Hipermedios educativos sobre la adopción y clasificación del riesgo obstétrico: validación del contenido y la usabilidad

Soares, Francisco Mayron Morais; Mesquita, Kirley Kethellen Batista; Mendes, Igor Cordeiro; Nunes, Rodrigo da Silva; Araújo Filho, João de Deus de; Fonseca, Luciana Mara Monti; Torres, Gilson Vasconcelos; Miranda, Francisco Arnoldo Nunes de

doi:10.1590/1983-1447.2022.20220108.en

person Francisco Mayron Morais Soares

schoolUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Departamento de Enfermagem. Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil.schoolFaculdade Uninta Itapipoca, Departamento de Enfermagem. Itapipoca, Ceará, Brasil.

0000-0001-7316-2519

person Kirley Kethellen Batista Mesquita

schoolUniversidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Departamento de Enfermagem. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brasil.

0000-0002-6459-3656

person Igor Cordeiro Mendes

schoolUniversidade Federal do Maranhão (UFMA), Departamento de Enfermagem. Pinheiro, Maranhão, Brasil.

0000-0002-9414-8924

person Rodrigo da Silva Nunes

schoolFaculdade Uninta Itapipoca, Departamento de Enfermagem. Itapipoca, Ceará, Brasil.

0000-0002-8801-4006

person João de Deus de Araújo Filho

schoolUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Departamento de Enfermagem. Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil.

0000-0002-3873-4048

person Luciana Mara Monti Fonseca

schoolUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto. Ribeiro Preto, São Paulo, Brasil.

0000-0002-5831-8789

person Gilson Vasconcelos Torres

schoolUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Departamento de Enfermagem. Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil.

0000-0003-2265-5078

person Francisco Arnoldo Nunes de Miranda

schoolUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Departamento de Enfermagem. Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil.

0000-0002-8648-811X

personCorresponding author Francisco Mayron Morais Soares E-mail:
mayronenfo@gmail.com

Associate editor

Rosana Maffacciolli

Editor-in-chief

João Lucas Campos de Oliveira

groupsAuthorship contribution

Project administration: Francisco Mayron Morais Soares, Francisco Arnoldo Nunes de Miranda. Formal analysis: Francisco Mayron Morais Soares, Gilson Vasconcelos Torres, Francisco Arnoldo Nunes de Miranda. Conceptualization: Francisco Mayron Morais Soares, Francisco Arnoldo Nunes de Miranda. Data curation: Francisco Mayron Morais Soares, Francisco Arnoldo Nunes de Miranda. Writing-original draft: Francisco Mayron Morais Soares, Igor Cordeiro Mendes, João de Deus de Araújo Filho, Rodrigo da Silva Nunes, Kirley Kethellen Batista Mesquita, Luciana Mara Monti Fonseca, Gilson Vasconcelos Torres, Francisco Arnoldo Nunes de Miranda. Writing-review & editing: Francisco Mayron Morais Soares, Luciana Mara Monti Fonseca, Gilson Vasconcelos Torres, Francisco Arnoldo Nunes de Miranda. Investigation: Francisco Mayron Morais Soares, João de Deus de Araújo Filho, Rodrigo da Silva Nunes, Kirley Kethellen Batista Mesquita, Francisco Arnoldo Nunes de Miranda. Methodology: Francisco Mayron Morais Soares, Igor Cordeiro Mendes, Kirley Kethellen Batista Mesquita, Luciana Mara Monti Fonseca, Gilson Vasconcelos Torres, Francisco Arnoldo Nunes de Miranda. Software: Francisco Mayron Morais Soares, Gilson Vasconcelos Torres, Francisco Arnoldo Nunes de Miranda. Supervision: Francisco Mayron Morais Soares, Francisco Arnoldo Nunes de Miranda. Validation: Francisco Mayron Morais Soares, Igor Cordeiro Mendes, Luciana Mara Monti Fonseca, Gilson Vasconcelos Torres, Francisco Arnoldo Nunes de Miranda.

