Property and Terms of Use
|
Website responsibility: RBLA is not responsible for the data, opinions, and concepts conveyed in the articles, nor for the accuracy of the data and references.
Author’s responsibility: Authors of articles published by RBLA retain the copyright to their work licensed under the Creative Commons BY Attribution 4.0 License, which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restrictions, on the condition that the original work is properly cited. RBLA encourages authors to archive their accepted manuscripts, publishing them in personal blogs, institutional repositories, and academic social media, as well as posting them on their personal social media, provided that the complete citation to the version published in the journal is included. |
Sponsors and Supporting Agencies
Editor-in-Chief
|
Associate Editors
|
Assistant Editors
|
Board of Reviewers
|
Technical Team
|
Types of documents accepted
|
Data availability statement
|
Authors must disclose the availability of the data used and generated in the research through the completion of the Open Science Compliance Form, which must be attached to the submission. Authors are encouraged to make all content (data, program codes, and other materials) underlying the manuscript available before or at the time of publication. Exceptions are allowed in cases involving legal and ethical issues. The goal is to facilitate the review of the manuscript and, if approved, to contribute to the preservation and reuse of content and the reproducibility of research, depending on the case. |
Authors' Contributions
|
Preparation of Manuscripts
Articles
Interviews
|
Digital Assets
|
Citations and References
|
Citations and references must follow ABNT standards (NBR 10520, 2023; NBR 6023, 2018), whose basic guidelines are: Citations
References
COATES, J. Women Talk. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996. 324p.
FREEMAN, D. Redefining the Relationship Between Research and What Teachers Know. In: BAILEY, K. M.; NUNAN, D. (ed.). Voices from the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. p. 88-115.
JENSEN, J. B. A investigação de formas de tratamento e a telenovela: a escalada, parte 1. Revista Brasileira de Linguística, Petrópolis, v. 4, n. 2, p. 43-73, 1977.
DELL’ISOLA, R. L. P. Ensino de língua portuguesa: ações meta e epilinguísticas em coleção didática. In: SIMPÓSIO MUNDIAL DE ESTUDOS DA LÍNGUA PORTUGUESA, 3., 2012, Macau. Anais […]. Macau: Universidade de Macau, 2012. p. 568-576.
DALACORTE, M. C. F. A participação dos aprendizes na interação em sala de aula de inglês: um estudo de caso. 1999. 221 f. Dissertation (Doctorate in Applied Linguistics to Foreign Language Teaching) – Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 1999.
References are followed by DOI: .... Available at: http://...... Accessed on: ATTENTION:
a) in the references, indicate the title, additions to the title (edition number, preface, translation, notes on re-edition), and city of publication, always in the language of the publication being referenced; |
Supplementary Documents
|
Authors must pay attention to the following supplementary documents their work may require (some are mandatory, and the submission will not be accepted without them):
|
Additional Information
|
Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Resources
Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) resources in the peer review process
Submission of Manuscripts Texts must be submitted through the journal’s page in the UFMG Periodicals Portal, available at https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla. Manuscripts submitted by other means will not be accepted. |
Contact
|
Editor-in-Chief of the Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada (RBLA)
Support – Seção de Periódicos of FALE/UFMG |
Read our Open Access Statement