The relationship between the timing of pregnancy discovery and prenatal attachment and distress: a case-control studySUMMARY
OBJECTIVE: This research was conducted to determine the relationship between the timing of pregnancy discovery and prenatal attachment and distress.
METHODS: An analytical, case-control research design was used. The study was conducted between April 2023 and March 2024. The population of the study consisted of pregnant women who presented to a training and research hospital in the north of Turkey for antenatal follow-up, and the sample consisted of 152 women from this population (case group 76 and control group 76). Data were collected using a Pregnant Descriptive Information Form, the Prenatal Attachment Inventory, and the Prenatal Distress Scale-Revised Version. The chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Spearman correlation analysis were utilized to analyze the data.
RESULTS: The prenatal attachment scores of participants who discovered their pregnancies late were significantly lower than the scores of those whose pregnancies were discovered early (p<0.05). The prenatal distress scores of participants whose pregnancies were discovered late were significantly higher than the scores of those with early discovery (p<0.05). While a statistically positive, low-level relationship was detected between the prenatal attachment and prenatal distress scores of pregnant women whose pregnancies were discovered early (p<0.05), there was no statistically significant relationship between the scores of those who discovered their pregnancies late (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: There was a difference between the timing of pregnancy discovery and prenatal attachment and prenatal distress.
KEYWORDS:
Pregnancy; Attachment; Recognition; Psychological distress
INTRODUCTION
Pregnancy is a critical process that profoundly affects women's lives. In this process, pregnancy discovery after the eighth gestational week is called late pregnancy discovery1. Early or late pregnancy discovery may affect the chances of having a healthy pregnancy and baby, as well as causing the patient to miss the legal curettage time1-4. In addition, the timing of pregnancy discovery is a critical issue in terms of maternal and fetal health. During pregnancy, it is necessary to make positive health-related changes such as receiving prenatal care, using folic acid, starting health-enhancing practices like nutrition and exercise, changing the drugs used or rearranging their dose, and quitting harmful substances like tobacco or alcohol1,2,4.
Prenatal attachment involves the mother's expression of love for and bonding with her baby during pregnancy5. A pregnant woman who achieves attachment believes that her baby has established a relationship with her, imagines her baby, and sees it as an individual. Therefore, it has been reported that the pregnant woman shows love, compassion, and attention to her baby, protects it, and is sensitive toward it5-7. When the literature is examined, it can be seen that prenatal attachment is affected by the pregnant woman's education level, employment status, presence of social support, history of anxiety or depression, marital satisfaction, desire for pregnancy, history of abortion, diagnosis of risky pregnancy or fetal anomaly, and the risk for premature birth5,8-11.
In addition to physiological, psychological, and social changes during pregnancy, the thought of responsibility for the care of the baby in the postpartum period causes prenatal distress12,13. Prenatal distress is defined as the fear and anxiety that arise as a result of the pregnant woman's concerns about birth and the baby, her body image during pregnancy, and changes in her relationships with her partner and environment13. Factors such as low socioeconomic level, education level, age, unplanned pregnancy, and socioeconomic conditions lead to prenatal distress14-18. The review of the literature on the timing of pregnancy discovery has indicated that there are no studies that have involved women with a history of abortion and curettage in the examination of the effect of the timing of pregnancy discovery on prenatal attachment and prenatal distress1,3,4. In this regard, the data obtained from this study might contribute to the provision of education by health professionals for society and the organization of antenatal care services. The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between the timing of pregnancy discovery and prenatal attachment and distress.
METHODS
Type of the study
The study was planned as an analytical, case-control research.
The setting and the properties of the study
The study was conducted at a training and research hospital in the north of Turkey between April 2023 and March 2024.
