This article investigates the problem of optimal intertemporal consumption in the CCAPM setup from a new empirical perspective. The econometric analysis is based on use of the equality between the stochastic discount factor (SDF) and the marginal rate of intertemporal substitution of consumption, which in the CCAPM is equivalent to the Euler equation resulting from the intertemporal optimization problem of the representative individual. We start from an asset pricing equation to find the estimators of the SDF, without the need to make a parametric assumption about preferences, and then estimate the parameters of the consumption models. In our empirical exercise, the dataset covers income, aggregate consumption and return on financial assets in the quarterly period from 1996:1 to 2016:4. We also consider the existence of a portion of rule-of-thumb consumers and the utility functions CRRA and habit formation in consumer preferences. The empirical results suggest that the preferences that exhibit the formation of consumption habits combined with the stochastic discount factor originating from the hypotheses of Brownian motion are those that most closely correspond to the hypotheses related to the behavior of aggregate consumption.
Artigos • Rev. Bras. Econ. 76
(1)
• Jan-Mar 2022 • https://doi.org/10.5935/0034-7140.20220004 linkcopiar
Testing the consumption-based CAPM using the stochastic discount factor*
Autoria
schoolUniversidade Católica de Brasília, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Economia (PPGE/UCB). QS 07, Lote 01, EPCT, Taguatinga, Brasília, DF, CEP 71966-700, Brazil. iD 0000-0001-6563-7553Universidade Católica de BrasíliaBrazilBrasília, DF, BrazilUniversidade Católica de Brasília, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Economia (PPGE/UCB). QS 07, Lote 01, EPCT, Taguatinga, Brasília, DF, CEP 71966-700, Brazil. iD 0000-0001-6563-7553
schoolUniversidade Católica de Brasília, Departamento de Pós-Graduação em Economia (PPGE/UCB) e Programa de Pós-Graduação em Políticas Públicas (MPPP/UCB). QS 07, Lote 01, EPCT, Taguatinga, Brasília, DF, CEP 71966-700, Brazil. 0000-0003-2215-7730Universidade Católica de BrasíliaBrazilBrasília, DF, BrazilUniversidade Católica de Brasília, Departamento de Pós-Graduação em Economia (PPGE/UCB) e Programa de Pós-Graduação em Políticas Públicas (MPPP/UCB). QS 07, Lote 01, EPCT, Taguatinga, Brasília, DF, CEP 71966-700, Brazil. 0000-0003-2215-7730
SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS
Universidade Católica de Brasília, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Economia (PPGE/UCB). QS 07, Lote 01, EPCT, Taguatinga, Brasília, DF, CEP 71966-700, Brazil. iD 0000-0001-6563-7553Universidade Católica de BrasíliaBrazilBrasília, DF, BrazilUniversidade Católica de Brasília, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Economia (PPGE/UCB). QS 07, Lote 01, EPCT, Taguatinga, Brasília, DF, CEP 71966-700, Brazil. iD 0000-0001-6563-7553
Universidade Católica de Brasília, Departamento de Pós-Graduação em Economia (PPGE/UCB) e Programa de Pós-Graduação em Políticas Públicas (MPPP/UCB). QS 07, Lote 01, EPCT, Taguatinga, Brasília, DF, CEP 71966-700, Brazil. 0000-0003-2215-7730Universidade Católica de BrasíliaBrazilBrasília, DF, BrazilUniversidade Católica de Brasília, Departamento de Pós-Graduação em Economia (PPGE/UCB) e Programa de Pós-Graduação em Políticas Públicas (MPPP/UCB). QS 07, Lote 01, EPCT, Taguatinga, Brasília, DF, CEP 71966-700, Brazil. 0000-0003-2215-7730
Figuras | Tabelas | Fórmulas
imageFigure 1 Real consumption and real income series open_in_new

imageFigure 2 Stochastic discount factors: SDF-BM, SDF-HJ and SDF-CAPM open_in_new

table_chartTable 1
Utility functions and stochastic discount factors of the models
| Model | Utility function | Stochastic discount factor |
|---|---|---|
| CRRA | ||
| Habit Formation | ||
| CRRA |
In logarithmic terms ln mt+1 = ln β − γΔ [ln(Ct+1 − λYt+1)] |
|
| Habit Formation | ln mt+1 = ln β − k(γ − 1) Δ [ln(Ct+1 − λYt)] − γΔ [ln(Ct+1 − λYt+1)] |
-
Note: The parameter γ is the relative risk aversion coefficient and G is the parameter that governs the temporal separability of the utility function.
