Screen time and sweet consumption in preschool children: a cross-sectional studyABSTRACT
Objectives: to analyze television and smartphone screen time and sweet consumption among preschool children in a capital city in northeastern Brazil.
Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted with 175 caregivers of children aged 1 to 5 years enrolled in six Early Childhood Education Centers. Sociodemographic data, screen time, and frequency of consumption of sweets, snacks, and soft drinks were collected and analyzed using non-parametric tests (p<0.05).
Results: excessive smartphone use (>two hours/day) was significantly more frequent in children aged 3 to 4 years (Odds Ratio=2.26; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.09-4.67; p=0.02), of mixed race/color (p<0.01), and not enrolled in full-time education (p<0.01). Limits on candy consumption reduced the chance of excessive smartphone screen time (Odds Ratio=0.32; p=0.023).
Conclusions: preschool children who exceed two hours of screen time per day showed higher intake of sweets.
Descriptors:
Screen Time; Child Nutrition; Preschool; Cross-Sectional Studies; Nursing.
RESUMO
Objetivo: analisar o tempo de exposição à televisão e smartphone e o consumo de guloseimas entre as crianças pré-escolares em uma capital do nordeste brasileiro.
Métodos: estudo transversal com 175 tutores de crianças de 1 a 5 anos matriculadas em seis Centros de Educação Infantil. Coletaram-se dados sociodemográficos, tempo de tela, e frequência de consumo de doces, salgadinhos e refrigerantes, analisados por testes não paramétricos (p<0,05).
Resultados: o uso excessivo de smartphone (>duas horas/dia) foi significativamente mais frequente em crianças de 3 a 4 anos (Odds Ratio=2,26; Intervalo de Confiança de 95%: 1,09-4,67; p=0,02), de raça/cor parda (p<0,01) e não matriculadas em período integral (p<0,01). Limites ao consumo de doces reduziram a chance de tempo de tela excessivo no smartphone (Odds Ratio=0,32; p=0,023).
Conclusões: crianças pré-escolares que excedem duas horas diárias de tela apresentaram maior ingestão de guloseimas.
Descritores:
Tempo de Tela; Nutrição da Criança; Crianças Pré-Escolares; Estudos Transversais; Enfermagem.
RESUMEN
Objetivos: analizar el tiempo de uso de la televisión y los smartphones, así como el consumo de dulces en niños en edad preescolar de una capital del noreste de Brasil.
Métodos: estudio transversal con 175 cuidadores de niños de 1 a 5 años matriculados en seis Centros de Educación Infantil. Se recopilaron datos sociodemográficos, el tiempo de uso de la televisión y la frecuencia de consumo de dulces, snacks y refrescos, y se analizaron mediante pruebas no paramétricas (p<0,05).
Resultados: el uso excesivo de smartphones (>dos horas/día) fue significativamente más frecuente en niños de 3 a 4 años (Odds Ratio=2,26; Intervalo de Confianza del 95 %: 1,09-4,67; p=0,02), de raza mixta/color (p<0,01) y no matriculados en la escuela de tiempo completo (p<0,01). Limitar el consumo de dulces redujo la probabilidad de pasar demasiado tiempo frente a la pantalla del teléfono inteligente (Odds Ratio=0,32; p=0,023).
Conclusiones: los niños en edad preescolar que superan las dos horas de tiempo frente a la pantalla al día mostraron un mayor consumo de dulces.
Descriptores:
Tiempo de Pantalla; Nutrición del Niño; Preescolar; Estudios Transversales; Enfermería.
INTRODUCTION
Screen time refers to the duration spent on entertainment activities mediated by electronic devices, such as televisions, smartphones, computers, and other technologies with a visual interface, generally characterized by passive content consumption. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that children under 2 years of age do not use screens and that those up to 5 years of age do not exceed one hour per day(1-3). However, a meta-analysis revealed that 24.5% of children under 2 years old already use screens, and in the preschool phase this number can reach 35.6%, indicating excessive use(4).
