FOOD WASTE AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Santos, Paulo Henrique Amorim; Martins, Roberto Antonio

doi:10.1590/S0034-759020210505

Tabla de contenido Anterior Actual Siguiente

Tabla de contenido

FORUM • Rev. adm. empres. 61 (5) • 2021 • https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020210505 linkcopy

FOOD WASTE AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

This paper aims to present an analysis of the scientific output on performance measurement and food waste as well as the trends and challenges in the field. Food waste increases food insecurity and misuses scarce natural and financial resources. However, there are many difficulties in measuring waste at the aggregate level, and the various ways used in companies lack a systemic approach. A systematic literature review was conducted using bibliometrics to guide the content analysis. The results indicate a lack of articles focusing on performance measurement systems for the whole supply chain with an emphasis on sustainability. The application of digital technologies to performance measurement systems is a trend that was observed. That opens an opportunity for research that aims to better quantify food waste and contribute to reduce food insecurity.

KEYWORDS:
Food waste; food loss; performance measurement systems; food security; systematic literature review

Concept	Definition
Performance	Efficiency and/or effectiveness of an action
Performance Measurement	Qualitative or quantitative evaluation of an action's efficiency and/or effectiveness
Performance Measurement System	Process (or processes) of defining objectives, developing a set of performance measures, collecting, analyzing, reporting, interpreting, reviewing, and acting on performance data (technical controls)
Performance Management	Cultural and behavioral routines that define how we use the performance measurement system to manage an organization's performance (social controls)

First Author	Year	Journal	TC1	TC by Year	TC Ranking by Year
Brown D	2013	Bioresource Technol	167	20.9	1
Elmekawy A	2014	J Power Sources	58	8.3	3
Soysal M	2018	Comput Oper Res	45	15.0	2
Duke Mlatm	2014	Philos T T Soc A	41	5.9	5
Pirani Si	2016	J Clean Prod	40	8.0	4
Sturgeon H	2016	Waste Manage	23	4.6	7
Charlebois S	2015	Int J Cult Tour Hosp	20	3.3	9
Manser Nd	2015	Bioresource Technol	17	2.8	10
Martin-rilo S	2015	J Clean Prod	17	2.8	10
Menna F	2018	Waste Manage	14	4.7	6
Sun H	2017	Waste Manage	14	3.5	8

Journal	Articles	TC1	h index2	Areas3	Publisher
Journal of Cleaner Production	5	83	150	[ES] [IE] [E]	Elsevier B.V.
Waste Management	4	60	127	[ES]	Elsevier Ltd.
Bioresource Technology	3	193	251	[ES] [E]	Elsevier B.V.
Sustainability	2	0	53	[ES] [IE]	MDPI Open Access Publishing

Cluster	Article	Research Type	Performance Measures	Performance Measurement System	Performance Measurement Scope	Performance Measurement Use	PMS Processes
1	Pirani and Arafat (2016)	Empirical	Sustainability Indicator	Does not address	Public and Household Consumption	Control	Measurement Selection and Design
	Duong et al. (2018)	Empirical	Set of Sustainability Indicators	Does not address	Transportation, Storage and Retail Distribution	Improvement	Measurement Selection and Design
	Charlebois et al. (2015)	Empirical	Waste Sources only	Does not address	Retail	Control	Measurement Selection and Design
	Sturgeon et al. (2016)	Theoretical	Set of Indicators with Causal Relations in the Economic Dimension	Does not address	Transportation, Storage and Distribution to Public and Household Consumption	Improvement	Measurement Selection and Design
	Derqui e Fernandez (2017)	Empirical	Social, Economic and Sustainability Indicators	Does not address	Public and Household Consumption	Improvement	Data Collection and Manipulation
	Naidoo and Gasparatos (2018)	Theoretical	Set of Sustainability Indicators	Yes	Retail	Strategic Management	Measurement Selection and Design Information Management
2	Duke et al. (2014)	Theoretical	Indicators with Causals Relations in the Economic Dimension	Does not address	Transportation, Storage and Distribution	Strategic Management Communication	Measurement Selection and Design Data Collection and Manipulation
	Alamar et al. (2018)	Theoretical	Measures with Causal Relations in the Economic Dimension	Does not address	Harvest/Slaughter Processing and Packaging	Improvement	Data Collection and Manipulation
	Soysal et al. (2018)	Empirical	Set of Economic and Sustainability Indicators	Does not address	Transportation, Storage and Distribution	Control Communication	Measurement Selection and Design
	Despoudi et al. (2018)	Empirical	Tons wasted, as Economic and Sustainability Indicator	Does not address	Post-Harvest/Slaughter Operations	Control	Information Management
	Orjuela-Castro et al. (2019)	Empirical	Set of Economic Indicators	Does not address	Transportation, Storage and Distribution	Improvement	Measurement Selection and Design
	Feiz et al. (2020)	Empirical	Set of Economic and Sustainability Indicators	Does not address	Processing and Packaging	Control	Measurement Selection and Design
	Salt et al. (2017)	Empirical	Set of Economic Indicators	Does not address	Public and Household Consumption	Control	Measurement Selection and Design
	Menna et al. (2018)	Theoretical	Set of Economic Indicators	Does not address	All Supply Chain Stages	Control	Unidentified
	Moustafa et al. (2018)	Theoretical	Set of Economic Indicators	Does not address	Retail	Control	Measurement Selection and Design
	Pauer et al. (2019)	Theoretical	Set of Sustainability Indicators	Yes	Processing and Packaging	Control	Measurement Selection and Design
	Bohtan et al. (2019)	Empirical	Set of Indicators with Causal Relations in the Economic Dimension	Yes	Post-Harvest/Retail Slaughter Operations	Control Improvement	Measurement Selection and Design Data Collection and Manipulation
	Garcia-Garcia et al. (2019)	Empirical	Set of Sustainability Indicators	Does not address	Transportation, Storage and Distribution to Processing and Packaging	Control	Measurement Selection and Design

location_on

Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administração de Empresas de S.Paulo Avenida Nove de Julho, 2.029, Bela Vista, CEP: 01313-902, Telefone: +55 (11) 3799-7718 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: rae@fgv.br

rss_feed Acompañe los números de esta revista en su lector de RSS

[TFN5] ¹
The acronym TC refers to the total citations of each document