Prevalence of cognitive impairment in Brazilian indigenous community from Amazonas

PREVALÊNCIA DE COMPROMETIMENTO COGNITIVO EM INDÍGENAS BRASILEIROS DO AMAZONAS

ABSTRACT.

Studies on the prevalence of dementia in the indigenous population are still scarce worldwide. In the few available studies, prevalence evidence varies from low to very high, with early onset of the disease and high mortality rate after the initial diagnosis. Still, little is known about the rate of dementia in indigenous populations from low- and middle-income countries, where the dementia prevalence in the general population is estimated to increase significantly in the next decades. Objective: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of cognitive impairment and associated factors in Brazilian indigenous people of the Mura ethnicity in Amazonas, Brazil. Methods: A total of 217 indigenous individuals aged 50 years and older from Amazonas, Brazil, were submitted to cognitive assessment. Attention, memory, verbal fluency, visuospatial performance, and mood state composed the cognitive impairment diagnosis. Results: The prevalence of cognitive impairment was 43.3% (95%CI 36.6-49.7) and varied according to age [OR=1.03 (95%CI 1.00-1.06)], education [OR=0.74 (95%CI 0.62-0.87)], body mass index [OR=0.91 (95%CI 0.83-0.98)], and income [OR=0.52 (95%CI 0.27-0.99)]. Conclusions: Cognitive impairment had an early onset in an indigenous community, and its prevalence was greater in older individuals with low education and low family income. These findings highlight the importance of implementing public indigenous health policies focusing on health professional training for early cognitive impairment detection.

Keywords:
Cognitive Dysfunction; Dementia; Population Groups; Epidemiology; Prevalence

RESUMO.

No mundo, estudos sobre a prevalência de demência em idosos indígenas são insuficientes, porém nas evidências disponíveis, a prevalência varia de baixa a muito alta, com início precoce da doença e elevada taxa de mortalidade após o diagnóstico inicial. As evidências em países de baixa e média renda são escassas, e neles a prevalência de demência aumentará significativamente nas próximas décadas. Objetivo: Determinar a prevalência de déficit cognitivo e fatores associados em indígenas brasileiros da etnia Mura no Amazonas, Brasil. Métodos: Duzentos e dezessete indígenas com 50 anos ou mais do Amazonas, Brasil, foram submetidos a avaliação cognitiva. Atenção, memória, fluência verbal, desempenho visuoespacial e estado de humor compuseram o diagnóstico de déficit cognitivo. Resultados: A prevalência de déficit cognitivo foi de 43,3% (intervalo de confiança - IC95% 36,6-49,7) e variou de acordo com a idade [odds ratio - OR=1,03 (IC95% 1,00-1,06)], educação [OR=0,74 (IC95% 0,62-0,87)], índice de massa corporal [OR=0,91 (IC95% 0,83-0,98)] e renda [OR=0,52 (IC95% 0,27-0,99)]. Conclusões: O comprometimento cognitivo teve início precoce na comunidade indígena, sendo sua prevalência maior em idosos com baixa escolaridade e baixa renda familiar. Esses achados destacam a importância da implementação de políticas públicas de saúde indígena, com foco na formação de profissionais de saúde, para a detecção precoce do déficit cognitivo.

Palavras-chave:
Disfunção Cognitiva; Demência; Grupos Populacionais; Epidemiologia; Prevalência

INTRODUCTION

Almost 70% of the 130 million people expected to develop dementia by 2050 are living in low- and middle-income countries¹. The global estimated prevalence of dementia is 5-7%, with higher rates in low- and middle-income countries and illiterate older adults^2,3. The prevalence of cognitive impairment no dementia (CIND) varies widely, ranging from 3 to 27%^4,5,6,7, and in Brazil, it ranges from 19.5 to 34.8% ^8,9. Unlike dementia, in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and CIND, the patient can keep independence in functional abilities¹⁰. MCI clinical diagnosis is based on evidence of cognitive decline reported by patient or informant or clinician over time, objective evidence of impairment in one or more cognitive domains, preservation of independence in functional abilities, and not demented^10,11. The concept of CIND is a broader definition of impairment that encompasses subjects who meet criteria for MCI and others who are cognitively impaired but do not meet all the criteria for MCI¹¹.

These projections may be underestimated when considering minority groups, such as indigenous population, who are disproportionately impacted by diseases worldwide^12,13. Despite recent efforts to increase the inclusion of minority groups, indigenous populations are still underrepresented in dementia research, posing a challenge to understand the real impact of dementia across all race, ethnic, and social groups^12,13.

