The Cadernos Cedes constitute one of the Centro de Estudos Educação e Sociedade -CEDES (Center for Education and Society Studies) publications. They have been published since 1980 to disseminate knowledge produced and mobilize discussions on topics and research in Education.

Designed and aimed primarily at teachers and professionals in practice and training who work in different areas of activity and various levels and teaching modalities, and from 2025 onwards, Cadernos Cedes will publish articles from approved Thematic Dossiers on a continuous basis.

Over the years, following the transformations in the course of History and the movement towards the internationalization of research, policies and practices in Education, the Cadernos have expanded exchanges with teachers and researchers from different countries, especially Latin America and Europe, receiving proposals and encouraging the publication of experiences and studies nationally and internationally.

The journal accepts proposals for Thematic dossiers composed of articles by authors from different regions of the country and abroad, which have previously been submitted for consideration by the Editorial Committee. Proposals must be sent to the following email address: revistas.cedes@linceu.com.br, under the Instructions to Authors.

Cadernos Cedes have been circulating since 2018, only online, when the printed format was discontinued.

Its abbreviated title is Cad. CEDES, a form that should be used in bibliographies, footnotes, references and bibliographic captions.

This journal follows the Open Access model, allowing virtual access, without restriction (including financial restrictions), to all scientific texts published by the journal.

Open Access is the condition in which the copyright holder of an academic work grants rights of use to third parties using an open license (Creative Commons Attribution, CC-BY), allowing immediate free access to the work and authorizing any user to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search or link the full texts of the articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software or use them for any other legal purpose.

Cadernos Cedes supports the Open Science policy, which advocates transparency in processes, reiterates ethics in research, adopts the preprint publication system, suggests openness in peer review and recommends sharing methods, data and computer programs. Participating in improving scientific communication practices following Open Science, Cadernos maintains open access, accepts preprint manuscripts, seeks transparent management and availability of research data, and has gradually opened the manuscript evaluation process.

When submitting an article in a Thematic dossiers to the journal, the author must indicate whether it is deposited on a preprint server and provide its name and URL.

The articles that comprise a Thematic dossiers must be unpublished, except those made available in preprint repositories. Simultaneous submission for evaluation to another journal is not permitted.

At the time of submission, the responsible author must complete and attach the Open Science Compliance Form, stating: (a) whether the manuscript is a preprint and, if so, its location; (b) whether data, program codes and other materials underlying the text of the manuscript are correctly cited and referenced; and, (c) open options are accepted in the peer review process.

  When submitting, the author must declare that all ethical guidelines regarding the integrity of scientific activities carried out during the research are respected and inform funding sources, such as research agencies. If applicable, the author must declare that the ethical principles were submitted and approved by the institution's ethics committee. Compliance with good ethical practices in research is the author's sole responsibility.

The Cadernos CEDES  are based on the principles of the SciELO Codes of Ethics, present in the “Guide to Good Practices for Strengthening Ethics in Scientific Publication” in the “Principles of Transparency and Good Practices in Academic Publications” recommended by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE); on the principles of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ); and the principles of Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA).

The CONEP—Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa (National Research Ethics Commission) document is a reference for virtual research. For researchers abroad, consult an equivalent document or contact the editorial secretary.  

Cadernos Cedes aims to disseminate knowledge produced in the field of Education. It publishes theoretical and empirical research and analytical studies of pedagogical practices, proposes to mobilize debates on educational policies and practices, and contributes to the constant updating of educators.

Cadernos Cedes follows the standards defined in the Digital Preservation Policy program of the SciELO Program.

• DOAJ (Switzerland)
•  SciELO (Brazil)
•  Edubase (Unicamp)
•  Biblat (Mexico)
•  Clase (Mexico)
•  Latindex (Mexico)
•  Scopus (Netherlands)

• Title of the periodical: Cadernos CEDES (online)
• Short title: Cad. CEDES (Online)
• Published by: Centro de Estudos Educação e Sociedade (Center for Education and Society Studies)
• Periodicity: Quarterly
• Publication mode: Continuous Publication
• Year of creation of the periodic: 1980

• Facebook
• X
• Instagram
• linkedIn

The Cadernos CEDES accepts the publication of preprint articles, which, in addition to accelerating the communication of research results, allows the author to receive feedback on the work from readers and make any changes he deems pertinent.

