Open-access Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder in firefighters and its associated psychosocial and organizational factors: a scoping review

Abstract

Objective  To map Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) prevalence among firefighters and to identify associated psychosocial, organizational, and sociodemographic factors.

Methods  This scoping review was conducted according to the JBI methodology and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, searches encompassed nine databases (PubMed, VHL, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, SciELO, PsycINFO, Embase, and OpenBDTD) for studies published from 2014 to 2024. Primary quantitative studies reporting PTSD prevalence among active firefighters or first responders with firefighting duties were included.

Results  After screening, 43 studies were included, reporting a PTSD prevalence ranging from 15% to 30%. Key associated factors included exposure to traumatic events, irregular shifts, sleep deprivation, and organizational stressors. Stigma emerged as the main barrier, and other aspects of firefighters’ lives are negatively impacted. Female firefighters showed a higher PTSD prevalence, often linked to experiences of harassment and discrimination. Specific organizational characteristics were related to worsening symptoms and lower help-seeking.

Conclusions  The findings indicate a high PTSD prevalence among firefighters, underscoring the need for organizational interventions, leadership support, stigma reduction strategies, and expanded access to mental health services.

Keywords:
Firefighters; Mental Health; Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders; Psychosocial Factors; Occupational Health; Scoping Review

Resumo

Objetivo  Mapear a prevalência de transtorno de estresse pós-traumático (TEPT) entre bombeiros e identificar os fatores psicossociais, organizacionais e sociodemográficos associados.

Métodos  Revisão de escopo conforme a metodologia do Joanna Briggs Institute e as diretrizes PRISMA-ScR, com buscas em nove bases de dados (PubMed, VHL, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, SciELO, PsycINFO, Embase e OpenBDTD) para estudos publicados de 2014 a 2024. Foram incluídos estudos quantitativos primários relatando a prevalência de TEPT entre bombeiros na ativa ou socorristas com atribuições de combate a incêndio.

Resultados  Após a triagem, 43 estudos foram incluídos, relatando prevalência de TEPT de 15% a 30%. Os principais fatores associados incluíram exposição a eventos traumáticos, turnos irregulares, privação de sono e estressores organizacionais. O estigma emergiu como a principal barreira, e outros aspectos da vida dos bombeiros são impactados negativamente. A prevalência de TEPT foi maior no sexo feminino, frequentemente associada a experiências de assédio e discriminação. Características próprias da corporação foram relacionadas ao agravamento dos sintomas e à menor procura por ajuda.

Conclusões  Os achados indicam elevada prevalência de TEPT entre bombeiros, ressaltando a necessidade de intervenções organizacionais, apoio da liderança, estratégias de redução do estigma e ampliação do acesso a serviços de saúde mental.

Palavras-chave:
Bombeiros; Saúde Mental; Transtorno de Estresse Pós-Traumático; Fatores Psicossociais; Saúde do Trabalhador; Revisão de Escopo

Introduction

Firefighters are routinely exposed to hazardous situations and extreme operational challenges, which may adversely affect both their physical and mental health. As emergency responders, they are typically the first professionals to arrive at chaotic scenarios, thereby facing continuous exposure to traumatic experiences such as victim rescue operations, large-scale firefighting, and responses to natural disasters. Consequently, these professionals are particularly vulnerable to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)1.

PTSD is a condition that develops following exposure to a traumatic event. It is characterized by intrusive symptoms like nightmares and flashbacks, avoidance of trauma-related stimuli, negative alterations in cognitions and mood, and marked alterations in arousal and reactivity2.

The World Health Organization (WHO) recognizes that catastrophes and recurring natural disasters have a significant emotional impact3, particularly on firefighters. Obuobi-Donkor et al.4 examined the prevalence and determinants of PTSD in military personnel and firefighters, reporting a prevalence of 57% in this occupational group. This number is notably higher than the 3% to 6%5 lifetime prevalence observed in the general population. Such a disparity highlights the epidemiological relevance of PTSD within this profession and reinforces its characterization as a significant occupational health problem. Consequently, there is an urgent need to unravel the specific contributing factors to PTSD in this professional context6.

Studies identify that overwork, insufficient rest, workplace harassment, and discrimination adversely affect firefighters’ mental health and are associated with an increase in PTSD and other mental disorders7-12. All these factors affect the psychological well-being of firefighters11, revealing a lack of psychological support. The stigma surrounding mental disorders in this population poses barriers to effective case management and difficulties in accessing mental health care6,13.

Although the PTSD prevalence is higher among firefighters and other emergency workers than in the general population, most reviews focus on mixed populations or address risk factors in isolation13, which indicates that the literature still lacks integrative synthesis addressing the full spectrum of psychosocial and organizational dimensions linked to PTSD prevalence in firefighters, as well as the identification and categorization of psychosocial, institutional, and sociodemographic factors. As a result, it is necessary to develop approaches that enhance these professionals’ access to mental health treatment.

Given that effective mental health strategies are essential to mitigate the vulnerability and health impacts faced by firefighters, this scoping review aims to map the prevalence of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) among firefighters and identify associated psychosocial, organizational, and sociodemographic factors.

Methods

Protocol and registration

The review protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF)14, in September 2024 (DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AJ3P4), in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines15. The study addressed the following research questions: What is the prevalence of PTSD among firefighters? Which psychosocial and organizational factors are associated with PTSD development? What sociodemographic characteristics are reported among affected individuals? Which intervention models or health policies have been described in the literature to prevent PTSD and other mental disorders in firefighters?

Eligibility criteria

Study selection was based on predefined eligibility criteria (EC) and followed the PCC (Population, Concept, Context) mnemonic framework. The population included active firefighters and first responders engaged in firefighting operations. The concept comprised PTSD. The context encompassed PTSD prevalence, associated factors, and exposure-comorbidity relationships within occupational settings, with emphasis on traumatic exposure, working conditions, and mental health support structures. Studies published in English, Portuguese, Spanish, and French were eligible.

Information sources

A preliminary search across international databases (PROSPERO, PubMed, Joanna Briggs Institute, Epistemonikos, American Psychological Association, PsycInfo, and Cochrane Library) did not identify reviews of a comparable scope to this study. Subsequently, Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), PubMed (EBSCOhost), the Virtual Health Library (VHL/BVS – EBSCOhost), the Complementary Medicine Database, MEDLINE (EBSCOhost), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Scopus, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), and Web of Science (WOS) were systematically searched. Gray literature was also included through the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and the Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (BDTD). Searches were conducted from May 3 to August 28, 2024, as studies published between 2014 and 2024.

Search strategy

The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews16 emphasizes comprehensive search strategies to map the full extent of available evidence, including gray literature. Accordingly, relevant Medical Subject Headings and Health Sciences Descriptors (MeSH/DeCS), as well as free-text terms related to PTSD, firefighters or first responders, and PTSD prevalence, were used, following approaches described in previous scoping reviews (e.g., Jones et al., 2020)17.