Indigenous populations are growing rapidly, and approximately 370 million individuals are estimated to be worldwide¹⁴. The advancement of urbanization, changes in dietary habits, and the aging of indigenous population have contributed to increase the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), obesity, metabolic syndrome, and alcoholism^15,16,17. These conditions represent important risk factor for atherosclerosis, which plays a pivotal role in the etiology of cognitive impairment and dementia¹⁸.

Despite that, the evidence regarding dementia in that population is scarce^19,20. A recent systematic review revealed that dementia prevalence in the indigenous population range from 0.5 to 26.8% in individuals from high-income countries²¹. Early onset and high mortality represent the main features of dementia in indigenous²¹. Moreover, age, low educational level, and poor health conditions are the major modifiable risk factors reported²¹.

Poverty, low educational levels, limited access to health system resources, and lack of population understanding about dementia pose additional vulnerability to cognitive disorders in the indigenous population from low- and middle-income countries²². However, fundamental questions remain regarding the dementia prevalence in those individuals, arising the critical need to understand how dementia affects indigenous communities in low- and middle-income countries³. The absence of such knowledge limits health policy maker actions and compromises the implementation of preventive measures to reduce the global disparities in dementia. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of cognitive impairment and associated factors in a Brazilian indigenous people of the Mura ethnicity in Amazonas, Brazil.

METHODS

Study design and setting

A cross-sectional observational study was carried out in the village of Pantaleão, which is 218 km from Manaus, located in Amazonas, Northern Brazil (Figure 1). ­Autazes inhabitants are distributed among three ethnic groups: the Apurinã, Munduruku, and Mura. In the last census in 2013, Mura represented the most populous ethnicity, with 8,103 indigenous people and 12.8% of older adults²³.

Figure 1.
Geographical location of the municipality of Autazes in Manaus, Amazonas. SIASI/SESAI/MS (2013).

After authorization from the National Foundation of Indians (FUNAI), the official Brazilian organization for indigenous population, a survey was conducted with those inhabitants aged ≥50 years with the assistance of local organizations, members of the community, and health care workers. Given the absence of reliable data on the number of dwellers aged ≥50 years, the snowball (referral) sampling technique was employed, whereby participants and other members of the community helped identify potential participants known to them to increase the sample size. A total of 245 indigenous individuals were identified. Data collection was carried out in a single phase, entailing an interview conducted at the household by a nurse trained in applying the tests. Testing took, on average, 70 min and included informed consent, the sociodemographic questioner, anthropometric data, cognitive and mood assessment, and subjective cognitive decline. The Research Ethics Committee of the School of Nursing of the University of São Paulo (n^o 1.105.424), the National Research Ethics Committee, and the FUNAI (CONEP, n^o 1.308.120) approved the study.

Participants

The study included individuals who self-identified as indigenous, lived, or worked in the village of Pantaleão and spoke Portuguese besides the native language. ­Dwellers out of town or who had deceased during the data collection period were excluded, as they were individuals who refused to participate. None of the participants showed visual or hearing deficits precluding cognitive assessment, psychoactive medication, and had a history of stroke in the past 3 months. The final sample comprised 217 indigenous subjects of both genders (n=126 women; 58.1%), with a mean age of 64.2 (range 50-100) years.

Cognitive assessment

All participants were submitted to the following neuropsychological tests: the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) recommended for use in Brazil²⁴; the Brief Cognitive Screening Battery (BCSB) involving immediate and delayed recall (after 5 min), often printed drawings (e.g., shoe, house, comb, plane, turtle, book, spoon, tree, and bucket) scoring 10 points each²⁵; the Digit Span Forward (DSF) and Digit Span Backward (DSB) entail the repetition of six sequences, each containing two and seven digits, to be repeated by the participant in the order readout (DSF) and reverse order (DSB), scoring 6 points in maximum; the Semantic Verbal Fluency Test (Animals and Fruits)²⁶; and the Stick Design Test²⁷, which involves reproducing four different drawings (i.e., square, a triangle with a shaft, rafters, and rake) shown previously, using four matchsticks. All of these tests have been validated for use in the Brazilian population and possess discriminatory sensitivity for identifying cognitive impairment in individuals with low educational level^{24,25,26,27,28}.