Prolonged screen time has been linked to several negative repercussions on children’s health, with effects that can extend into adolescence and adulthood. Evidence points to delays in cognitive, social, and linguistic skills(5); poorer academic performance; reduced quality of interaction between parents and children(6); and an increase in psychological and emotional problems, such as symptoms of depression, anxiety, and manifestations consistent with neurodevelopmental disorders. Additionally, there is a worsening of sleep quality(7,8), an increase in disruptive behaviors(7), as well as a higher risk of childhood obesity due to reduced physical activity and the prevalence of sedentary lifestyles(5,9).
Furthermore, screen time directs children to advertising for unhealthy foods and influences their consumption patterns(10), as observed by the relationship between excessive screen time and rejection of fruits and vegetables by Chinese preschool children(11). In Spain, longer periods of screen time for children during their leisure time have been associated with poorer eating habits(12). This reality is also present in the Brazilian context, where a relationship was found between screen time and the practice of eating meals in front of screens, as well as the consumption of ultra-processed foods by 4-year-old children(13).
Despite existing evidence linking excessive screen time and sugar consumption in preschool children, it is necessary to understand how parents and guardians regulate, or fail to regulate, the use of electronic devices and access to ultra-processed foods in children’s daily lives. Therefore, investigating parental practices is fundamental to guiding more effective interventions by healthcare professionals, such as primary care nurses, who work directly with families and can promote more protective routines for children’s health(11,14,15).
Studies investigating the effectiveness of nurse-led interventions to reduce screen time and sweet consumption by preschoolers have yielded results below expectations, such as the limited effectiveness of short-term interventions (sustainability of the effect)(16) or even the inability to produce the primary effect, as exemplified by the responsive parenting intervention INSIGHT, which reduced screen time and television exposure in infants, but did not increase the frequency or amount of interactive play(17).
Nurses play a central role in providing nutritional counseling to caregivers during early childhood, promoting healthy eating by adapting their guidance to the individual needs of each family. However, they face challenges in seeking up-to-date knowledge about nutrition and encounter difficulties when addressing sensitive topics such as childhood obesity(18).
Thus, when considering the potential negative outcomes of inadequate nutrition in childhood, it becomes relevant to explore factors associated with food consumption. The aim is to produce scientific knowledge to support more precise health promotion strategies, foster public policies(19) and guide the role of nursing during well-child visits and school health consultations, under a broader approach(1).
OBJECTIVES
To analyze television and smartphone screen time and sweet consumption among preschool children in a capital city in northeastern Brazil.
METHODS
Ethical aspects
In compliance with Resolution 466/12 of the Brazilian National Health Council, this study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the authors’ home institution, which issued an approval opinion. The Informed Consent Form was signed voluntarily by all participants.
Study design, period and location
This is a cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach, guided by the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology checklist. It is a subset of the baseline of a cluster-randomized multicenter trial conducted in six public Early Childhood Education Centers (ECECs) in Fortaleza (Ceará), which serve children from 6 months to 5 years old.
ECECs, formerly known as daycare centers, are institutions specializing in the care and education of children from six months of age, through active pedagogical practices focused on holistic development in early childhood. These units offer full-time and part-time care options, organized in morning and afternoon shifts, according to demand and local organization.
At the time of data collection, the capital city had 186 public ECECs, serving approximately 25.556 children. For this study, the Municipal Department of Education indicated units located in areas of greater social vulnerability, based on the Social Vulnerability Index of Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada(20,21). From this list, six ECECs were selected by simple random sampling, considering the age ranges of early childhood education I to IV (from 1 to 5 years old). Data collection took place between December 2022 and July 2023(22).
Population and inclusion criteria
Non-probabilistic convenience sampling was used, consisting of 175 guardians, defined as legal representatives or primary caregivers of children aged 1 to 5 years enrolled in childhood education I to IV classes of six ECECs. The sample size was derived from a larger longitudinal study, estimated based on the detection of a 0.2 kg/m2 difference in Body Mass Index (mean 19 kg/m2; Standard Deviation=0.05; α=0.05; power=90%; two-tailed), with an additional 20% to compensate for losses, totaling 99 participants per group. For this cross-sectional study, an average of 29 to 30 dyads per ECEC was considered. Guardians over 18 years of age, responsible for children aged 1 to 5 years, with active participation in daily care, were included. Guardians who did not respond after three contact attempts at different times were excluded. Although the Health Sciences Descriptors define preschoolers as children aged 2 to 5 years, and the international literature defines them as 3 to 5 years, this study adopted the 1-to-5-year age range, in accordance with the Brazilian educational classification.
