ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Spirituality is intrinsically involved in nursing care. Despite being a topic that, in recent years, has attracted the interest of researchers, there is still little evidence to prove the effect of spirituality in reducing pain and associated anxiety. In this sense, the aim of this study was to identify the state of science related to the use of spirituality as a nursing intervention to control patients’ pain and anxiety in different health problems.
CONTENTS: An integrative literature review in the following databases: Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science and Biblioteca Virtual da Saúde (BVS – Virtual Health Library). Data collection was carried out in May and updated in September 2021. Scientific articles with full text available published in the last 10 years that addressed spirituality in nursing care to patients with pain and anxiety were included. Ten articles were included in the analysis, including six randomized clinical trials, two quasi-experimental studies and two systematic reviews. The following interventions based on spirituality that guided nursing in pain reduction were identified: prayer meditation, prayer, positive thinking training, active listening, among others. All articles showed a positive effect in reducing pain and anxiety, as well as improving vital parameters.
CONCLUSION: Nursing interventions based on spiritual care techniques seem to be effective in reducing pain and anxiety. Nevertheless, further studies should be carried out in order to validate that spirituality as nursing care is effective in reducing pain and associated anxiety.
Keywords:
Nursing Care; Pain; Spirituality
RESUMO
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A espiritualidade está intrinsecamente envolvida no cuidado de Enfermagem. Apesar de ser uma temática que, nos últimos anos, vem despertando interesse de pesquisadores, ainda são poucas as evidências que comprovam o efeito da espiritualidade na redução da dor e ansiedade associada. Nesse sentido, o objetivo deste estudo foi identificar o estado da ciência relacionada ao uso da espiritualidade como intervenção de enfermagem no controle da dor e da ansiedade do paciente em diferentes problemas de saúde.
CONTEÚDO: Trata-se de uma revisão integrativa da literatura, nas bases de dados Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science e na Biblioteca Virtual da Saúde. A coleta de dados foi realizada em maio e atualizada em setembro de 2021. Foram incluídos artigos científicos com texto completo disponível, publicados nos últimos 10 anos e que abordassem a espiritualidade no cuidado de enfermagem ao paciente com dor e ansiedade. Foram incluídos 10 artigos na análise, sendo seis ensaios clínicos randomizados, dois estudos quase experimentais e duas revisões sistemáticas. Identificou-se intervenções baseadas na espiritualidade que nortearam a enfermagem na redução da dor: meditação de orações, prece, treinamento de pensamento positivo, escuta ativa, entre outros. Todos os artigos demonstraram efeito positivo na redução da dor e da ansiedade, bem como melhora nos parâmetros vitais.
CONCLUSÃO: As intervenções de enfermagem baseadas em técnicas de cuidados espirituais parecem ser eficazes na redução da dor e da ansiedade. Sugere-se, contudo, que novos estudos sejam realizados para validar a espiritualidade como cuidado de enfermagem eficaz na redução da dor e ansiedade associada.
Descritores:
Cuidados de Enfermagem; Dor; Espiritualidade
INTRODUCTION
Spirituality, Nursing and Pain are an inseparable triad because they are felt, lived and experienced in a unique, individual, integral and total manner. Spirituality is the relationship of the creature with the divine, the transcendent, the Creator; nursing exists in the interpersonal relationship of professionals and people, healthy or sick, for the maintenance and rebalancing of their energies, their health; pain is the universal symptom that unites the triad in the vital cycle of human beings; and anxiety results from feelings of fear, insecurity, uneasiness, excessive worries, which can also lead to pain1, be it physical, emotional, or of the soul.
People, in their need to survive, whether following a specific religion or not, are responsible for their decisions, attitudes and choices guided by their value systems and philosophy of life that connects them to their surroundings and to the universal whole.
Throughout life, individuals express their relationship with the world, community, group, family, and themselves, impacting the ability of self-knowledge, the ability to relate to others, to “be-in-the-world”, to their constant “coming-to-be”, to existence itself. And, in this sense, they seek a connection with something superior and transcendental, governing their “coming-to-be” and “being-in-the-world”, bringing up the need to understand the feelings of love, compassion, pain, fear, anxiety, health, disease, restoration of well-being, desire of happiness, braveness, hope, solidarity, creativity, personal satisfaction, morality, ethics, care, humanization, life, finitude, spirituality, among others.