Subjective cognitive decline

The memory complaint scale comprises seven questions assessing the frequency of memory complaints and the degree they impact daily activities. Responses are graded in increasing intensity (0, 1, and 2), yielding the following classification: no memory complaints (0-2 points), mild memory complaints (3-6 points), moderate memory complaints (7-10 points), and severe memory complaints (11-14 points)²⁹.

Mood and depressive symptoms

The mood was measured by the Faces Scale of Andrews³⁰, a visual scale containing seven figures of stylized faces representing expressions ranging from extreme happiness to extreme unhappiness, with 1: very happy; 2: happy; 3: somewhat happy; 4: regular; 5: somewhat unhappy; 6: unhappy; and 7: very unhappy. The lower the rating, the greater the degree of psychological well-being, where score ≥4 indicates impaired well-being. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the short version of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), comprising 15 questions (yes/no) on depression symptoms. A score ≥6 indicates a positive screen for depression and requires further examination³¹.

Criteria for cognitive impairment diagnosis

Cognitive assessment, subjective cognitive decline, and mood data were independently reviewed by two neurologists to reach a consensus diagnosis, based on the criteria established by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) for dementia diagnosis³². The consensus diagnosis was used to classify participants into “with cognitive impairment” and “without cognitive impairment.” This classification was based on the following criteria:

1. Score on MMSE ≤14 for illiterate subjects and ≤19 for literate subjects (mean minus two standard deviations based on the normative data)³³;

2. Score ≤9 on verbal fluency or ≤7 on delayed recall of BCSB^{24,25,26,27,28,33};

3. Analysis of performance on the other cognitive tests, according to case-by-case observation; and

4. The instruments assessing subjective cognitive decline, mood, and depression symptoms were also considered in the classification.

A third specialist reviewed disparities on the consensus diagnosis. Due to the unavailability of several participants’ relatives, functional assessment for daily living activities of indigenous older adults was not determined, and therefore, discrimination between MCI and dementia was not performed.

Statistical analysis

Data were normally distributed. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for repeated samples with Greenhouse correction in the absence of sphericity in the distribution pattern of the variables. Multiple comparisons (post-hoc) were made using the Bonferroni test. ­Student’s t-test and chi-square test were used to compare means and frequencies, respectively. To characterize the sample, classic descriptive analysis procedures were used with average, standard deviation, and absolute and relative frequency calculations. The association between the prevalence of cognitive impairment and factors such as sex, age, education, income, arterial hypertension, DM, smoking, alcoholism, body mass index (BMI), and mood changes was analyzed using odds ratio (OR) measures. The significance level was 5% with a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Description of sociodemographic, habits, and medical history

Participants were predominantly female, aged 50-100 years, self-identified indigenous, widowed or in a stable union, and had low educational level (0-15 years) and economic status. The majority of the population (92.7%) belong to low economic status (D and E classes), with a family income mean of R$ 639.78 (160-180 range in US$). Regarding medical history, most participants were not in the use of medications, had no chronic diseases, and were within the ideal limit for BMI. There was no significant difference between the groups for sociodemographic characteristics or medical history (Table 1).

Table 1.
Sociodemographic characteristics and medical history for total sample and according to cognitive impairment.

	Variables	Cognitive impairment
		Total sample n=217	Yes n=94	No n=123	p
		Mean (±SD) or n (%)	Mean (±SD) or n (%)	Mean (±SD) or n (%)
Age, years		64.2 (10.2)	65.0 (11.5)	63.7 (9.1)	0.384
Age group	50-59	81 (37.3)	38 (40.4)	43 (35.0)	0.524
	60-64	44 (20.3)	16 (17.0)	28 (22.8)
	≥65	92 (42.4)	40 (42.6)	52 (42.2)
Education		1.3 (2.1)	1.1 (1.9)	1.5 (2.3)	0.164
Illiterate (% yes)		128 (59.0)	62 (66.0)	66 (53.7)	0.072
Gender (% female)		126 (58.1)	59 (46.8)	67 (53.2)	0.220
Indigenous (% yes)		216 (99.5)	94 (43.5)	122 (56.5)	0.567
Marital status	Single	14 (6.5)	6 (42.9)	8 (57.1)	0.062
	Married	63 (29.0)	22 (34.9)	41 (65.1)
	Divorced	5 (2.3)	-	5 (100)
	Others	135 (62.2)	66 (48.9)	69 (51.1)
Retired (% yes)		116 (53.5)	52 (44.8)	64 (55.2)	0.631
Economic class	C2	6 (2.8)	3 (50)	3 (50)	0.525
	D-E	211(97.2)	91(43.1)	120(56.9)
Medical history (% yes)	Medication	38 (17.5)	14 (36.8)	24 (63.2)	0.375
	Diabetes mellitus	43 (19.8)	17 (39.5)	26 (60.5)	0.576
	Hypertension	72 (33.2)	28 (38.9)	44 (61.1)	0.353
	Stroke	17 (7.8)	6 (35.3)	11 (64.7)	0.487
	Epilepsy	1 (0.5)	0 (0)	1 (100)	0.567
	Alcoholism	8 (3.7)	2 (25.0)	6 (75.0)	0.471
	Smoking	6 (2.8)	2 (33.3)	4 (66.7)	0.700
Body mass index	Underweight	6 (2.8)	2 (33.3)	4 (66.7)	0.732
	Normal	103 (47.5)	49 (47.6)	54 (52.4)
	Overweight	80 (36.9)	32 (40.0)	48 (60.0)
	Class I obesity	18 (8.3)	7 (38.9)	11 (61.1)
	Class II obesity	7 (3.2)	2 (28.6)	5 (71.4)