Searches covered the entire available period for each database, ensuring that the information was up to date in an evolving research field. The complete search strategy, including descriptors, databases, filters, and Boolean operators, is summarized in Table 1.

Table 1
Search strategy and descriptors

Selection of sources of evidence

The search and selection process followed three steps: (1) identification, (2) screening of eligible publications, and (3) data extraction. All records were exported to Rayyan®18for further analysis (management and screening). The flow of information through the identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion phases followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Screening involved reference management with automated tools, duplicate removal, exclusion of ineligible records during calibration, and analysis of studies meeting the eligibility criteria. Studies were excluded if they: (a) did not include active firefighters or first responders with firefighting duties; (b) did not assess PTSD or used non-validated instruments; (c) did not report prevalence or associated factors; (d) used qualitative designs, review formats, case reports, or other non-primary evidence; (e) lacked full-text availability; or (f) evaluated populations unrelated to fire services. These criteria were applied at both the title/abstract screening and full-text eligibility stages. Researchers (ASOA) and (SRL) participated independently in the selection process. First, titles and abstracts were analyzed separately to identify articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Second, the full texts of the selected studies were read in their entirety to confirm eligibility. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. The study selection process is presented in the PRISMA-ScR flowchart (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Scoping Review flowchart.

Data charting and extraction

Data extraction was performed independently by researchers (ASOA) and (SRL) using Rayyan®18 and subsequently organized in Microsoft Excel®19. Selected articles were retrieved by the reviewers and entered into the data charting form. To ensure consistency and clarity, the form was independently assessed by reviewers.

Data items and variables

The following variables were extracted from each included source of evidence: author(s), year of publication, country of study, reported PTSD prevalence, sample size, Quality Appraisal Level (QAL), study design, objectives, and main results. Additionally, population characteristics (e.g., gender, years of service), instruments used for PTSD assessment, and psychosocial and organizational factors associated with PTSD were analyzed. However, they were not explicitly presented in the table. To preserve methodological accuracy, no assumptions or data simplifications were applied during extraction, as the review focused on capturing quantitative data directly related to the review questions as reported in the original studies.

Critical appraisal of individual sources of evidence

The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Prevalence Studies, expressed as a Quality Appraisal Level (QAL). The reviewers independently evaluated the studies and resolved any discrepancies (ASOA) and (SRL). Each criterion was classified as ‘Yes’, ‘No’, or ‘Unclear’, and the total number of affirmative responses was used to determine the overall quality level. As part of the appraisal process, it was assumed that the included studies reported PTSD symptoms. When relevant data were missing or unclear, these issues were documented and resolved by consensus between the reviewers.

Thematic patterns related to psychosocial, organizational, and sociodemographic factors were subsequently integrated through descriptive narrative synthesis and labeled according to the appraisal criteria.

Studies meeting ≥70% of the criteria were classified as high quality, those meeting 50-69% as moderate quality, and those meeting <50% as low quality. Low-quality studies were not excluded; however, their findings were interpreted with caution, considering the specificities and limitations of each study design.

The results were synthesized to highlight potential weaknesses and to avoid overinterpretation of findings.

Details on data handling and summarization are provided in the Data synthesis subsection. Quantitative variables were organized into structured tables to facilitate comparison of prevalence estimates, and assessment instruments across studies while preserving the methodological heterogeneity inherent to scoping reviews.

Data synthesis

Relevant variables were extracted and standardized. Prevalence values, sample characteristics, study designs, and assessment tools were tabulated to enable structured comparison across studies. For synthesis, quantitative data were summarized descriptively. Psychosocial, organizational, and sociodemographic factors were identified and grouped into thematic categories using an inductive approach conducted by reviewers.

To illustrate this distribution, a world map was created to show the geographic distribution of the included studies. For descriptive and illustrative purposes, green shading indicates countries and regions where studies were identified. Graphical panels display the aggregated sample size by region and the proportional contribution of each area to the total sample. Data were initially organized in Microsoft Excel® and subsequently imported into geographic mapping software (QGIS, version Changelog for QGIS 3.44)20. The mapped variables included country and continent, while complementary panels displayed aggregated sample size and mean reported PTSD prevalence included country and continent, while complementary panels displayed aggregated sample size and mean reported PTSD prevalence by continent. Figure 2 presents these data by country and continent together with the mean sample size and mean PTSD prevalence, providing a visual summary aligned with the aims of the review.

Figure 2
Distribution of selected studies in scoping review, by design and geographic location

(A) percentage distribution of studies designs; (B) geographic distribution of studies by country and continent on global map; (C) proportional distribution of studies designs by continent; and (D) average distribution of studies sample sizes by continent (outer circle) and average PTSD prevalence by continent (inner circle).


Results

Selection of sources of evidence

The search retrieved 981 records across databases, of which 459 duplicates were removed. Of the remaining 522 records, titles and abstracts were screened, and 208 were excluded, primarily because the study population did not meet the inclusion criteria, due to inappropriate populations or the absence of PTSD assessment.

Of the 314 records assessed for full-text eligibility, 250 were excluded for reasons including inappropriate outcomes, population mismatch, inadequate study design, insufficient data, use of non-validated PTSD instruments, or being outside the scope of the review. Thus, 64 full-text articles were examined, of which 21 were review articles and were therefore excluded. Thereafter, the analysis focused on the characteristics of the remaining studies on PTSD, after which five additional records identified through other sources as gray literature (BDTD) were assessed and excluded for failing to meet the final criteria.

A total of 43 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this scoping review. The analysis focused on studies that addressed PTSD as a primary outcome and examined its associations with psychiatric, behavioral, and occupational comorbidities, including depression, sleep disorders, alcohol use, and burnout among firefighters. Figure 1 presents the scoping review flowchart.

Characteristics of sources of evidence

This review included only primary quantitative studies published in English, Portuguese, Spanish, or French between 2014 and 2024 that used validated or standardized instruments to assess PTSD. Studies were excluded that focused on emergency workers without firefighting tasks. Qualitative studies, reviews, case reports, dissertations, conference abstracts, editorials, and other non-primary evidence materials were excluded, as were studies for which the full text was unavailable. The process adhered to the PRISMA ScR framework as depicted in Table 1. The file containing the search strategy was deposited in the SciELO repository and is publicly available in Google Drive®.

Critical appraisal of sources of evidence

The 43 included studies examined PTSD prevalence among firefighters or first responders with firefighting duties. Key study characteristics, such as sample size, objectives, instruments, country, QAL rating, prevalence, and associated factors, are summarized in Table 2. Additional aspects, including psychosocial and organizational factors related to PTSD in fire departments, assessment tools, associated prevalence, and main findings, were analyzed but were not presented in the table. The review categorized the selected articles by design, in line with the standard classification used in the field of epidemiological health research.

