Update of the epidemiological distribution of COVID-19 variants: a review articleINTRODUCTION
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) resulted in the current pandemic that has spread since 2019, being the virus responsible for the “Coronavirus Disease 2019” (COVID-19)1. This disease was responsible for more than 171,708,011 infections worldwide, until June 7, 2021, and more than 3,697,151 deaths. Concomitantly, with the development of vaccines, about 447,911,020 human beings have been vaccinated and more than 2,049,141,878 doses have been applied, in accordance with World Health Organization (WHO)2.
Viruses are known to have the ability to constantly mutate in such a way that they give rise to variants that persist for a long time or disappear in a short period of time. During the pandemic, several countries recorded these events3. In this context, the WHO is working on a global surveillance system so that all countries can collaborate with new information on variants of SARS-CoV-24.
Scientific teams are studying the range of circulation of these new variants, the effect that these mutations can have on potential reinfection, diagnosis, vaccination, severity, and disease transmission. Countries are working with the WHO on how surveillance systems can be strengthened or adapted to assess the potential variations of the virus through continuous systematic clinical and epidemiological surveillance, establishing genetic sequencing when possible and accessing international findings to send sequencing samples and phylogenetic analysis5.
The pandemic spread of a virus in virgin populations can select mutations that alter pathogenesis, virulence, and/or transmissibility. The ancestral form of SARS-CoV-2 that emerged from China has now been largely replaced by strains containing the D614G mutation, replacement of aspartic acid with glycine (Asp 614-para-Gly) in the viral spike protein. However, this change in the virus seems to have evolved into greater transmissibility in humans, rather than greater pathogenicity, due to the association with higher viral loads in the upper respiratory tract than those observed with the ancestral strain6–9.
As of May 25, 2021, there are four variants of concern to WHO around the world: South Africa (B.1.351, May 2020), United Kingdom (B.1.1.7, Sep 2020), India (B.1.617, Oct 2020), and Brazil (P.1, Nov 2020)10.
Thus, the purpose of this study is to describe the geographic distribution of the most worrying variants of COVID-19.
METHODS
The present review was performed in MEDLINE (PubMed) and LILACS, following the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)11. The search terms used were SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, and variants to find articles published until June 7, 2021. The exclusion criteria were inappropriate topics or not relevant to the purpose of the study (Figure 1).
Genomic sequencing
Since the start of the pandemic in 2020, global science has relentlessly sought to encode the genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 to advance vaccine development. Concomitantly, it was noticed, in some countries around the world, that the genomes of the viruses that infect some human beings had some differences from the genome of the new coronavirus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic. In a study published in April 2020, the genomic sequences of Italian, Chinese, Mexican, German, and Australian patients were compared, reaching the conclusion that not all sequences belonged to the same viral strain12.
In another phylogenetic study with 160 SARS-CoV-2 genomes collected from different regions of the world, it was verified that the existence of three central variants differ mainly by protein alterations13. Therefore, the genome of the new coronavirus is very subject to mutations, favoring the difficulty in the production of antibodies and the recognition of the immune system against the viral antigen14.
Much of this mutant capacity of SARS-CoV-2 is associated with the Spike receptor-binding domain (RBD), especially in the region of the Spike glycoprotein that regulates virus binding at the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor that remains located on the surface of human cells15.
The D614G substitution increases the replication ability of SARS-CoV-2 in primary epithelial cells, with an advantage in the upper respiratory tract epithelial cells in nasal and large (proximal) epitheliums of the airways that express greater amounts of human ACE2 (hACE2) receiver6–8. In addition, Korber et al.9 concluded that the D614G substitution does not significantly change the morphology of SARS-CoV-2, the peak cleavage pattern, and the in vitro neutralization properties in the context of the live virus.
Viral variants
According to the WHO, SARS-CoV-2 variants can be divided into variants of interest (VOIs) and variants of concern (VOCs). As of June 1, 2021, there are four variants of concern, and they are found in the UK, South Africa, Brazil, and India. Regarding the VOIs, six were documented16 (Table 1).
The variant B.1.1.7 contains eight mutations in Spike, and the strain is associated with many additional mutations throughout the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Among the Spike mutations, N501Y is suggested to increase the ACE2-RBD interaction. Double deletion of H69-V70 amino acids in Spike's N-terminal domain (NTD) often co-occurs with one of the three mutations in RBD: N501Y, N439K, or Y453F. Y453F is associated with an outbreak in Denmark, with and without the presence of a ΔH69/V70 deletion, but is also found in people in the UK. The N439K mutation usually occurs with ΔH69/V70, but it also frequently occurs without the ΔH69/V70 mutation. In an in vitro selection study with Regeneron antibodies, Y453F and N439K were found to escape neutralization by REGN10933 and REGN10987 that comprise the REGN-COV2 cocktail regime. It has also been reported that N439K resists neutralization while maintaining the virus' fitness /infectivity. Another mutation of obvious concern in B.1.1.7 is P681H, proximal to the furin cleavage site that has often appeared independently and has come to dominate the local epidemic in Hawaii17–19.
A new strain of SARS-CoV-2 has been discovered in South Africa, 501Y.V2, which is composed of nine alterations in the Spike protein. However, although this new strain is associated with greater transmissibility and not immunogenicity, it is known that the accumulation of mutations can result in a space for viral neutralization. The nine alterations in the Spike protein can be divided into groups that include four protein substitutions and a deletion (L18F, D80A, D215G, Δ242-244, and R246I)20. In Brazil, viral mutations were also found in this same region of the Spike protein21.
