Abstract
Objectives: to perform the cross-cultural adaptation (CCA) of the Responsive feeding practices assessment tool (RFPAT) for the Brazilian context.
Methods: methodological study of cross-cultural adaptation conducted in five stages: translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert committee review, and pre-test. Bilingual translators and specialists in responsive feeding, infant feeding, methodology, and linguistics participated in the study. The pre-test evaluated the comprehensibility, clarity, and structural adequacy of the instrument among 15 caregivers of children aged 6 to 12 months who received care at Primary Health Care facilities of the Brazilian Unified Health System in the city of São Paulo, Brazil.
Results: the cross-cultural adaptation resulted in a Brazilian version of the instrument named “Questionário de Avaliação de Práticas de Alimentação Responsiva (RFPAT-Br)”. In the pre-test, the instrument was considered comprehensible, clear, and structurally adequate by the participants.
Conclusion: the RFPAT-Br was successfully cross-culturally adapted for use in the Brazilian context, demonstrating adequate comprehensibility and clarity in the pre-test. Future studies are required to evaluate its psychometric properties.
Key words
Child; Responsive feeding; Feeding behavior; Surveys and questionnaires
Resumo
Objetivos: realizar a tradução e adaptação transcultural do instrumento Responsive Feeding Practices Assessment Tool (RFPAT) para o contexto brasileiro.
Métodos: estudo metodológico de tradução e adaptação transcultural realizado em cinco etapas: tradução, síntese, retrotradução, avaliação por comitê de especialistas e pré-teste. Participaram tradutores bilíngues e especialistas em alimentação responsiva, alimentação infantil, metodologia e linguística. O pré-teste avaliou compreensibilidade, clareza e adequação estrutural do instrumento em 15 cuidadores de crianças entre 6 e 12 meses atendidas na Atenção Primária à Saúde do Sistema Único de Saúde, no município de São Paulo, Brasil.
Resultados: o processo resultou em uma versão brasileira do instrumento denominada “Questionário de Avaliação de Práticas de Alimentação Responsiva (RFPAT-Br)”. No pré-teste, o instrumento foi considerado compreensível, claro e estruturalmente adequado pelos participantes.
Conclusão: o RFPAT-Br foi traduzido e adaptado transculturalmente para uso no contexto brasileiro, apresentando adequada compreensão e clareza no pré-teste. Estudos futuros são necessários para avaliação de suas propriedades psicométricas.
Palavras-chave
Criança; Alimentação responsiva; Comportamento alimentar; Inquéritos e questionários
Introduction
Responsive feeding consists of a set of “feeding practices that encourage the child to eat autonomously and in response to physiological and developmental needs, which may encourage self-regulation in eating and support cognitive, emotional, and social development.”1 To achieve this, it is important to provide a feeding environment without distractions, characterized by parental interaction and support, and the provisioning of healthy foods. Caregivers should be attuned to the child’s hunger and satiety cues, responding promptly and affectionately response to them.2-3
Responsive feeding practices provide a conductive environment for ensuring good health, adequate nutrition, safety and security, opportunities for early learning, and responsive caregiving – the five key components for the optimal child growth and development.1 Systematic reviews conducted in high-income countries with children in their early years of life show an association between overweight/obesity and non-responsive feeding practices, evidencing their relationship with child nutritional status.4-5 Thus, it is important to evaluate and identify how caregivers are feeding their children in the early years of life to enable the planning and implementation of actions and strategies aligned with clinical practice and child health programs and policies.
Primary Health Care (PHC), the health care level of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS) with the highest population coverage, greatest territorial capillarity, and lower complexity,6 is characterized as a conductive environment for the assessment of responsive feeding and for providing guidelines on adequate child feeding and nutrition in the early years. Accordingly, a mapping of responsive feeding assessment tools for children under two years old was performed in scientific literature. Although no instruments applicable to the entire age range of zero to 24 months were identified, the Responsive Feeding Practices Assessment Tool (RFPAT) was considered the most suitable instrument for adaptation to the Brazilian context, particularly for children aged 6-12 months, a period corresponding to the introduction of complementary feeding.7
The RFPAT is a responsive feeding assessment tool that includes 15 items distributed across three domains: proactive preparation, attentite to the child’s cues and appropriate feeding, and responsive communication. It is a simple, brief, and low-cost tool, administered by an interviewer with an average duration of 12 minutes.7 Notably, the RFPAT was also selected because it was developed from a clear conceptualization of responsive feeding and has been previously validated. Evidence of content validity was obtained through the Delphi method, and its internal structure was evaluated using Principal Component Analysis.