Population and the sample of the study
The sample was determined using the G*Power 3.1.9.2 software. There was no study in the literature investigating the relationship between the timing of pregnancy discovery and prenatal attachment and distress. Therefore, it was decided to calculate the effect size of our study by taking the medium effect (0.50) in Cohen's effect size classification19,20. The sample size of the study was calculated as at least 128 pregnant women (case group 64, control group 64) according to the independent samples t-test results conducted using the G*Power 3.1.9.2 software, based on a confidence interval of 80% (1-α), a test power of 95% (1-β), and an effect size of d=0.50. To increase the analysis power of the study, a total of 152 pregnant women (case group 76 and control group 76) were included using the nonprobability sampling (random) method by increasing the sample size by 20%. During the data collection, a total of 47 pregnant women were excluded from the study as 17 were older than 35 years, 2 were diagnosed with psychological disorders (bipolar disorder, schizophrenia), and 28 did not want to participate in the study.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
In the study, women whose pregnancy was discovered in or before the eighth gestational week were included in the case group. In addition, both case and control groups included pregnant women who were between the ages of 18 and 35 years, were between the 4th and 40th weeks of gestation, presented to the pregnancy clinic for routine checkups, and were at least a primary school graduate. In the study, women who got pregnant with assisted reproductive techniques were diagnosed with psychological disorders, got pregnant as a result of sexual harassment, rape, or incest, or were diagnosed with fetal anomalies or risky pregnancies were not included in either group.
Data collection tools
The data were collected using a Pregnant Descriptive Information Form, the Prenatal Attachment Inventory, and the Prenatal Distress Scale-Revised Version.
Pregnant Descriptive Information Form: This form was developed by the researchers following a literature review1,3,5. It involved a total of 24 questions, 10 about the sociodemographic characteristics of pregnant women (such as age and education level) and 14 about obstetric characteristics (such as the number of pregnancies).
The Prenatal Attachment Inventory: This form was developed by Muller in 1990 to make sense of the thoughts and feelings experienced by women during pregnancy and determine their attachment levels in the prenatal period21. Its Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Yılmaz and Beji20. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of the inventory was reported as 0.8421,20. The alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.90 in this study.
The Prenatal Distress Scale (PDS)-Revised Version: This scale was first developed by Yali and Lobel22 to evaluate the concerns and anxieties specific to the pregnancy period22. The Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Yüksel et al23. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was reported as 0.8523. The alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.80 in the present study.
Data analysis
The research data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science27. Before statistical comparisons between groups with early and late pregnancy discovery were made, their suitability for normal distribution was examined with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare non-normally distributed scale scores based on questions with two response options. The chi-square independence test was preferred when testing the significance of relationships between categorical data. In cases where the relationships between numerical variables were not normally distributed, Spearman's correlation test was employed. The significance level was p<0.05.
Ethical aspects of the study
This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethics committee approval for the research was obtained from the Ondokuz Mayıs University Social and Human Sciences Ethics Committee (protocol no: 2022-865). The pregnant women's verbal and written consent was obtained.
RESULTS
According to these results, there was no statistically significant relationship between the participants’ family type, employment status, and perceived income and the time when their pregnancies were discovered (p=0.100, 0.797, and 0.346, respectively). When we look at the distribution by age groups, while the majority of the 18–24-year-old and 25–30-year-old groups were diagnosed early, the pregnancies of 61.8% of the 31–35-year-old participants were discovered late. In addition, it was determined that the median age of the participants who discovered their pregnancy late (31) was higher than the median age of the participants who discovered it early (28), and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.001). In addition, it was determined that as participants’ education level increased, the rate of early pregnancy discovery also increased, and there was a statistically significant difference between the timing of pregnancy discovery and education level (p=0.002) (Table 1).
Comparison of the timing of pregnancy discovery according to participants’ sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics.
In both groups, pregnancy was discovered early in 69% of the first pregnancies, but it was discovered late in 57.3% of multiparous participants, and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.001). It was determined that the number of live births in participants who discovered their pregnancy late was significantly higher than those in participants who did it early, and there was a statistically significant difference between the groups (p=0.001). In addition, 68.2% of the participants who had a planned pregnancy discovered their pregnancy early, while 75% of those who had an unplanned pregnancy discovered their pregnancy late, and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of planned pregnancy (p=0.001) (Table 1).
According to these results, the prenatal attachment scores of participants whose pregnancy was discovered late (55) were lower than the scores of those whose pregnancy was detected early (72), and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.001). The prenatal distress scores of participants who discovered pregnancy late (13) were higher than those who did it early (9), and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.001) (Table 2).
Comparison of participants’ mean prenatal attachment and prenatal distress scores according to the timing of pregnancy discovery.
When all the participants were examined, a statistically low, negative relationship was found between prenatal attachment and prenatal distress scores (p=0.03). According to the findings of the participants whose pregnancies were discovered early, a low-level, statistically positive relationship was found between prenatal attachment and prenatal distress scores (p=0.011). However, no statistically significant relationship was discovered between prenatal attachment and prenatal distress scores of participants whose pregnancy was discovered late (p=0.334), (Table 3); (Figure 1).