This needs to understand feelings and emotions, as well as the cycle of life, creates a connection between body, mind, culture, spirituality, and the subjective or even objective search for medical and non-medical resources to alleviate pain, anxiety, suffering, fear, and also, in face of the various afflictive existential, economic, loss or disease situations, among others, that life imposes. Nursing care is intrinsically involved and acts in all stages of these experiences, that is, in the maintenance of the homeodynamic balance or in the rebalancing of basic psychobiological, psychosocial, and psychospiritual human needs and their various meanings1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, which impact the process of caring in an empathe-tic way, whether cognitive, emotional, or compassionate, using spirituality as a supportive and helpful procedure.
The importance of using spirituality in human care goes back to ancient times, when primitive civilizations attributed the power over health and disease to a superior Being, which accompanied the evolution of knowledge of man and care, the latter, today, related to a more humanist assistance, allied with science and technique. Thus, spirituality is an old component of the Art and Science of Nursing.
In the 1960s and 1970s, Nursing followed the path of theories that sought to explain the harmonic confluence between the art and science of caring for human beings, which are unique, homeodynamic, family members, have beliefs and values, communities, culture, and environment, showing the tendencies and the importance of nurses to recognize the set of psychobiological, psychosocial, and psychospiritual aspects of this being who is the object of their knowledge and work1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. The psychospiritual aspects of human beings that impacted care1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 as much as those of a physical nature were scarce in the nursing literature at that time, and focused more on the religious practices of the major religions in Western culture to the detriment of spirituality, a human need that today has garnered the interest of several scholars not only in the field of nursing but also of health as a whole2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.
At this point is valid to make some considerations about the basic human need - spirituality, or religious or psychospiritual philosophy, which according to some authors1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 are understood as impulses, tendencies, or fundamental needs coming from the unconscious, such as the need for survival, preservation of the species, and the need to believe in something superior to the limited human condition, specific and inherent to man, which influences the other needs, namely, the psychobiological and psychosocial ones.
The need to search for the meaning of life, of one’s role and function in this world, of one’s essence, of having a philosophy of life, of establishing a relationship with oneself and with the social and spiritual realms, in short, why and for what one lives, all this can be defined as Spirituality, often confused with religion, which is only “an expression of spirituality, practiced through sacred traditions, transmitted by cultural heritage, accompanied by dogmas and doctrines”1. As some authors9, 10, 11, 12, 13 express well, spirituality is the subjective and symbolic construction of the understanding that human beings use to unveil their vulnerability, fragility, and confrontation succeeded by countless situations imposed by daily living, such as the health/illness cycle, its treatment, and care.
Many researchers, although there is no taxonomy of religion and spirituality, defined spirituality as the individual meaning and purpose in life, connecting the “I” to the universal whole, the sacred, regardless of whether or not one believes in God13, 14, 15, 16, 17, “experienced inside or outside of institutional environments and traditions”17. These authors also mention that in 2009 the Consensus Committee of the United States of America (USA) defined spirituality as: “The aspect of humanity that refers to the way individuals seek and express meaning and purpose and the way they experience their connection to the moment, to themselves, to others, to nature, and to the meaningful or sacred”17 and also, the definition of the International Consensus Conference of 2012: “Spirituality is a dynamic and intrinsic aspect of humanity through which people seek ultimate meaning, purpose, and transcendence, and experience a relationship with themselves, family, others, community, society, nature, and what is meaningful or sacred. Spirituality is expressed through beliefs, values, traditions, and practices”18.
On the other hand, other authors13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 define religion as doctrinal practices and rites for approaching transcendence, often professed in a socially organized formal religious institution, and authors15 reflect on spirituality, religiosity, and religion as different but dynamic and interconnected realities. Another author20 argues: “Spirituality is an innate attribute of human beings, which promotes well-being, health and stability”, furthermore, that it’s inherent to the “essence of life”, giving it meaning by producing “behaviors and feelings of hope, love and faith” while “religiosity is a way for individuals to express their spirituality through the adoption of values, beliefs and ritual practices that provide answers to essential questions about life and death”. Health professionals have endeavored to investigate the concepts and meanings of spirituality and religion to understand, distinguish, and apprehend them to better assist therapeutically human beings under their care.
