DESARROLLO Y VALIDACIÓN DE UN ALGORITMO PARA LA PLANIFICACIÓN DE LA ADMINISTRACIÓN DE MEDICAMENTOS INTRAVENOSOS EN NEONATOS

Costa, Anna Caroline Leite; Mendes, Léia Arcanjo; Santos, Luciano Marques dos; Marcatto, Juliana De Oliveira; Corrêa, Allana dos Reis; Kusahara, Denise Miyuki; Manzo, Bruna Figueiredo

doi:10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2023-0262en

person Anna Caroline Leite Costa

Study design · Data collection · Data analysis and interpretation · Discussion of results · Writing and/or critical review of content · Review and final approval of the final version

schoolUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Hospital das Clínicas, Empresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.schoolUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.

0000-0003-3236-619X

person Léia Arcanjo Mendes

Data analysis and interpretation · Discussion of results · Writing and/or critical review of content · Review and final approval of the final version

schoolUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil. schoolPrefeitura de Belo Horizonte. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.

0000-0001-5535-4728

person Luciano Marques dos Santos

Discussion of results · Writing and/or critical review of content · Review and final approval of the final version

schoolUniversidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem. Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brasil. schoolUniversidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas. Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brasil.

0000-0001-7866-6353

person Juliana De Oliveira Marcatto

Discussion of results · Writing and/or critical review of content · Review and final approval of the final version

schoolUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.

0000-0002-6870-8414

person Allana dos Reis Corrêa

Writing and/or critical review of content · Review and final approval of the final version

schoolUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.

0000-0003-2208-958X

person Denise Miyuki Kusahara

Study design · Data analysis and interpretation · Discussion of results · Writing and/or critical review of content · Review and final approval of the final version

schoolUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.

0000-0002-9498-0868

person Bruna Figueiredo Manzo

Study design · Data analysis and interpretation · Discussion of results · Writing and/or critical review of content · Review and final approval of the final version

schoolUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.

0000-0003-0064-9961

personCORRESPONDING AUTHOR Anna Caroline Leite Costa.
anna.leitebh@gmail.com

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

There is no conflict of interest.

EDITORS

Associated Editors: Melissa Orlandi Honório Locks, Maria Lígia dos Reis Bellaguarda. Editor-in-chief: Elisiane Lorenzini.

Questions	CVI^* 1^st round (n=14)	CVI^* 2^nd round (n=14)	CVI^* 3^rd round (n=13)
Chunk 1 - Assessment of the algorithm’s full content
1. The visual presentation is attractive and organized.	0.71	0.79	1.00
2. The algorithm’s sequence of instructions favors its use in practice.	0.64	1.00	-
3. The selected colors are attractive.	0.71	0.71	0.85
4. The language used is appropriate.	0.79	0.93	-
5. The information is clear and does not create ambiguity.	0.57	0.86	-
6. The content has a logical organization.	0.86	-	-
7. The content meets the objective proposed by the algorithm.	0.86	-	-
8. The content is scientifically adequate and up to date.	0.86	-	-
9. The instrument is easy to use.	0.93	-	-
10. The algorithm is applicable to the practice of professionals dealing with IVT in neonatology.	0.86	-	-
11. I feel motivated to use the algorithm.	0.93	-	-
12. I would indicate the algorithm to be used in services.	0.86	-	-
13. The use of this technology can optimize nursing professionals’ working time.	0.79	1.00	-
14. A chart containing information about the characteristics of the medications most frequently used in neonatology can help professionals involved in care (a section of the chart showing the information contained about the main medications used in neonatology is sent).	0.71	0.79	item excluded after 2^nd round.
Chunk 2 - Assessment of content related to recommendation of intravenous therapy for infants
1. The sequence of instructions in this chunk favors its use in practice.	0.71	0.93	-
2. The language used in this chunk is appropriate.	0.64	0.93	-
3. The content of this chunk has a logical organization.	0.93	-	-
4. The information and conduct guided in this chunk are clear and do not generate ambiguity.	0.64	0.86	-
5. The content of this chunk meets the objective proposed by the algorithm.	0.79	1.00	-
6. The conduct highlighted in this chunk is appropriate.	0.71	0.93	-

Questions	CVI^* 1^st round (n=14)	CVI^* 2^nd round (n=14)	CVI^* 3^rd round (n=13)
bold>Chunk 3 - Assessment of content related to conduct when several medications are prescribed for infants
1. The sequence of instructions in this chunk favors its use in practice.	0.86	-	-
2. The language used in this chunk is appropriate.	0.79	0.79	0.92
3. The content of this chunk has a logical organization.	0.93	-	-
4. The information and conduct guided in this chunk are clear and do not generate ambiguity.	0.64	0.93	-
5. The content of this chunk meets the objective proposed by the algorithm.	0.71	1.00	-
6. The conduct highlighted in this chunk is appropriate.	0.79	0.93	-
Chunk 4 - Assessment of content relating to conduct in medication administration
1. The sequence of instructions in this chunk favors its use in practice.	0.71	1.0	-
2. The language used in this chunk is appropriate.	0.86	-	-
3. The content of this chunk has a logical organization.	1.0	-	-
4. The information and conduct guided in this chunk are clear and do not generate ambiguity.	1.0	-	-
5. The content of this chunk meets the objective proposed by the algorithm.	0.86	-	-
6. The conduct highlighted in this chunk is appropriate.	0.71	0.86	-
Chunk 5 - Assessment of what is contained in the general care framework
1. The language used in this chunk is appropriate.	0.64	0.93	-
2. The visual presentation is attractive and organized.	0.5	0.86	-
3. The selected colors are attractive.	0.86	-	-
4. The information and conduct guided in this chunk are clear and do not generate ambiguity.	0.57	0.71	0.85
5. The content has a logical organization.	0.79	1.0	-
6. The content is scientifically adequate and up to date.	0.86	-	-
7. The procedures contained in this chunk cover important points that must be considered during IVT.	0.79	0.93	-
8. The conduct contained in this chunk is appropriate.	0.86	-	-
9. If you have identified a reference that could be added to this algorithm, please cite it here:	-	-	-

[TFN1] ^*CVI: Content Validity Index