DISCUSSION
In this study, which was conducted to determine the relationship between the timing of pregnancy discovery and prenatal attachment and distress, it was found that the mean prenatal attachment scores of participants whose pregnancy was discovered late were lower than the scores of those whose pregnancy was detected early, while their mean prenatal distress scores were higher, and that this difference was significant. There were no data about prenatal attachment and distress in studies on the timing of pregnancy discovery in the literature; therefore, no comparison could be made1-4. It is thought that early pregnancy discovery affects the transition and adaptation process to parenthood, reducing the pregnant woman's prenatal distress level and, in parallel, increasing the prenatal attachment level. On the other hand, late pregnancy discovery increases the level of prenatal distress because it causes delays in positive health behaviors such as quitting smoking and starting folic acid supplements. This study presents new findings, which have not been evaluated before, to the literature. Additionally, a statistically negative relationship was found between pregnant women's prenatal attachment and prenatal distress scores. Similar to our research findings, studies in the literature have shown that as the prenatal distress level of pregnant women increases, their prenatal attachment level decreases17,18.
Many factors related to the timing of pregnancy discovery in different cultures and societies affect maternal and child health and therefore public health outcomes2,4. In this study, while there was no significant difference between pregnant women's timing of pregnancy discovery and their family type, employment status, place of residence, and perceived economic status, a significant difference was found in terms of their age, education levels, and pregnancy planning status. Similar to our research finding, in the study in which the National Survey of Family Growth data were analyzed, it was stated that there was a relationship between late pregnancy discovery and age, perceived economic status, education level, and unwanted or unplanned pregnancy1. In addition, some other studies have shown that there is a relationship between late pregnancy discovery and pregnant women's age, income level, marriage status, ethnic group, and marital adjustment24.
Strengths and limitations
Since the participants were recruited from only one hospital, the results cannot be generalized across the country; however, since the hospital where the data were collected was one of the largest hospitals in the province, our results can be generalized throughout the province as many pregnant women from surrounding provinces and districts present to the gynecology clinic of this institution. Additionally, no generalization can be made across the country due to regional and cultural differences. The strength of the study is that the new findings obtained as a result of the study will contribute to the literature and provide guidance for future research.
CONCLUSION
This study found that the mean prenatal attachment scores of participants whose pregnancy was detected late were lower than the scores of those whose pregnancy was detected early, while their mean prenatal distress scores were higher. Health professionals, especially midwives and nurses, who provide primary health care, need to recognize the factors affecting the discovery of pregnancy and teach all women of reproductive age the signs and symptoms of pregnancy.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by Ondokuz Mayıs University Social and Human Sciences Research Ethics Committee (October 28, 2022/no. 2022-865).
CONSENT
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
CONSENT TO PUBLISH
The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for the publication of the image in Figure 1a.
REFERENCES
-
1 Branum AM, Ahrens KA. Trends in timing of pregnancy awareness among US Women. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21(4):715-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2155-1
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2155-1 -
2 Foster DG, Gould H, Biggs MA. Timing of pregnancy discovery among women seeking abortion. Contraception. 2021;104(6):642-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2021.07.110
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2021.07.110 -
3 McCarthy M, Upadhyay U, Biggs MA, Anthony R, Holl J, Roberts SC. Predictors of timing of pregnancy discovery. Contraception. 2018;97(4):303-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.12.001
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.12.001 -
4 Watson K, Angelotta C. The frequency of pregnancy recognition across the gestational spectrum and its consequences in the United States. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2022;54(2):32-7. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12192
» https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12192 -
5 Gürol A, Ejder Apay S, Sönmez T. Effects of the labour fear on the prenatal attachment and determination of the affecting factors. Arch Health Sci Res. 2020;7(2):137-45. https://doi.org/10.5152/archealthscires.2020.460568
» https://doi.org/10.5152/archealthscires.2020.460568 -
6 Howland MA, Sandman CA, Davis EP, Glynn LM. Prenatal maternal psychological distress and fetal developmental trajectories: associations with infant temperament. Dev Psychopathol. 2020;32(5):1685-95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095457942000142X
