From Shiguang to Xingguang: Ontology and the Method of Huiguang in the Taiyi Jinhua ZongzhiAbstract:
This article advances an ontological interpretation of light in the Taiyi Jinhua Zongzhi 太乙金華宗旨, arguing that its discourse on luminosity articulates a coherent Daoist metaphysical framework rather than a psychological or purely symbolic model of inner experience. It demonstrates that the text distinguishes xingguang 性光 (innate light), as the ontological Dao, from shiguang 識光 (cognitive light), which obscures this primordial luminosity, and prescribes huiguang 回光 (turning the light inward) as the disciplined path of return. Against prevailing symbolic and psychological readings, this distinction is shown to function as an internally articulated ontological structure rather than a metaphorical taxonomy of experience. Through close textual analysis, the article elucidates a triadic framework of light as ontology, method and visionary confirmation. It concludes that the Taiyi Jinhua Zongzhi presents a distinctively Daoist model of light-centered cultivation, contributing to Daoist metaphysics and to broader debates on non-dual ontology and contemplative practice.
Keywords:
Taiyi Jinhua Zongzhi; Daoist alchemy; Xingguang; Shiguang; Huiguang; Visionary experience; Luminous ontology
Resumo:
Este artigo avança uma interpretação ontológica da luz, no Taiyi Jinhua Zongzhi 太乙金華宗旨, argumentando que seu discurso sobre a luminosidade articula um quadro metafísico daoísta coerente, em vez de um modelo psicológico ou puramente simbólico de experiência interna. Demostra que o texto distingue xingguang 性光 (luz innata), como o Dao ontológico, de shiguang 識光 (luz cognitiva), o qual obscurece essa luminosidade primordial e prescreve huiguang 回光 (virando a luz para dentro), como o caminho disciplinado de retorno. Contra as leituras simbólicas e psicológicas prevalecentes, evidencia-se que essa distinção funciona como uma estrutura ontológica internamente articulada, em lugar de uma taxonomia metafórica de experiência. Através de análise textual minuciosa, o artigo elucida um quadro triádico de luz, como ontologia, método e confirmação visionária. Conclui-se que o Taiyi Jinhua Zongzhi apresenta um modelo distintivamente daoísta de cultivo centrado na luz, contribuindo para a metafísica daoísta e debates mais amplos sobre ontologia não dual e prática contemplativa.
Palavras-chave:
Taiyi Jinhua Zongzhi; Alquimia Daoist; Xingguang; Shiguang; Huiguang; Experiência visionária; Ontologia luminosa
INTRODUCTION
The Taiyi Jinhua Zongzhi (hereafter ZZ) 太乙金華宗旨, a canonical work in the field of Daoist inner alchemy, has an uncertain date of original composition. Since its initial publication in the early Qing dynasty, the text primarily circulated within Daoist communities, resulting in a relatively limited impact in its early years. Its international significance arose when Richard Wilhelm translated it into German in 1929, with Carl Jung’s assistance. Wilhelm and Jung interpreted the text through a syncretic and psychologically inflected framework that profoundly shaped its modern reception. Subsequent English and Japanese translations further extended the global circulation of the text. From the 1990s onward, Chinese scholars have revisited the text through re-translations of the German, English and Japanese versions, which have brought renewed attention to its doctrinal and philosophical significance (Zhang, 2008b, p. 29). This complex reception history has decisively shaped modern interpretive tendencies, many of which approach the ZZ primarily through psychological symbolism or comparative typologies rather than through its own internal Daoist conceptual logic.
According to Monica Esposito’s (1998, p. 95; 2004, p. 259-268; 2013, p. 263-315) research, at least, six extant versions of the ZZ survive, generally divided into two major traditions: the Jingming Dao 淨明道 system and the Quanzhen Dao Longmen School 全真道龍門派 (Mori, 1998, p. 43-64; Mori, 2002, p. 165-184). Unless otherwise indicated, this study draws on the Daozang jiyao 道藏輯要 edition, which is particularly valued for its systematic presentation of cultivation methods centered on the theme of light. Clarifying the textual basis of the present study is essential, since the ontological status of light articulated in the ZZ is inseparable from the concrete doctrinal and practical framework preserved in this recension.
Against this background, and against the dominant tendency to interpret the ZZ primarily through psychological symbolism or comparative religious typologies, this article argues that the text conveys a rigorously structured Daoist ontology of light. Specifically, ZZ has developed a distinctive path centered on the cultivation of light. It regards xingguang 性光, or innate light, as Dao itself, the foundation of existence, while shiguang 識光, or cognitive light, is understood as embodied distinguishing awareness. This cognitive light can obscure the individual’s innate light, but it does not extinguish it. This distinction provides a philosophical interpretive framework for clarifying how existence and consciousness interact within Daoist inner alchemy.