Study protocol
The questionnaire involved children’s sociodemographic variables (age, sex, race/color, school shift) and family composition (age and education of main caregivers), based on the economic classification criteria of Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa (ABEP)(23). Education was self-reported by the tutor and categorized into primary, secondary and higher education (complete or incomplete). Socioeconomic stratum was classified into groups A-B and C-D-E, according to the ABEP methodology.
Dependent variables were screen time and sweet consumption, investigated using instruments previously validated for the Brazilian context. To assess screen time, the Family Health Behavior Questionnaire(24) was used, in which caregivers reported, in hours and minutes, the mean daily time children spent performing different activities, including playing outdoors, watching television/DVD, using a computer and/or smartphone and/or tablet, and playing video games, in addition to sleep times related to sleeping and waking. Estimates were collected separately for weekdays and weekends.
Based on WHO guidelines for children under 5 years old, the ideal parameters considered were: screen time ≤ 60 minutes/day, physical activity ≥ 180 minutes/day, and at least 11 hours of sleep for 2-year-olds and ten hours for those between 3 and 5 years old(2).
Sweet consumption was assessed using the Parent Mealtime Action Scale(25), which investigates how often guardians set limits on the daily consumption of sweets, soft drinks, and snacks, in three categories (1 - never, 2 - sometimes, 3 - always). An item from the Ministry of Health’s Food Consumption Markers was also included, asking whether or not meals occur in the presence of screens (answers: “yes”, “no” or “do not know”)(26).
Tutors were initially contacted by phone or messaging app to schedule the interviews. Data collection was conducted in person, in private rooms at the ECECs, with only the researcher and the participant present. The researchers were previously trained on completing the instruments, standardizing the approaches, and conducting data collection ethically.
Analysis of results and statistics
Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 27 after being entered into Microsoft Excel® 2019. Due to the non-normality of continuous variables (p<0.05), non-parametric tests such as Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and Spearman correlation were used. Associations among categorical variables were verified using the chi-square test and, when necessary, Fisher’s exact test. To measure the strength of these associations, the unadjusted Odds Ratio (OR) was calculated, accompanied by a 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI). Cramer’s V coefficient was also calculated when pertinent. A statistical significance level of p<0.05 was adopted in all analyses. Omitted cases were excluded from the analysis and not replaced.
RESULTS
The study included 175 caregivers, predominantly mothers (87.4%). Most families belonged to the C-D-E socioeconomic stratum (90.9%); and 73.7% were beneficiaries of the Bolsa Família Program (Family Allowance). Among children, 59.1% were between 1 and 2 years old; 71.5% were non-white (predominantly mixed race); and 81.5% were enrolled full-time in early childhood education centers. Most mothers had up to 8 years of education (92.6%). Table 1 presents participant sociodemographic characteristics.
The median daily screen time (television and smartphone) was 60 minutes on weekdays, increasing on weekends, when more than 50% of children exceeded two hours per day. Excessive smartphone use (>two hours/day) was significantly more frequent in children aged 3 to 4 years (OR=2.26; 95%CI: 1.09-4.67; p=0.02), of mixed race/color (p<0.01), and among those not enrolled in full-time schooling (p<0.01). For television, there was no significant difference by age. Only a trend towards a higher proportion of >two hours/day was observed among children aged 3-4 years (p=0.11 on weekends; p=0.57 during the week).
There was a significant association between race/skin color and screen time, with children of mixed race/color showing greater exposure to both TV (p=0.02) and smartphones (p<0.01). Table 2 presents detailed data on screen time according to age and race/color. Full-time attendance at ECCs was associated with less smartphone use during the week and weekends (p<0.01), indicating a possible protective effect of structured school routines.
Concerning eating behavior, more than half of children (59.8%) ate meals in front of screens, a practice more common among children aged 1 to 2 years (63.9%). Sweet consumption during meals in front of screens was higher in this group. About 28% of children received additional screen time as a reward from their caregivers.
