|
Assessment of LV systolic function
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1. Qualitative assessment of global LV function is the preferred way of assessing critically ill patients by nonspecialist physicians |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
0% |
|
0% |
|
100% |
|
| 2. Quantitative assessment of LV function in critically ill patients may be performed by nonspecialist physicians in selected situations |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
9 |
|
|
|
18,75% |
|
0% |
|
81,25% |
|
| 3. The Simpson method is the method of choice for the quantitative assessment of LV function in critically ill patients by nonspecialist physicians. |
3 |
11 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
81,25% |
|
0% |
|
18,75% |
|
| 4. dP/dT should be used by nonspecialist physicians for semiquantitative evaluation of LV systolic function |
3 |
11 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
87,5% |
|
12,5% |
|
0% |
|
| 5. The Teichholz method is the method of choice for the quantitative assessment of LV function in critically ill patients by nonspecialist physicians |
No |
7 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
56,25% |
|
12,5% |
|
31,25% |
|
| 6. MAPSE should be used by nonspecialist physicians for semiquantitative evaluation of LV systolic function |
No |
1 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
|
|
|
12,5% |
|
18,75% |
|
68,75% |
|
| 7. The S’ wave should be used by nonspecialist physicians for semiquantitative evaluation of LV systolic function |
No |
3 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
|
|
|
37,5% |
|
18,75% |
|
43,75% |
|
|
Assessment of RV systolic function
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8. An assessment of RV function should be routinely performed in situations of severe hypoxemia and ARDS |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
13 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
6,25% |
|
93,75% |
|
| 9. An evaluation of RV function should be routinely performed in cases of PTE |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
0% |
|
100% |
|
| 10. The assessment of RV function by nonspecialists should be performed using the parameters of global systolic function (RV/LV dimensions, interventricular septal dynamics) |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
14 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
0% |
|
100% |
|
| 11. The assessment of RV function by nonspecialists should be performed by measuring FAC |
3 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
81,25% |
|
12,5% |
|
18,75% |
|
| 12. The assessment of RV function by nonspecialists should be performed by measuring the parameters of longitudinal function (TAPSE, S’ wave) |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
9 |
|
|
|
6,25% |
|
6,25% |
|
87,5% |
|
| 13. The assessment of RV function by nonspecialists can be performed by measuring right chamber pressures in selected situations |
No |
3 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
43,75% |
|
12,5% |
|
43,75% |
|
|
Diagnostic evaluation of shocks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14. Bedside echocardiography should be routinely used in the initial evaluation of shocks. |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
0% |
|
100% |
|
| 15. Bedside echocardiography should be routinely used in the follow-up of shocks and in the reassessment after institution of therapies. |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
0% |
|
100% |
|
| 16. Bedside echocardiography contributes to the recognition of severe hypovolemia as a cause of shock |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
0% |
|
100% |
|
| 17. Bedside echocardiography contributes to the recognition of cor pulmonale as the cause of shock |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
0% |
|
100% |
|
| 18. Bedside echocardiography contributes to the recognition of cardiac tamponade as a cause of shock |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
0% |
|
100% |
|
| 19. Bedside echocardiography contributes to the recognition of severe LV dysfunction as a cause of shock |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
0% |
|
100% |
|
|
Hemodynamic evaluation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20. The estimation of central venous pressure through echocardiography by a nonspecialist physician is recommended as part of the hemodynamic evaluation of critically ill patients |
3 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
10 |
|
|
|
6,25% |
|
12,5% |
|
81,25% |
|
| 21. The estimation of left atrial pressure by means of echocardiography by a nonspecialist physician is recommended as part of the hemodynamic evaluation of critically ill patients. |
No |
3 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
|
|
|
37,5% |
|
6,25% |
|
56,25% |
|
| 22. Estimation of extravascular pulmonary water by means of chest ultrasound by a nonspecialist physician should be part of the hemodynamic evaluation of critically ill patients. |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
12 |
|
|
|
12,5% |
|
0% |
|
87,5% |
|
| 23. B-lines on lung ultrasound can be used as a safety measure for fluid delivery |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
9 |
|
|
|
6,25% |
|
12,5% |
|
81,25% |
|
| 24. Inferior vena cava variability should be used as a tool to assess fluid responsiveness |
No |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
8 |
|
|
|
18,75% |
|
12,5% |
|
68,75% |
|
| 25. Functional hemodynamic tests (minibolus and final respiratory occlusion test) should be used as a tool for assessing fluid responsiveness |
No |
4 |
2 |
0 |
8 |
2 |
|
|
|
37,5% |
|
0% |
|
62,5% |
|
| 26. The passive leg elevation maneuver should be used as a tool to assess fluid responsiveness |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
6 |
9 |
|
|
|
6,25% |
|
0% |
|
93,75% |
|
| 27. The estimation of CO through the measurement of the velocity-time integral should be used as a tool for hemodynamic evaluation |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
11 |
|
|
|
0% |
|
0% |
|
100% |
|