• SD: standard deviation.

Cognitive impairment and associated factors

The prevalence of cognitive impairment was 43.3% in the total sample. The odds of cognitive impairment varied across age, education, and BMI (Table 2). In participants aged ≥50 years, every year of age increased the odds of cognitive impairment by 3% (OR=1.03), whereas every year of education reduced the odds by 26% (OR=0.74). In participants aged ≥60 years and those aged ≥65 years, every year of age increased the odds of cognitive impairment by 9% (OR=1.09) and each year of education reduced this chance by 29% (OR=0.71; Table 2). Moreover, BMI and family income reduced the odds of cognitive impairment by 10% (OR=0.90) and 48%, respectively, in individuals aged ≥60 years (Table 2).

Table 2.
Prevalence of cognitive impairment and associated factors.

Yes	Prevalence of cognitive impairment
	Total sample n (%) [95%CI]		≥60 years n (%) [95%CI]		≥65 years n (%) [95%CI]
	94 (43.3) [36.6-49.72]		59 (43.7) [35.63-52.13]		47 (51.1) [41.04-61.05]
Associated factors	[95%CI]	OR	[95%CI]	OR	[95%CI]	OR
Sex (female)	0.86-2.6	1.5	0.86-3.40	1.71	0.96-5.08	2.20
Diabetes mellitus	0.81-3.14	1.6	0.59-2.84	1.29	0.46-3.14	1.20
Hypertension	0.52-1.63	0.92	0.39-1.60	0.79	0.30-1.64	0.71
Alcoholism	0.02-1.49	0.18	0.01-2.25	0.12	0.01-5.21	0.23
Smoking	0.26-6.76	1.33	0.08-21.11	1.29	0.06-15.77	0.96
Age	1.00-1.06*	1.03	1.04-1.15*	1.09	1.02-1.18*	1.09
Education	0.62-0.87*	0.74	0.53-0.91*	0.71	0.49-0.94*	0.71
Income	0.42-1.05	0.67	0.27-0.99*	0.52	0.27-1.27	0.59
Body mass index	0.83-0.96*	0.90	0.83-0.98*	0.91	0.84-1.03	0.93
Mood	0.81-3.14	1.60	0.86-3.40	1.71	0.96-5.08	2.20

• OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; *significant association.

DISCUSSION

This study revealed that almost half of the indigenous people over 50 years of age had signs of cognitive impairment, indicating a relatively higher prevalence and earlier onset, compared to the rates found in other indigenous populations²¹. Age and education levels were the main factors associated with cognitive impairment.

It is noteworthy that prevalence encompassed individuals with MCI and dementia. They were not discriminated against in our study due to the difficulties of having the participants’ proxy evaluating their functional ability for daily activities. Comparing our findings with previous studies in indigenous older adults^34,35,36, the prevalence detected was higher in the Mura indigenous participants. Smith et al.³⁶ found a prevalence of cognitive impairment of 40.2% (26.8% with dementia and 13.4% with CIND) in older adults aged 65 years and over. Radford et al.³⁵ found a prevalence of cognitive impairment of 38.7% (21.0% with dementia and 17.7% with CIND) among individuals aged 60 years and above, while Giudice et al.³⁴ reported a prevalence of 35.3% (21.0% with dementia and 14.3% with CIND) in older adults aged ≥45 years. In contrast, other authors have found a low prevalence (0.4-7.5%) in indigenous populations from Canada, Australia, and Guam^{37,38,39,40,41}. However, these studies involved older adults with greater education^6,8,36 or diagnosed according to clinical criteria^{37,38,39,40,41} without citing the use of neuropsychological tests, in contrast to this study.