Brazil, actively engaged with this theme, began recommending responsive practices during child feeding through the Dietary Guidelines for Brazilian Children Under Two Years of Age, published in 2019.8 This is a major milestone in which the Ministry of Health recognizes the importance of the feeding environment and the psychosocial factors involved in child feeding. Furthermore, it demonstrates Brazil’s pioneering role by including responsive feeding as a recommendation in an official document guiding public policies and clinical practice nationwide.
However, Brazil lacks a responsive feeding assessment tool that can be used in clinical practice and population surveys within this age group. Thus, the aim of the present study was to perform the cross-cultural adaptation (CCA) of the RFPAT for the Brazilian context.
Methods
This methodological study involved the CCA study of the RFPAT tool.9-10 The process encompassed the tool’s identification, instructions, response options, and item statements.9-10 The study was initiated after obtaining permission from the primary author of the original tool to conduct the CCA.7
The present study followed five stages:
1. Translation
The translation of the original tool into Brazilian Portuguese was performed independently by two bilingual Brazilian translators (proficient in English, the tool’s original language). The first translator was a health professional and specialist in responsive feeding, while the second was a linguistics specialist with no prior knowledge of the topic.
Two independent translations were produced (T1 and T2). Each translator documented the process, providing reports that detailed their linguistic choices and justifications.
2. Synthesis
The translators from the previous stage collaboratively synthesized T1 and T2. During this phase, an observer participated to document the process and assist in resolving discrepancies to reach a consensus.
The synthesis stage produced a reconciled version (T12) and a final report.
3. Back-translation
Based on the T12 version, two bilingual translators performed the back-translation from Brazilian Portuguese to English. Both were blinded to the original RFPAT tool and had no prior knowledge of responsive feeding. The first back-translator was a linguistics specialist and a native English speaker, whereas the second was a sworn translator and a native Brazilian Portuguese speaker.
Two independent back-translations were produced (BT1 and BT2), each accompanied by its respective report.
4. Expert committee
The RT1 and RT2 versions were first sent to the author of the original tool for equivalence analysis and feedback. If any inconsistencies had been identified, T1, T2, and T12 would have been revised before proceeding to the expert committee review.
Since equivalence was achieved in the previous stages, all produced versions were forwarded to a multidisciplinary expert committee. The committee’s composition followed pre-established criteria, requiring at least: one expert in the study’s methodology, one health professional, one professional from the field of linguistics/translation, and all translators involved in the previous stages.
The committee was thus comprised of one expert in the study’s methodology, two university professors with expertise in responsive feeding and child nutrition, two clinical nutritionists with experience in treating children under two years old (acting in PHC and the private sector), two public policy managers in the fields of food and nutrition and child health, one linguistics translator, and all translators who participated in the earlier stages.
The role of the multidisciplinary committee was to jointly evaluate all translations from the previous stages, their respective reports, and the original author’s considerations, aiming to develop a version equivalent to the original tool across four dimensions (semantic, idiomatic, experiential, and conceptual) (Table 1). Each item and its different versions were analyzed individually via videoconference, seeking to develop the pre-final version of the tool by consensus.
The identified discrepancies were discussed until a consensus was reached among the experts, and the entire process was thoroughly documented by the study’s lead author. No items were removed from the tool.
Conclusively, the pre-final (PF) version in Brazilian Portuguese was produced, accompanied by its respective report.