Authors11 in 2007 studying the historical retrospective of the study of spirituality in Brazilian nursing pointed out that “... the first scientific publication dates from 1947 and remains until today represented by the Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem”. They searched for articles addressing Spirituality from 1941 to 1999 published in “...the entire REBEn collection present in the Library of the Nursing School of University of São Paulo...”, and 57 articles were selected, from which nine categories emerged: “... Spirituality as part of the character and morals of the indivi-346 dual who chooses to work in nursing; spirituality as a work philosophy of nurses; spirituality as part of the curriculum and training of nurses; spirituality in patient care, as a basic human need; the meaning of spirituality for those being cared for (patients/clients); the meaning of spirituality for those who work with patient care; spirituality and humanization; spirituality and death; and spirituality in the light of Ethics and Bioethics”.
After analyzing each category, authors11 considered that the articles allowed to identify the evolution of nursing thought regarding the complexity of the subject. Initially more associated with religion, as nurses’ scientific knowledge advanced, their reflections lead them to understand care connected with ethical-philosophical phenomena. Therefore, this understanding reveals the impact of spirituality on human beings nursing care, who in their life cycle are affected by the unbalance of basic needs, such as psychobiological, psychosocial, and psychospiritual needs, in short, their health12, 20.
The objective of this study was to identify the state of the science21, 22 related to the use of spirituality as a nursing intervention to control pain and anxiety in patients with varied health problems.
CONTENTS
The choice for an integrative review aimed at learning the current panorama of the scientific production of nurses on the use of spirituality as a nursing care/intervention tool in the control of pain and anxiety caused by different disease scenarios, understanding that it favors the identification and systematic and comprehensive search of primary results on the topic, critical evaluation, synthesis, analysis, and incorporation of evidence from national and international scientific studies, highlighting the need for new investigations23, 24, 25, whose retrospective time frame respected the copyrights of the literature used, according to Law 9610/1998 of the Ministério da Educação e da Cultura (MEC - Ministry of Education and Culture)26.
The model used was composed of six steps: subject of interest; establishment of the guiding question; criteria for inclusion and exclusion of articles; combination of two or more DeCS/ MeSH of the descriptors with the Boolean expressions E/AN-D/Y used in the articles search strategy in the researched databases; information extracted from the selected articles; analysis and presentation of the studies23, 24, 25.
The research question was structured according to the format of the PICO acronym (patient, intervention, comparison, outcomes)27, which guides its formulation, favoring the collection of evidence from the databases, being a key element to perform judicious searches, resulting in the question: “what is the national and international scientific production of nurses on the use of spirituality as a nursing intervention in pain and anxiety control”?
The following databases were consulted: Publisher Medline (Pubmed), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, The Cochrane Library), Web of Science and Biblioteca Virtual de Saúde (BVS - Virtual Health Library), using controlled descriptors from the DeCS and MeSH, in Portuguese, English and Spanish languages: “espiritualidade/ spirituality/espiritualidad”; “Enfermagem/Nursing/Enfermería”; “dor/pain/dolor”; “cuidado de enfermagem/nursing care/ atención de enfermería”; “intervenção de enfermagem/nursing intervention/atención de enfermería”; “ansiedade/anxiety/ansiedad”. Two or more mentioned DeCS/MeSH were combined with the Boolean operator E/AND/Y (Table 1).
Data collection was performed in May 2021 and updated in September of the same year. The inclusion criteria were scientific articles from the last 10 years fully available electronically in the aforementioned languages, from national and international journals, that addressed spirituality in nursing care to patients with pain and anxiety, published by nurses and using spirituality as a nursing intervention to control pain and anxiety. In addition, articles whose classification of scientific evidence level ranged from 1 to 3 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA)28, 29; thus, the presence of authors from the nursing field in articles on this subject was an inclusion criterion.
Documents, editorials, letters, theses, dissertations, monographs, manuals, congress abstracts, qualitative studies, articles duplicated in more than one database (counting only one), or that did not meet the research question, the objective, and the descriptors were excluded. It’s worth noting that the present research was done by three authors, but the selection and search for the studies was carried out independently by two of the authors and reviewed by the third, in order to prevent bias and reflecting the concern with scientific rigor and quality, as well as the credibility of the results obtained in the literature.
After identifying the studies according to the search strategy described above, duplicates were excluded, and articles that did not fit the scope of the review were excluded based on the information contained in the title. Next, the abstracts were read, eliminating articles that were off topic, and finally, the studies selected for the sample were read in-full (Figure 1).