Table 2
General design and main findings in scoping review

Results of individual sources of evidence

PTSD in firefighters is a complex and multifactorial phenomenon influenced by psychosocial21, occupational22, and environmental factors23. An overview of the studies analyzed shows that the main triggering factors were associated with exposure to traumatic situations21,22, disasters23,24, pandemic contexts25, psychosocial and organizational conditions, as well as the dynamics of stress symptoms over time26,27. Many of these elements are indirectly related to environmental factors.

In addition to diagnosis, prevalence, and treatment, the literature emphasizes the importance of preventive occupational measures. These include identifying underlying causes 22,26, managing risk factors and comorbidities28,29, addressing stigma as a barrier to care30,31, and mitigating exposure to traumatic events32. The most frequently reported PTSD-associated comorbidities/signal included depression28, burnout syndrome08, alcohol abuse37-44, sleep disorders45-47, and suicidal ideation48.

Psychosocial factors in the workplace comprised discrimination and harassment49, occupational stress50, and exposure to severe traumatic incidents51. Conversely, mitigating factors included social support and individual resilience51-53. Coping strategies and skills aimed at recovery and well-being also emerged among firefighters with PTSD54,57, particularly during the initial stages of their career55.

Consequently, greater symptom severity has been associated with functional impairment and increased exposure to stigma within fire services56.

The evidence also underscores the relevance of organizational policies addressing trauma exposure and psychological support before, during, and after active service, as well as during retirement23,35,37,39,49. In this context, workplace management structures designed to provide effective psychological support24,38,40,44,50 were emphasized.

Subgroup analyses targeted specific populations, including male38,54 or female firefighters10, volunteers6, wildfire suppression personnel21, and urban search and rescue teams32. In addition, some investigations compared these different populations, how for example, a South Korean study compared firefighters with the general population35, another compared people exposed to the World Trade Center attacks13, and a third one compared firefighter from different countries9.

To do that, the included studies used diverse research designs, focusing on specific disasters33: the World Trade Center attacks in the USA26, the Kiss nightclub fire in Brazil47, the Oklahoma City bombing in the USA29, and the covid-19 pandemic25.

Several investigations did not describe personalized actions or interventions tailored to the work environment or to individual firefighter characteristics, despite evidence that such factors may influence life satisfaction11 and the need for mental health care56, whether for prevention or rehabilitation12.

In addition, some studies showed national contexts and encompassed diverse global regions, including North and South America, Europe, Asia (East, Southeast, and Middle East), Oceania, and Africa. The United States10,13,22,24 accounted for the largest number of publications, followed by South Korea4,11,35,44,48,51, Brazil28,36,47, and Turkey8,32. Other countries, such as Germany5, Portugal21, the United Kingdom9, Denmark33, the Netherlands54, Iran12, Thailand45, Australia37, China52, and Ethiopia23, also reported findings on their firefighter populations. One study involved interregional collaboration, specifically between the USA and Israel49.

Figure 2 illustrates the global distribution of the included studies, along with descriptive summaries of the other variables.

In summary, methodologically, most studies employed cross-sectional designs6,9-12,21-25,27-28,30-32,34-49,51,53,56 (76.74%), followed by cohort8,29,52,54 (11.63%) and specify longitudinal approaches13,33,55 (4.65%), while others represent smaller proportions. Geographically, the Americas (North and South) led the volume of PTSD research. Multivariate studies are concentrated in North America and Europe. The highest PTSD prevalence was concentrated in Western Asia (28.90%) and Oceania (25.60%), and the largest sample sizes are concentrated in East Asia (13,090), North America (1,215), and Southeast Asia (1,114).

Quality appraisal of included studies

The critical appraisal of the included studies was conducted using the Quality Appraisal Level (QAL); thus, it considers the clarity of objectives, sample size, instruments, outcomes, and the completeness of methodological reporting. Design variations were also considered when interpreting differences in prevalence. Based on these criteria, high-quality studies were characterized by clear objectives, adequate sample sizes, validated instruments, and well-defined outcomes.

Moderate-quality studies relied mainly on alternative instruments and self-reported measures; in these studies, standardized instruments were used, but the strength of the evidence supporting the findings was limited. Low-quality criteria involved substantial missing information across more than three methodological domains. Overall, most studies were classified as high quality, and the QAL ratings are presented in Table 2.

In terms of quality distribution, of 43 included studies, 36 were rated as high quality6,8,10-13,21-34,36-41,43-50,52-53,56, and 7 as moderate9,35,39,42,51,54,55. No studies were classified as low quality.

Regarding assessment methods, most high-quality studies employed standardized PTSD assessment instruments (e.g., PCL-5) and examined more than one psychosocial factor potentially associated with PTSD symptoms. Two studies45,51 did not use validated instruments for PTSD assessment. Others relied on diagnostic criteria related to the organizations6,9,12,24,27-28,40,43,46,48-49,51.

With respect to sample size and analytical robustness, among the 31 studies with large sample sizes (more than 300 participants)9-13,22-24,28,30-31,33,36-49,51-52,54,55,56, most analyzed the associated factors appropriately, including depression28,38,40, sleep disturbances45,47, alcohol use39,42,43, social support49,52, cumulative exposure21,37, suicidal ideation22,44,46; occupational stress12,40; rumination35, resilience33,53; and discrimination among women10.

The main instruments used to assess PTSD were: the PTSD Checklist (PCL) for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5 )13,18,21,23-28,31,34,38,39,41,44; the Life Events Checklist for DSM-5, which emphasizes exposure to traumatic events22,42,43,49,53; the Impact of Event Scale-Revised, measuring intrusion, avoidance, and hyperarousal35,36,40; the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale, based on DSM-IV criteria6; the Post-Traumatic Stress Symptom Scale (focusing on intrusive thoughts and physiological arousal)9; and the Trauma Screening Questionnaire10. Overall, the predominance of high-quality articles reinforces the consistency of the evidence base synthesized in this review.

Synthesis of results

Data extraction

Quantitative data on PTSD prevalence and the psychosocial and organizational factors associated with it among firefighters were synthesized. The synthesis combined quantitative data (QD), summarized in Table 2, with a narrative analysis of recurring themes. Among the cross-cutting findings, stigma emerged as the main barrier to seeking treatment44 whereas gender-based discrimination emerged as a psychosocial stressor associated with PTSD prevalence among female firefighters8.

Prevalence, amplitude characteristics, and associations

Research on PTSD development in firefighters has reported varying prevalence estimates as a central manifestation of psychological distress. In the included studies, PTSD prevalence ranged from 15% to 30% among firefighters. Many investigations employed different instruments to establish associations and comorbidities, using standardized scales to assess depression28,38, anxiety24,50, stress32, sleep quality45,47, alcohol consumption44, emotional difficulties43, and suicide risk22,31,46,48.