» https://doi.org/10.1017/S095457942000142X -
7 Rollè L, Giordano M, Santoniccolo F, Trombetta T. Prenatal attachment and perinatal depression: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(8):2644. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082644
» https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082644 -
8 Canlı A, Demirtaş B. Prenatal attachment and the relationship with body self-perception. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2022;51(1):e1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2021.09.003
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2021.09.003 -
9 Gioia MC, Cerasa A, Muggeo VMR, Tonin P, Cajiao J, Aloi A, et al. The relationship between maternal-fetus attachment and perceived parental bonds in pregnant women: considering a possible mediating role of psychological distress. Front Psychol. 2023;13:1095030. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1095030
» https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1095030 -
10 Kidd KN, Prasad D, Cunningham JEA, Azevedo Cardoso T, Frey BN. The relationship between parental bonding and mood, anxiety and related disorders in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2022;307:221-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.069
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.069 -
11 Sacchi C, Miscioscia M, Visentin S, Simonelli A. Maternal-fetal attachment in pregnant Italian women: multidimensional influences and the association with maternal caregiving in the infant's first year of life. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):488. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03964-6
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03964-6 -
12 Ayu IP, Rachmawati IN, UngsianikT. Maternal age as a main factor influencing prenatal distress in Indonesian primigravida. Enfermerm Clin. 2019;29:310-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.04.039
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.04.039 -
13 Yılmaz EB, Şahin E. Factors associated with prenatal distress levels of pregnant women. J Psychiatr Nurs. 2019;10(3):197-203. https://doi.org/10.14744/phd.2019.17363
» https://doi.org/10.14744/phd.2019.17363 -
14 Ugurlu M, Uctu AK. The relationship of the prenatal distress with health literacy and health perception of pregnant women. Iran J Public Health. 2023;52(9):1917-24. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v52i9.13573
» https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v52i9.13573 -
15 Yilmaz FA, Gözüyeşil E, Köse Tuncer S, Akman G, Aba YA, Durgun Ozan Y, et al. Prenatal distress levels of pregnant women in Turkey and affecting factors: a multicentre study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;41(5):708-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2020.1789950
» https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2020.1789950 -
16 Henrichs J, Kroon M, Walker A, Witteveen A, Westerneng M, Baar A, et al. Maternal prenatal distress, maternal pre and postnatal bonding and behavioral and emotional problems in toddlers. A secondary analysis of the IRIS study. J Child Fam Stud. 2023;32(7):2113-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-022-02529-1
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-022-02529-1 -
17 Kaya Şenol D, Pekyiğit A. The effect of distress in pregnancy on prenatal attachment. Balıkesir Health Sci J. 2024;13(1):144-50. https://doi.org/10.53424/balikesirsbd.1138887
» https://doi.org/10.53424/balikesirsbd.1138887 -
18 Özkan H, Kanbur A, Karakoç H, Aksoy AN. The relationship between distress and prenatal attachment during pregnancy. Genel Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2023;5(2):201-7. https://doi.org/10.51123/jgehes.2023.86
» https://doi.org/10.51123/jgehes.2023.86 -
19 Kılıç S. Effect size. J Mood Disord. 2014;4(1):44-6. https://doi.org/10.5455/jmood.20140228012836
» https://doi.org/10.5455/jmood.20140228012836 -
20 Yılmaz SD, Beji NK. Turkish version of prenatal attachment ınventory: a study of reliability and validity. J Nursol. 2013;16:103-9. Available from: https://toad.halileksi.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/prenatal-baglanma-envanteri-toad.pdf
» https://toad.halileksi.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/prenatal-baglanma-envanteri-toad.pdf -
21 Muller ME. Development of the prenatal attachment inventory. West J Nurs Res. 1993;15(2):199-211;discussion 211-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/019394599301500205
» https://doi.org/10.1177/019394599301500205 -
22 Yali AM, Lobel M. Coping and distress in pregnancy: an investigation of medically high risk women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;20(1):39-52. https://doi.org/10.3109/01674829909075575
» https://doi.org/10.3109/01674829909075575 -
23 Yüksel F, Akın S, Durna Z. The Turkish adaptation of the "revised prenatal distress questionnaire": a reliability/validity and factor analysis study. J Educ Res Nurs. 2011;8(3):43-51. https://doi.org/10.30934/kusbed.467716
» https://doi.org/10.30934/kusbed.467716 -
24 Kost K, Lindberg L. Pregnancy intentions, maternal behaviors, and infant health: investigating relationships with new measures and propensity score analysis. Demography. 2015;52(1):83-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0359-9
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0359-9