After reading the abstracts and the full texts, the information was gathered and organized in a specially composed form to identify title, author, year of publication, journal and database, type of study/level of evidence, objectives/summary, and main conclusions of the selected articles, including or excluding them for the final analysis.
As previously mentioned, the PRISMA28, 29 guidelines were used for classification of evidence (Figure 1), determining eligibility, inclusion of articles, favoring the quality, scientific validity and reliability of articles by the following levels of evidence (LE)23, 24, 25: level 1, evidence from systematic review or meta-analysis of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCT) or from clinical guidelines based on systematic reviews of RCT; level 2, evidence from at least one well-designed RCT; level 3, evidence from well-designed and non-randomized clinical trials; level 4, evidence from well-designed cohort and case-control studies; level 5, evidence from systematic reviews of descriptive and qualitative studies; level 6, evidence from a single descriptive or qualitative study; level 7, evidence from authoritative opinion and/or expert committee reports. The PRISMA guidelines also aided the construction of the Figure 1 flowchart.
The number of articles identified was 1340; however, as specified in the inclusion criteria, after reading the titles and abstracts, articles that did not address the study topic, duplicates, and those whose full texts were not available (n =1332) were excluded (Figure 1). Thus, only 10 articles were selected for this review. From the evaluation of the studies it was possible to extract three categories of analysis as answers to the research question: “articles about spiritual care as a nursing intervention in patients with pain (n=3)”, “articles published in the nursing area (with a nurse in the authorship group) about spirituality as an intervention in patients with pain” (n=1) and “articles published in the nursing field about spirituality as a therapeutic intervention in patients with pain, anxiety and other physiological alterations” (n=6).
Of these, 60% were indexed in Pubmed, 30% in Scielo/LILACS via BVS, and 10% in Web of Science. Most were conducted in the Asian continent (70%), more specifically in Iran and Indonesia, with only three studies conducted in Brazil, predominantly in the southeastern region. The selected articles were published in the years 2019 (n=2), 2018 (n=3), 2016 (n=1), 2015 (n=1), and 2014 (n=3) (Table 2). They consisted of six RCT (LE 2), two quasi-experimental studies (LE 3), and two systematic reviews (LE 1). Hierarchical LE (1 to 3) are considered high according to the quality of strong and sufficient LE23, 24, 25, 28, 29, demonstrating that spirituality used by nurses as a nursing intervention in the researched studies seems to be effective in controlling pain and anxiety.
The studies presented a varied population with different disease scenarios, such as: pregnant women from the 32nd week of gestation until labor30, patients with a burn level higher than 20% in its acute phase (24 to 72 hours after the burn)31, postoperative puerperal women in caesarean37, patients with chronic renal failure (CRF)33, with stroke34, with coronary artery disease36, patients undergoing intravenous chemotherapy treatment38 and patients with leukemia39 (Table 2).
Two spirituality-based intervention programs that guided nursing for the reduction of pain were identified: the program of spiritual care in changing dressings in patients with burns31 and the Nursing Intervention Integrating an Islamic Praying (NIIP)30. The following were also identified: intervention through prayer33, 38, prayer meditation37, nursing spiritual care based on Swanson’s theory of care (knowing, being with, doing for, enabling, and maintaining belief) and O’Brien’s dimensions of care on the practice of spiritual care (being with, listening, touching)34, positive thinking and prayer training36, and spiritual care based on the presence of support and help in prayer rituals39 (Table 2).
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS)30, 31, 32, 37 and the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)31 were used for pain assessment. The Pain Behavior Observation Scale (PBOS)30 was used to evaluate pain behavior. The Duke Religious Index “DUREL”33, 38 scale measured religious involvement. To measure anxiety levels, the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale34 and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) were used38. Finally, spiritual well-being was evaluated by the Ellison and Paloutzian scale (SWBS)36.
The present study found that five (50%)30, 31, 32, 35, 37 articles focused on the efficacy of spirituality as a nursing intervention in pain control of various etiologies; four (40%)34, 36, 38, 39 in reducing anxiety in various diseases, one (10%) in vital parameters in patients with CRF33 (Table 2), with a predominance of 60% of articles with LE 2, 20% with LE 1 and 20% with LE 3, confirming the scientific rigor of the studies, with spirituality being recommended as a nursing intervention for pain and anxiety control in patients with various health problems. These results are in agreement with several authors16, 17, 18, 21, 40, 42 when discussing the importance and efficacy of spirituality in several scenarios of pain and anxiety experienced by patients and evidenced in well--planned, conducted, and reported RCT.