Regarding associated factors, the odds of cognitive impairment were higher in older participants, proving up to three times higher in older adults over 65 years than in younger participants. Moreover, approximately 58% of the participants with cognitive impairment were <65 years old. Among them, 40.4% were aged 50-59 years, suggesting earlier cognitive impairment onset than the general population, which is approximately 70 years old for MCI in the United States and over 60 years old in Brazil⁴². A recent systematic review corroborates our findings reporting that age was the main non-modifiable risk factor for cognitive impairment in the indigenous population²¹. Furthermore, CIND and dementia were detected in indigenous individuals aged 45-65 years^{34,35,36,38,40}, supporting that early cognitive impairment occurs in the indigenous population.

Education was another factor found to influence the prevalence of cognitive impairment in the indigenous population of the village of Pantaleão. For participants aged 50 years and over, each year of schooling decreases cognitive impairment by 26%. Moreover, the rate of cognitive impairment tended to be higher among illiterate than educated individuals. Low education has been reported as one of the main risk factors for dementia, particularly in developing countries, including those in Latin America and Brazil^2,3. Older adults with 8 years of education or less are approximately twice as likely to develop dementia than higher educated individuals².

The current explanation for the low education impact on increasing the risk of dementia is grounded in the cognitive reserve theoretical model^43,44. According to this model, some people can better tolerate the brain structural and biochemical changes by recruiting compensatory or preexisting brain mechanisms intrinsically related to educational and occupational activities^43,44. Individuals with low levels of education tend to use the brain for processing differently than individuals with high levels of education^43,44. Inter-individual variability, efficiency, and flexibility in the primary brain networks invoked in a task performance are the theoretical model explaining differences of cognitive performance in individuals with low education and from diverse ethnic groups^43,44. Smaller cognitive reserve, low schooling, and temporary exposure to a health demand anticipate, in years, a clinical manifestation of dementia⁴⁵. In this sense, the high prevalence of cognitive impairment observed in mid-life and older adults indigenous may be related to low cognitive reserve due to illiteracy and low educational level. However, the educational level is not the only or even the best cognitive reserve indicator in any population^43,44, especially in those from diverse ethnic backgrounds. The influence of culture and environment on neural activity, cognitive network, and cognitive reserve’s neural basis is still a topic of ongoing research^43,44. Therefore, future studies investigating clinical and biological indicators of cognitive reserve are necessary to elucidate the factors associated with the high prevalence of cognitive impairment in indigenous populations.

BMI and family income also affected the odds of cognitive impairment in the indigenous participants. Cognitive impairment odds were reduced by 10% for every point on the BMI, while each family income unit reduced the odds of cognitive impairment by 48% in older adults aged ≥60 years. Corroborating this finding, Giudice et al.³⁴ observed that low BMI was associated with greater cognitive decline in Aboriginals over a follow-up period of 5 years. Some participants presented lower-than-expected BMI in this study, which may have influenced the cognitive impairment odds. Regarding income influence, the lower the socioeconomic level, the higher the dementia prevalence in non-indigenous older adults in a Brazilian study¹⁹. Many authors hold that, in indigenous communities, the poor living conditions, low family income, poor housing, and limited access to health services represent important factors contributing to the cognitive impairment risk⁴³. Although other indicators assessing socioeconomic level were not objectively assessed, the poor living conditions of the dwellers of Pantaleão were evident during the interviews, most of which were conducted at participants’ homes. The majority of houses were wooden, arranged in streets and plots, many backing onto streams. A water supply system existed, but well water was predominantly used and basic sanitation deficient. Many homes housed multiple families, where this overcrowding exacerbated disorganization and poor hygiene. Most dwellers were unemployed, living on government welfare (pension or benefits).

In contrast to previous studies, no association between chronic noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) and the cognitive impairment prevalence rates was observed^15,17,19. High rates of hypertension, DM, and dyslipidemia have been described in indigenous populations, with and without cognitive impairment^15,17,19. Therefore, low percentages of diabetes, hypertension, and obesity observed in the current sample may explain the lack of association^15,17,19.

