Following 32 years of implementation of neoliberal policies in Mexico, the Metropolitan Area of the Valley of Mexico, one of the four largest metropolitan areas in Latin America, has undergone significant demographic, economic, social and territorial changes. It has grown strongly in population and extension; its economy has de-industrialized and grown in outsourcing with predominance of informality, it has lost dynamism of growth and comprises the largest concentration of poor in the country. Its territory spreads towards periphery and is internally rearranged by the action of the real estate and financial capital, it is restructured over a network of tertiary urban corridors, its mobility is dominated by the private car, and it shows a strong socio-spatial segregation. Being politically and administratively fragmented, the territorial policies applied to the metropolis are uncoordinated, contradictory, pragmatic, circumstantial, unplanned, and mainly aimed to facilitating capital interventions, particularly the real estate and financial. The contentious character of the metropolis continuously generates urban movements that now include middle and upper classes who advocate for living conditions of their neighbourhoods against the combined interventions of real estate capital and local governments. The metropolis is under crisis, but neither the dispersed social movement, nor the political parties have an alternative urban project to overcome it.
Keywords:
Metropolitan Areas of the Valley of Mexico; Neoliberalism; Territorial changes; Metropolitan crisis; Public policies.
Fuentes: ^ INEGI, "Censo General de Población y Vivienda" DF y Edomex, INEGI, 1940-1990 ^^ CONAPO, "Del imitación de las zonas metropolitanas deMéxico", CONAPO, 2005 ^^^ INEGI, "Censo de Población y Vivienda 2010"
Fuente: Elaboración propia con base en los datos del cuadro "Población de la ciudad deMéxico y la ZMVM) *Nota: Esta tasa de crecimiento corresponde al cambio de la Ciudad deMéxico a la ZMVM
Fuente: Elaboración propia con información de INEGI 2010 y CONAPO 2005 Tomado de Pradilla (coord.) y otros, 2015a: cap. 2.

Fuente: Elaboración propia con base en el Banco de Información Económica (BIE), producto interno bruto por entidad federativa, INEGI.





a Local idadesd de 2,500 o más habitanrtes b Local idades de 100,000 o más habitantes, para fines de comparación no se incluye el DF c Se refiere a la población que tiene satisfechas todas sus necesidades, pero en hasta 9.99% de la norma, por lo que pueden estar en riesgo de pobreza (anexo metodológico) Fuente: Cálculos propios con base en las ENIGH, 2008, INEGI, Tomados de Damián, 2011: 8