The author can use a preprint, and it is assumed that when submitting the article to the journal through the Open Science Compliance Form, stating: (a) whether the manuscript is a preprint and, if so, its location; (b) whether data, program co, the name of the Preprint server and the DOI of the Preprint are informed.

Articles submitted to preprints share the originality of the publication with the journals, and the evaluation process will not use the double-blind procedure, as the authorship will become known.

The following are the procedures for evaluating a Thematic Dossier proposal:

1. A Thematic Dossier proposal, containing: (1) a presentation with justification of the relevance of the topic and argumentation regarding the set of articles; (2) extended abstracts of the articles that make up the dossier, including bibliographic references; and (3) a brief curriculum vitae and institutional affiliation of the authors involved, is first analyzed by the Editorial Committee, which assesses its relevance to the journal’s scope, the timeliness of the topic, and its potential contributions to the field and to the intended readership of Cadernos. 

2. Once approved by the Editorial Committee (the proposal with the extended abstracts of the articles that will compose the dossier, as well as information about the respective authors), the proponents and authors have a period of 120 days to complete their registration and to submit the Dossier Presentation and each article in the OJS system. 

3. The Thematic Dossier, with full texts, is received by the editors, who verify compliance with the guidelines and submit the articles to Similarity Check. In cases of detection of a high degree of similarity to already published texts, the article may be rejected, given the requirement of originality. 

4. Each proposal is followed throughout the entire editorial production process by two associate editors who are members of the Committee. 

5. The set of articles is assigned to at least two ad hoc reviewers, research professors who are consulted in advance regarding their availability and interest in carrying out the evaluation. The reviewers are PhD-level professors affiliated with institutions in Brazil or abroad. Members of the Editorial Board may also act as ad hoc reviewers. 

6. In the event that two ad hoc reviewers are not available, the Committee invites four PhD professors, who gain access to the full dossier and are asked to form two pairs, each responsible for evaluating 50% of the articles, while also commenting on the dossier as a whole. 

7. Each dossier is evaluated as a whole, taking into account its relevance, originality, and contribution to the field of education. 

8. Each article that composes a dossier is, in turn, subject to double-blind peer review by two ad hoc reviewers, considering its focus and specificities, its theoretical-methodological consistency, analytical rigor, as well as its articulation and relevance to the set of texts and suitability to the journal’s scope. When the recommendations regarding an article do not coincide between the ad hoc reviewers, a third reviewer is called upon to provide an additional opinion. 

9. An article that is part of a thematic dossier proposal may not be published if it is not approved and recommended by at least two ad hoc reviewers upon evaluation. 

10. Traditionally, Cadernos has adopted the double-blind system, in which reviewers’ names remain confidential, and authors’ names are also concealed from reviewers. However, in line with Open Science policies, authors may choose to disclose their names to reviewers. Likewise, all ad hoc reviewers have the option of being identified to authors. 

11. The organizers of thematic dossiers may suggest names of possible ad hoc reviewers for consideration by the Committee. The Editorial Committee may choose to publish reviews anonymously or credit reviewers who have authorized identification.

12. During the evaluation process, for authors who opt for open review, Cadernos CEDES offers reviewers the option to communicate directly with the corresponding author, with or without identity disclosure. 

13. Cadernos CEDES publishes in the final version of the article the name and ORCID of the two editors responsible for the evaluation process. 

14. At the end of each year, a “Nominata” section will be published, listing the ad hoc reviewers who participated in the evaluation of the thematic issues published.

Valuing the consolidation of Open Science processes, the author is requested to share all content (data, program codes and other materials) underlying the manuscript's text, previously or at the time of publication. Exceptions are allowed in cases of legal and ethical issues.

The objective is to facilitate the evaluation of the manuscript and, if approved, contribute to the preservation and reuse of data and information and the replicability of research.

For sharing, the author can use their institution's repository and identify relevant and certified repositories: List of repositories for depositing SciELO research data.

Alternatively, the author may state that the data will be made available upon direct request to the author or that all data are contained and discussed in the article.

If applicable, the repository where the data and information are located must be cited in the text in accordance with the Research Data Citation Guide, preferably in the methodological section, included in the list of references, and in the "Data Statement Availability" section.