Although 66% of tutors reported imposing limits on screen time, such restrictions were not significantly associated with a reduction in screen time, suggesting low effectiveness of parental strategies (Table 3).
Screen time (television and smartphone) during the week and on weekends according to screen time limits reported by children’s guardians, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil, 2023 (N=175)
Limits on sweet consumption were associated with a lower chance of excessive screen time only for smartphones (OR=0.32; 95%CI: 0.12-0.85; p=0.023). For television, the association was not significant (OR=1.63; p=0.445). For soft drinks and snacks, we did not observe significant associations with >two hours/day of screen time (TV or smartphone), as shown in Table 4.
Excessive screen time (television and smartphone) related to limits on sweet consumption, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil, 2023 (N=175)
These results indicate that parental dietary control exercised through limits on sweet consumption was associated with a lower likelihood of excessive smartphone use, but this did not extend to television nor was it consistent for other types of ultra-processed foods.
DISCUSSION
This study revealed that children, especially those aged 3 to 4, of mixed race/color, and not enrolled in full-time education, showed a higher frequency of excessive smartphone use. Regarding screen time, it was found that more than half of children ate meals in front of screens, a behavior associated with increased sweet consumption.
The results of this study reveal a worrying picture of the early and excessive use of electronic devices among preschool children, especially smartphones, whose frequency of use was significantly higher among children aged 3 to 4 years. This finding is in line with guidelines from the WHO(2), the American Academy of Pediatrics(25) and the Brazilian Society of Pediatrics(26), which recommend completely avoiding screen use in children under 2 years of age and limiting it to a maximum of one hour per day between two and 5 years of age. The high proportion of children aged 1 to 2 years who already exceeded the recommended screen time limits stands out as a worrying finding.
The association between older age and greater screen exposure may reflect both increased childhood autonomy and reduced parental supervision as a child grows, a factor identified in the literature as a risk factor for the development of harmful digital behaviors(5,6).
Another relevant finding was that more than half of children ate meals in front of screens, mostly those aged 1 to 2 years. This behavior compromises the self-regulation of hunger and satiety, favoring sweet consumption and disorganized eating habits(23). The literature also points to risks of selective eating, food refusal, and excessive calorie intake when eating occurs in front of devices(27,28). The high prevalence of children between one and 2 years old consuming sweets and excessive screen time may be associated with the period of food introduction, since caregivers use screens to distract the child and thus feed them, a habit that can persist over time.
In relation to sweet consumption, most caregivers reported setting limits, especially for sweets (66.3%). It was observed that such limits were associated with a lower chance of excessive screen time when using smartphones. However, for television and the other ultra-processed foods assessed (soft drinks and snacks), the associations were not statistically significant. This finding suggests that imposing limits on screen time alone proved to be ineffective in reducing exposure, a fact also reported in other contexts(29), indicating that interventions focusing on education and parental supervision are necessary for the effective reduction of exposure time. Evidence suggests that multifaceted strategies, such as parental education(30), the use of digital technologies for disseminating information(23), and the provision of alternative activities(31,32) are more effective in reducing screen time in preschoolers. Incorporating these strategies into primary health care programs and the routine of daycare centers can contribute to the promotion of children’s health and well-being.
The weekend emerged as a critical moment, with increased screen time and higher consumption of soft drinks. This relaxation of routines, coupled with the distraction caused by devices, can encourage the consumption of ultra-processed foods, especially sugary drinks(33). Furthermore, parental eating habits can influence this intake, causing children to consume more soda compared to other foods, such as fruits and vegetables(13).
The association between increased screen time and mixed race/color highlights structural inequalities that impact children’s digital and dietary habits. Studies suggest that black and mixed race children are more likely to be exposed to modifiable risk factors, such as prolonged screen time and inadequate nutrition, reflecting social vulnerability and less access to protective environments(34,35). The predominance of children who identified as mixed-race in this study highlights the importance of considering racial factors in analyses of parenting practices, screen time, and eating behaviors in early childhood.