As the authors40 well expose, “spirituality is considered the very essence of being and for some it’s what motivates and guides them to live a meaningful existence”. It’s essential that nurses understand the bio-psycho-spiritual needs of patients under their care, that they are prepared to implement interventions to guarantee that these needs are met, and also understand the efficacy and beneficial results of spirituality in the control of pain and anxiety, promoting spiritual, physical, psychological, and social well-being.
It’s worth mentioning, as some authors5, 13, 17, 41, 42 emphasize, that spirituality applied as nursing care does not depend on the professional’s faith; however, the spiritual needs of patients must be assessed, so that patients and nurses can implement together a therapeutic intervention plan of support and facing of difficulties and stress factors, aiming at comfort and well-being, as well as pain and anxiety control. Furthermore, it’s important that nurses use the methodological process, systematized and inherent to the science of caring, as an adequate instrument for the operationalization of this care as part of the Sistematização da Assistência de Enfermagem (SAE - Systematization of Nursing Care), providing theoretical/practical support to the prescription of nursing interventions to meet the patient’s needs and evaluating the results of these actions43.
The SAE is the guideline for the Nursing Appointment, which involves the nursing history, physical examination, nursing diagnosis, nursing care prescription, nursing care evolution, and the daily report that nurses must perform of patients under their responsibility44. In the Nursing Diagnoses45 (nursing scientific language classification), pain, anxiety, and spirituality (“willingness to increase spiritual well-being and improve spiritual distress and hindered religiosity”) are included in the taxonomic classification, with their defining characteristics, related factors, and risk factors that support the implementation of the care process45. Therefore, through practice based on validated protocols planned by the SAE, both basic and advanced, nurses perform nursing interventions interacting with the multi-professional and disciplinary team, fully assisting the patients with competence and quality, contributing to their recovery43.
All the articles in this review presented a significantly better effect not only in pain intensity and anxiety, but also in other parameters evaluated in comparison with the baseline condition of each individual, besides highlighting that spirituality applied as a nursing intervention is effective and safe30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39.
It’s worth mentioning that, in the phase of identification and systematic search of articles, a respectable number of articles produced by nurses on spirituality were found, but many presented qualitative and descriptive methodologies, were narrative reviews, conceptual considerations, or other approaches that deviated from the established inclusion criteria. On the other hand, the medical and psychological production without the contribution of a nurse as an author was also greatly numerous and had various types of methodologies.
This review expressed the need to stimulate more research produced by nurses, since these professionals stay longer in direct contact with patients suffering from acute, chronic, and total pain. Nurses need to appropriate the power they have based on their competences and profile to implement interventions that complement their integral care to human beings, including spirituality. For this reason, systematic, randomized, and controlled studies that result in high, strong, and sufficient evidence are needed23, 24, 25, 28, 29. These studies should encompass spirituality as a nursing intervention in daily care and in the treatment of pain and anxiety, as these often compromise the quality of life of people by incapacitating them, partially or totally, temporarily or permanently.
There are some limitations to be considered on the present research: studies on the topic indexed in other databases that were not consulted; studies that were not identified due to not being available electronically; combinations of descriptors may have been insufficient to encompass all publications related to the subject. However, it’s important to highlight that the authors searched the databases with a broad scope of health research and different combinations of descriptors in order to reduce selection bias.
It’s undeniable that the evidence base of spirituality in nursing care needs more research, especially regarding patients’ bio-psycho-spiritual needs, as found herein, in order to more accurately and safely implement evaluations, validate results, and in the case of this review, spirituality is associated with pain and anxiety control.
CONCLUSION
Most of the evidence emerged from the reviewed studies focused on levels 1 to 3 regarding the effectiveness of the applicability of spirituality as a nursing intervention. Thus, it’s possible to conclude that nursing interventions based on spiritual care techniques are effective in reducing levels of pain and anxiety, and spirituality can be used as an important strategy in nursing care. Its applicability should be increasingly present in the daily care of nurses and health teams. New studies with rigorous scientific methodologies need to be carried out to underpin and validate spirituality as a nursing care that contributes to the therapeutic control and reduction of pain and anxiety, as well as to plan the systematization of nursing care.