Beyond these clinical correlates, other studies applied instruments addressing lack of social support49,52, coping strategies35, personality traits and resilience25,33,53, predictive factors such as somatization33and intrusive rumination51, as well as the impact of organizational culture on PTSD development and maintenance30, along with several additional psychosocial and occupational dimensions9,11,12,29,32,33,37,51.

Taken together, the evidence indicates that PTSD among firefighters is multifactorial33, associations emerged across multiple domains, including exposure to traumatic factors11,12,13, disorder severity9,34,37, and the relationship between PTSD and physical health11,12,50. Overall, the synthesized evidence indicates that PTSD among firefighters is multifactorial33, driven by cumulative trauma exposure, organizational culture, and psychosocial stressors.

These findings address the initial research questions by mapping prevalence trends, identifying predictive factors, and highlighting knowledge gaps to inform future interventions.

Discussion

Summary of evidence

The PTSD prevalence identified in this review aligns with previous literature, which consistently reports higher prevalence in firefighters than in the general population4-5. Repeated exposure to traumatic events remains the central trigger of PTSD among firefighters, as documented across multiple studies11-13.

It was evidenced that PTSD is associated with exposure to traumatic events, and risk is heightened by psychosocial and organizational factors21-22 including lack of institutional support, stigma related to mental disorders49 and barriers to accessing treatment50,56.

Taken together, the evidence indicates that psychological suffering among firefighters involves multiple interacting determinants, requiring comprehensive assessment and intervention strategies capable of addressing clinical, occupational, and cultural dimensions simultaneously.

From an organizational perspective, several factors contribute to sustained psychological strain and restrict recovery opportunities, including irregular shifts, extended working hours, sleep deprivation, and rigid hierarchical structures. In addition, occupational cultures that normalize endurance, discourage help-seeking, and stigmatize mental health problems may exacerbate symptom chronicity. This delay in treatment contributes to the observed prevalence.

Given the complexity of the issue, a broad analytical foundation is necessary, integrating cross-cultural perspectives44, diverse operational realities10, and public mental health policies48,56. Nevertheless, many studies did not describe key sociodemographic or occupational characteristics36, which limited comparability and hindered the development of more robust conclusions10,13,55. As a consequence, the lack of methodological standardization limits cross-study synthesis and highlights persistent psychosocial risks57by constraining the ability to describe practical solutions applicable across different contexts.

These findings reinforce the need for standardized assessment instruments10,13,43 and for concrete organizational responses to psychosocial risk factors. Beyond exposure to traumatic events, each incident adds a cumulative emotional burden58 to individuals and their colleagues11,57, while chronic exposure may result in neurobiological changes59 that impair memory and emotional regulation60. This relationship reinforces the link between occupational experience and psychological distress.

These conditions require individual and collective mental health interventions61 supported by occupational structures and interpersonal care33. Several studies mentioned critical stress management strategies62, like peer-support supervision63, and others forms that bring about the critical need for research in these populations, such as screening, monitoring and the effectiveness of treatments64. However, although coping strategies65 within care networks66 have been discussed, evidence regarding their effectiveness remain limited67.

The included studies reported that firefighters experience an average of 26 traumatic events throughout their careers, with psychological distress described in relation to cumulative occupational exposure and incidents involving multiple casualties21. Few studies followed participants for more than two years, limiting understanding of symptom trajectories. This suggests that the scarcity of emotional decompression protocols—particularly after critical incidents—contributes to worsening mental health outcomes by restricting emotional expression and psychological recovery. Other studies reported cases in which the severity of psychological distress worsened over time22-25.

Psychosocial and organizational conditions, including exhausting shifts, sleep deprivation, prolonged working hours, and irregular shift patterns21-22,43 further intensify these outcomes.

Within this organizational context, cultures marked by functional normativity and the stigmatization of mental disorders increase vulnerability by discouraging help-seeking behaviors and reinforcing silence around psychological suffering30,33,50,68. Norms that valorize endurance33 and emotional self-control foster fear of being perceived as weak, professionally inadequate, or incapable, thereby limiting access to mental health care50 and worsening mental health outcomes, while further entrenching stigma around mental disorders68.

Moreover, silent suffering is exacerbated by systemic barriers such as gender stereotypes. Female firefighters experience additional psychosocial stressors, including gender discrimination, moral harassment and sexual harassment.

In one context, 37% of female firefighters reported experiencing organizational harassment in the workplace10. These conditions contribute to inequitable workloads, structural barriers to career progression, mental health risks, and higher prevalence of depression (42%)48 and PTSD (35%)10 compared to male firefighters. In addition, others factors that further contribute to psychological distress30.

Another critical dimension involves sleep deprivation, which impairs cognitive, physical, and psychological domains43-44,69. Poor sleep increases vulnerability to mood disorders44, reduces cognitive performance by around 40%43, and raises the likelihood of operational errors attributable to planning, judgment, and emotional regulation by 60% due to executive dysfunction44 and decision-making capacity decrease43. After 18–24h of wakefulness, performance may resemble a blood alcohol concentration of 0.05–0.10%70.

Without adequate sleep regulation, the processing of traumatic memories remains incomplete70, complicating PTSD treatment when affective regulation and neurobiological function are disrupted. This dysregulation exacerbates PTSD symptoms, depressive episodes28, and mood regulation disorders44,69.

Finally, alcohol consumption emerges as an additional dimension of vulnerability among these professionals41,18. Alcohol misuse affects 28% of firefighters39-40, and among veterans with longer service (15–18 years), the likelihood of developing alcoholism is tripled37.

Within this context, cultural norms that emphasize emotional restraint and self-reliance shape not only vulnerability but also coping behaviors among firefighters. Rather than seeking support, many professionals adopt silence as an adaptive strategy71, a response reinforced by rigid hierarchies, limited leadership support, and fear of judgment30,50.

This pattern contributes to the normalization of distress and weakens institutional responses to mental health needs. As a result, insufficient organizational support, combined with repeated trauma exposure and alcohol use41, exacerbates PTSD and is associated with comorbid conditions such as depression28 and sleep impairments43-44. By valuing resilience33 and self-restraint, institutional cultures may inadvertently promote perceptions of invulnerability71, sustaining cycles of psychological suffering and delaying access to care.

Considering the complex clinical landscape, effective PTSD management requires multidimensional interventions capable of addressing organizational, psychosocial, and cultural barriers30,50. Strict hierarchical and fear of reprisals or career consequences limit access to mental health care30,50,56, while stigma reinforces the reluctance to seek treatment72 and encourages self-sacrifice73.

PTSD thus reflects the interaction of organizational, psychosocial, and cultural factors. Treating emotional problems41 as individual rather than structural challenges30,50 perpetuates systemic vulnerability and underscores the urgency of institutional change within fire services.

Therefore, reducing PTSD prevalence and other psychological conditions among firefighters requires addressing variations in organizational support systems, access to mental health services, and gender dynamics within fire departments.

Contexts characterized by supportive leadership, peer support, and structured post-incident interventions tend to report lower prevalence. In contrast, environments marked by stigma, harassment, and excessive workloads show a higher PTSD prevalence.