CONCLUSION
This review showed that much of this mutated capacity of SARS-CoV-2 is associated with the Spike RBD that regulates virus binding to the angiotensin-2 converting enzyme receptor (ACE2). The VOCs to WHO detected so far (June 7, 2021) have been mapped in the UK, South Africa, Brazil, and India. It is known that they are more associated with greater transmissibility than pathogenicity. However, there is still a need for further studies to identify whether current vaccines will be effective in inducing antibody production against the variants and whether such variants will be responsible for new waves of infection in the current pandemic.
REFERENCES
-
1 Van der Made CI, Simons A, Schuurs-Hoeijmakers J, Van den Heuvel G, Mantere T, Kersten S, et al. Presence of genetic variants among young men with severe COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;324(7):663-73. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.13719
» https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.13719 -
2 World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard [internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. [cited on Jun. 4, 2021]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI6LCVuYX08AIVyICRCh32EQ2HEAAYASABEgLAhfD_BwE
» https://covid19.who.int/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI6LCVuYX08AIVyICRCh32EQ2HEAAYASABEgLAhfD_BwE -
3 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. New variants of the virus that causes COVID-19 [internet]. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2021. [cited on Feb. 12, 2021]. Availabe from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/transmission/variant.html
» https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/transmission/variant.html -
4 Mahase E. Covid-19: what new variants are emerging and how are they being investigated? BMJ. 2021;372:n158. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n158
» https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n158 -
5 World Health Organization. SARS-sob-2 Variants [internet]. Disease Outbreak News; 2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. [cited on Feb. 12, 2021]. Available from: https://www.who.int/csr/don/31-december-2020-sars-cov2-variants/en/
» https://www.who.int/csr/don/31-december-2020-sars-cov2-variants/en/ -
6 Hou YJ, Chiba S, Halfmann P, Ehre C, Kuroda M, Dinnon KH 3rd, et al. SARS-CoV-2 D614G variant exhibits efficient replication ex vivo and transmission in vivo. Science. 2020;370(6523):1464-8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe8499
» https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe8499 -
7 Yurkovetskiy L, Wang X, Pascal KE, Tomkins-Tinch C, Nyalile T, Wang Y, et al. Structural and functional analysis of the D614G SARS-CoV-2 spike protein variant. Cell. 2020;183(3):739-51.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.032
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.032 -
8 Hodcroft EB, Zuber M, Nadeau S, Vaughan TG, Crawford KHD, et al. Spread of a SARS-CoV-2 variant through Europe in the summer of 2020. Nature. 2021;595(7869):707-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03677-y
» https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03677-y -
9 Korber B, Fischer WM, Gnanakaran S, Yoon H, Theiler J, Abfalterer W, et al. Tracking changes in SARS-CoV-2 spike: evidence that D614G increases infectivity of the COVID-19 virus. Cell. 2020;182(4):812-27.e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.043
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.043 -
10 World Health Organization. COVID-19 Weekly epidemiological update [internet]. Edition 41; 2021. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. [cited on May 25, 2021]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/341525
» https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/341525 -
11 Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
» https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 -
12 Stefanelli P, Faggioni G, Lo Presti A, Fiore S, Marchi A, Benedetti E, et al. Whole genome and phylogenetic analysis of two SARS-CoV-2 strains isolated in Italy in January and February 2020: additional clues on multiple introductions and further circulation in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(13):2000305. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.13.2000305
» https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.13.2000305 -
13 Forster P, Forster L, Renfrew C, Forster M. Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(17):9241-3. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004999117
» https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004999117 -
14 Koyama T, Weeraratne D, Snowdon JL, Parida L. Emergence of drift variants that may affect COVID-19 vaccine development and antibody treatment. Pathogens. 2020;9(5):324. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9050324
» https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9050324 -
15 Santos JC, Passos GA. The high infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 is associated with increased interaction force between Spike-ACE2 caused by the viral N501Y mutation. bioRxiv. 2021;12.29.424708. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.29.424708
» https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.29.424708 -
16 World Health Organization. COVID-19 Weekly epidemiological update. Edition 42; 2021. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. [cited on Jun 1, 2021]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/341525
» https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/341525 -
17 Shen X, Tang H, McDanal C, Wagh K, Fischer W, Theiler J, et al. SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.1.7 is susceptible to neutralizing antibodies elicited by ancestral spike vaccines. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29(4):529-39.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2021.03.002
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2021.03.002 -
18 Koyama T, Weeraratne D, Snowdon JL, Parida L. Emergence of drift variants that may affect COVID-19 vaccine development and antibody treatment. Pathogens. 2020;9(5):324. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9050324
» https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9050324 -
19 Koyama T, Platt D, Parida L. Variant analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Bull World Health Organ. 2020;98(7):495-504. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.20.253591
» https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.20.253591 -
20 Wibmer CK, Ayres F, Hermanus T, Madzivhandila M, Kgagudi P, Oosthuysen B, et al. SARS-CoV-2 501Y.V2 escapes neutralization by South African COVID-19 donor plasma. Nat Med. 2021;27(4):622-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01285-x
» https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01285-x -
21 McCallum M, Marco A, Lempp F, Tortorici MA, Pinto D, Walls AC, et al. N-terminal domain antigenic mapping reveals a site of vulnerability for SARS-CoV-2. Cell. 2021;184(9):2332-47.e16. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.14.426475
» https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.14.426475