The amount of time a child spends at school directly influences their screen time (television and smartphone use). It was observed that children enrolled in full-time programs at ECECs showed less screen time, reinforcing the protective role of the school routine, as described in other studies(36,37). Another study adds comparisons between different ages, showing that younger children accumulate more weekly screen hours than older children, suggesting that entering and remaining in ECECs contributes to gradually reducing this exposure(38).
The high proportion of families benefiting from income transfer programs highlights the influence of socioeconomic vulnerability on children’s screen time. Although children from wealthier families have greater access to devices, research indicates that in vulnerable contexts, screen use is even more frequent(39). In these contexts, screens are frequently used as the primary form of leisure, given the scarcity of alternatives, which can exacerbate inadequate eating habits, as demonstrated by national and international studies(40,41).
Another relevant finding was the high proportion of mothers with up to eight years of education, reflecting a scenario of low maternal education. This factor, associated with the unfavorable socioeconomic context, can influence both children’s screen time and dietary patterns, as already described in national and international studies that link lower parental education to less protective health practices(18,34,35).
The relationship between screen time and setting limits was also explored. Most caregivers reported imposing restrictions on device use, with a higher rate among children who spend up to two hours a day in front of screens. However, no statistically significant association was identified between setting these limits and reducing screen time, suggesting that, even with a declared intention to control, many caregivers are unable to effectively moderate children’s screen use. This result points to a possible gap between parental practice and children’s actual behavior, a finding also observed in a Canadian study that compared monitoring and limiting screen time during the week with actual screen time, with parental limitations not directly reflected in less screen time(42).
Given this, sweet consumption in front of screens, even with limits set by guardians, is a worrying finding. The intake of sweets associated with excessive screen time can contribute to unregulated eating patterns and greater vulnerability to health problems throughout life(43). Viola et al.(18) found a correlation between increased screen time and higher intake of ultra-processed foods, such as sweets and sugary drinks, suggesting that prolonged time on devices may act as a facilitating factor for the adoption of unhealthy eating habits. Similarly, Mumena et al.(44) highlight that excessive screen use, especially during leisure time, is associated with increased consumption of sugary foods, supporting the idea that excessive screen time not only affects eating behavior but also the development of long-term eating habits.
In this context, the use of screens and sweet consumption are proving to be a risky practice, increasingly incorporated into families, which harms not only the child physically, but also the behavioral, emotional, and social characteristics developed throughout childhood.
Study limitations
Since this is a cross-sectional study, it is not possible to establish causal relationships between screen time, sociodemographic variables, and sweet consumption. The observed associations should therefore be interpreted as correlational. Longitudinal studies are recommended to better understand the effects of screen time on dietary patterns throughout childhood development. Furthermore, the sample consisted of children enrolled in public early childhood education centers in a northeastern municipality, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other populations with different socioeconomic and cultural profiles. Additionally, screen time was estimated through self-reporting by caregivers, which may have introduced recall bias or social desirability bias. Finally, qualitative aspects of the content and the context of screen use, relevant elements for interpreting their impacts on development, were not assessed.
Contributions to nursing, health, or public policy
The findings of this study offer relevant insights for nurses working in Primary Health Care and ECEC units, with the goal of planning preventive actions focused on preschool children’s digital and nutritional health. Hence, nurses can incorporate into their care routine the assessment of screen time and eating habits during well-child visits, using brief screening tools and creating protocols to identify risk situations. The nurses’ role can include developing educational workshops with parents and caregivers, discussion groups on appropriate screen time management, and the creation of educational materials on healthy eating in early childhood. Nurses can also work in an intersectoral manner, integrating nutritional surveillance and parental guidance actions, strengthening public policies focused on the comprehensive health of children.
CONCLUSIONS
The study showed that preschool children who exceed two hours of screen time per day had higher intake of soft drinks and sweets, especially when eating in front of screens, with a higher occurrence on weekends, suggesting less parental control. Children in full-time daycare had less screen time, indicating the protective role of structured environments and routines.
Structural factors, such as low maternal education, unfavorable socioeconomic status, and self-declared mixed race, emerged as critical determinants of greater screen exposure and inadequate dietary patterns. These results reinforce the need for intersectoral interventions, with an emphasis on the role of nursing in the context of Primary Health Care, aimed at promoting healthy screen use habits and limiting screen time during meals, in order to reduce sweet consumption by preschoolers.