Within this theoretical framework, huiguang 回光, or turning the light inward, constitutes the core practice of “reverse” cultivation, enabling practitioners to return from the conditioned operation of shiguang to xingguang as the ontological foundation. In this way, the ZZ integrates ontology, practical methods and visionary experience into a unified system, in which existence and awareness, or essence and experience, are not separated as binary opposites, but instead interact and communicate through continuous and dynamic processes of reconstruction.
Methodologically, this article is based on a close reading and detailed analysis of Daoist medical theory and the inner alchemical symbol system. To maintain the structural integrity of the original materials, it prioritizes indigenous Daoist concepts rather than introducing an external interpretative framework. Throughout the research process, the analysis deliberately avoids the use of foreign paradigms, such as psychology or phenomenology, focusing, instead, on the intrinsic logic of the text. By working within the conceptual grammar of the tradition itself, this article strives to be faithful to the original framework in interpretation.
This argument is developed gradually through three key stages. First, this article examines how “light” is rooted in the symbolic system and doctrinal foundations of ZZ, tracing its intellectual origins within relevant Daoist traditions. Second, the discussion turns to the distinction between xingguang and shiguang. This study argues it constitutes the ontological core of the t theoretical structure of the text. On this basis, the analysis further explores the significance of huiguang as a concrete practice of cultivation - it is precisely this contemplative process that enables the “ontology of light” to be activated and realized in practice. Ultimately, this interpretation is not limited to a re-examination of a single text; rather, it seeks to clarify the philosophical significance of “light” in Daoist metaphysics, thereby situating the ZZ firmly within broader theoretical discussions of non-dual thought and contemplative practice.
1 LIGHT AS THE GUIDING PRINCIPLE: ALCHEMICAL SYMBOLISM AND METHODS IN TAIYI JINHUA ZONGZHI
The symbolic framework of the ZZ is built upon several key terms and distinct structural features. It is not merely a manual of practice. Instead, the text establishes a specialized conceptual vocabulary to explain inner cultivation in philosophical terms. Though not among the most prominent Daoist classics, the text presents a distinctive vision of inner alchemy, with its very title encapsulating its central principles and symbolic uniqueness.
The term Taiyi can refer to two distinct, but related, Chinese characters: 太乙 and 太一. Though both signify cosmic origin and unity, 太乙 is more frequently used in the context of Daoist inner alchemy and deified entities (such as the deity Taiyi Jiuku Tianzun太乙救苦天尊, The Celestial Worthy of Great Unity Who Saves from Suffering), while 太一 is often associated with Han cosmology and the supreme oneness before differentiation. For the ZZ, Taiyi functions, primarily, as a conceptual designation for the Dao itself, understood as the ultimate ontological horizon of cultivation rather than as a historical deity.
In this context, Jinhua 金華 functions as more than a symbol. It represents the experiential reality of Taiyi太乙, marking the moment this ontological foundation surfaces in practice. Alchemical discourse describes this as the formation of the golden elixir, indicating the disclosure of one’s original nature under conditions of profound stillness. As Min Yide 閔一得 observes, “Taiyi is the foundation, and Jinhua is the outcome” (Xu, 1990, p. 197). Here, symbolic imagery serves to articulate a relation between ontological ground and experiential confirmation, rather than to prescribe concrete techniques. The word Zongzhi 宗旨 refers not simply to methods, but to the guiding orientation through which cultivation is conceptually framed. In the ZZ, this orientation is articulated through the “Method of Huiguang” 回光法. Rather than offering procedural instruction, huiguang designates a philosophical principle of reversal through which cognitive differentiation is realigned with its ontological source. The manifestation of light, therefore, functions as a criterion of realization, not as the objective of a practical regimen.
The ZZ consists of thirteen chapters, traditionally attributed to Lü Dongbin呂洞賓 and compiled through spirit-writing practices. For the present study, these compositional features are noted only insofar as they frame the conceptual coherence of the text. Following Wilhelm’s translation, this analysis focuses on the first eight chapters. These chapters are crucial as they define the foundational distinctions among light, cognition and realization.
A prominent feature of the ZZ is its emphasis on cultivating nature (xinggong性功). There is an explicit statement in the text: “The secret of inner alchemical cultivation is to achieve the state of non-action through intentional effort… The core of its doctrine is always to focus on cultivating one’s nature”2 (Wang, 1994, p. 57).
This emphasis shifts the focus of the discussion from specific practical guidance to a philosophical proposition: ontological clarity must precede instrumental technique. By placing nature above life (qi, vitality), the ZZ redefines the meaning of “realization”, understanding it as a transformation in cognitive orientation, so as to get rid of the pursuit of extraordinary ability or magic power. This position challenges the traditional sequences of inner alchemical cultivation - such as “cultivating life before nature” (xian ming hou xing先命後性) or the practice of using effort to reach non-action and, instead, redirects attention toward the nature’s direct refinement without the help of external assistance. In the end, the completion of practice is defined by ontological fit rather than technical accumulation. The ZZ clearly points to its fundamental concern with spiritual transcendence, not the pursuit of physical immortality.