Following the principles assumed by the Board and Editors of the Centro de Estudos Educação e Sociedade, Cadernos Cedes has not charged a fee for publishing articles since its founding. However, aiming for the financial sustainability of the editorial process, Cadernos CEDES requests that authors who have their articles approved join CEDES or collaborate in publishing the articles, presenting the following alternatives:
 

•  Authors can choose to JOIN THE CEDES INSTITUTION. In this case, the value of the annual membership fee for each author, individually, in 2024 is R$350.00 (three hundred and fifty reais). For foreign authors, the cost is US$100.00 (one hundred dollars);
• Authors can opt for EDITORIAL PRODUCTION COLLABORATION PER ARTICLE. For the year 2024, the cost is R$600.00 (six hundred reais)

Collaboration or association is requested only from authors whose articles have been approved for publication. Submitting articles is free.

When submitting an article for publication in Cadernos CEDES, the author must declare that all ethical guidelines regarding the integrity of the scientific activities carried out during the research were respected and inform the funding sources, such as research agencies. If applicable, the author must declare that the ethical principles were submitted to and approved by the institution's ethics committee. Compliance with good ethical practices in research is the author's sole responsibility.

All articles will be evaluated, disregarding social markers of difference, such as gender, sexual orientation, race, religious belief, nationality, and the authors' political positions.

As for the authorship of the work, all authors who contributed to the conception, development and analysis of the data presented are identified as authors. Therefore, the author must identify and include all co-authors who effectively collaborated in writing the article. All authors must demonstrably accept responsibility for the article's content and register their respective contributions at the end of the manuscript in case of acceptance for publication.

If the author discovers any relevant error after publishing the article, he or she must immediately inform the editors so that the appropriate errata can be published.

Concerning the identification of misconduct, which includes plagiarism, self-plagiarism, republication of articles, and falsification of data, Cadernos CEDES uses the Similarity Check system. However, if the process of detecting misconduct fails and the article is published, the author becomes subject to editorial sanctions, such as retraction of plagiarized or already published scientific articles.

The Cadernos CEDES are based on: the principles of the SciELO Codes of Ethics, present in the “Guide to Good Practices for Strengthening Ethics in Scientific Publication”; in the “Principles of Transparency and Good Practices in Academic Publications” recommended by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE); on the principles of Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ); and the principles of the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA).

The reference for virtual environment research is the  CONEP  – Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa (National Research Ethics Commission) document. For researchers abroad, consult an equivalent document or contact the editorial secretary.

Authors must declare the existence or absence of conflicts of interest, as the reliability of the peer review process and the credibility of published articles depend partly on how conflicts of interest are managed during writing, peer review, and editor decision-making. The conflict of interest may be of a personal, commercial, political, academic, or financial nature.

Conflicts of interest may arise when authors, evaluators or editors have interests that, apparent or not, may influence the preparation or evaluation of manuscripts.

To best decide on a manuscript, one needs to know about any competing interests the authors may have. The goal is not to eliminate these interests; they are almost inevitable. Manuscripts will not be rejected simply because there is a conflict of interest.

If there are no conflicts of interest, transcribe and add the following note in the field indicated above: There were no conflicts of interest to carry out this study. Information about the author's conflicts of interest will be inserted at the end of the published article. If authors are still determining what may constitute a potential conflict of interest, they should contact the editorial secretariat of Cadernos CEDES.

In this way, it is expected:

Authors: When submitting a manuscript, authors are responsible for recognizing and disclosing financial or other conflicts that may have influenced their work. They must acknowledge all financial support for the work and other financial or personal connections related to the research.

Assessors: They must disclose to the editors any conflicts of interest that could influence their opinions of the manuscript, and they must declare themselves unqualified to review specific manuscripts if they believe that doing so is appropriate. As in the case of the authors, if there is silence on the part of the evaluators about potential conflicts, this may mean that such conflicts exist and have not been revealed or that the conflicts do not exist. Therefore, evaluators are also asked to provide statements of competing interests, which are used to assess the value of peer reports.

Editors: They must declare potential conflicts of interest in evaluating manuscripts and act to prevent conflicts of interest involving authors and evaluators from compromising ethical standards in publication.

After peer review, approved articles are submitted to the Similarity Check system for similarity assessment. If a significant degree of similarity with an already published text is detected, the corresponding author will be contacted to make adjustments to the text, and the article may be rejected, considering the requirement for originality.

Manuscripts submitted to Cadernos CEDES must comply with the principles of the Guideline on Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER), which guide the reporting of information about sex and gender in study planning, data analysis and results, and interpretation of findings.

Per this guideline, the terms sex (biological attribute) and gender (shaped by social and cultural circumstances) must be used carefully to avoid confusion.