-
FUNDING
We thank the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development for the funding grant awarded to author Marreiro AS, the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel for the grant awarded to authors Castro IAL and Azevedo SGV, and the Ceará Foundation for Support of Scientific and Technological Development for the grant awarded to author Albuquerque TR.
AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS
Research data may be made available upon request to the corresponding author.
REFERENCES
-
1 Riesch SK, Liu J, Kaufmann PG, Doswell WM, Cohen S, Vessey J. Preventing adverse health outcomes among children and adolescents by addressing screen media practices concomitant to sleep disturbance. Nurs Outlook. 2019;67(4):492-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2019.02.002
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2019.02.002 -
2 World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep for children under 5 years of age [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2019[cited 2025 Jul 29] Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/311664
» https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/311664 -
3 John JJ, Joseph R, David A, Bejoy A, George KV, George L. Association of screen time with parent-reported cognitive delay in preschool children of Kerala, India. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02480-4
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02480-4 -
4 McArthur BA, Volkova V, Tomopoulos S, Madigan S. Global prevalence of meeting screen time guidelines among children 5 years and younger: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2022;176(4):373-83. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.6386
» https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.6386 -
5 Neophytou E, Manwell LA, Eikelboom R. Effects of excessive screen time on neurodevelopment, learning, memory, mental health, and neurodegeneration: a scoping review. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021;19(3):724-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-019-00182-2
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-019-00182-2 -
6 Muppalla SK, Vuppalapati S, Pulliahgaru AR, Sreenivasulu H. Effects of excessive screen time on child development: an updated review and strategies for management. Cureus. 2023;15(6):e39894. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40608
» https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40608 -
7 Lissak G. Adverse physiological and psychological effects of screen time on children and adolescents: Literature review and case study. Environ Res. 2018;164:149-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.015
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.015 -
8 Lin J, Magiati I, Chiong SHR, Singhal S, Riard N, Ng IHX, et al. The relationship among screen use, sleep, and emotional/behavioral difficulties in preschool children with neurodevelopmental disorders. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2019;40(7):519-29. https://doi.org/10.1097/dbp.0000000000000683
» https://doi.org/10.1097/dbp.0000000000000683 -
9 Felix E, Silva V, Caetano M, Ribeiro MVV, Fidalgo TM, Rosa Neto F, et al. Excessive screen media use in preschoolers is associated with poor motor skills. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020;23(6):418-25. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0238
» https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0238 -
10 Thomas F, Thomas C, Hooper L, Rosenberg G, Vohra J, Bauld L. Area deprivation, screen time and consumption of food and drink high in fat salt and sugar (HFSS) in young people: results from a cross-sectional study in the UK. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):e027333. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027333
» https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027333 -
11 Petty MLB, Escrivão MAMS, Souza AAL. Preliminary validation of the Parent Mealtime Action Scale and its association with food intake in children from São Paulo, Brazil. Appetite. 2013;62:166-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.11.024
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.11.024 -
12 Marsh S, Taylor R, Galland B, Gerritsen S, Parag V, Maddison R. Results of the 3 Pillars Study (3PS): a relationship-based programme targeting parent-child interactions, healthy lifestyle behaviours, and the home environment in parents of preschool-aged children. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0238977. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238977
» https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238977 -
13 Huo J, Kuang X, Xi Y, Xiang C, Yong C, Liang J, et al. Screen time and its association with vegetables, fruits, snacks and sugary sweetened beverages intake among Chinese preschool children in Changsha, Hunan province: a cross-sectional study. Nutrients. 2022;14(19):4086. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14194086
» https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14194086 -
14 Kerai S, Almas A, Guhn M, Forer B, Oberle E. Screen time and developmental health: results from an early childhood study in Canada. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):310. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12701-3
