Abstract
This paper investigated population misreporting in Brazil from 1991 to 2010. We have firstly documented that there is a discontinuity in the population distribution, but only for census years. Secondly, we estimated the elasticity of population (mis)reporting regarding intergovernmental grant that ranges from 0.3 to 2.5. Lastly, we have found that not only political variables operate to help those municipalities to obtain more federal funds, but also fiscal autonomy and the proximity to local population office bureau.
Keywords
population reporting; census; Brazilian municipalities
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail


Note: Polled for 1991, 2000 and 2010. Bunching around the first threshold. Bin of 82 municipalities and 3,456 observations. Elaborated by the authors.







Note: Estimation using Probit (standard adjusted for clusters id). The reported coefficients refer to the marginal effect. Number of observations: 839. Socioeconomic control variables and interaction between the political variables that are binary. See Appendix for full tables.
Note: Estimation using Probit (standard adjusted for clusters identification). The reported coefficients refer to the marginal effect. Number of observations: 682. Socioeconomic control variables and interaction between the political variables that are binary.
Note: Estimation using Probit (standard adjusted for clusters identification). The reported coefficients refer to the marginal effect. Number of observations: 750. Socioeconomic control variables and the fixed effects for states. See Appendix for full tables.
Note: Estimation using Probit (standard adjusted for clusters identification). The reported coefficients refer to the marginal effect. Number of observations: 750. Socioeconomic control variables and interaction between the political variables that are binary. See Appendix for full tables.