Furthermore, Cadernos CEDES observes the gender equity policy in forming its editorial board.

The reference for virtual environment research is the  CONEP  – Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa (National Research Ethics Commission) document. For researchers abroad, consult an equivalent document or contact the editorial secretary.

The authors of articles published in Cadernos CEDES maintain the copyright of their works, licensing them under the Creative Commons CC-BY license, which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction as long as the original work is correctly cited.

All content in Cadernos CEDES, except where otherwise specified, is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.

Cadernos CEDES encourages authors to self-archive their accepted manuscripts, publishing them on personal blogs, institutional repositories, and academic social media, as well as posting them on their personal social media, as long as the full citation is included in the periodic's website version.

The Cadernos CEDES receives support from the following organizations:
 

• Dean of Extension and Research at the State University of Campinas supports CEDES in the infrastructure sector.
• Support Program for Scientific Publications of the Ministry of Science and Technology and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development.

• Ana Luiza Bustamante Smolka, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo/SP, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/0714157996169290, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2064 - 3391, E-mail: asmolka@unicamp.br

• Alessandra Arce Hai, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo/SP, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/3845288858275245, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9275-1201, E-mail: alessandra.hai@ufscar.br
• Ana Clara Bortoleto Nery, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Marília, São Paulo/SP, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/2576247757923028, ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0021-2911, E-mail: ana-clara.nery@unesp.br
• Daniela Dias dos Anjos, Universidade São Francisco, Itatiba , São Paulo/SP, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/7443577853883024, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7695-835X, E-mail: daniela.anjos@usf.edu.br
• Débora Dainez, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Sorocaba, São Paulo/SP, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/4671868444231806, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8223-098X, E-mail: ddainez@ufscar.br
• Denise Maria de Carvalho Lopes, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal Rio Grande do Norte/RN, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/1935167361851222, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1791-0735, E-mail: denisemclufrn@gmail.com
• Eduardo Alessandro Kawamura, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo/SP, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/8414504892188884, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0209-2282, E-mail: ekawamura@gmail.com
• Elizabeth dos Santos Braga, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/4167787371244197, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8115-249X, E-mail: elizabeth.braga@usp.br
• Izabel Galvão,  Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis, Paris, França. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9368-0751, E-mail : izabel.galvao02@univ-paris8.fr
• Juan Manuel Sanchez, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, México, México. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3411-7808, E-mail: manuellow@gmail.com
• Lucia Helena Reily, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo/SP, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/2137953768970405, ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2792-8664, E-mail: lureily@unicamp.br
• Luci Banks-Leite, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo/SP, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/6096748963079181, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4160-3687, E-mail: lbanks@uol.com.br
• Maria da Conceição Ferreira dos Reis Fonseca, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais/MG, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/2605895454297792, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5702-7189, E-mail: mcfrf@gmail.com
• Maria Silvia Pinto de Moura L. da Rocha, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo/SP, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/5277455644761315, ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6001-1292, E-mail: msilvia@puc-campinas.edu.br
• Regiane Helena Bertagna, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, São Paulo/SP, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/4538018150038718, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4415-0978, E-mail: regiane.bertagna@unesp.br
• Rita de Cassia Gallego, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/5047364999300982, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4465-8173, E-mail: ritagallego@usp.br
• Silvia Dubrovsky, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6339-2855, E-mail: silviadubrovsky@gmail.com