First, the absence of standardized post-incident protocols hinders timely intervention. Structural, institutional, and operational failures contribute to persistent psychosocial risk and underreporting6,21. Consequently, PTSD may develop as a chronic condition in firefighting contexts.

International guidelines from the WHO and ILO addressing organizational strategies related to mental health awareness3,74, help-seeking behavior, and treatment access75 were identified among the sources referenced by the included studies.

Nevertheless, implementing international agency programs remains challenging for organizations. These guidelines advocate top-down institutional reforms to address hierarchical barriers and working conditions, alongside bottom-up initiatives to promote mental health awareness and help-seeking behaviors.

In addition to collective action aimed at identifying and addressing psychosocial risk factors33, it is also necessary to target workplace conditions that contribute to stress, psychological distress, and dissatisfaction74. Without systemic change, fire departments risk perpetuating cycles in which prevention occurs only after critical incidents. Therefore, the implementation of effective policies to promote firefighters’ mental health should be prioritized61.

Critical limitations

This scoping review follows the methodological framework proposed by JBI. Nevertheless, several methodological limitations must be acknowledged. First, the absence of temporal analyses prevented the establishment of causal relationships6,10, as only a limited number of longitudinal investigations assessed symptom progression over time6,11,33,43,46,48,51,53,54. In addition, many studies relied on small or non-representative samples13,48, frequently using convenience sampling31,49-50 or single-event analyses6,26. Some investigations lacked objective diagnostic or methodological criteria22,46, and underreporting may have occurred due to fear of professional or institutional consequences55.

Second, multiple sources of bias were identified across the included studies. Selection bias related to voluntary participation29-30,56 and recall bias33 may contribute to the underestimation of PTSD prevalence23,42. Interviewer bias was also observed, particularly in studies that do not include assessments focused on specific traumatic exposures38.

A potential health worker effect was observed, as most studies evaluated only active firefighters, excluding individuals on medical leave. This may have led to underestimation of both the true severity of PTSD within this population, as well as potential cases of psychological distress.

Other mapped methodological limitations include insufficient differentiation between exposed and unexposed groups13, inclusion of behavioral or personality characteristics8, and limited examination of sleep patterns and shift characteristics45.

With respect to scope and coverage, few studies conducted population-based comparisons25,29,35, restricting broader contextual interpretation. Importantly, preventive strategies - such as training programs, emotional support initiatives41, and leadership development - were rarely addressed across studies, highlighting a critical gap in the literature. Thus, future research should incorporate occupational characteristics12-13,26,29,39,44,45,47 and ensure greater diversity regarding gender, ethnicity, race, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status24,31,42,49.

Finally, the limitations of this scoping review include the omission of unpublished studies, language restrictions, and the limited inclusion of grey literature. The exclusive inclusion of quantitative designs may also have resulted in the loss of valuable qualitative evidence, which is essential for understanding subjective experiences and contextual dimensions of PTSD among firefighters.

Main findings

The evidence demonstrates that PTSD among firefighters represents a substantial occupational concern. Compared to other high-risk groups, PTSD prevalence in firefighters is consistently higher6,8,31,36,42,47, and may be two to four times greater than that observed in the general population, underscoring the magnitude of occupational exposure in this profession.

To contextualize this finding epidemiological studies, such as the National Comorbidity Survey Replication by Kessler et al.5, have estimated the lifetime PTSD prevalence in the general population. When contrasted with other high-risk groups, this disparity becomes particularly pronounced. In this regard, Obuobi-Donkor et al.4 reported PTSD prevalence among firefighters exceeding that documented in military personnell8,31,36,42,47.

Taken together, these findings indicate that firefighters experience an exceptionally high burden of PTSD. This pattern does not reflect a statistical anomaly. Rather, it represents the cumulative impact of chronic exposure to traumatic events combined with the organizational and psychosocial stressors identified in this review.

A multidimensional and interconnected pattern of psychological suffering was evident, encompassing chronic stress, psychiatric comorbidities, and adverse organizational environments. Without systemic change, the structural barriers described in the evidence are likely to perpetuate PTSD and related conditions, including neurocognitive processes that interfere with sleep regulation and emotional functioning, thereby contributing to depressive28 and anxiety-related68 symptoms. This significant pattern appears intricately linked to variations across organizational culture in fire departments.

In light of this evidence, the high PTSD prevalence justifies the urgency of implementing targeted mental health policies and interventions at firefighters. The absence of structured mental health protocols suggests that isolated or generic wellness programs are insufficient to address the complexity of occupational stressors faced by firefighters. Accordingly, there is a need to move beyond conventional wellness initiatives within fire service culture6,8,12,23,32,49.

Instead, tailored strategies must address the specific determinants of PTSD, including organizational, psychosocial, and occupational factors. Despite the severity of symptoms, cultural barriers to help-seeking persist.

These findings emphasize the urgent need for standardized assessment tools, longitudinal research designs, organizational reforms, and comprehensive mental health interventions aligned with international initiatives56. In this context, WHO and ILO guidelines recommend strategies focused on stigma reduction, psychological support74, and access to treatment for affected personnel. These measures include supporting individuals on medical leave in their return to work through reciprocal care models75, as well as ensuring continuity of emotional support from career entry through retirement.

Finally, systematic analyses comparing firefighters with others armed forces personnel may further clarify differences related to cultural and organizational contexts that influence PTSD prevalence.

Conclusions

PTSD prevalence among firefighter’s ranges from 15% to 30%. Evidence points to psychosocial and organizational factors contributing to the worsening of outcomes associated with the disorder. Cumulative exposure to traumatic events, irregular shift work, extended duty hours, and sleep deprivation further contribute to psychological burden and the development of burnout syndrome. Female firefighters are at higher risk of PTSD than their male counterparts, and one-third report experiences of sexual harassment and discrimination in the workplace.

Beyond individual exposure, institutional cultures that prioritize performance and operational readiness, alongside hierarchical management structures and persistent stigma surrounding mental disorders, emerged as significant barriers preventing firefighters experiencing psychological distress or living with PTSD from seeking help or treatment. In this context, approaches focused exclusively on individual responsibility may inadvertently reinforce stigma76, silence psychological suffering30, and shift accountability away from organizational and institutional determinants.

From an organizational perspective, peer support initiatives31,49,51 and structured mental health promotion practices play significant role within fire departments6,34. However, their effectiveness depends on integration into broader institutional strategies rather than isolated implementation.

Accordingly, the findings indicate the need to expand access to mental health care and organizational psychological support through formal institutional policies8,29,40 and structured mental health programs50,56, moving beyond individual stress management or emotional regulation interventions23,35. Also underscore the importance of public health policies addressing PTSD through prevention73, diagnosis77, and treatments78, grounded in humanized management approaches65.