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Evaluated Items	n (%)	CVI	p^*
Overall impressions	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
BL1 - It is easy to use.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
BL2 - It is didactic.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
BL3 - I recommend hypermedia for teaching the embracement of obstetric risk to Nursing students and professionals.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
Objective	10.8 (8)	0.98	0.96
1.1 They are coherent with Nursing practice.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
1.2 They are coherent from the point of view of the teaching-learning process.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
1.3 Promotes behavior change and develops critical thinking.	10(90.9)	0.90	0.832
1.4 It can circulate in the scientific environment, because the information is correct.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
1.5 Meets the objectives of hospital institutions that work with obstetric emergencies.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
Structure and presentation	10.8 (98)	0.98	0.97
2.1 The hypermedia script is appropriate for nursing students.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
2.2 Data are presented in an organized, clear, and objective manner.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
2.3 The material is appropriate for the level of nursing students.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
2.4 It follows the logical sequence of the content proposed for student learning.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
2.5 The way of presenting hypermedia contributes to student learning	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
2.6 The patient profile provides sufficient data to make a clinical judgment	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
2.7 The writing style corresponds to the level of knowledge of the target audience	10(90.9)	0.90	0.832
Relevance	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
5.1 The number and the characters meet the proposed objective.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
5.2 The speech of the text is used efficiently and comprehensible to the clientele.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
5.3 Visual resources are used appropriately.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
5.4 The characters are presented as visual resources and reflect an approach to reality.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
Usability	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
4.1 The concepts presented are understandable and easy to apply.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
4.2 Provides guidance clearly.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
4.3 Provides guidance effectively.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
4.4 Provides guidance quickly and reading is not exhaustive.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
Efficiency	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
5.1 The number and the characters meet the proposed objective.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
5.2 The speech of the text is used efficiently and comprehensible to the clientele.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
5.3 Visual resources are used appropriately.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
5.4 The characters are presented as visual resources and reflect an approach to reality.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
Environment	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
6.1 The website is appropriate for content presentation.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
6.2 Resources are appropriate for learning the subject.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
6.3 Resources provide learning situations.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
TOTAL	10.9	0.98	0.98

Evaluated Items	n (%)	CVI	p^*
Overall impressions	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
BL1 - It is easy to use.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
BL2 - It is didactic.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
BL3 - I recommend hypermedia for teaching the embracement of obstetric risk to Nursing students and professionals.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
Functionalities	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
1.1 Hypermedia presents as an appropriate tool for the proposal for which it is intended.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
1.2 Hypermedia allows to generate positive results.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
Usability	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
2.1 Hypermedia is easy to use.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
2.2 It is easy to learn the concepts used and their applications.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
2.3 Allows control of the activities presented in it, being easy to apply.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
2.4 Allows the user to easily apply the worked concepts.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
2.5 The way of presenting hypermedia contributes to student learning.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
2.6 Provides help clearly and completely.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
2.7 Provides help quickly, not being tiring.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
Efficiency	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
5.1 The hypermedia design is appropriate for its use.	11(100.0)	1.00	1,000
5.2 The number of classes is consistent with the proposed time.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
5.3 The organization of thematic topics is appropriate for a good understanding of the content, as well as the easy location of the desired topic.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
5.4 Resources are used efficiently and understandably.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
Environment	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
6.1 The website is appropriate for content presentation.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
6.2 Resources are appropriate for learning the subject.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
6.3 Resources provide learning situations.	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000
TOTAL	11(100.0)	1.00	1.000

Usability Assessment Items	Mean	p^*
1 - I think I would like to use this hypermedia often.	5.0	0.01
2 - I think the hypermedia is unnecessarily complex.	2.0	0.01
3 - I think the hypermedia system is easy to use.	5.0	0.01
4 - I think I would need help from a person with technical knowledge to use hypermedia.	1.5	0.001
5 - I think that the various functions of hypermedia are very well integrated.	4.0	0.003
6 - I think that hypermedia has a lot of inconsistency.	1.5	0.02
7 - I imagine people will learn how to use this hypermedia quickly.	5.0	0.007
8 - I think that the hypermedia is difficult to use.	1.0	0.01
9 - I felt confident using hypermedia.	5.0
10 - I had to learn a lot of new things before I could use hypermedia.	1.0	0.001
Total Usability Score	91.9	0.595

[TFN1] Source: Research data, 2022.

[TFN2] ^*p>0.05 Agreement Binomial Test; BL: Baseline; CVI: Content Validity Index