• Amélia Alvarez, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid, Espanha. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4193-0610, E-mail: amelialvarez@me.com
• Andréa Horta Machado, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais/MG, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/2169699757403101, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8891-7486 , E-mail: ahortamachado@gmail.com
• Andrea Vieira Zanella, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina/SC, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/2409769589523805, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8949-0605, E-mail: avzanella@gmail.com
• Antonia Candela, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México, México. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9001-4451, E-mail: acandela@cinvestav.mx
• Beatriz Celada, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Comahue, Argentina. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0492-5708, E-mail: bmcelada@hotmail.com
• Darlene Aparecida de Oliveira Ferreira, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, São Paulo/SP, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/1693558682186525, ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6447-7025, E-mail: darlene@rc.unesp.br
• Denise Silva Vilela, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo/SP, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/8155152145332951, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2973-1301, E-mail: denisevilela@ufscar.br
• Elizabeth Tunes, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal/DF, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/0384208157289616, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6884-8521, E-mail:  bethtunes@gmail.com
• Harry Daniels, Universidade de Oxford, Oxford, Inglaterra. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4523-0670, E-mail: harry.daniels@education.ox.ac.uk
• Jane Paiva,  Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/3049044829510326, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3501-8740, E-mail: janepaiva27@gmail.com
• Josélia Gomes Neves, Universidade Federal de Rondônia, Ji-Paraná, Rondônia/RO, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/1098108142638272, ORCID:             https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2318-5397, E-mail: joselia.neves@pq.cnpq.br
• Laêda Bezerra Machado, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco/PE, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/6311786387582869, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9524-0319, E-mail: laeda01@gmail.com
• Maria Letícia B. P. Nascimento, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/1186603380091130, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5598-9472, E-mail: letician@usp.br
• Maria Cláudia Santos Lopes de Oliveira, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal/DF, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/6281151757179145, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6089-3379, E-mail: mcsloliveira@gmail.com
• Maria da Conceição Passeggi, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/5015707256397317, ORCID:  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4214-7700,   E-mail: mariapasseggi@gmail.com
• Marilda Gonçalves Dias Facci, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, Paraná/PR, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/2222738235813129, ORCID:        https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7443-490X, E-mail: marildafacci@gmail.com
• Mateu Cabot Ramis, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Espanha. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/6577387419527250. ORCID:  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7303-9112, E-mail: mcabot@uib.es
• Mihaela Mitescu Manea, Universitatea de Vest din Timişoara, Timisoara, Romenia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5779-752X, E-mail: mihaela.mitescu@e-uvt.ro
• Myrian Southwell, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina. ORCID:         https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5392-6606, E-mail: islaesmeralda@gmail.com
• Pablo Del Río, Universidade de Vigo, Vigo, Galicia, Espanha. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9733-7683, E-mail: p.delrio@me.com
• Robert Verhine, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Bahia/BA, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/8612465206032005, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5157-3680, E-mail: rverhine@gmail.com
• Silvana Aparecida Bretas, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe/SE, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/7370461006457963, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1101-3272, E-mail: s-bretas@uol.com.br
• Timothy Ireland, Universidade Federal de João Pessoa, João Pessoa, Paraíba/PB, Brazil. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/5935627249778242, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2986-581X, E-mail: ireland.timothy@gmail.com

Directors

Presidente: Sergio Stoco
Vice – Presidente: André Luiz Paulilo
Primeira Secretária: Karine Morgan
Segundo Secretário: Gabriel Meneses Barros
Primeiro Tesoureiro: Nadia Pedroti Drabach
Segunda Tesoureira: Ana Elisa Spaolonsi
Diretora de Comunicações: Ingrid Costa Ribeiro Souza
Diretora de Eventos: Theresa Adrião

Regina Tereza Cestari de Oliveira
Luciana Marques
Rodrigo Pereira 
Flávia Monteiro de Barros Araújo
Teise Garcia
Maria Augusta Peixoto Mundim
Vera Lúcia Jacob Chaves
Vera Peroni
Cassia Domiciano

Andreza Barbosa
Romualdo Portela 

E-mail: cedes1979@gmail.com; cedesdis@unicamp.br
Tel.: 55 (19) 3521-6710

EDUCAÇÃO & SOCIEDADE: Revista de Ciências da Educação

Av. Berttrand Russel n°801 - Fac. de Educação - Anexo II 1° andar - sala 2

Campinas, SP, Brazil  CEP: 13083 – 865

Email: cedessec@gmail.com; cedesdis@unicamp.br

Tel.:  (+55 19) 3521-6710/6708 

Linceu Editorial Ltda
E-mail: ana.morais@linceu.com.br
Tel.: (12) 99162 5609

Cadernos Cedes publishes an Annual Volume composed of three thematic dossiers. Each thematic dossier includes:

Presentation: argumentative text whose title must reflect the content of the proposal;

Articles: original and unpublished texts aligned with the theme of the proposal.

The evaluation process consists of four phases:

Phase 1: Submitting a proposal

Submission of proposals for thematic dossier to the Editorial Committee can be done in three ways:

1.  via spontaneous demand;
2.  by guest editorship;
3.  through an open call.

All proposals must follow the Instructions for Authors and must be sent to the following email address: revistas.cedes@linceu.com.br

Dossiers proposals must contain 10 to 12 articles that express the theoretical-methodological diversity of the field, covering different institutions and regions of the country, and necessarily include at least two articles by authors affiliated with the institutions abroad.