5. Pre-test
The pre-test was conducted with 15 caregivers of children aged 6 to 12 months receiving care at a School Health Center (a primary health care unit), which is an integral part of the PHC, located in the western zone of the municipality of São Paulo. All participants were women and mothers, aged between 20 and 50 years, with the majority identifying as Brown (parda) and having incomplete basic education. The children were also predominantly Brown (parda) and were distributed across all months of the 6-to-12-month age range. The participants were recruited during pediatric growth and development consultations and, after their appointments, they answered the survey in a private, quiet environment.
The PF version was administered to each participant, followed by an interview to evaluate the tool’s comprehensibility, clarity, and structure from the caregivers’ perspective. The participants were allowed to propose suggestions, which could be implemented provided if they did not alter the meaning of the original item.
Consequently, the final (F) version was obtained, along with its report.
The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the School of Public Health at the University of São Paulo (CAAE: 75478823.1.0000.5421; Opinion Nº. 6.565.510). Prior to data collection, participants received detailed explanations about the research, its voluntary nature, and their right to refuse or withdraw at any time. After clarifying any doubts, the participants signed the Informed Consent Form in duplicate, with one copy delivered to the participant.
Results
The CCA generated seven versions of the RFPAT tool (T1, T2, T12, BT1, BT2, PF, and F) (Supplementary Table 1) and their respective reports (available upon request to the lead author).
Certain items required further debate to reach a consensus, especially during the synthesis and expert committee stages. Regarding item 1, the name of the tool, the word “questionário” (questionnaire) was chosen instead of “ferramenta” (tool), as it is more widely used and easily understood in Brazil. The English acronym was retained with the addition of “Br” (RFPAT-Br) to identify it as the Brazilian version (Supplementary Table 1). Thus, the name of the tool in the translated and adapted version became “Questionário de avaliação de práticas de alimentação responsive” (RFPAT-Br).
The term “your child,” present in several statements throughout the questionnaire, was adapted to “____________ (child’s name)” because the caregiver responsible for the child might not be the parent, but rather another caregiver. It was also considered that reading the alternatives to the caregivers using the child’s proper name makes the assessment more personal and welcoming, facilitating the establishment of a relationship of trust.
Regarding item 12, “Você alimenta __________ (nome da criança) em um lugar específico para esta atividade. Por exemplo: na cadeira, sobre um tapete/esteira ou no seu colo, em um lugar específico da casa ou ambiente”, the expert committee decided to retain “sobre um tapete” (on a mat) and add “esteira” (woven mat), as these are recognized examples of infant feeding places in Brazil, particularly within traditional communities. Additionally, this example was reordered to appear immediately after “na cadeira” (in the chair), since the latter is a more common practice in the Brazilian context. In item 13, “O lugar que você escolheu para alimentar __________ (nome da criança) é um lugar com poucas distrações. Por exemplo: Televisão/celular/tablet desligados, sem outras crianças brincando por perto etc”, the experts included “televisão/celular e tablet desligados” (TV/cell phone and tablet turned off), considering that the use of technology by children during meals reflects current Brazilian reality (Supplementary Table 1).
During the final pre-test stage, the need to replace “vamos perguntar/vamos fazer algumas perguntas” (we are going to ask/we are going to ask a few questions) with “vamos ler algumas afirmações” (we are going to read some statements) was identified in the introductory items for each domain (items 11, 16, and 22). These changes were made to align with the semantic structure of the tool. In item 2 of the original instrument “This tool includes few statements that will reflect the way you feed the child. When these statements are conveyed and explained to you select the most appropriate answer considering the actual situation of feeding your child at the moment”, the term “statement” is used, indicating the affirmative nature of the sentences (Supplementary Table 1). These modifications did not interfere with the tool’s content and were executed in collaboration with the linguistics specialist.
The participants considered the tool clear and comprehensible, offering no additional suggestions. The structure of the tool was also well evaluated, being described as short and simple. Furthermore, the importance of reading the response options aloud during the administration of the first domain (items 12 to 15) was noted, in order to familiarize participants with the Likert-type response format.