Limitations and final considerations

First, the sample comprised indigenous from a single village in the State of Amazonas. Further evidence from other ethnicities and rural communities can complement the current findings. Additionally, longitudinal studies with systematic participants follow-up, based on regular cognitive and clinical assessments, including the evaluation of dementia diagnosis, dementia biomarkers, such as tau protein and beta-amyloid, can discriminate cases into CIND and dementia, as well as enable identification of reversible dementia cases and factors that increase the risk of developing dementia in the indigenous population.

The use of traditional neuropsychological tests may also be a limitation. The cognitive tests applied in this study were already used by participants from Mamirauá and Amanã Sustainable Development Reserves, located about 600 km west of Manaus (Amazonas) in the Brazilian Amazonian region³³. Moreover, they were featured by visual tasks and present low educational level influence. However, those tests were not validated for cognitive impairment diagnosis in the indigenous population. In interpreting our findings, a lack of adapted tests for the indigenous culture should be considered. Finally, functional assessment should be employed in future studies to better discriminate those with CIND from those with dementia.

Despite the limitations, the current evidence contributes to understanding the health disparities in low- and middle-income countries by providing evidence about cognitive impairment in Mura indigenous population in Brazil and the related factors.

An indigenous community from Amazonas, Brazil, presented high cognitive impairment prevalence, featured by early onset and associated with age, low educational level, BMI, and income. By showing the indigenous vulnerability to cognitive disorders, the current findings highlight the critical need to expand the investigation of dementia in underrepresented populations to adequately plan global strategies to face the dementia burden worldwide.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the National Foundation of Indians (FUNAI), to the village leaders, and to the entire community of indigenous elders for hosting and supporting data collection.