table_chartTable 2
Descriptive statistics related to the SDFs generated
| SDF-BM | SDF-HJ | SDF-CAPM | Correlation | SDF-BM | SDF-HJ | SDF-CAPM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 0.78 | 0.94 | 0.98 | SDF-BM | 1.000 | ||
| Median | 0.75 | 0.91 | 0.98 | SDF-HJ | -0.377 | 1.000 | |
| Maximum | 1.36 | 1.54 | 1.32 | SDF-CAPM | 0.839 | -0.574 | 1.000 |
| Minimum | 0.22 | 0.62 | 0.61 | ||||
| Std. Dev. | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.14 |
-
Note: SDF-B, SDF-HJ and SDF-CAPM are the three stochastic discount factors generated with the market data. SD is the standard deviation.
table_chartTable 3
Estimation of the parameters for the consumption models ± SDF with Brownian motion
| CRRA: | External Habit: | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ln mt+1 = ln β − γΔ [ln(Ct+1 − λYt+1)] | ln mt+1 = ln β − k(γ − 1) Δ [ln(Ct+1 − λYt)] − γΔ [ln(Ct+1 − λYt+1)] | |||||||||||
| (I) | (II) | (I) | (II) | |||||||||
| λ = 0 | λ = 0.3 | λ = 0.6 | λ = 0 | λ = 0.3 | λ = 0.6 | λ = 0 | λ = 0.3 | λ = 0.6 | λ = 0 | λ = 0.3 | λ = 0.6 | |
| β | 0.7931*** (0.0258) | 0.7851*** (0.0255) | 0.7810*** (0.0255) | 0.7586*** (0.0272) | 0.7506*** (0.0263) | 0.7467*** (0.0260) | 0.8032*** (0.0267) | 0.7954*** (0.0253) | 0.7809*** (0.02570) | 0.7694*** (0.0288) | 0.7641*** (0.0267) | 0.7466*** (0.0261) |
| γ | 3.1869* (1.7895) | 1.6370* (0.9275) | -0.0218 (0.1060) | 2.9965 (1.9378) | 1.372 (1.1132) | -0.028 (0.1123) | 3.3722* (1.7914) | 2.3789** (0.9032) | -0.0096 (0.1081) | 3.0711 (1.9314) | 2.4658** (1.1759) | -0.0138 (0.1149) |
| k | - | - | - | - | - | -0.9352 (1.0063) | -1.3013 (0.9311) | 0.0519 (0.1071) | -1.1701 (1.4090) | -1.5301 (1.2117) | 0.0712 (0.1153) | |
| ARCH Test1 | 8.5496* | 5.5882 | 8.4329* | 1.8771 | 1.7209 | 2.1605 | 7.691585 | 4.446435 | 7.4668 | 1.9296 | 1.7548 | 2.0991 |
| LM Test2 | 2.3064 | 3.5597 | 3.703 | 0.8984* | 1.8165 | 1.4511 | 3.123008 | 4.735853 | 3.496 | 1.202 | 2.638 | 1.4032 |
| Jarque-Bera3 | 1.2215 | 1.3451 | 2.1766 | 16.477*** | 16.123*** | 16.653*** | 1.207257 | 1.526151 | 2.2992 | 17.209*** | 11.170*** | 15.192*** |
-
Notes: *, ** and *** refer to rejection of the null hypothesis at the levels 10%, 5% and 1%. Steps of the Gauss-Newton/Marquardt method. (1) ARCH test, least squares method; (2) Breusch-Godfrey serial correlation LM Test; (3) Jarque-Bera test of normality of the residuals. The shaded columns represent the valid models as defined by the diagnostic tests at 5% significance. i)_Iç>5 is the estimator of the stochastic discount factor (SDF), according to the hypothesis proposed by Hansen and Jagannathan (1991) for asset pricing. ii) Specification test: (4 lags)-ARCH Test: with null hypothesis of constant variance. Test of the autoregressive effect of the variance of the errors; iii) Specification test: (4 lags)- LM Test: with null hypothesis of absence of autocorrelation of the errors. Test of the presence of serial correlation in the model; iv) Specification test: (4 lags)- Jarque- Bera, with the null hypothesis of normality of the errors. Tests whether the errors are constant, as in a normal distribution. v) %ç>5 represents the aggregate consumption; ;ç>5 represents the aggregate income; and %6áç represents the consumption of individuals that optimize (rational expectations), where: %6áç>5 L %ç>5 F _ã;ç>5. vi) The data of aggregate consumption and aggregate income of the individuals utilized in the model are per capita; vii) Considering for the term :ã; the values 0; 0.3; and 0.6, with minimum value (zero) and maximum value (0.6) set so that consumption cannot be negative. viii) Model I (CRRA) estimates results in level; as well as model I (External Habit). ix) Model II (CRRA) estimated results in logarithms, as well as model II (External Habit).