The ZZ embodies a highly mature comprehensive system: while focusing on the cultivation of immortality and inner alchemy, it is based on a theoretical framework that actively integrates Confucian and Buddhist thoughts (Du; Zhang, 2004, p. 131). This convergence reflects the deployment, made by ZZ, of a shared philosophical vocabulary rather than an attempt at doctrinal synthesis, aligning with the broader discourse of ‘the unity of the three teachings’ (sanjiao heyi 三教合一) articulated within the Quanzhen Dao 全真道 tradition.
The text clearly states:
The sacred learning begins with knowing where to stop, ends with the ultimate good as the stopping point, starts from the infinite, and returns to the infinite. Buddha teaches that the mind arises from non-attachment, which is the essence of the great treasure teachings. Our Daoism completes the full virtue of life and destiny with the principle of ‘achieving emptiness’. In summary, the three teachings can be encapsulated in one phrase, which is the divine pill for life and death (Wang, 1994, p. 107).
Here, Confucian “infinite” （wuji無極）, Buddhist “emptiness of the mind” （xinkong心空） and Daoist “achieving emptiness” （zhixu致虛）are mobilized not as comparative doctrines, but as convergent expressions of a single soteriological. Each articulates a return to Dao as the highest state of cultivation, oriented toward what the text describes as the “divine pill for life and death.
2 LIGHT AS A SACRED SYMBOL AND METAPHYSICAL AXIS IN DAOIST ALCHEMY
This section does not aim to offer a comparative survey of luminous symbolism across religious traditions, but to demonstrate that, within Daoist inner alchemy, light functions as a metaphysical axis that grounds ontology, method and realization, rather than as a merely symbolic or illustrative motif.
Across religious traditions, light is frequently understood as a symbol of transcendence, wisdom and revelation. In Christianity, light accompanies Christ’s birth. In Buddhism, it marks the Buddha’s enlightenment. In Hinduism, it symbolizes Brahman’s consciousness and the self. In Islam, light is regarded as a divine attribute that guides believers toward truth. Taken together, these traditions affirm the universality of light as a central image in religious experience.
Religious scholar Mircea Eliade has emphasized this comparative dimension, arguing that light functions across cultures as a medium of transcendence capable of liberating believers from the mundane and revealing a higher sacred order (Eliade, 1990, p. 129). While these comparative lenses encompass the broad universality of luminous imagery, they often remain at a descriptive level, overlooking the specific ontological weight light carries in Daoist inner alchemy. In this context, light is less a symbolic emblem of transcendence and more an operative metaphysical principle - a distinction central to recent scholarship (Hsiao, 2003; Hsiao, 2007; Zhang, 2008a, p. 54).3
Within Daoist inner alchemy, luminous imagery is consistently employed to articulate the relation among Dao, nature (xing 性) and spirit (shen 神). Wang Chongyang 王重陽, for example, described his alchemical realization through images of concealed radiance gradually revealed through refinement:
Like gold, like jade, and like a pearl, it is dense and billowing with a spectrum of colors spread. The myriad lights are not yet revealed; a mass of dust and dirt is smeared all over. With frequent washing, the round form is revealed; with careful polishing, the original nature is shown. Unextinguished and uncreated, shining idle and bright, only then do we realize we have regained the old pattern (Wang, 2005, p. 9).
Similarly, Zhang Boduan 張伯端, in the Wuzhen pian 悟真篇, repeatedly invoked the metaphor of light to describe the refinement of spirit: “Of late, throughout my body golden radiance shines; This secret cannot be spoken with ordinary men” (Wuzhen pian 悟真篇, no. 53, “Tunyin zhibao, guang xian shenjin 吞飲至寶 光現身金”) (Chen, 2004, p. 260).
These voices indicate that, before the ZZ, light already functioned within Daoist inner alchemy as both a metaphysical and practical marker of realization. What distinguishes the ZZ, however, is not the introduction of luminous imagery per se, but its systematic articulation of light as an internally differentiated structure of cultivation.
This perspective is echoed in the works of later figures, like Qiu Chuji 丘處機, who associated light with an unborn and undying dimension of nature and spirit - a luminosity that transcends cosmic cycles yet remains immanent within the human body (Hu; Chen, et.al, 1994, p. 284-286). This reference is not a historical survey; instead, it locates the ZZ within a broader doctrinal horizon, anchoring its specific claims in a shared alchemical metaphysics.
