Keywords
Medical Oncology; Cardiotoxicity; Risk Factors; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Palavras-chave
Oncologia; Cardiotoxicidade; Fatores de Risco; Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada
Keywords
Medical Oncology; Cardiotoxicity; Risk Factors; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Palavras-chave
Oncologia; Cardiotoxicidade; Fatores de Risco; Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada
Introduction
The advancement of cancer therapies in recent decades has radically transformed the prognosis of various types of cancer, significantly improving patient survival. However, this progress has brought a significant increase in cardiovascular (CV) complications.1
In this scenario, cardio-oncology has established itself as an essential field, requiring diagnostic strategies with ever-increasing accuracy in the early identification of cardiological impairments, even in the subclinical phase, in addition to the implementation of appropriate monitoring and control plans.1
Antineoplastic agents and transthoracic radiotherapy (especially at high doses) are responsible for several toxic CV effects, including left ventricular dysfunction (LVD), cardiomyopathies, myocarditis, hypertension, thromboembolic disease, pericarditis, valvular dysfunction, arrhythmias, myocardial ischemia, vascular changes, and even right ventricular involvement, which may be reversible or permanent.2
Traditionally, cardiotoxicity (CTX) investigation is based on the search for left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) by echocardiography (Echo).1 However, this finding is observed relatively late in the continuum of myocardial injury, being diagnosed when the damage is already irreversible.2,3
And, despite the increasing use of biomarkers and global longitudinal strain in Echo, there is still a significant gap in the identification of early biological changes that precede mechanical dysfunction.2
With a greater understanding of potential CTXs associated with new and established cancer therapies, there have been remarkable advances in the availability and technical resources of imaging exams, allowing cancer patients to undergo treatment safely, without experiencing events or remaining with cardiologic sequelae. However, the uniformity of use and application in this context is still far from ideal.
Available nuclear medicine (NM) techniques have long been important for evaluating and monitoring patients undergoing cancer treatment.4 From radioisotopic ventriculography, with high reproducibility, to myocardial scintigraphy, which investigates ischemia and also left ventricular function, and cardiac scintigraphy with MIBG-123I, all are very useful in the identification and monitoring of CTX.2,4,5
Positron emission tomography with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) integrated with computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) is widely used for initial diagnosis and follow-up of cancer patients.1,5
FDG uptake reflects the use of glucose by the myocardium, which exhibits remarkable metabolic flexibility, alternating between fatty acid oxidation and the use of glucose as the main energy substrate, according to factors such as the diet preceding the study and some pathophysiological conditions.1
Under basal conditions, during prolonged fasting, a healthy heart predominantly uses fatty acids, resulting in low myocardial FDG uptake. However, the presence of cellular stress, inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, hypoxia, or apoptosis induces a metabolic shift toward glycolysis, with increased FDG uptake, which occurs early in the CTX cascade, before structural or functional changes detectable by conventional methods.6,7
Antineoplastic agents can trigger myocardial lesions through distinct mechanisms, but are convergent in the initial metabolic and inflammatory changes.2
As recommended by the European MN position statement in cardio-oncology, patients at higher risk of CV complications require early and continuous standardized monitoring for acute events and possible late effects.2 It highlights the following as risk factors (RF) for CTX: genetic predisposition, pre-existing CV diseases, previous cancer treatment, age, presence of RF for CV disease, the type of cancerand cancer treatment performed.2
Some previously conducted studies have attempted to evaluate the use of FDG PET/CT in the early detection of CTX, demonstrating, among other things, the association between cardiac FDG uptake patterns and metabolic parameters in the identification of CTX.6–8
However, a more recent prospective multicenter study evaluating 18FDG PET/CT, myocardial strain, and biomarkers during chemotherapy in lymphoma patients observed that increased FDG uptake was a frequently observed finding, but without correlation with the presence of left ventricular dysfunction (LVD). Thus, the clinical relevance of myocardial metabolic regulation still requires further investigation.9
The association between myocardial FDG uptake patterns and traditional CVRFs in cancer patients also remains uncertain.
Ribeiro Sobrinho et al.10 pioneered a large cohort study analyzing the association between myocardial FDG uptake patterns in oncological PET/CT scans and CV FR, demonstrating that male sex and higher body weight are independent predictors of myocardial uptake, while diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease are associated with its absence. These findings may reposition FDG uptake as a relevant CV metabolic marker, and not just as an incidental finding.
