|
Low effectiveness
|
| "Low effectiveness. I have difficulty summarizing the results and conclusions of my research in a presentation of up to one hour”. |
| Weak. Our website needs to be updated frequently, and I am unable to meet this demand”. |
| "Weak, because I haven´t been able to translate it into a non-scientific format yet". |
| "Low effectiveness. Few people truly understand the topic". |
| "Very low effectiveness. Outdated strategies or social media posts with little impact, despite high-impact research". |
| “It is not very effective, because I can´t dedicate time to it.” |
|
Moderate effectiveness
|
| "Time limitations for investing in dissemination". |
| "Recognition of the importance of objective and simple messages". |
| " Communication is still primarily aimed at the academic community, with limited reach to the general public ". |
| " I believe effectiveness is average, given time limitations for such dissemination ". |
| " Moderate. I imagine the more objective and simpler, the better". |
| " Average. I believe dissemination through scientific articles, abstracts, or conference papers targets only the academic community and similar groups ". |
|
High effectiveness
|
| " I received positive feedback such as photos from events involving my research ". |
| " Using photography and visual communication to impact the general public". |
| " Participating in local community events, promoting interaction". |
| "Lectures, field classes, and interviews demonstrate effectiveness”. |
| "Creative tools like storymaps to translate project results for non-specialized audiences, successfully” |
| "People are giving me feedback with photos from events involving my research, making science actively citizen-oriented". |
| "Mediation, I assess it as very good and efficient". |
| “I work with photography. I believe visual communication has a great impact on the public”. |
| "An example I believe worked well was participating in city events in Seropédica, like Environment Day, with various activities, prizes, and interesting exchanges with residents”. |
| " Lectures, field classes, and interviews. They have been effective". |
| "We created storymaps with geographic narratives to communicate project results to non-environmental audiences (engineers from a renewable energy company) and it was successful". |
|
Other challenges and/or additional comments
|
| "Sequence of difficulties: 1. Translating research into accessible and engaging materials for the public; 2. Disseminating and making materials available to the target audience; 3. Having indicators to measure the reach of this dissemination". |
| "Simplifying research materials into popular language and communicating results to the target audience". |
| "Encouragement to write about work conducted on the institution's website". |
| "We use techniques aimed at the academic environment. Data dissemination through scientific articles and presentations at academic events". |
| "Making technical/scientific language more accessible, approaching journalistic and even poetic language". |