Under this ideological background, the ZZ has taken a decisive conceptual step by distinguishing light into xingguang, shiguang and huiguang. Here, light is no longer just a passive symbol of transcendence, but a metaphysical pivot that integrates ontology, practice methods and realizations. This differentiation, thus, lays the theoretical framework discussed below. The following chapters will further explore how the ZZ interprets “light” as a holistic structure composed of ontological foundation, practical methods and the proof of realization.
3 LIGHT IN DAOIST ALCHEMY: ONTOLOGY, METHOD AND VISION
Beyond its general symbolic meaning in Daoist thought, light in the ZZ constitutes a highly integrated framework of inner alchemy. This framework operates through three interdependent dimensions: light as the foundation of all existence, huiguang as the method of spiritual reversal and visionary experience as the empirical confirmation of realization. By integrating origin, method and verification, the ZZ situates individual practice within a holistic and complete cosmological order.
3.1 Light as the Ontological Foundation
This section will discuss the “light” in ZZ as the ontological foundation, or a fundamental reality that precedes and shapes all manifestations, even including cognition itself. Here, light is not a simple metaphor or a secondary cognitive product, but is presented as a fundamental condition for existence.
The ZZ systematizes the cultivation of inner alchemy by establishing light as the source of existence and the pivot of practice. In this framework, light transcends the mere metaphorical meaning. It is understood as the ontological essence of the origin of all things and, thus, provides a unified basis for cosmology and practice.
The text states:
The light is neither in the body nor outside the body. The mountains, rivers, the earth, the brightness of the sun, and the moon are just the manifestations of this light, so it does not only exist in the body. Wisdom and enlightenment, all functions of the mind, are also the functions of this light; therefore, it can also be said to be outside the body. The brilliance of heaven and earth is filled with the vastness, and the luster of the body is also spread out in the celestial and reflected on the earth. Therefore, when one turns their light inward, the heaven and the earth, the mountains and the rivers, all circulate as well (Wang, 1994, p. 75).
This passage establishes light as a non-dual ontological principle: it not only runs through the universe’s structural level, but also exists in human cognitive activities. It exists as the foundation for the generation of all phenomena, rather than an object of consciousness that can be objectified.
However, this non-duality does not simply confuse the light as the foundation of the ontology with the light as the cognitive function. On the contrary, the ZZ outlines different levels of manifestation structures in a unified continuum of light. It is this intrinsic distinction that explains its core paradox: light remains primary in ontology, but is covered at the empirical level.
Therefore, the purpose of huiguang is defined in ontological terms, as demonstrated by the text.
Huiguang is by no means just a psychological recalibration or a stop of scattered thinking. It is also a fundamental reversal of the generation process. This process includes the active condensation of the primordial power of yin and yang, and the re-intake of true qi, so as to trace back to the source of its ontology in practice. This reversal is not limited to the regulation of instantaneous thoughts, but also aims to eliminate the cyclical structure of conditional existence (Wang, 1994, p. 71).
To circulate is to return from the mind of self-awareness to the beginning where form and spirit had not yet emerged, seeking within oneself for the form that existed before heaven and earth were born (Wang, 1994, p. 72).
Here, light is identified with the true qi of creation (造化之真炁) and the pre-cosmic body (天地未生之體), thereby locating ontological light before both embodied form and cognitive differentiation.
The text further portrays light as the sovereign principle within the human body:
Just as the celestial heart (tian xin天心) is like a residence, the light is the master who lives in it. Thus, when the light is turned inward, the energy of the whole body gathers solemnly - just like the holy king building the capital, setting the pole, and all countries from all over the world come to pay tribute (Wang, 1994, p. 58).
Light, thus, functions as a unifying principle of coordination, regulating the body’s various functions from the inside out. As the ontological axis of intrinsic harmony, it transcends the level of purely subjective experience and establishes a physiological order grounded in metaphysical reality.
While Confucianism speaks of “illuminating luminous virtue” (ming ming de 明明德)(Ruan, 1980, p.1673) and Mahāyāna Buddhism of the luminous mind (prabhāsvara), the ZZ grounds such convergences explicitly in the ontological and practical framework of huiguang.
Most crucially, the text introduces a distinction between xingguang and shiguang:
Ordinary people, when looking at objects with a gaze free of discrimination, perceive what is called ‘xingguang’ - a light of pure nature, like a mirror reflecting without intention or water reflecting without judgment. Yet, after a moment, this light becomes ‘shiguang’, the light of discernment, due to the act of discrimination. A mirror that holds an image ceases to be a mirror; water that retains a form is no longer water; and light that holds consciousness ceases to be light (Wang, 1994, p. 127).
Xingguang reflects without attachment, pure and formless. Shiguang arises the moment cognition intervenes, transforming clarity into conditioned awareness. The text explains: “Initially, ‘xingguang’, upon turning the thought, becomes consciousness, and when consciousness arises, the light becomes elusive and untraceable, not that there is no light, but the light has become consciousness” (Wang, 1994, p. 127).