REFERENCES

• ¹ Prince M, Wimo A, Guerchet M, Ali GC, Wu YT, Prina M. World Alzheimer Report 2015. The global impact of dementia: an analysis of prevalence, incidence, cost and trends. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International; 2015. [cited on Jun 17, 2022]. Available from: Available from: https://www.alzint.org/u/WorldAlzheimerReport2015.pdf
  » https://www.alzint.org/u/WorldAlzheimerReport2015.pdf
• ² Nitrini R, Bottino CMC, Albala C, Capuñay NSC, Ketzoian C, Rodriguez JJL, et al. Prevalence of dementia in Latin America: a collaborative study of population-based cohorts. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009;21(4):622-30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610209009430
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610209009430
• ³ Prince M, Bryce R, Albanese E, Wimo A, Ribeiro W, Ferri CP. The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(1):63-75.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.007
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.007
• ⁴ Di Carlo A, Baldereschi M, Amaducci L, Maggi S, Grigoletto F, Scarlato G, et al. Cognitive impairment without dementia in older people: prevalence, vascular risk factors, impact on disability. The Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(7):775-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04752.x
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04752.x
• ⁵ Graham JE, Rockwood K, Beattie BL, Eastwood R, Gauthier S, Tuokko H, et al. Prevalence and severity of cognitive impairment with and without dementia in an elderly population. Lancet. 1997;349(9068):1793-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)01007-6
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)01007-6
• ⁶ Plassman BL, Langa KM, McCammon RJ, Fisher GG, Potter GG, Burke JR, et al. Incidence of dementia and cognitive impairment, not dementia in the United States. Annals of Neurology. 2011;70(3):418-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22362
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22362
• ⁷ Unverzagt FW, Gao S, Baiyewu O, Ogunniyi AO, Gureje O, Perkins A, et al. Prevalence of cognitive impairment: data from the Indianapolis Study of Health and Aging. Neurology. 2001;57(9):1655-62. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.57.9.1655
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.57.9.1655
• ⁸ César KG, Brucki SMD, Takada LT, Nascimento LFC, Gomes CMS, Almeida MCS, et al. Prevalence of cognitive impairment without dementia and dementia in Tremembé, Brazil. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2016;30(3):264-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000122
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000122
• ⁹ Ferreira-Filho SF, Borelli WV, Sguario RM, Biscaia GF, Müller VS, Vicentini G, et al. Prevalence of dementia and cognitive impairment with no dementia in a primary care setting in southern Brazil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2021;79(7):565-70. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2020-0410
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2020-0410
• ¹⁰ Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, Dubois B, Feldman HH, Fox NC, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):270-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008
• ¹¹ Plassman BL, Langa KM, Fisher GG, Heeringa SG, Weir DR, Ofstedal MB, et al. Prevalence of cognitive impairment without dementia in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(6):427-34. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-6-200803180-00005
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-6-200803180-00005
• ¹² Gilmore-Bykovskyi AL, Jin Y, Gleason C, Flowers-Benton S, Block LM, Dilworth-Anderson P, et al. Recruitment and retention of underrepresented populations in Alzheimer’s disease research: a systematic review. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2019;5:751-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2019.09.018
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2019.09.018
• ¹³ Olin JT, Dagerman KS, Fox LS, Bowers B, Schneider LS. Increasing ethnic minority participation in Alzheimer disease research. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2002;16 Suppl 2:S82-85. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002093-200200002-00009
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/00002093-200200002-00009
• ¹⁴ Mikkelsen C. The indigenous world 2015. Copenhagen: Iwgia; 2015. [cited on Jun 17, 2022]. Available from: Available from: https://www.iwgia.org/images/publications/0716_THE_INDIGENOUS_ORLD_2015_eb.pdf
  » https://www.iwgia.org/images/publications/0716_THE_INDIGENOUS_ORLD_2015_eb.pdf
• ¹⁵ Oliveira GF, Oliveira TRR, Ikejiri AT, Andraus MP, Galvao TF, Silva MT, et al. Prevalence of hypertension and associated factors in an indigenous community of Central Brazil: a population-based study. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e86278. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086278
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086278
• ¹⁶ Souza Filho ZA, Ferreira AA, Santos B, Pierin AMG. Hypertension prevalence among indigenous populations in Brazil: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015;49(6):1012-22. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0080-623420150000600019
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/s0080-623420150000600019
• ¹⁷ Vos T, Barker B, Begg S, Stanley L, Lopez AD. Burden of disease and injury in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples: the Indigenous health gap. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38(2):470-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyn240
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyn240
• ¹⁸ Paciaroni M, Bogousslavsky J. Connecting cardiovascular disease and dementia: further evidence. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2(6):e000656. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.113.000656
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.113.000656
• ¹⁹ Fagundes SD, Silva MT, Thees MFRS, Pereira MG. Prevalence of dementia among elderly Brazilians: a systematic review. Sao Paulo Med J. 2011;129(1):46-50. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-31802011000100009
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-31802011000100009
• ²⁰ Warren LA, Shi Q, Young K, Borenstein A, Martiniuk A. Prevalence and incidence of dementia among indigenous populations: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2015;27(12):1959-70. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610215000861
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610215000861
• ²¹ Souza-Talarico JN, Carvalho AP, Brucki SMD, Nitrini R, Ferretti-Rebustini REL. Dementia and cognitive impairment prevalence and associated factors in indigenous populations: a systematic review. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2016;30(3):281-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000140
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000140
• ²² Hall GH, Patrinos HA, orgs. Indigenous peoples, poverty, and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139105729
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139105729
• ²³ Sistema de Informações da Atenção à Saúde Indígena. Saúde indígena: respeito e cuidados [cited on Jun 17, 2022]. Available from: Available from: http://www.ccms.saude.gov.br/saudeindigena/quemsaoeles/respeitoecuidados.html