In this regard, a preventive framework should incorporate mental health programs involving health services, public safety agencies, and civil defense sectors, since integrated actions are required to address psychosocial and organizational risk factors to which firefighters are exposed76.

Consistent with international experiences and guidelines, management-oriented strategies supported by empowered, human-centered leadership can reduce stigma by reframing PTSD as a condition that can be prevented, minimized, and addressed. Whether through systemic interventions aimed at improving working conditions, strengthening peer and institutional support, or expanding access to mental health services, these approaches may foster safer organizational environments and promote early recognition and care for firefighters experiencing psychological distress.

Finally, future research should prioritize longitudinal designs and follow-up assessments to evaluate the effectiveness of preventive and therapeutic interventions. Individual-level care strategies, combined with improvements in working conditions and organizational environments, are essential to promote the well-being of all professionals involved in the mental health care of firefighters affected by PTSD.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Diogenes Martins Munhoz for his valuable contribution and support, which were essential to the development of this article.

References

  • 1 Steinberg L, Vujanovic AA. The appearance of multidimensionality: exploring the case for unidimensionality of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 using a firefighter sample. Psychol Assess. 2024;36(3):235-41. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001300
    » https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001300
  • 2 American Psychiatric Association. Manual diagnóstico e estatístico de transtornos mentais: DSM-5. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2021.
  • 3 World Health Organization. Rapport mondial sur la violence et la santé. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
  • 4 Obuobi-Donkor G, Oluwasina F, Nkire N, Agyapong VI. A scoping review on the prevalence and determinants of post-traumatic stress disorder among military personnel and firefighters: Implications for public policy and practice. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(3):1565. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031565
    » https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031565
  • 5 Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):593-602. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593
    » https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593
  • 6 Schnell T, Suhr F, Weierstall-Pust R. Post-traumatic stress disorder in volunteer firefighters: influence of specific risk and protective factors. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020;11(1).1764722. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1764722
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1764722
  • 7 Langtry J, Owczarek M, McAteer D, Taggart L, Gleeson C, Walshe C, et al. Predictors of PTSD and CPTSD in UK firefighters. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021;12(1):1849524. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1849524
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2020.1849524
  • 8 Bastug G, Ergul-Topcu A, Ozel-Kizil ET, Ergun OF. Secondary traumatization and related psychological outcomes in firefighters. J Loss Trauma. 2019;24(2):143-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2018.1560898
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2018.1560898
  • 9 Santana TGS. Prevalência de transtorno de estresse pós-traumático e fatores associados em bombeiros militares do Rio de Janeiro [dissertação]. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; 2016.
  • 10 Jahnke SA, Haddock CK, Jitnarin N, Kaipust CM, Hollerbach BS, Poston WSC. The prevalence and health impacts of frequent work discrimination and harassment among women firefighters in the US fire service. Biomed Res Int. 2019; 2019:6740207. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6740207
    » https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6740207
  • 11 Shin Y, Nam JK, Lee A, Kim Y. Latent profile analysis of post-traumatic stress and post-traumatic growth among firefighters. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(1):2159048. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2022.2159048
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2022.2159048
  • 12 Khoshakhlagh AH, Sulaie SA, Yazdanirad S, Orr RM, Laal F. Relationships between job stress, post-traumatic stress and musculoskeletal symptoms in firefighters and the role of job burnout and depression mediators: a Bayesian network model. BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):468. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17911-5
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17911-5
  • 13 Mueller AK, Singh A, Webber MP, Hall CB, Prezant DJ, Zeig-Owens R. PTSD symptoms, depressive symptoms, and subjective cognitive concerns in WTC-exposed and non-WTC-exposed firefighters. Am J Ind Med. 2021;64(10):803-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23285
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23285
  • 14 Angelin ASO, De Lucca SR. Prevalence of posttraumatic stress in firefighters: a scope review. [Preprint]. OSF, 2024. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AJ3P4
    » https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AJ3P4
  • 15 Mattos SM, Cestari VRF, Moreira TMM. Scoping protocol review: PRISMA-ScR guide refinement. Rev Enferm UFPI. 2023;12:e3062. https://doi.org/10.26694/reufpi.v12i1.3062
    » https://doi.org/10.26694/reufpi.v12i1.3062
  • 16 Santos WMD, Secoli SR, Püschel VADA. The Joanna Briggs Institute approach for systematic reviews. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018;26:e3074. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2885.3074
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2885.3074
  • 17 Jones C, Miguel-Cruz A, Smith-MacDonald L, Cruikshank E, Baghoori D, Chohan AK, et al. Virtual trauma-focused therapy for military members, veterans, and public safety personnel with posttraumatic stress injury: systematic scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(9): e22079. https://doi.org/10.2196/22079
    » https://doi.org/10.2196/22079
  • 18 Ferreira LS. Roteiro para fazer revisões de literatura usando o Zotero e o Rayyan. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; 2024.
  • 19 Favero LP. Manual de análise de dados: estatística e modelagem multivariada com Excel®, SPSS® e Stata®. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2017.
  • 20 Dawson N, Fischer J, Kuhn M, Pasotti A, Rouzaud D, Bruy A, et al. QGIS Geographic Information System. Version 3.44 LTR "Bratislava". Zenodo; 2024. Disponível em: https://qgis.org
    » https://qgis.org
  • 21 Oliveira J, Aires Dias J, Duarte IC, Caldeira S, Marques AR, Rodrigues V, et al. Mental health and post-traumatic stress disorder in firefighters: an integrated analysis from an action research study. Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1259388. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259388
    » https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259388
  • 22 Bartlett BA, Jardin C, Martin C, Tran JK, Buser S, Anestis MD et al. Posttraumatic stress and suicidality among firefighters: the moderating role of distress tolerance. Cognit Ther Res. 2018;42(4):483-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9892-y
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-018-9892-y
  • 23 Bezabh YH, Abebe SM, Fanta T, Tadese A, Tulu M. Prevalence and associated factors of post-traumatic stress disorder among emergency responders of Addis Ababa Fire and Emergency Control and Prevention Service Authority, Ethiopia: institution-based, cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(11):e020705. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020705
    » https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020705
  • 24 Jitnarin N, Jahnke SA, Poston WSC, Haddock CK, Kaipust CM. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and mental health comorbidity in firefighters. J Workplace Behav Health. 2022;37(3):147-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2022.2081172
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2022.2081172
  • 25 Seidman AJ, Born W, Corriveau E. First Responders During COVID-19: Career Calling, PTSD, and Work Self-Efficacy. Am J Prev Med. 2024;66(6):1017-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.01.001
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.01.001
  • 26 Ruggero CJ, Schuler K, Waszczuk MA, Callahan JL, Contractor AA, Bennett CB, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder in daily life among World Trade Center responders: Temporal symptom cascades. J Psychiatr Res. 2021; 138:240-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.04.002