A proposal submitted to the Cadernos CEDES Editorial Committee must contain:

Argumentative presentation, problematizing the topic at hand, including references, and not just a summary of each article that makes up the proposal;

Expanded summary of each article, with bibliographical references (300 to 500 words, not counting references) and three to five keywords per article;

Abbreviated CV of the authors (100 to 200 words), presenting their institutional links and links to the Lattes CV or similar.

An article part of a proposal cannot be submitted simultaneously to another journal. If an article is published in preprint, all information must appear in the Open Science Compliance Form.

The proposal will be evaluated by the Editorial Committee, which may approve, reject or request changes:

Phase 2: Submission of full texts of approved proposal

The proposal approved by the Editorial Committee must be submitted by the proponent, with the complete texts within 120 days, counting from the date of communication of approval, respecting the limits regarding the number of characters with space in the text:

Thematic dossier: 400,000 in total;

Presentation: between 10,000 and 20,000;

Articles: it’s suggested between 28,000 and 35,000.

The text submission process takes place through the online system OJS, Open Journal System (SciELO), as support for electronic management and publication of scientific journals and must be submitted by the organizer (after registration in the system) in its complete form, with the Presentation and Articles in suggested order for publication, which will be respected in view of the continuous flow policy.

A specific link with the title of the approved proposal will be made available to the dossier organizer, who will be responsible for guiding authors in submitting their articles to the system, including the names of co-authors, their contributions and other metadata.

It is up to the organizer of the proposal:

• define the order of texts;
• take care of the number of characters in each text and in the complete dossier, as well as compliance with the rules for presenting texts;
• write the Presentation;
• supervise the submission work of guest authors;
• monitor the possible process of reformulating articles with the authors;
• ensure the delivery of revised texts by the stipulated deadline;
• guarantee the financial contribution per article or author’s association to Cedes.

Phase 3: Submission of proposal articles

After the authors register in the system, the author responsible for each article will be able to submit it to the platform.

When submitting the manuscript, the responsible author must obligatorily inform the designated fields in the article submission system of the following data: Full name, ORCID, institutional affiliation, email, and mini CV informing the degree.

Articles must be unpublished and may be written in Portuguese, Spanish, French and English. Texts in English and French must be submitted and revised in their original language and, after approval, must necessarily be translated into Portuguese by the authors or organizers. Articles in Spanish will be published in the original language. English and French texts will also be available in the original language.

All content will be evaluated for similarity using the Similarity Check system. The author will request a review if an unjustified degree of similarity is identified. If inappropriate conduct is identified, such as plagiarism or data falsification, the author(s) will become subject to editorial sanctions.

The author responsible for the article must complete and attach the Open Science Compliance Form, which informs them about the status of the manuscript, whether it is a preprint or not, data availability, and openness to peer review.

Phase 4: Assessment process

A proposal approved by the Editorial Committee is monitored by two members, associate editors, throughout the editorial production process.

A thematic dossier is analyzed as a whole, taking into account its relevance, originality and contribution to the field of education, just as each article that makes up an dossier will be analyzed in its articulation and relevance to the set of texts, its theoretical-methodological consistency, analytical rigor, timeliness, quality of the text and suitability for the editorial scope.

Each proposed dossier, with the complete texts, is sent for consideration by at least two reviewers from the Editorial Board or ad hoc specialists who argue about the consistency of the proposal and the pertinence of its acceptance – both the complete dossier and each separate article.

The organizers of the thematic dossiers will have the option of nominating names of possible ad hoc referees for consideration by the Committee. The Editorial Committee may publish reviews anonymously or credit reviewers who have authorized their identification.

If there is any modification to the initial proposal without consultation and consent from the editors, the Thematic dossier proposal will be automatically eliminated.

Approval of the Thematic dossier does not imply automatic approval of the articles. Each article will be subject to a specific evaluation, at the end of which changes may be suggested, or its exclusion from the set of texts may be required. In this case, the organizer is responsible for replacing such an article, informing about the authors and contributions of the included text, and respecting the deadlines agreed with the editors. Substitutions may only occur with the explicit consent of the editors.

Authors must submit the text to spelling and grammatical checks before presenting it to the journal.