However, it is still essential to interpret the increase in FDG uptake in a contextualized way, integrating the clinical, metabolic, and CV characteristics of patients. The simple dichotomy between the presence or absence of uptake can be understood as the gateway to a broader classification: from a metabolically neutral phenotype, through a potentially reversible adaptive remodeling, to inflammatory and metabolically decompensated stages, associated with a higher risk of future DVE (Figure 1).
In an integrated cardio-oncology setting, routinely performed FDG PETCT for cancer patients can provide valuable additional information about the metabolic state of the heart, without increased cost or additional radiation exposure.5
Some limitations should be considered, suggesting the need for future prospective studies. The retrospective and cross-sectional design prevents prognostic inferences, and the visual assessment of uptake, although pragmatic and aligned with clinical practice, is subject to interobserver variability and the influence of metabolic preparation. Still, the large sample size, multivariate analysis, and pathophysiological consistency of the findings lend robustness to the conclusions.
The main legacy of this study is to reinforce the need to abandon a simplistic interpretation of myocardial FDG uptake. Metabolic imaging should be understood as part of a biological continuum, integrating clinical characteristics, patient RF, the therapy used, and myocardial vulnerability (Figure 2)..
In summary, the article published in this issue of the Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia broadens the horizon of cardio-oncology by demonstrating that myocardial FDG uptake on PET/CT reflects distinct CV phenotypes, modulated by traditional RF. This is a significant step towards a metabolic approach to CTX associated with cancer treatment.
References
-
1 Addison D, Neilan TG, Barac A, Scherrer-Crosbie M, Okwuosa TM, Plana JC, et al. Cardiovascular Imaging in Contemporary Cardio-Oncology: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023;148(16):1271-86. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001174.
» https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001174 -
2 Totzeck M, Aide N, Bauersachs J, Bucerius J, Georgoulias P, Herrmann K, et al. Nuclear Medicine in the Assessment and Prevention of Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiotoxicity: Prospects and Proposal of Use by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50(3):792-812. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05991-7.
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05991-7 -
3 Rao VU, Reeves DJ, Chugh AR, O'Quinn R, Fradley MG, Raghavendra M, et al. Clinical Approach to Cardiovascular Toxicity of Oral Antineoplastic Agents: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77(21):2693-716. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.009.
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.009 -
4 Mesquita CT, Rezende MF. Precision Medicine: Can 18F-FDG PET Detect Cardiotoxicity Phenotypes? Arq Bras Cardiol. 2022;119(1):109-10. doi: 10.36660/abc.20220393.
» https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20220393 -
5 Mikail N, Chequer R, Imperiale A, Meisel A, Bengs S, Portmann A, et al. Tales from the Future-Nuclear Cardio-Oncology, from Prediction to diagnosis and Monitoring. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;24(9):1129-45. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jead168.
» https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jead168 -
6 Dourado MLC, Dompieri LT, Leitão GM, Mourato FA, Santos RGG, Almeida PJ Filho, et al. Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiac18F-FDG Uptake in Patients with Lymphoma: An Early Metabolic Index of Cardiotoxicity? Arq Bras Cardiol. 2022;118(6):1049-58. doi: 10.36660/abc.20210463.
» https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20210463 -
7 Berenguer DRF, Becker MMC, Buril RO, Bertão PA, Markman B Filho, Brandão SCS. Progression of Myocardial 18F-FDG Uptake in a Patient with Cardiotoxicity. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024;121(2):e20230276. doi: 10.36660/abc.20230276.
» https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20230276 -
8 Becker MMC, Arruda GFA, Berenguer DRF, Buril RO, Cardinale D, Brandão SCS. Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity: Current Methods of Diagnosis and Possible Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT as a New Biomarker. Cardiooncology. 2023;9(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40959-023-00161-6.
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-023-00161-6 -
9 Becker MMC, Buril RO, Wanderley MRB Jr, Berenguer DRF, Mourato FA, Costa IBSS, et al. Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT and Strain for Early Cardiotoxicity Detection in Lymphoma Patients. Cardiooncology. 2025;12(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40959-025-00416-4.
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-025-00416-4 -
10 Ribeiro JMD Sobrinho, Leão EDLM, Accioly BB, Mourato FA, Becker MMC, Brandão SCS. Captação Miocárdica de Fluordesoxiglicose-18F na Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons/Tomografia Computadorizada: Uma Janela para Fenótipos Cardiovasculares e Assinaturas Metabólicas em Pacientes com Câncer. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2026;123(1):e20250028. doi: 10.36660/abc.20250028.
» https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20250028