The final version—Questionário de avaliação de práticas de alimentação responsiva (RFPAT-Br)—achieved semantic, idiomatic, experiential, and conceptual equivalence, and was considered clear and comprehensible by PHC users (Figure 1). Importantly, the classification ranges and the scoring system for responsive practices established by the original tool were maintained, namely: poor (0–34 points), moderate (35–36 points), good (37–40 points), and excellent (41–60 points).
Discussion
The Questionário de avaliação de práticas de alimentação responsiva (RFPAT-Br) is the first tool for the Brazilian population to assess responsive feeding under two years old – particularly children aged 6 to 12 months. It is a brief, simple, and quick-to-administer instrument, essential characteristics for the use at PHC and in population surveys in the country. However, we highlight the need to further assess the tool’s psychometric properties, including the suitability of the feeding practices classification ranges for the Brazilian population.
Studies on responsive feeding in children are recent in the scientific literature and are currently considered by international organizations as an important component for ensuring adequate child growth.1,11 In this context, studies on this topic have become increasingly frequent and, consequently, so has the creation of instruments to assess it.12 One of the most widely used and adapted instruments is the Infant Feeding Style Questionnaire (IFSQ); however, responsive feeding therein is only part of a broader assessment of infant feeding styles.13-15 Subsequently, new specific instruments for assessing responsive feeding were developed, presenting different characteristics. Some rely on observational application, cater to different age groups within the first two years of life, and originate from low- and middle-income countries, such as India,16 Cambodia,17 China,18 and Sri Lanka.7
Responsive feeding has clearly been a topic of interest across diverse nations, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, underscoring the importance of evaluating responsive feeding practices from early life. Given the primary recommendation to adapt instruments with proven methodological and psychometric quality rather than developing new ones,19 the authors of the present study mapped the assessment instruments available in the literature and identified the RFPAT as the most suitable to be adapted to the Brazilian context.7
The CCA process allowed for the translation of the RFPAT from English into Brazilian Portuguese and its cultural adaptation, considering the context and particularities of the Brazilian territory, through qualitative procedures.9-10 Five stages were rigorously followed and documented to achieve semantic, idiomatic, experiential, and conceptual equivalence with the original instrument.9-10 The chosen methodology is one of the most widely used in the healthcare field due to its methodological rigor.20-21
The participation of bilingual translators specializing in linguistics and the topic, the original instrument’s author, and a multidisciplinary panel of experts was pivotal to achieving equivalence. The original author’s evaluation of BT1 and BT2 with no further recommendations can be considered a quality control measure for the previous stages.9-10 Furthermore, stages two and four, which involved extensive discussions, provided valuable insights and solutions before the instrument proceeded to the pre-test phase. Following pre-test, the importance of recommending that response options be read aloud during the administration of the first domain became evident, ensuring participants’ familiarization with the Likert-type response format, while also allowing for grammatical agreement adjustments in certain items.
Among the main adaptations, we highlight the experts’ concern with considering the child’s feeding environment and the community responsible for their care. In PHC, clinical practice shows that many caregivers responsible for bringing children to health appointments are grandparents or other guardians, rather than the parents. Thus, using the child’s proper name throughout the questionnaire is a culturally sensitive adaptation, especially given that PHC is the healthcare level with the highest population coverage and territorial reach.6 The use of specific and concrete phrasing is an important recommendation for developing an adequate assessment instrument.22
Moreover, regional differences were also considered, such as the use of woven mats (esteiras) during feeding in traditional Brazilian communities. The Dietary Guidelines for Brazilian Children Under Two Years of Age emphasizes the importance of respecting regional dietary habits and cultures to promote healthy eating, adding that “feeding is a cultural act that involves relationships, habits, and ways of preserving and transmitting traditions and knowledge.”8
We also highlight the inclusion of “televisão/celular e tablet desligados” (TV/cell phone and tablet turned off) as an example of non-distractive practices during meals. Early exposure to screens is associated with impairments in child development—cognitive, emotional, and language-related—as well as adverse health outcomes and mental distress.23-25 Consequently, the Brazilian Ministry of Health, in its Guide on the Use of Digital Device for Children, Adolescents and Screens, recommends avoiding screens and digital devices for children under two years old.24 Both the Child’s Health Booklet and the Dietary Guidelines for Brazilian Children Under Two Years of Age are in line with this recommendation, the latter emphasizing the importance of avoiding screen exposure during meals as it hinders healthy eating.8,26
The strengths of this study include the rigorous methodology and the multidisciplinary expertise of the committee members involved in the CCA process. Due to the narrow age range of the instrument (6 to 12 months) and time constraints for data collection, the sample size of the pre-test is acknowledged as a limitation, considering the recommendation for 30 to 40 participants.9,10
In conclusion, the RFPAT-Br is the first instrument for the Brazilian population to assess responsive feeding in children aged 6 to 12 months. It is a brief, simple, and quick-to-administer questionnaire, with potentially favorable characteristics for future use in both PHC and population surveys, following psychometric evaluation.