  » http://www.ccms.saude.gov.br/saudeindigena/quemsaoeles/respeitoecuidados.html
• ²⁴ Brucki SMD, Nitrini R, Caramelli P, Bertolucci PHF, Okamoto IH. Sugestões para o uso do mini-exame do estado mental no Brasil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2003;61(3B):777-81. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-282X2003000500014
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-282X2003000500014
• ²⁵ Nitrini R, Caramelli P, Herrera Júnior E, Porto CS, Charchat-Fichman H, Carthery MT, et al. Performance of illiterate and literate nondemented elderly subjects in two tests of long-term memory. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004;10(4):634-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617704104062
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617704104062
• ²⁶ Caramelli P, Carthery-Goulart MT, Porto CS, Charchat-Fichman H, Nitrini R. Category fluency as a screening test for Alzheimer disease in illiterate and literate patients. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2007;21(1):65-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0b013e31802f244f
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0b013e31802f244f
• ²⁷ Baiyewu O, Unverzagt FW, Lane KA, Gureje O, Ogunniyi A, Musick B, et al. The stick design test: a new measure of visuoconstructional ability. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005;11(5):598-605. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135561770505071X
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S135561770505071X
• ²⁸ Paula JJ, Costa MV, Bocardi MB, Cortezzi M, Moraes EN, Malloy-Diniz LF. The stick design test on the assessment of older adults with low formal education: evidences of construct, criterion-related and ecological validity. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013;25(12):2057-65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610213001282
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610213001282
• ²⁹ Vale FAC, Balieiro Jr AP, Silva-Filho JH. Memory complaint scale (MCS). Proposed tool for active systematic search. Dement Neuropsychol. 2012;6(4):212-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642012DN06040004
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642012DN06040004
• ³⁰ McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
• ³¹ Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1983-1982;17(1):37-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4
• ³² Hardman J. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV. Virgínia: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
• ³³ Brucki SMD, Nitrini R. Cognitive impairment in individuals with low educational level and homogeneous sociocultural background. Dement Neuropsychol. 2014;8(4):345-50. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642014DN84000007
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642014DN84000007
• ³⁴ Giudice DL, Smith K, Fenner S, Hyde Z, Atkinson D, Skeaf L, et al. Incidence and predictors of cognitive impairment and dementia in Aboriginal Australians: a follow-up study of 5 years. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;12(3):252-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2015.01.009
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2015.01.009
• ³⁵ Radford K, Mack HA, Draper B, Chalkley S, Daylight G, Cumming R, et al. Prevalence of dementia in urban and regional Aboriginal Australians. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11(3):271-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2014.03.007
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2014.03.007
• ³⁶ Smith K, Flicker L, Lautenschlager NT, Almeida OP, Atkinson D, Dwyer A, et al. High prevalence of dementia and cognitive impairment in Indigenous Australians. Neurology. 2008;71(19):1470-3. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000320508.11013.4f
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000320508.11013.4f
• ³⁷ British Columbia Provincial Health Officer. Pathways to health and healing - 2nd report on the health and well-being of Aboriginal People in British Columbia. Homeless Hub [Internet]. 2009 [accessed on Dez 10, 2020]. Available from: Available from: https://www.homelesshub.ca/resource/pathways-health-and-healing-%E2%80%93-2nd-report-health-and-well-being-aboriginal-people-british
  » https://www.homelesshub.ca/resource/pathways-health-and-healing-%E2%80%93-2nd-report-health-and-well-being-aboriginal-people-british
• ³⁸ Cotter PR, Condon JR, Barnes T, Anderson IPS, Smith LR, Cunningham T. Do Indigenous Australians age prematurely? The implications of life expectancy and health conditions of older Indigenous people for health and aged care policy. Aust Health Rev. 2012;36(1):68-74. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH11996
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1071/AH11996
• ³⁹ Galasko D, Salmon D, Gamst A, Olichney J, Thal LJ, Silbert L, et al. Prevalence of dementia in Chamorros on Guam: relationship to age, gender, education, and APOE. Neurology. 2007;68(21):1772-81. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000262028.16738.64
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000262028.16738.64
• ⁴⁰ Li SQ, Guthridge SL, Aratchige PE, Lowe MP, Wang Z, Zhao Y, et al. Dementia prevalence and incidence among the Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations of the Northern Territory. Med J Aust. 2014;200(8):465-9. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja13.11052
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5694/mja13.11052
• ⁴¹ Mehta KM, Yaffe K, Pérez-Stable EJ, Stewart A, Barnes D, Kurland BF, et al. Race/ethnic differences in AD survival in US Alzheimer’s Disease Centers. Neurology. 2008;70(14):1163-70. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000285287.99923.3c
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000285287.99923.3c
• ⁴² Brucki SMD. Epidemiology of mild cognitive impairment in Brazil. Dement Neuropsychol. 2013;7(4):363-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642013DN74000002
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642013DN74000002
• ⁴³ Farfel JM, Nitrini R, Suemoto CK, Grinberg LT, Ferretti REL, Leite REP, et al. Very low levels of education and cognitive reserve: a clinicopathologic study. Neurology. 2013;81(7):650-7. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a08f1b
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a08f1b
• ⁴⁴ Steffener J, Stern Y. Exploring the neural basis of cognitive reserve in aging. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1822(3):467-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.09.012
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.09.012
• ⁴⁵ Jervis LL, Beals J, Fickenscher A, Arciniegas DB. Performance on the mini-mental state examination and mattis dementia rating scale among older American Indians. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007;19(2):173-8. https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.2007.19.2.173
  » https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.2007.19.2.173

• 1
  This study was conducted by the Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo SP, Brazil.

• Funding: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  15 Aug 2022
• Date of issue
  Dec 2022

History

• Received
  12 Nov 2021
• Reviewed
  25 Mar 2022
• Accepted
  06 May 2022