This expression reveals a core tension: if xingguang occupies a primary position in ontology and is the same as Dao, how can it be “covered or obscured” by shiguang? The ZZ resolves this problem by distinguishing between the presence of ontology and its manifestation. The masking of xingguang does not refer to light disappearing or being denied; instead, it marks a transformation from light as an unconditioned foundation to a functional light taken by cognition. Therefore, what is lost is the direct access to the reality of existence. Light remains ontologically intact, but its radiance is refracted by the prism of differentiative consciousness.
This clarification resonates with Zhuangzi’s庄子insight that “[…] an empty chamber gives rise to brightness” (xu shi sheng bai虛室生白) (Fang, 2018, p. 60). It is a dictum suggesting that illumination is not an addition to the mind, but the natural consequence of its vacuity. Consequently, the distinction between xingguang and shiguang describes a dynamic, non-dual structure, rather than bifurcating being and cognition. It maps the conditions under which the original ground reveals itself.
Therefore, Xingguang is not physical light. It is the generative source of all things and the luminous form of the Dao. As the text states: “Nature is called Dao. Dao has no name or form; it is only one essence, only one primordial spirit” (Wang, 1994, p. 127). The ZZ establishes the ontological foundation for its teachings by placing this luminous source within the human body, specifically through the “reversal of vision”. This transition leads directly to the discussion of practical methods in the following section.
3.2 Cultivating Light: Inner Alchemy as Embodied Practice
This section argues that huiguang in the ZZ is not a loosely defined meditative technique, but a systematically articulated, embodied method of inner alchemy that translates luminous ontology into disciplined practice.
When applying light as a spiritual practice, the ZZ employs a specific inner alchemical method known as huiguang. Its core principle lies in guiding practitioners to turn their attention inward. This practice operates through the ontological distinction between xingguang and shiguang by emphasizing the reversal of outwardly dispersed energy, together with contemplative techniques, such as cessation and insight zhiguan 止觀 and breath regulation tiaoxi 調息.
The ZZ presents huiguang as a systematically elaborated method, tracing its transmission to earlier Daoist sources, such as Guan Yin Zi關尹子.4, and developing it across multiple instructional chapters.
The essence of circulating light lies in the principle of reversal (ni 逆), the cornerstone of inner alchemy. As the maxim states: “Progression begets humanity, reversal achieves immortality” (順則生人，逆則成仙). Ordinary life follows progression, in which post-natal essence, qi, and spirit dissipate and decline. Reversal, in contrast, returns them to their pre-natal unity with Dao. Here, the eyes are considered pivotal: outward gazing disperses vitality, but when turned inward, they concentrate spirit, illuminating the innate light of existence.
A second principle centers on the “heavenly heart” (天心tianxin). Regarded in Daoist inner alchemy as the pivotal locus of refinement and often identified with the so-called “mysterious gate” (玄關 xuan guan) and related prenatal centers. Its activation is said to coordinate all other nodes of practice, although its precise bodily location has long been subject to divergent interpretations.
ZZ addresses this ambiguity by clarifying:
The heavenly heart is situated at the core of the sun and the moon... Confucianism refers to it as ‘the void center’; Buddhism as ‘the spiritual platform’; Daoism as ‘the ancestral land’, ‘the yellow court’, ‘the mysterious gate’, ‘the prenatal orifice’ (Wang, 1994, p. 57).
What are the sun and the moon in this context? In alchemical texts, they symbolize the two eyes, with the left eye representing the sun and the right eye, the moon. Thus, the heavenly heart’s location at the sun’s and the moon’s center implies that it is positioned between and at the level of the two eyes, colloquially known as the “heavenly eye”（tian mu天目）, which is the region of the forehead. ZZ posits that “Light, being inherently mobile and difficult to stabilize, when returned over time, coagulates into the natural Dharma body, and the spirit is concentrated above the nine heavens” (Wang, 1994, p. 57-58).
By focusing the mind on the heart of the heavenly realm, the Dharma body emerges naturally over time. The Min edition further employs the symbol “[…]∴” to represent the divine heart, underscoring that “the essence of the practice lies in focusing pure thought exclusively on this point, without relying on any additional methods for progress” (Wang, 1994, p. 58).
Concurrently, ZZ delineates two concrete methodologies for the practice of returning light, operating under the general principle of focusing on the heavenly heart: cessation and insight (zhiguan止觀), and respiratory regulation (tiaoxi調息). Cessation and insight are a way to promote the dual cultivation of meditative concentration (ding定) and innate wisdom (hui慧). Concentration refers to the deep and silent state, while wisdom is connected with human nature. Wisdom is ignited through concentration. With the manifestation of wisdom, the light begins to flow back, which reflects the specific operation of huiguang (turning the light inward).
