FOUCAULDIANS SPECULATIONS ON A NEOSCIENCE UBUESQUEThis paper review aims to continue the discussion brought by the paper Foucauldian Speculations on a Neuroscience Ubuesque. Inspired by Isabelle Stengers (2023) on the importance of decelerating science, I discuss the partial research results’ publications, the relationship between science and the public, and some considerations about science education in a time of post-truth. So, I defend that individuals do not separate the learning of science from its implications. Then, the relationship between science and the public, considered responsible for the growth of negationism, is marked by value, context, and life history. Moreover, in dialogue with science education researchers, I argue that the time of post-truth challenges us to build pedagogical practices able to problematize the race, gender, class, and ambiental inequalities that we live on and produce actions that could create a sense of collective since there is no transformation without the social movements
Key words:
Fake News; science education; sociopolitical