Data availability
The reports for each stage of the CCA process are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Except for these reports, the entire dataset supporting the results of this study is published within the manuscript itself.
References
-
1 United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), World Health Organization (WHO). Nurturing young children through responsive feeding: Thematic brief. Geneva: WHO; 2023. [Internet]. [access in 2024 Nov 1]. Available from: https://nurturing-care.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/NTCTRF.pdf
» https://nurturing-care.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/NTCTRF.pdf -
2 Black MM, Aboud FE. Responsive feeding is embedded in a theoretical framework of responsive parenting. J Nutr. 2011 Mar; 141 (3): 490-4. doi: 10.3945/jn.110.129973
» https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.110.129973 -
3 Pérez-Escamilla R, Jimenez EY, Dewey KG. Responsive feeding recommendations: harmonizing integration into dietary guidelines for infants and young children. Curr Dev Nutr. 2021 Apr; 5 (6): nzab076. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzab076
» 10.1093/cdn/nzab076 -
4 Hurley KM, Cross MB, Hughes SO. A systematic review of responsive feeding and child obesity in high-income countries. J Nutr. 2011 Mar; 141 (3): 495-501. doi: 10.3945/jn.110.130047
» https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.110.130047 -
5 Disantis KI, Hodges EA, Johnson SL, Fisher JO. The role of responsive feeding in overweight during infancy and toddlerhood: a systematic review. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011 Apr; 35 (4): 480-92. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.3
» https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.3 - 6 Mendonça MHM, Matta GC, Gondim R, Giovanella L. Atenção Primária à Saúde no Brasil: conceitos, práticas e pesquisa. 1a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz; 2018.
- 7 Pallewathta P, Agampodi TC, Agampodi SB, Pérez-Escamilla R, Siribaddana S. Measuring Responsive Feeding in Sri Lanka: Development of the Responsive Feeding Practices Assessment Tool. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2021 Jun; 53 (6): 489-502.
-
8 Ministério da Saúde (BR). Guia Alimentar para crianças brasileiras menores de 2 anos. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2019. [access in 2025 Mar 1]. Available from: http://189.28.128.100/dab/docs/portaldab/publicacoes/guia_da_crianca_2019.pdf
» http://189.28.128.100/dab/docs/portaldab/publicacoes/guia_da_crianca_2019.pdf -
9 Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec; 25 (24): 3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
» https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014 -
10 Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of the DASH & QuickDASH outcome measures. Toronto: Institute for Work & Health; 2007. [Internet]. [access in 2024 Nov 1]. Available from: https://dash.iwh.on.ca/sites/dash/files/downloads/cross_cultural_adaptation_2007.pdf
» https://dash.iwh.on.ca/sites/dash/files/downloads/cross_cultural_adaptation_2007.pdf -
11 World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group. Nurturing care for early childhood development: a framework for helping children survive and thrive to transform health and human potential. Geneva: WHO; 2018. [access in 2025 Mar 1]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/781de51d-4cef-482e-bb3b-c2b3becf3c9f/content
» https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/781de51d-4cef-482e-bb3b-c2b3becf3c9f/content -
12 Heller RL, Mobley AR. Instruments assessing parental responsive feeding in children ages birth to 5 years: a systematic review. Appetite. 2019 Jul; 138: 23-51. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.03.006
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.03.006 -
13 Thompson AL, Mendez MA, Borja JB, Adair LS, Zimmer CR, Bentley ME. Development and validation of the Infant Feeding Style Questionnaire. Appetite. 2009 Oct; 53 (2): 210-21. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2009.06.010