“To circulate signifies to cease, and to contemplate signifies to observe. Ceasing without contemplating is termed as circulating without light; contemplating without ceasing is termed as having light without circulation” (Wang, 1994, p. 73).
Meditative posture is also specified: “With the eyes slightly closed, focus the gaze on the tip of the nose. Keep the body upright and center the attention on the space between the eyebrows. Light is naturally active; it will manifest on its own once the mind is settled there” (Wang, 1994, p. 72).
Breath regulation supports this practice by aligning physical respiration with mental focus, a principle that lies at the core of Daoist medicine. Classical texts, such as the Huangdi neijing 黃帝內經 and the Beiji qianjin yaofang 備急千金要方, consistently link breathing to the nourishment of spirit and vitality. Within this tradition, the ZZ regards tiaoxi, or breath regulation, as an important pathway connecting physiological functions with spiritual objectives.
The method has been further strengthened through visual symbols. Images, such as the Golden Flower, the Sun and Moon, and the Yellow Court, orient the practitioner inward. Alchemical charts, like the Xiuzhen tu 修真圖and Neijing tu 內經圖, depict the same process: direct spirit with intention, guide qi with spirit; let qi circulate through the whole body, until spirit returns to emptiness. Such imagery functions not as abstract symbols, but as practical aids for concentration, guiding the flow of light and qi.
The key to circulating light lies in the principle of wu wei er wei 無為而為, often rendered as “effortless action”. As the ZZ states, “The essence of Dao lies in the concept of ‘action through inaction’” (Wang, 1994, p. 105). In practice, this means allowing stillness to give rise naturally to movement and letting vital energy emerge spontaneously, rather than forcing results. Rooted in Laozi’s teaching of wu wei, the ZZ applies it to meditation by emphasizing that one should not deliberately seek visions of light. Through sustained practice, innate luminosity reveals itself.
Adepts do not force visions. Instead, they allow the light to appear naturally through steady practice. This means that the light in the ZZ is not a product of mental effort or intentional visualization. Rather, it emerges when the practitioner aligns themselves with the Dao. The distinction between “spontaneous” and “reactive” movements separates true realization from mere mental construction. It shows that light appears only when the mind stops trying to control the process. Finally, the text distinguishes the mundane heart (fanxin 凡心) from the heavenly one: “The mundane heart cannot find true stillness unless it reaches a state of complete tranquility. If movement arises as a reaction to external things, it is driven by human desire. However, if movement occurs spontaneously, it is the movement of heaven” (Wang, 1994, p. 106).
When the mundane heart observes objects, it becomes dependent on them. It follows external things rather than staying centered. In contrast, the mundane heart moves only in reaction to the outside world, while the heavenly heart moves on its own. This autonomous movement is natural and requires no effort. The heavenly heart moves only when the practitioner reaches a state of deep meditation where all thoughts and sensory functions stop. In this profound stillness, the innate light will naturally appear.
3.3 Encountering Light: Visions and Realms of Attainment
This section argues that the various visual experiences, described in the ZZ, are neither subjective illusions nor mere symbolic representations. They constitute a means of verifying the success of spiritual practice. Through these experiences, practitioners are capable of confirming that light is not confined to the theoretical realm, but is a genuinely existing reality.
In the ZZ, manifestations of light serve as a sign of the realization of enlightenment. The text clearly describes the process that occurs when a practitioner enters the realm of light: in the silence, the practitioner first experiences the golden light; then, the entire world appears shining. This state symbolizes the enlightening awareness of the mind, that is, the “full blooming” of the jinhua. Following this, a sense of fullness spreads all over the body. The blood turns into a milky white essence, and the body is also tempered into a precious vessel. This stage is known as the “great condensation” of the golden flower (Wang, 1994, p. 95).
The description of blood turning into a white essence and the body becoming a “treasure” points to more than just spiritual change. It shows that the practice also involves a deep physical transformation. This imagery directly corresponds to the state of “great condensation of the golden flower”, where the practitioner’s body is no longer experienced as inert matter, but as a transformed and alchemical body. Comparable formulations appear in Daoist texts, such as the Zhen Gao 真誥 and Taishang Laojun Neiguan Jing 太上老君内觀經, which describe realization as a process in which corporeality itself becomes spiritually reconfigured (Tao, 2011; The Daoist Canon, 1988, p. 396-398).
Alongside this consummate vision, the text delineates three distinct visionary experiences as verifiable signs of progress:
At times in meditation, the spirit enters the valley… this is the spirit dwelling in the valley. At times, in stillness, the gaze grows radiant, and all before turns white… This is the state of ‘when the inner chamber is empty, light arises.’ At times in stillness, the body feels soft and harmonious, rising and floating upward… this is the spirit returning to the celestial summit (Wang, 1994, p. 95).