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12701-3 -
15 Birken CS, Maguire J, Mekky M, Manlhiot C, Beck CE, DeGroot J, et al. Office-based randomized controlled trial to reduce screen time in preschool children. Pediatrics. 2012;130(6):1110-5. h https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-3088
» https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-3088 -
16 Adams EL, Marini ME, Stokes J, Birch LL, Paul IM, Savage JS. INSIGHT responsive parenting intervention reduces infant’s screen time and television exposure. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018;15:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0657-5
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0657-5 -
17 Helle C, Hillesund ER, Øverby NC. A qualitative study of public health nurses’ perspectives and experiences on nutritional guidance for parents of infants and toddlers. Matern Child Nutr. 2024;20:e13546. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13546
» https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13546 -
18 Viola PCAF, Ribeiro SAV, Carvalho RRS, Andreoli CS, Novaes JF, Priore SE, et al. Situação socioeconômica, tempo de tela e de permanência na escola e o consumo alimentar de crianças. Cien Saude Colet. 2023;28(1):257-67. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232023281.05772022
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232023281.05772022 -
19 Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA). Índice de Vulnerabilidade Social [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Jul 29]. Available from: https://ivs.ipea.gov.br/#/
» https://ivs.ipea.gov.br/ -
20 Sistema de Vigilância Alimentar e Nutricional (SISVAN). Relatório Público[Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Jul 29]. Available from: https://sisaps.saude.gov.br/sisvan/relatoriopublico/index
» https://sisaps.saude.gov.br/sisvan/relatoriopublico/index -
21 Prefeitura Municipal de Fortaleza. Mostrando itens por tag: Educação Infantil [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Jul 31]. Available from: https://www.fortaleza.ce.gov.br/noticias/tag/Educa%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20Infantil
» https://www.fortaleza.ce.gov.br/noticias/tag/Educa%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20Infantil -
22 Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa (ABEP). Critério de classificação econômica Brasil [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 Sep 30]. Available from: https://abep.org/criterio-brasil/
» https://abep.org/criterio-brasil/ -
23 Goncalves W, Byrne R, Lira P, Viana M, Trost SG. Cross-cultural adaptation of instruments measuring children’s movement behaviors and parenting practices in Brazilian families. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(1):239. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010239
» https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010239 -
24 Ministério da Saúde (BR). Orientações para avaliação de marcadores de consumo alimentar na atenção básica [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2015 [cited 2025 Jul 29]. 35 p. Available from: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/marcadores_consumo_alimentar_atencao_basica.pdf
» https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/marcadores_consumo_alimentar_atencao_basica.pdf -
25 Guram S, Heinz P. Media use in children: American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations 2016. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2018;103(2):99-101. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-311317
» https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-311317 -
26 Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria (SBP). SBP atualiza recomendações sobre saúde de crianças e adolescentes na era digital [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: SBP; 2020. Available from: https://www.sbp.com.br/imprensa/detalhe/nid/sbp-atualiza-recomendacoes-sobre-saude-de-criancas-e-adolescentes-na-era-digital/
» https://www.sbp.com.br/imprensa/detalhe/nid/sbp-atualiza-recomendacoes-sobre-saude-de-criancas-e-adolescentes-na-era-digital/ -
27 Cole NC, Musaad SM, Lee SY, Donovan SM, Team TSK. Home feeding environment and picky eating behavior in preschool-aged children: a prospective analysis. Eat Behav. 2018;30:76-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2018.06.003
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2018.06.003 -
28 Yalcin S, Oflu A, Akturfan M, Yalcin SS. Characteristics of picky eater children in Turkey: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 2022;22:431. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03458-0
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03458-0 -
29 Raj D, Ahmad N, Mohd Zulkefli NA, Lim PY. Stop and play digital health education intervention for reducing excessive screen time among preschoolers from low socioeconomic families: cluster randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e40955. https://doi.org/10.2196/40955
» https://doi.org/10.2196/40955 -