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2009.06.010 -
14 Wood CT, Perreira KM, Perrin EM, Yin HS, Rothman RL, Sanders LM, et al Confirmatory factor analysis of the Infant Feeding Styles Questionnaire in Latino families. Appetite. 2016 May 1; 100: 118-25. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.018
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.018 -
15 Pedroso J, Gubert MB. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Infant Feeding Style Questionnaire in Brazil. PLoS One. 2021 Sep; 16 (9): e0257991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257991
» https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257991 -
16 Boucheron P, Bhopal S, Verma D, Roy R, Kumar D, Divan G, et al Observed feeding behaviours and effects on child weight and length at 12 months of age: Findings from the SPRING cluster-randomized controlled trial in rural India. PLoS One. 2020 Aug; 15 (8): e0237226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237226
» https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237226 -
17 Sall NS, Bégin F, Dupuis JB, Bourque J, Menasria L, Main B, et al A measurement scale to assess responsive feeding among Cambodian young children. Matern Child Nutr. 2020 Jul; 16 (3): e12956. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12956
» https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12956 -
18 Liu Y, Yu G, Li Z, Kong Y, Yang R, Yin C, et al A Responsive Feeding Questionnaire Based on Self-Determination Theory for Caregivers of Chinese Toddlers. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2023 Jun; 55 (6): 447-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2023.02.011
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2023.02.011 -
19 World Bank Group. A Toolkit for Measuring Early Childhood Development in Low and Middle-Income Countries. Washington (DC): World Bank Group; 2017. [access in 2025 Mar 1]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1596/29000
» https://doi.org/10.1596/29000 -
20 Machado RS, Fernandes ADBF, Oliveira ALCB, Soares LS, Gouveia MTO, Silva GRF. Métodos de adaptação transcultural de instrumentos na área da enfermagem. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2018 Jun; 39: e2017-0164. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2018.2017-0164
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2018.2017-0164 - 21 Iliescu D. Adapting tests in linguistic and cultural situations. 1a ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017.
- 22 Krosnick JA, Presser S. Question and questionnaire design. In: Marsden PV, Wright JD. Handbook of Survey Research. 2a ed. Bingley, England: Emerald Group Publishing; 2010.
- 23 Rocha HAL, Correia LL, Leite ÁJM, Machado MMT, Lindsay AC, Rocha SGMO, et al Screen time and early childhood development in Ceará, Brazil: a population-based study. BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov; 21 (1): 2072.
-
24 Brasil. Crianças, adolescentes e telas: Guia sobre usos de dispositivos digitais. Brasília (DF): SECOM/PR; 2024. [Internet]. [access in 2025 Mar 1]. Available from: https://www.gov.br/secom/pt-br/assuntos/uso-de-telas-por-criancas-e-adolescentes/guia/guia-de-telas_sobre-usos-de-dispositivos-digitais_versaoweb.pdf
» https://www.gov.br/secom/pt-br/assuntos/uso-de-telas-por-criancas-e-adolescentes/guia/guia-de-telas_sobre-usos-de-dispositivos-digitais_versaoweb.pdf -
25 Madigan S, McArthur BA, Anhorn C, Eirich R, Christakis DA. Associations Between Screen Use and Child Language Skills: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Jul; 174 (7): 665-75. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0327
» https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0327 -
26 Ministério da Saúde (BR). Caderneta da Criança. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2024. [Internet]. [access in 2025 Mar 1]. Available from: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/caderneta_crianca_menina_passaporte_cidadania_7ed.pdf
» https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/caderneta_crianca_menina_passaporte_cidadania_7ed.pdf


Souce: adapted from Pallewathta et al.