The practitioner verifies their progress through three specific stages: the spirit dwelling in the valley, light appearing in the inner chamber and the spirit returning to the celestial summit. These experiences constitute a set of practical frameworks to test the progress of the practice of turning the light inward. According to the text, as long as such views are generated based on a continuous and stable practice, even if they only appear once, it is sufficient to prove that the practice has made real and accurate progress.
This leads to a key question: how does the ZZ distinguish these visions from simple illusions or psychological appearances? Why are they regarded as reliable proofs of the success of practice? The answer does not resort to any external judgment criteria, but lies in the logic of the text itself. It is the practice itself that provides a standard for the “truth” (true realization of cultivating).
These observational experiences are fundamentally tied to transformations at the physical level. They are not isolated psychological events, but arise alongside changes in physiological state, emotional stability and bodily sensation. This progression is neither accidental nor disorderly. Rather, visions unfold according to a clear and structured sequence and appear only at specific stages of practice. Ultimately, the value of a vision does not lie in the content of the image itself, but in whether it can be integrated into the ongoing process of huiguang. Through this integration, mind, body and conduct are transformed simultaneously as an organic whole.
In this sense, the confirmation, obtained through visual experience, is a kind of practical verification, not a propositional proof. What is “verified” here is not an abstract theory, but the own practitioner’s real changes. It suggests that their minds and bodies have successfully reconnected with the original light. Thus, a vision acts as an index of this alignment. It is not a guarantee of knowledge in the modern sense, but a sign of ontological harmony.
While modern scholars, such as Ann Taves (2009), analyze visionary phenomena as culturally mediated, the ZZ frames such experiences as intrinsic to the cultivation process itself, functioning, simultaneously, as method, confirmation and goal, an embodied, imaginal and ontological one.
Taken together, the analyses of ontology, practice and visionary realization demonstrate that the ZZ integrates these dimensions into a coherent, luminous system. By distinguishing between xingguang and shiguang, and prescribing the method of huiguang, the text grounds its cultivation in a clear ontological framework. More specifically, the articulation of xingguang (ontological ground), shiguang (cognitive differentiation) and huiguang (practical reversal) forms an internally generated philosophical structure, in which ontology, cognition and practice are related as successive yet non-dual moments of a single luminous process. The resulting visions - whether the “golden flower in full bloom,” the “emergence of whiteness in the void,” or the “return of spirit to heaven” - serve as confirmations that practice has led from conditioned cognition back to innate luminosity. The “realm of light,” therefore, is not an incidental mystical episode, but the consummation of Daoist inner alchemy: simultaneously the path, the criterion and the realization of transformation.
CONCLUSIONS
The Taiyi Jinhua Zongzhi (ZZ), as a central text of Daoist inner alchemy, articulates a systematic and internally coherent account of light not as a metaphorical image, but as the ontological ground of cultivation itself. This study has demonstrated that the text distinguishes xingguang, as the Dao, in its ontological dimension from shiguang, as the mode of discriminating awareness, through which this luminosity becomes experientially obscured. Through the steady and continuous practice of huiguang, the ZZ outlined a way to reverse cognitive division and return it to its origin. These elements jointly form a trinity structure. Under this framework, ontology, practice and realm of realization are not independent of one another, but are intrinsically connected and non-dual.
By focusing on this structure, the present analysis of this article goes beyond the category of interpreting Daoist practice only as symbolism or through the lens of western psychology. On the other hand, it demonstrates that the ZZ develops its own “ontology of light”. Within this ontology, existence, consciousness and practice are not independent categories, but form a successive link in the process of returning to the origin. This framework does not draw upon external theoretical models. It originated firmly from the tradition itself and is deeply rooted in the conceptual system of inner alchemy.
From a philosophical perspective, the ZZ offers a Chinese model of non-dual reality. In this model, “obscurity” will never cover up the person’s true nature, nor will practice ever be detached from the nature. The realization of enlightenment is not just a psychological characterization or a mysterious state of ecstasy. It actually serves as a practical experience of the physical and the Dao. This framework explains the connection between essence and experience, or light and the body, in its own way.
Modern scholars have noted connections between Daoist meditation and contemporary cognitive research. However, the true value of the ZZ lies not in its universal applicability, but in the precision of its conceptual framework. The ZZ understands light as the link among existence, practice and the realization of enlightenment, thereby offering a rigorous philosophical account of self-cultivation. This framework is more than a historical artifact. It provides a distinctive Chinese perspective for global discussions of existence and self-transformation.
REFERENCES
- CHEN, Q. L. Annotations to the Zhouyi Cantongqi, Annotations to the Wuzhen pian. Beijing: China Social Sciences, 2004. 321p.