30 Lin YM, Kuo SY, Chang YK, Lin PC, Lin YK, Lee PH, et al. Effects of parental education on screen time, sleep disturbances, and psychosocial adaptation among Asian preschoolers: a randomized controlled study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2021;56:e27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2020.07.003
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2020.07.003 -
31 Miguel-Berges ML, Santaliestra-Pasias AM, Mouratidou T, Flores-Barrantes P, Androutsos O, De Craemer M, et al. Parental perceptions, attitudes and knowledge on European preschool children’s total screen time: the ToyBox-study. Eur J Public Health. 2020;30(1):105-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz151
» https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz151 -
32 Raj D, Zulkefli NABM, Minhat HS, Ahmad N. Parental intervention strategies to reduce screen time among preschool-aged children: a systematic review. Malays J Med Health Sci. 2022;18(6):295-304. https://doi.org/10.47836/mjmhs.18.6.38
» https://doi.org/10.47836/mjmhs.18.6.38 -
33 Lutz MR, Orr CJ, Yin HS, Heerman WJ, Flower KB, Sanders LM, et al. Television time, especially during meals, is associated with less healthy dietary practices in toddlers. Acad Pediatr. 2024;24(5):741-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2023.09.019
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2023.09.019 -
34 Trinh MH, Sundaram R, Robinson SL, Lin TC, Bell EM, Ghassabian A, et al. Association of trajectory and covariates of children’s screen media time. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(1):71-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.4488
» https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.4488 -
35 Zink J, Liu B, Yang C, Herrick KA, Berrigan D. Differential associations between television viewing, computer use, and adiposity by age, gender, and race/ethnicity in United States youth: A cross-sectional NHANES analysis. Pediatr Obes. 2023;18(10):e13070. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.13070
» https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.13070 -
36 Parker H, Burkart S, Reesor-Oyer L, von Klinggraeff L, Pfledderer CD, Adams E, et al. The day-level association between child care attendance and 24-hour movement behaviors in preschool-aged children. J Phys Act Health. 2024;21(6):616-23. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2023-0656
» https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2023-0656 -
37 Ling J, Suriyawong W, Robbins LB, Zhang N, Kerver JM. FirstStep2Health: a cluster randomised trial to promote healthy behaviours and prevent obesity amongst low-income preschoolers. Pediatr Obes. 2024;19(7):e13122. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.13122
» https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.13122 -
38 Madigan S, Browne D, Racine N, Mori C, Tough S. Association between screen time and children’s performance on a developmental screening test. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(3):244-50. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.5056
» https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.5056 -
39 Centro Regional de Estudos para o Desenvolvimento da Sociedade da Informação (Cetic). TIC Kids Online Brasil - Portal de Dados [Internet]. 2023[cited 2024 Oct 6] Available from:https://cetic.br/pt/pesquisa/kids-online/
» https://cetic.br/pt/pesquisa/kids-online/ -
40 Nascimento BF, Neves TC, Rodrigues PL, Nascimento do Carmo C, Araujo TF, Mattos RD, et al. Sociodemographic factors and screen exposure associated with the consumption of healthy and unhealthy dietary markers in children attended at a university hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Nutr Health. 2025;31(1):197-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060231166036
» https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060231166036 -
41 McNeill G, Masson LF, Macdiarmid JI, Craig LCA, Wills WJ, Bromley C. Socio-economic differences in diet, physical activity and leisure-time screen use among Scottish children in 2006 and 2010: are we closing the gap? Public Health Nutr. 2017;20(6):951-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980016002949
» https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980016002949 -
42 Tang L, Darlington G, Ma DWL, Haines J, Study GFH. Mothers’ and fathers’ media parenting practices associated with young children’s screen-time: a cross-sectional study. BMC Obes. 2018;5:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40608-018-0214-4
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s40608-018-0214-4 -
43 Yabiku-Soto K, Saavedra-Garcia L, Guerra Valencia J, Hernández-Vásquez A, Diez-Canseco F. Factors associated with screen time among preschool children in Lima, Peru. Child Care Health Dev. 2024;50(5):e13330. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.13330
» https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.13330 -
44 Mumena WA, Alahmadi AI, Alenazi AE, Alfaruqi FI, Alqarafi GM, Ahmed HA, et al. Leisure screen time predicts free sugar consumption in children. Nutrition. 2023;108:111963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2022.111963
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2022.111963
Edited by
-
EDITOR IN CHIEF:
Antonio José de Almeida Filho
-
ASSOCIATE EDITOR:
Marcia Cubas