Originals must be submitted in the extension, .doc or .docx (Word for Windows), Open Office or .rtf, with the following characteristics:
 

• Title and subtitle of the article: Times New Roman 16 font, centered, bold, with a maximum of twelve words representing the article's content. The title and subtitle must also be presented in Portuguese, English, Spanish (or French, if the article is in this language) and must be in bold and italics.
• Internal titles and subtitles: Times New Roman 14 font, respectively, bold and centered.
• Abstract and keywords: Except for reviews and interviews, texts must present a summary of up to eight hundred characters (with spaces) and a maximum of five keywords that make it possible to identify the article's content, separated by a period. Use Times New Roman 12 font, without indentation. Summary and keywords must also be presented in English and Spanish (the Spanish version may be replaced by the French version in cases where the article was originally written in that language).
• Core: Times New Roman 12 font, without paragraph indentation, 1.15 spacing between lines, 6 pt before and after paragraphs, and 3 cm margins.

Images, figures and photographs: All images must be in the body of the text, in good resolution, adequately numbered and accompanied by captions and source indication.

Tables and graphs: they must be in the body of the article, identified with the respective title and source (mandatory), as well as the caption (if any). Tables must always be in editable format and never in images.

Citations: Citations must follow the author-date system of the ABNT NBR 10520:2023:

- Author cited outside of parentheses: capital letter followed by lowercase letters with year and page:

Ex:

According to Elia (1979), Bopp laid the foundations for identifying kinship between languages.

- Author cited in parentheses: capital letter followed by lowercase letters with year and page.

Ex:

It is now known that the thesis that Vulgar Latin was homogeneous cannot be supported (Elia, 1979, p. 42).

- Indirect citation: do not use quotation marks, but indicate author, date and page.

Ex:

For Elia (1979, p. 2), there is a part-to-whole relationship between philology and linguistics.

- Direct quotations with less than three lines: use double quotation marks, also indicating author, date, and page; use single quotation marks for quotations within quotations.

Ex:

Superstrata are called “[...] the languages of conquering peoples that influence the language of conquered peoples without, however, absorbing it” (Elia, 1979, p. 110).

- Direct quotation with more than three lines: paragraph with 4 cm indentation, font size 10, without italics and quotation marks, indicating at the end in parentheses the author, date and page.

Ex:

As Elia recalls about Bopp's method,

[...] One of the method's most important results was the genealogical classification of languages, according to which a group of languages is traced back to the common ancestor (common Slavic, common Germanic, common Latin...), of which those are phases or differentiations (Elia, 1979, p. 5).

- Interventions in direct quotation: ellipsis in brackets for deletions; interpolations, additions or comments in brackets; emphasis or emphasis in italics.

Ex.:

They are called superstrata, "[...] the languages of conquering peoples that influence the language of conquered peoples without [...] absorbing it" (Elia, 1979, p. 110).

- Citation of more than one work by the same author published in the same year: add lowercase letters, in alphabetical order, after the date and without space in the text and references.

Ex:

Portuguese has been included in Romance studies in Brazil (Elia, 1979a, 1979b).

- Citation of more than one work by the same author published in different years: separate the year with a comma.

Ex:

Elia (1961, 1989) dealt with the issue of Brazilian Portuguese.

- Citation of a work with more than one author: separate each author by a semicolon.

Ex:

The dialectal differences between Brazilian Portuguese and Portuguese appear at different linguistic levels (Cunha; Cintra, 1985, p. 9-24).

- Citation of works by different authors: separate by work by semicolon in alphabetical order.

Ex:

Different academics have treated Romance linguistics in Brazil (Elia, 1979; Miazzi, 1976).

- Citation of a work extracted from another work: indicate the author and year of the citation, include the expression apud and indicate the author, year and page of the work in which the citation was made.

Ex:

As Meillet (1917-1919, p. 230 apud Elia, 1979, p. 4) had pointed out, “[...] les romanistes imitent trop souvent la grammaire comparée des langues indo-europeennes par ses mauvais cotés”.

References: must comply with NBR 6.023/2018 of ABNT, being ordered alphabetically by the first author's surname. All authors may be cited in references with up to three authors, separated by semicolons. In references with more than three authors, cite only the first author, followed by the expression "et al.". The accuracy of the references in the list and the correct citation of their data in the text is the responsibility of the work's author.

• Books (one author)

FRIGOTTO, G. Educação e a crise do capitalismo real. 4. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2000.

• Books (two authors)

BABIN, P.; KOULOUMDJIAN, M. Os novos modelos de compreender: a geração do audiovisual e do computador. São Paulo: Paulinas, 1989.