- DU, C.; ZHANG, C. Z. Annotated Translation of the Huangting Jing · Annotated Translation of the Taiyi Jinhua Zongzhi. Beijing: China Social Sciences, 2004.
- ELIADE, M. Mysticism, Witchcraft, and Cultural Fashions. Translated by L. D. Song and Q. Lu. Beijing: Guangming Daily, 1990. 174p.
- ESPOSITO, M. The different versions of the Secret of the Golden Flower and their relationship with the Longmen School. Transactions of the International Conference of Eastern Studies, v. 43, p. 90-109, 1998.
- ESPOSITO, M. The Establishment of Mount Jingai and the Taiyi Jinhua Zongzhi in the Qing Dynasty. In: TAKATA, T. (ed.) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Chinese Religious Textual Materials. Kyoto: Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University, 2004. p. 259-268.
- ESPOSITO, M. Creative Daoism. Wil: University Media, 2013. p. 263-315.
- FANG, Y. (ed.) Zhuangzi. Beijing: The Commercial, 2018. 637p.
- HSIAO, C. M. The Connotation, Origins, and Development of Qiu Chuji’s Theory of Returning the Light (Part I): With a Comparison to the Chan Doctrine of “Returning the Light to Illuminate Itself”. Daoist Alchemical Culture, v. 28, n. 3, p. 101-128, 2003.
- HSIAO, C. M. Light, death and rebirth: The content and characteristics of Wang Chong-Yang’s Neidan mystical experience. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, v. 37, n. 1, p. 75-116, 2007.
- HU, D. J.; CHEN, Y. T. et al (ed.). Taoist Texts Outside the Canon (Zangwai daoshu), vol. 11. Chengdu: Bashu, 1994. p. 284-286.
- MORI, Y. The Formation and Transformation of the Taiyi Jinhua Zongzhi. Oriental Thought and Religion, n. 15, p. 43-64, 1998.
- MORI, Y. Identity and lineage: The Taiyi jinhua zongzhi and the spirit-writing cult to Patriarch Lü in Qing China. In: KOHN, L.; ROTH, H. D. (ed.). Daoist Identity: History, Lineage, and Ritual. Honolulu: University of Hawaiʻi Press, 2002. p. 165-184.
- RUAN, Y. Commented Edition of the Thirteen Classics (Shisan jing zhushu), v. 2. Beijing: Zhonghua, 1980. 2784p.
- TAO, H. J. Declarations of the Perfected (Zhen Gao). Edited by Y. Zhao. Beijing: Zhonghua, 2011.
- TAVES, A. Religious Experience Reconsidered: A Building-Block Approach to the Study of Religion and Other Special Things. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.
- The Daoist Canon (no author), v. 11. Beijing; Shanghai; Tianjin: Cultural Relics; Shanghai; Tianjin Ancient Books, 1988 (reprint ed.).
- WANG, C. Y. The Collected Works of Wang Chongyang (Wang Chongyang ji). Jinan: Qilu, 2005. 372p.
- WANG, K. P. (translator.) An Interpretation of the Principles and Practices of the Lü Patriarch of Pure Yang: A Contemporary Translation of the Taiyi Jinhua Zongzhi. Beijing: Foreign Languages, 1994. p. 57-127.
- XU, Z. R. (ed.) Secret Essentials of Quanzhen Taoism. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 1990. 251p.
- ZHANG, Y. A Preliminary Study on the Alchemical Theory of the Taiyi Jinhua Zongzhi. Chinese Daoism, n. 6, p. 54-57, 2008a.
- ZHANG, Y. Collective Unconscious and Light: A Metaphysical Comparison between Jung and the Taiyi Jinhua Zongzhi. 2008, 66 (Foreign Philosophy) . Jinan: Shandong Normal University, 2008b.
-
2
All translations are mine unless a specific source is cited.
-
3
Taiwanese scholar Chin-Ming Hsiao has provided a detailed discussion on this topic in his two papers: “The Connotation, Origins, and Development of Qiu Chuji’s Theory of Returning the Light (Part One)” and “Light, Death, and Rebirth: The Content and Characteristics of Wang Chong-yang’s Neidan Mystical Experience”.
-
4
Guan Yin Zi, also known as Guan Ling Yin Xi關令尹喜, was a gatekeeper from a small vassal state during the late Spring and Autumn period. He is celebrated for his encounter with Laozi, which led to the creation of the Tao Te Ching, and is, thus, revered as a key figure in the early development of Daoism.
-
Data availability statement:
The dataset for this article is available in the SciELO Dataverse of the Trans/Form/Ação Journal, at the link: https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2025.v48.n5.e025227
The dataset for this article is available in the SciELO Dataverse of the Trans/Form/Ação Journal, at the link: https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2025.v48.n5.e025227
