Comparação das respostas físicas em jogos de futebol por <i>bio-banding</i> e por idade cronológica: uma revisão sistemática

Moré, Rita Adriana Stoeterau; Dellagrana, Rodolfo André

doi:10.1590/1980-0037.2025v27e95895

review article • Rev. bras. cineantropom. desempenho hum. 27 • 2025 • https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2025v27e95895 linkcopiar

Comparação das respostas físicas em jogos de futebol por bio-banding e por idade cronológica: uma revisão sistemática

Autoria SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Resumo

Resumo O objetivo desta revisão sistemática foi identificar e sintetizar as informações disponíveis em estudos que comparam as respostas físicas de jovens jogadores de futebol submetidos a jogos em dois modelos distintos de competição: o modelo por bio-banding, que considera o estágio de maturação biológica, e o modelo cronológico, baseado unicamente na idade dos jogadores. A condução desta revisão seguiu as diretrizes do Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Realizaram-se buscas bibliográficas em três bases de dados: PubMed, Web of Science e SCOPUS, utilizando os seguintes descritores: "jogo de futebol", "desempenho físico", "maturação biológica" e "bio-banding". Os critérios de inclusão foram artigos com estudos experimentais conduzidos em contexto de jogo, que comparassem as respostas físicas de jogadores durante competições organizadas por bio-banding e cronológicas, com o intuito de investigar a influência da maturação biológica nessas respostas. A busca inicial resultou em 336 registros, dos quais 4 artigos compuseram a amostra final. A qualidade metodológica dos estudos incluídos foi avaliada como média a alta. Os achados sugerem que a maturação biológica tem influência nas respostas físicas de jovens jogadores de futebol, e que, tanto os jogadores com maturação tardia, como os com maturação precoce, podem se beneficiar dos jogos organizados por status de maturação biológica.

Palavras-chave:
Crescimento; Desempenho físico; Futebol

		Abbott et al. (2019)	Arede et al (2024)	Lüdin et al. (2022	Romman et al. (2020)
Q1	Was/were the study objective(s) clearly defined?	2	2	2	2
Q2	Were the participant characteristics presented in detail in the methods section? (number of subjects, sex, age, country/city)	2	1	1	2
Q3	Was the sample size justified?	0	0	0	0
Q4	Is the bio-banding procedure clearly described in the methods section?	2	2	2	2
Q5	Were the statistics presented clearly?	2	2	2	2
Q6	Result details (means and standard deviations and/or change/difference, effect size/mechanistic magnitude-based inference).	2	2	2	1
Q7	Were the conclusions adequate considering the study methods and objectives?	2	2	2	1
Q8	Are there practical implications given the study's results?	2	2	2	1
Q9	Were the study's limitations recognized and described by the authors?	2	2	2	1
Q10	Is there any future direction described by the authors?	2	2	2	2

Author/Country	Study Design	Age (years)	n	Physical responses assessed	Main results	Quality Index
Abbott et al.¹⁸ /England	Randomized crossover study.	12.7±1.0	25	Total distance (m); Distance covered at high speed >5.5 m∙s^-1 (m); Accelerations >2 m∙s² ou Deceleration <2 m∙s²; e RPE	Players with advanced maturation produced higher rates of perceived exertion in bio-banding games compared to chronological age games. RPE Chronological 6.6±0.5 RPE Bio-banding 7.5±0.9	90%
Arede et al.²⁴ / Portugal	Randomized crossover study.	13.3±0.9	116	Total distance covered (m); Accelerations >3 m∙s² or Decelerations <3 m∙s²; Average speed (km∙h⁻¹) and peak speed (km∙h⁻¹).	The total distance was shorter in the bio-banding competition (69.26±19.03) compared to the chronological competition (84.70±13.11) (ES= 1.1); the number of decelerations was lower in the bio-banding competition (4.08±1.74) compared to the chronological competition. o (5.03±1.73) (ES= 0.82); the average speed was lower in the bio-banding competition (3.98±1.10) compared to the chronological competition. (4.88±0.76) (ES= 1.15)	85%
Lüdin et al.¹³ / Switzerland	Randomized crossover study.	12.7±0.4*	65	Total distance (m); Distance covered at high speed >15.8km·h^-1 (m); Number of accelerations >2.4 m∙s²	Advanced maturation players (under-13) had a higher number of accelerations in bio-banding competition (64±25) compared to chronological competition (47±13) (ES= -0.6).	85%
					The late-maturing players (U-14) had a greater number of accelerations in the chronological competition (57±17) in comparison to the competition bio-banding(48±13) (ES=0.6);
					The advanced-maturing players (U-14) had a greater number of accelerations in the chronological competition(75±24) in comparison to the competition bio-banding (62±19) (ES=0.5)
Romman et al.¹⁶ / Switzerland	Paired crossover study.	12.7±0.4**	62	Distances covered classified by velocity: Walking = 0–5.8 km∙h^-1; Jogging= 5.8–11.5 km∙h^-1; Running = 11.5–15.8 km∙h^-1; High-speed running=15.8–20.0 km∙h^-1; Sprint = >20.0 km∙h^-1	Bio-banding reduced the total distance covered (1.83±0.40 vs. 1.94±0.39 km) and the jogging distances covered (0.69±0.24 vs. 0.75±0.25 km), running (0.30±0.13 vs. 0.32±0.14km) and high-speed running distances (0.11±0.06 vs. 0.12±0.07 km) in comparison to the chronological competition.	70%

location_on

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Campus Universitário Trindade, Centro de Desportos - RBCDH, Zip postal: 88040-900 - Florianópolis, SC. Brasil, Fone/fax : (55 48) 3721-8562/(55 48) 3721-6348 - Florianópolis - SC - Brazil
E-mail: rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br

rss_feed Stay informed of issues for this journal through your RSS reader

[TFN1] ^*
Mean age calculated from the four groups presented in the study. ** mean age calculated from the two groups presented in the study.