• Book chapter

OLIVEIRA, F. Neoliberalismo à brasileira. In: GENTILI, P. (Org.). Pós-neoliberalismo:  as políticas sociais e o estado democrático. Rio de Janeiro: Paz & Terra, 1995. p. 29-34.

• Journal articles (with more than three authors)

PODSAKOFF, P.M. et al. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, Greenwich, Conn., v. 1, n. 2, p. 107-142, 1990.

• Theses

CARVALHO, W.L.P. O ensino das ciências sob a perspectiva da criatividade: uma análise fenomenológica.1991. 302f. Thesis (Doctorate in Education) – Faculty of Education. Campinas State University, Campinas, 1992.

• Online journal articles

CURY, C. R. J. Do público e do privado na Constituição de 1988 e nas Leis Educacionais. Educação & Sociedade, Campinas, v. 39, n. 145, p. 870-889, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1590/es0101-73302018206229

• Books in electronic format

BANCO MUNDIAL. Um ajuste justo: análise da eficiência e equidade do gasto público no Brazil. [S. l.]: Grupo Banco Mundial, 2017. (Volume I: Síntese.) Available in:https://www.worldbank.org/pt/country/brazil/publication/brazil-expenditure-review-report . Accessed on: May 15, 2020.

• Signed article (Newspapers)

DIMENSTEIN, G. Escola da vida. Folha de S. Paulo, São Paulo, 14 jul. 2002. Folha Campinas, p. 2.

• Unsigned article (Newspapers)

FUNGOS e chuva ameaçam livros históricos. Folha de S. Paulo, São Paulo, 5 jul. 2002. Cotidiano, p. 6.

• Decrees and Laws

BRAZIL. Decree no. 2,134, of January 24, 1997. Regulates art. 23 of Law no. 8,159, of January 8, 1991, which provides for confidential public documents and access to them and other provisions. Diário Oficial da União: section 1, Brasília, DF, n. 18, p. 1435-1436, 27 jan. 1997.

• Federal Constitution

BRAZIL. [Constitution (1988)]. Constituição da República Federativa do Brazil. Brasília, DF: Federal Senate, 1988.

• Official report

FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ. Report 1999. [Curitiba: UFPR], 1979. Mimeographed.

• Videos

VILLA-LOBOS: o índio de casaca. Rio de Janeiro: Manchete Vídeo, 1987. 1 videotape (120 min.), VHS, son., color.

• Articles published in Congress Annals

PARO, V.H. Administração escolar e qualidade do ensino: o que os pais ou responsáveis têm a ver com isso? In: SIMPOSIO BRAZILEIRO DE POLITICA E ADMINISTRAÇÃO DA EDUCAÇÃO, 18., 1997, Porto Alegre. Anais [...]Porto Alegre, Edipucrs, 1997. p. 303-314.

When submitting the manuscript, one is asked to send the Open Science Compliance Form and the Ethics Committee's approval form, if necessary.

All authors who contributed to the presented data's conception, development and analysis are identified as authors. Therefore, after approval of the manuscript, the corresponding author will be asked to inform the contributions of each author to one of the papers: Problematization and Conceptualization; Analysis; Writing; Final approval. This information will be requested at the editing stage and inserted in the "Author contributions" section at the end of the manuscript.

In the editing phase, the corresponding author will be asked to provide information about the research data related to the article, with the following options being offered: (1) The data is available at (cite the repository and DOI of the deposited data); (2) Data will be provided upon request; (3) All data were generated or analyzed in this study; (4) Not applicable.

Acknowledgments for the financial support received from funding institutions for carrying out the research and/or preparing the manuscript must be informed, if any. The name of the financing agency must be written in full, followed by the grant number. Suppose a specific project grant did not fund the research. In that case, the following information must be included: "This research did not receive a specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or non-profit sectors." This information will be requested at the editing stage and inserted in the "Fundings" section at the end of the manuscript.

They must include the collaboration of people, groups, or institutions that deserve recognition but do not have justification for their inclusion as authors. This information will be requested at the editing stage and inserted in the “Acknowledgements” section at the end of the manuscript.

Centro de Estudos Educação e Sociedade - Cedes
Av. Berttrand Russel, 801 - Fac. de Educação - Anexo II - 1 andar - sala 2,
CEP: 13083-865, Campinas - SP - Brazil
Fone Cel.: (+55 12) 9 9162 5609
Fone / Fax: (+ 55 19) 3521-6710 / 6708
E-mail: revistas.cedes@linceu.com.br