REFERENCES
- 1 Araújo CP. A problemática da assistência religiosa em enfermagem. Rev Esc Enf USP. 1975;9(1):27-34.
- 2 Piepgras R. The other dimension: spiritual help. Am J Nurs. 1968;68(12):2610-3.
- 3 Brookes J. Care of the whole person. N Z Nurs J. 1969;62(3):7-8.
- 4 Berns A. Ministering to religious needs is important part of care. Mod Nurs Home. 1971;26(4):4.
- 5 Araújo CP. Estudo sobre a necessidade religiosa de pacientes em face pré-cirúrgica. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 1977;11(1):77-9.
- 6 Araújo CP, Horta WA. O significado psicológico de palavras relacionadas a valores espirituais entre estudantes de enfermagem. Rev Bras Enferm. 1978;31(1):93-100.
- 7 Escribano MD. La intimidad del cuidado y el cuidado de la intimidad: una reflexión desde la ética. Rev ROL Enfermería. 1999;22(4):303-8.
- 8 Hassed CS. Depression: dispirited or spiritually deprived? Med J Aust. 2000;173(10):545-7.
- 9 Como JM. Spiritual practice: a literature review related to spiritual health and health outcomes. Holist Nurs Pract. 2007;21(5):224-36.
- 10 Selli L, Alves JS. O cuidado espiritual ao paciente terminal no exercício da enfermagem e a participação da bioética. Bioethikos. 2007;1(1):43-52.
- 11 Pereira LL. Espiritualidade na enfermagem brasileira: retrospectiva histórica. O Mundo da Saúde. 2007;31(2):225-37.
- 12 Pedrão RB, Beresin R. O enfermeiro frente à questão da espiritualidade. Einstein. 2010;8(11):86-91.
- 13 Gonçalves JP, Lucchetti G, Menezes PR, Vallada H. Religious and spiritual interventions in mental health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Psychol Med. 2015;45(14):2937-49.
- 14 Sullivan WP. “It helps me to be a whole person”: The role of spirituality among the mentally challenged. Psychosoc Rehabil J. 1993;16(3):125-34.
- 15 Gomes NS, Farina M, Forno CD. Espiritualidade, religiosidade e religião: reflexão de conceitos em artigos psicológicos. Rev Psicol IMED. 2014;6(2):107-12.
- 16 Steinhauser KE, Fitchett G, Handzo G F, Johnson KS, Koenig HG, Pargament KI, et al. state of the science of spirituality and palliative care research part i: definitions, measurement, and outcomes. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017;54(3):428-40.
- 17 Puchalski C, Ferrell B, Virani R, Otis-Green S, Baird P, Bull J, et al. Improving the quality of spiritual care as a dimension of palliative care: the report of the Consensus Conference. J Palliat Med. 2009;12(10):885-904.
- 18 Puchalski CM, Vitillo R, Hull SK, Reller N. Improving the spiritual dimension of whole person care: reaching national and international consensus. J Palliat Med. 2014;17(6):642-56.
- 19 Nascimento LC, Santos TF, Oliveira FC, Pan R, Flória-Santos M, Rocha SM. Espiritualidade e religiosidade na perspectiva de enfermeiros. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2013;22(1):52-60.
- 20 Reginato V, Benedetto MAC, Gallian DMC. Espiritualidade e saúde: uma experiência na graduação em medicina e enfermagem. Trab Educ Saúde. 2016,14(1):237-55.
- 21 Steinhauser KE, Fitchett G, Handzo GF, Johnson KS, Koenig HG, Pargament KI, et al. State of the Science of Spirituality and Palliative Care Research Part I: Definitions, Measurement, and Outcomes. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017;54(3):428-40.
- 22 Balboni TA, Fitchett G, Handzo GF, Johnson KS, Koenig HG, Pargament KI, et al. State of the Science of Spirituality and Palliative Care Research Part II: Screening, Assessment, and Interventions. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017;54(3):441-53.
- 23 Mendes KD, Silveira RC, Galvão CM. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2008;17(4):758-64.
- 24 Galvão CM. Níveis de evidência. Acta Paul Enferm. 2006;19(2):V.
- 25 Soares CB, Hoga LAK, Peduzzi M, Sangaleti C, Yonekura T, Silva DRAD. Revisão integrativa: conceitos e métodos utilizados na enfermagem. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2014;48(2):335-45.