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.04.002
  • 27 Chiang ES, Riordan KM, Ponder J, Johnson C, Cox KS. Distinguishing Firefighters with Subthreshold PTSD From Firefighters with Probable PTSD or Low Symptoms. J Loss Trauma. 2021;26(1):65-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2020.1728494
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2020.1728494
  • 28 Lima EP, Assunção AA, Barreto SM. Transtorno de Estresse Pós-Traumático (TEPT) em bombeiros de Belo Horizonte, Brasil: prevalência e fatores ocupacionais associados. Psicol Teor Pesq. 2015;31(2):279-88. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-37722015022234279288
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-37722015022234279288
  • 29 North CS, McDonald K. A Prospective post-disaster longitudinal follow-up study of emotional and psychosocial outcomes of the Oklahoma City bombing rescue and recovery workers during the first quarter century afterward. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2023; 17: e331. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2022.296
    » https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2022.296
  • 30 Testoff AC, Pauley JL, Brewer M, Weidlich CP, Koru-Sengul T, Solle NS et al. Mental health disorders, organizational stigma, and health service utilization among US fire investigators: a cross-sectional survey. J Occup Environ Med. 2024;66(11): e423-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003173
    » https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003173
  • 31 Boffa JW, Stanley IH, Hom MA, Norr AM, Joiner TE, Schmidt NB. PTSD symptoms and suicidal thoughts and behaviors among firefighters. J Psychiatr Res. 2017; 84:277-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.10.014
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.10.014
  • 32 Bakirci E, Sar V, Cetin A. Assessment of the Psychological effects on firefighters in the aftermath of the Pazarcik and Elbistan earthquakes in 2023. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2024;51(4):529-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-024-09896-1
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-024-09896-1
  • 33 Ask E, Gudmundsdottir D. A Longitudinal study of posttraumatic stress symptoms and their predictors in rescue workers after a firework factory disaster. Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2014;16(2): 316-21. https://doi.org/10.4172/1522-4821.1000118
    » https://doi.org/10.4172/1522-4821.1000118
  • 34 Wilson M. The utilization of resilience training as a primary intervention for trauma disorders in first responders [dissertação]. San Francisco: California School of Professional Psychology; 2021.
  • 35 Lee JH, Park S, Sim M. Relationship between ways of coping and posttraumatic stress symptoms in firefighters compared to the general population in South Korea. Psychiatry Res. 2018; 270:649-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.10.032
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.10.032
  • 36 Nascimento JCP, Costa TMS, Sarmento SDG, Santos KVG, Dantas JKD, Queiroz CG, et al. Análise do transtorno do estresse pós-traumático em profissionais emergencistas. Acta Paul Enferm. 2022;35:eAPE03232. https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2022AO03232
    » https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2022AO03232
  • 37 Harvey SB, Milligan-Saville JS, Paterson HM, Harkness EL, Marsh AM, Dobson M, et al. The mental health of fire-fighters: an examination of the impact of repeated trauma exposure. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2016;50(7):649-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867415615217
    » https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867415615217
  • 38 Arbona C, Schwartz JP. Posttraumatic stress disorder symptom clusters, depression, alcohol abuse, and general stress among hispanic male firefighters. Hisp J Behav Sci. 2016;38(4):507-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986316661328
    » https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986316661328
  • 39 Paulus DJ, Vujanovic AA, Schuhmann BB, Smith LJ, Tran J. Main and interactive effects of depression and posttraumatic stress in relation to alcohol dependence among urban male firefighters. Psychiatry Res 2017; 251:69-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.02.011
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.02.011
  • 40 Zegel M, Lebeaut A, Healy N, Tran JK, Vujanovic AA. Mental health correlates of probable posttraumatic stress disorder, probable alcohol use disorder, and their co-occurrence among firefighters. Behav Modif. 2022;46(2):395-421. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455211033517
    » https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455211033517
  • 41 Leonard SJ, McGrew SJ, Lebeaut A, Vujanovic AA. PTSD symptom severity and alcohol use among firefighters: the role of emotion regulation difficulties. J Dual Diagn. 2023;19(4):209-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2023.2260324
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2023.2260324
  • 42 Kaufman CC, Vujanovic AA, Murphy JG, Rosmarin DH. The association between PTSD symptom clusters and religion/spirituality with alcohol use among first responders. J Psychiatr Res. 2024; 176:304-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.06.015
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.06.015
  • 43 Smith LJ, Gallagher MW, Tran JK, Vujanovic AA. Posttraumatic stress, alcohol use, and alcohol use reasons in firefighters: the role of sleep disturbance. Compr Psychiatry. 2018; 87:64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.09.001
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.09.001
  • 44 Kim JI, Park H, Kim JH. Alcohol use disorders and insomnia mediate the association between PTSD symptoms and suicidal ideation in Korean firefighters. Depress Anxiety. 2018;35(11):1095-103. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22803
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22803
  • 45 Khumtong C, Taneepanichskul N. Posttraumatic stress disorder and sleep quality among urban firefighters in Thailand. Nat Sci Sleep. 2019; 11:123-30. https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S207764
    » https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S207764
  • 46 Healy NA, Vujanovic AA. PTSD symptoms and suicide risk among firefighters: the moderating role of sleep disturbance. Psychol Trauma. 2021;13(7):749-58. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001059
    » https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001059
  • 47 Bertolazi AN, Mann KC, Lima AVPB, Hidalgo MPL, John AB. Post-traumatic stress disorder prevalence and sleep quality in fire victims and rescue workers in southern Brazil: a cross-sectional study. Public Health. 2022; 209:4-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2022.05.002
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2022.05.002
  • 48 Park H, Kim JI, Min B, Oh S, Kim JH. Prevalence and correlates of suicidal ideation in Korean firefighters: a nationwide study. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19(1):428. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2388-9
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2388-9
  • 49 Stanley IH, Hom MA, Chu C, Dougherty SP, Gallyer AJ, Spencer-Thomas S, et al. Perceptions of belongingness and social support attenuate PTSD symptom severity among firefighters: A multistudy investigation. Psychol Serv. 2019;16(4):543-55. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000240
    » https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000240
  • 50 Jones S, Nagel C, McSweeney J, Curran G. Prevalence and correlates of psychiatric symptoms among first responders in a Southern State. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2018;32(6):828-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2018.06.007
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2018.06.007
  • 51 Lee JS. Perceived social support functions as a resilience in buffering the impact of trauma exposure on PTSD symptoms via intrusive rumination and entrapment in firefighters. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0220454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220454
    » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220454
  • 52 Huang J, Wang X, Li W, An Y. The relationship between conscientiousness and posttraumatic stress disorder among young Chinese firefighters: the mediating effect of perceived social support. Psychiatry Res. 2019; 273:450-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.053
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.053
  • 53 Senger AR, McGrew SJ, Gallagher MW, Vujanovic A. Associations of resilience and hope with mental and physical health among firefighters. J Clin Psychol. 2023;79(9):2124-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23534
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23534