table_chartTable 4
Estimation of the parameters for the consumption models ± SDF with Hansen and Jagannathan (HJ)
| CRRA: | External Habit: | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ln mt+1 = ln β − γΔ [ln(Ct+1 − λYt+1)] | ln mt+1 = ln β − k(γ − 1) Δ [ln(Ct+1 − λYt)] − γΔ [ln(Ct+1 − λYt+1)] | |||||||||||
| (I) | (II) | (I) | (II) | |||||||||
| λ = 0 | λ = 0.3 | λ = 0.6 | λ = 0 | λ = 0.3 | λ = 0.6 | λ = 0 | λ = 0.3 | λ = 0.6 | λ = 0 | λ = 0.3 | λ = 0.6 | |
| β | 0.9368*** (0.2195) | 0.9424*** (0.0213) | 0.9405*** (0.0273) | 0.9202*** (0.0206) | 0.9244*** (0.0202) | 0.9237*** (0.0197) | 0.9338*** (0.0231) | 0.9418*** (0.0220) | 0.9399*** (0.0206) | 0.9171*** (0.0216) | 0.9228*** (0.0209) | 0.9236*** (0.0197) |
| γ | -0.8871 (1.2567) | 0.4752 (0.6975) | 0.1090 (0.0686) | -0.7591 (1.2133) | 0.3238 (0.6940) | 0.0884 (0.0687) | -0.9120 (1.2620) | 0.4265 (0.7626) | 0.1292* (0.0687) | -0.7765 (1.2200) | 0.2087 (0.7609) | 0.0996 (0.0702) |
| k | - | - | - | - | - | - | -0.2731 (0.6763) | -0.2447 (1.3002) | 0.1053 (0.0848) | -0.3187 (0.7093) | -0.3713 (0.8886) | 0.0630 (0.0792) |
| ARCH Test1 | 3.1252 | 2.7246 | 4.2501 | 3.1773 | 1.9352 | 3.0199 | 2.8937 | 3.0035 | 2.5674 | 3.1802 | 2.4359 | 2.2058 |
| LM Test2 | 3.7501 | 4.0376 | 2.9404 | 3.9872 | 4.3067 | 3.3979 | 3.8774 | 3.8813 | 3.3203 | 4.1887 | 4.0752 | 3.5833 |
| Jarque-Bera3 | 10.048*** | 8.6162** | 6.2302** | 1.0365 | 1.2140 | 0.8823 | 10.210** | 8.4676** | 3.9070 | 1.1911 | 1.4771 | 0.4304 |
-
Notes: *, ** and *** refer to rejection of the null hypothesis at the levels 10%, 5% and 1%. Steps of the Gauss-Newton/Marquardt method. (1) ARCH test, least squares method; (2) Breusch-Godfrey serial correlation LM Test; (3) Jarque-Bera test of normality of the residuals. The shaded columns represent the valid models as defined by the diagnostic tests at 5% significance. i)_Iç>5 is the estimator of the stochastic discount factor (SDF), according to the hypothesis proposed by Hansen and Jagannathan (1991) for asset pricing. ii) Specification test: (4 lags)-ARCH Test: with null hypothesis of constant variance. Test of the autoregressive effect of the variance of the errors; iii) Specification test: (4 lags)- LM Test: with null hypothesis of absence of autocorrelation of the errors. Test of the presence of serial correlation in the model; iv) Specification test: (4 lags)- Jarque- Bera, with the null hypothesis of normality of the errors. Tests whether the errors are constant, as in a normal distribution. v) %ç>5 represents the aggregate consumption; ;ç>5 represents the aggregate income; and %6áç represents the consumption of individuals that optimize (rational expectations), where: %6áç>5 L %ç>5 F _ã;ç>5. vi) The data of aggregate consumption and aggregate income of the individuals utilized in the model are per capita; vii) Considering for the term :ã; the values 0; 0.3; and 0.6, with minimum value (zero) and maximum value (0.6) set so that consumption cannot be negative. viii) Model I (CRRA) estimates results in level; as well as model I (External Habit). ix) Model II (CRRA) estimated results in logarithms, as well as model II (External Habit).