- 26 Brasil. Ministério da Educação e Cultura. Lei nº 9.610, de 19 de fevereiro de 1998. Altera, atualiza e consolida a legislação sobre direitos autorais e dá outras providências. MEC.19/02/1998.
- 27 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Diretrizes metodológicas: elaboração de revisão sistemática e metanálise de ensaios clínicos randomizados/Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos, Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia. Brasília: Editora do Ministério da Saúde, 2012. 92 p.: il. – (Série A: Normas e Manuais Técnicos).
- 28 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336-41.
- 29 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
- 30 Desmawati, Waraporn K, Warangkana C. Effect of nursing intervention integrating an Islamic praying program on labor pain and pain behaviors in primiparous Muslim women. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2019;24(3):220-6.
- 31 Keivan N, Daryabeigi R, Alimohammadi N. Effects of religious and spiritual care on burn patients’ pain intensity and satisfaction with pain control during dressing changes. Burns. 2019;45(7):1605-13.
- 32 Vasigh A, Tarjoman A, Borji M. The effect of spiritual-religious interventions on patients’ pain status: systematic review. Anaesth Pain Intens Care. 2019;22(4):499-505.
- 33 Brasileiro TOZ, Prado AAO, Assis BB, Nogueira DA, Lima RS, Chaves ECL. Effects of prayer on the vital signs of patients with chronic kidney disease: randomized controlled trial. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2017;51:e03236.
- 34 Trihandini B, Fatmasari D, Hartati YK LE, Sudirman S. Effect of spiritual nursing care on the level of anxiety in patients with stroke. Belitung Nurs J. 2018.4(1):98-103.
- 35 Simão TP, Caldeira S, Carvalho EC. The effect of prayer on patients’ health: systematic literature review. Religions. 2016;7(1):11.
- 36 Ghodsbin F, Safaei M, Jahanbin I, Ostovan MA, Keshvarzi S. The effect of positive thinking training on the level of spiritual well-being among the patients with coronary artery diseases referred to Imam Reza specialty and subspecialty clinic in Shiraz, Iran: a randomized controlled clinical trial. ARYA Atheroscler. 2015;11(6):341-8.
- 37 Beiranvand S, Noparast M, Eslamizade N, Saeedikia S. The effects of religion and spirituality on postoperative pain, hemodynamic functioning and anxiety after cesarean section. Acta Med Iran. 2014;52(12):909-15.
- 38 Carvalho CC, Chaves ECL, Iunes DH, Simão TP, Grasselli CSM, Braga CG. A efetividade da prece na redução da ansiedade em pacientes com câncer. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2014;48(4):683689.
- 39 Moeini M, Taleghani F, Mehrabi T, Musarezaie A. Effect of a spiritual care program on levels of anxiety in patients with leukemia. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2014;19(1):88-93.
- 40 McDonnell-Naughton M, Gaffney L, Fagan A. Spirituality and caring for the older person: a discussion paper. J Relig Health. 2020;59(6):2775-93.
- 41 Arrieira OCI, Thofehrn MB, Milbrath VM, Schwonk CRGB, Cardoso DH, Fripp JC. O sentido da espiritualidade na transitoriedade da vida. Rev Esc Anna Nery. 2017;21(1):1-6.
- 42 Lin MF, Hsieh YJ, Hsu YY, Fetzer S, Hsu MC. A randomized controlled trial of the effect of music therapy and verbal relaxation on chemotherapy-induced anxiety. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(7-8):988-99.
- 43 Posso MBS. Semiologia e Semiotécnica de Enfermagem- Bases para o cuidar. In: Posso MBS, Sant’Anna ALGG. Semiologia e semiotécnica de enfermagem. 2ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Atheneu; 2021.
-
44 COFEN. Resolução Cofen n.358/2009. Dispõe sobre a Sistematização da Assistência e a implementação do Processo de Enfermagem em ambientes, públicos ou privados, em que o ocorre o cuidado profissional de enfermagem e dá outras providências. [Internet]. Brasília: Cofen: 2009[citado2021out3]. Disponível em: http://www.cofen.gov.br/resolu-cofen-3582009_4384.html
» http://www.cofen.gov.br/resolu-cofen-3582009_4384.html - 45 North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. Nursing Diagnoses: definitions and classification: 2021-2023. 12ª ed. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2021.