  • 54 De Haart R, Mouthaan J, Vervliet B, Lommen MJJ. Avoidance learning as predictor of posttraumatic stress in firefighters. Behav Brain Res. 2021; 402:113064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2020.113064
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2020.113064
  • 55 Gulliver SB, Zimering RT, Knight J, Morissette SB, Kamholz BW, Pennington ML, et al. A prospective study of firefighters' PTSD and depression symptoms: the first 3 years of service. Psychol Trauma. 2021;13(1):44-55. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000980
    » https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000980
  • 56 Kim JE, Dager SR, Jeong HS, Ma J, Park S, Kim J et al. Firefighters, posttraumatic stress disorder, and barriers to treatment: results from a nationwide total population survey. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0190630. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190630
    » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190630
  • 57 Lucca SR. Fatores psicossociais e saúde mental no trabalho: instrumentos de diagnóstico e intervenção. São Paulo: Proteção; 2019.
  • 58 Berger W, Coutinho ESF, Figueira I, Marques-Portella C, Luz MP, Neylan TC et al. Rescuers at risk: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of the worldwide current prevalence and correlates of PTSD in rescue workers. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012;47(6):1001-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-011-0408-2
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-011-0408-2
  • 59 Stice E, Burger K. Neural vulnerability factors for obesity. Clin Psychol Rev. 2019; 68:38-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.12.002
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.12.002
  • 60 McEwen BS. In pursuit of resilience: stress, epigenetics, and brain plasticity. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016;1373(1):56-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13020
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13020
  • 61 Stanley IH, Hom MA, Joiner TE. A systematic review of suicidal thoughts and behaviors among police officers, firefighters, EMTs, and paramedics. Clin Psychol Rev 2016; 44:25-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.12.002
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.12.002
  • 62 Mitchell JT, Everly GS. Critical incident stress management (CISM). In: Bourke ML, Van Hasselt VB, Buser SJ, editors. First responder mental health. Cham: Springer; 2023. p. 179-209.
  • 63 Maness A, Roper D, Dobani F, Pennington M, Leto F, Viccora E, et al. A brief descriptive analysis of a pilot study of peer support training and supervision for Texas firefighters. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2024;37(6):934-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2024.2402169
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2024.2402169
  • 64 McFarlane AC, Bryant RA. Post-traumatic stress disorder in occupational settings: anticipating and managing the risk. Occup Med (Lond). 2007;57(6):404-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqm070
    » https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqm070
  • 65 Ministério da Saúde (BR). HumanizaSUS: política nacional de humanização: documento base para gestores e trabalhadores do SUS. 4a ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2008.
  • 66 Soravia LM, Schwab S, Walther S, Müller T. Rescuers at risk: posttraumatic stress symptoms among police officers, fire fighters, ambulance personnel, and emergency and psychiatric nurses. Front Psychiatry. 2021; 11:602064. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.602064
    » https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.602064
  • 67 Jahnke SA, Poston WSC, Haddock CK, Murphy B. Firefighting and mental health: Experiences of repeated exposure to trauma. Work. 2016;53(4):737-44. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162255
    » https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162255
  • 68 Robins A, Fevre R, Lewis D, Robinson A, Jones T. Insight into ill-treatment in the workplace: patterns, causes and solutions. Vol. 2. Cardiff: Cardiff University; 2012.
  • 69 Carey MG, Al-Zaiti SS, Dean GE, Sessanna L, Finnell DS. Sleep problems, depression, substance use, social bonding, and quality of life in professional firefighters. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(8):928-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e318225898f
    » https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e318225898f
  • 70 Walker MP, Van Der Helm E. Overnight therapy? The role of sleep in emotional brain processing. Psychol Bull. 2009;135(5):731-48. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016570
    » https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016570
  • 71 Baglioni C, Battagliese G, Feige B, Spiegelhalder K, Nissen C, Voderholzer U, et al. Insomnia as a predictor of depression: a meta-analytic evaluation of longitudinal epidemiological studies. J Affect Disord. 2011;135(1-3):10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.01.011
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.01.011
  • 72 Stanley IH, Boffa JW, Hom MA, Kimbrel NA, Joiner TE. Differences in psychiatric symptoms and barriers to mental health care between volunteer and career firefighters. Psychiatry Res. 2017; 247:236-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.11.037
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.11.037
  • 73 Henderson SN, Van Hasselt VB, LeDuc TJ, Couwels J. Firefighter suicide: understanding cultural challenges for mental health professionals. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2016;47(3):224-30. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000072
    » https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000072
  • 74 International Labour Organization. World Health Organization. Mental health at work: Policy brief. Geneva: ILO/WHO; 2022.
  • 75 World Health Organization. World mental health report: transforming mental health for all. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.
  • 76 Martínez A, Blanch A. Are rescue workers still at risk? A meta-regression analysis of the worldwide prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder and risk factors. Stress Health. 2024;40(1):e3372. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3372
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3372
  • 77 Lima EP, Assunção AA, Barreto SM. Prevalência de depressão em bombeiros. Cad Saude Publica. 2015;31(4):733-43. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00053414
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00053414
  • 78 Dobson D, Dobson K. A terapia cognitivo-comportamental baseada em evidências. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2021.
  • Data availability:
    All data extracted and analyzed in this scoping review are publicly available in the Open Science Framework (OSF) repository. The dataset includes the standardized data extraction forms and aggregated variables used for descriptive synthesis and figure generation. The data can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/AJ3P4. The data is also available in a Google Drive® cloud repository as a complementary method of access and preservation. (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1YQYPz28sKgwQS5ZYG-yWDaGF9yGd7gib?usp=drive_link).
  • Statement on the use of Artificial Intelligence:
    The authors declare that no Artificial Intelligence tools were used in the preparation of this article.
  • Presentation at a scientific event:
    The authors declare that the study has not been presented at a scientific event.
  • Funding:
    The authors declare that the study was subsidized by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES; processo nº 88887.988158/2024-00).

Edited by

Data availability

All data extracted and analyzed in this scoping review are publicly available in the Open Science Framework (OSF) repository. The dataset includes the standardized data extraction forms and aggregated variables used for descriptive synthesis and figure generation. The data can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/AJ3P4. The data is also available in a Google Drive® cloud repository as a complementary method of access and preservation. (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1YQYPz28sKgwQS5ZYG-yWDaGF9yGd7gib?usp=drive_link).

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    27 July 2026
  • Date of issue
    2026

History

  • Received
    02 Sept 2025
  • Reviewed
    13 Jan 2026
  • Accepted
    15 Jan 2026
location_on
Fundação Jorge Duprat Figueiredo de Segurança e Medicina do Trabalho - FUNDACENTRO Rua Capote Valente, 710 , 05409 002 São Paulo/SP Brasil, Tel: (55 11) 3066-6076 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: rbso@fundacentro.gov.br
rss_feed Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
Ir para o topo Reportar erro