table_chartTable 5
Estimation of the parameters for the consumption models ± SDF with CAPM
| CRRA: | External Habit: | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ln mt+1 = ln β − γΔ [ln(Ct+1 − λYt+1)] | ln mt+1 = ln β − k(γ − 1) Δ [ln(Ct+1 − λYt)] − γΔ [ln(Ct+1 − λYt+1)] | |||||||||||
| (I) | (II) | (I) | (II) | |||||||||
| λ = 0 | λ = 0.3 | λ = 0.6 | λ = 0 | λ = 0.3 | λ = 0.6 | λ = 0 | λ = 0.3 | λ = 0.6 | λ = 0 | λ = 0.3 | λ = 0.6 | |
| β | 0.9834*** (0.0167) | 0.9805*** (0.0164) | 0.9788*** (0.0161) | 0.9728*** (0.0172) | 0.9697*** (0.0168) | 0.9679*** (0.0165) | 0.9848*** (0.0176) | 0.9850*** (0.0166) | 0.9788*** (0.0162) | 0.9731*** (0.0182) | 0.9746*** (0.0172) | 0.9679*** (0.0166) |
| γ | 0.8952 (0.9255) | 0.2806 (0.5226) | -0.2895 (0.0536) | 0.9498 (0.9594) | 0.3337 (0.5499) | -0.0256 (0.0550) | 0.9075 (0.9322) | 0.5062 (0.5518) | -0.0273 (0.0550) | 0.9518 (0.9660) | 0.6012 (0.5934) | -0.0237 (0.0565) |
| k | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2.5839 (28.2087) | 0.5834 (1.4885) | 0.0093 (0.0529) | 1.3379 (33.8693) | 0.7629 (2.1348) | 0.009 (0.0553) |
| ARCH Test1 | 3.6638 | 3.2959 | 4.4861 | 8.3804* | 7.9194* | 9.3291* | 3.7254 | 2.9212 | 4.3436 | 8.3589* | 7.2487 | 9.2253* |
| LM Test2 | 3.8568 | 4.6171 | 3.3007 | 4.0793 | 4.9417 | 3.3409 | 4.0308 | 3.697 | 3.1803 | 4.1253 | 3.9259 | 3.232 |
| Jarque-Bera3 | 0.0364 | 0.0628 | 0.2428 | 5.1114 | 5.1779* | 6.5792** | 0.0798 | 0.1178 | 0.2497 | 5.2661* | 5.8812* | 6.5713** |
-
Notes: *, ** and *** refer to rejection of the null hypothesis at the levels 10%, 5% and 1%. Steps of the Gauss-Newton/Marquardt method. (1) ARCH test, least squares method; (2) Breusch-Godfrey serial correlation LM Test; (3) Jarque-Bera test of normality of the residuals. The shaded columns represent the valid models as defined by the diagnostic tests at 5% significance. i)_Iç>5 is the estimator of the stochastic discount factor (SDF), according to the hypothesis proposed by Hansen and Jagannathan (1991) for asset pricing. ii) Specification test: (4 lags)-ARCH Test: with null hypothesis of constant variance. Test of the autoregressive effect of the variance of the errors; iii) Specification test: (4 lags)- LM Test: with null hypothesis of absence of autocorrelation of the errors. Test of the presence of serial correlation in the model; iv) Specification test: (4 lags)- Jarque- Bera, with the null hypothesis of normality of the errors. Tests whether the errors are constant, as in a normal distribution. v) %ç>5 represents the aggregate consumption; ;ç>5 represents the aggregate income; and %6áç represents the consumption of individuals that optimize (rational expectations), where: %6áç>5 L %ç>5 F _ã;ç>5. vi) The data of aggregate consumption and aggregate income of the individuals utilized in the model are per capita; vii) Considering for the term :ã; the values 0; 0.3; and 0.6, with minimum value (zero) and maximum value (0.6) set so that consumption cannot be negative. viii) Model I (CRRA) estimates results in level; as well as model I (External Habit). ix) Model II (CRRA) estimated results in logarithms, as well as model II (External Habit).
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
Como citar
location_on
Fundação Getúlio Vargas
Praia de Botafogo, 190 11º andar, 22253-900 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil, Tel.: +55 21 3799-5831 , Fax: +55 21 2553-8821 -
Rio de Janeiro -
RJ -
Brazil
E-mail: rbe@fgv.br
E-mail: rbe@fgv.br
rss_feed
Acompañe los números de esta revista en su lector de RSS
Versão para download de PDF
Artículos relacionados
Lista de links para artigos relacionados. Os links abrem em nova aba.
Versões e tradução automática
Escolha a versão original do texto ou utilize um serviço de tradução automática.
Versão original do texto
Como citar
Escolha um formato para exportar ou selecione um estilo de citação. O conteúdo abaixo pode ser atualizado após a seleção.
Thumbnail
Thumbnail