| Helewa et al., 198110 (cross-sectional) |
To evaluate the concurrent criterion validity and inter-rater reliability of the sphygmomanometer and a weight measurement method for measuring knee EXT strength in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis |
Population: individuals with rheumatoid arthritis |
Adaptation: bag and cuff |
Muscle group: knee EXT |
| Database/source |
N=5 |
Equipment preparation: 20mmHg pre-inflation |
Familiarization with the test: the methods were explained to each individual and pre-tested on the opposite leg |
| (MEDLINE) |
Age: 18 to 65 years |
Calibration: Yes |
Number of repetitions: 1 |
| Ethical approval NR |
Gender: F: 3 (66%) |
|
Contraction time: 5s |
|
M: 2 (34%) |
|
Resting time: NR |
|
BMI: NR |
|
Verbal stimulus: NR |
|
|
|
Participant positioning: SP, upper limbs at the side of the body, thighs supported, hip joint flexed at 45° and knee flexed at 90°; |
|
|
|
The examiner passively positioned the subject’s MI to maintain a 90° angle at the knee joint; the individual was asked to maintain the position while the examiner applied resistance gradually (with open hands on the equipment). |
|
|
|
Position of the equipment: placed above the ankle, longitudinally |
| Balogun et al., 199024 |
To evaluate the modified sphygmomanometer reproducibility during HG force measurement; determine the relations between the modified sphygmomanometer and dynamometer readings, derive a linear regression equation to predict HG strength from modified sphygmomanometer measurements and to determine the relative contribution of age, body, weight, and height to predicting HG strength |
Population: healthy adolescents and adults |
Adaptation: bag |
Muscle group: HG |
| (cross-sectional) |
N=34 |
Equipment preparation: 20mmHg pre-inflation |
Familiarization with the test: each individual underwent two experimental sessions |
| Database/source |
Age: 16 to 28 years |
Calibration: NR |
Number of repetitions: 2, considering the higher value |
| (retrieved from Toohey et al., 2018)29 |
Gender: F: 6 (18%) |
|
Contraction time: 5 s + 2 s for reading |
| Ethical approval NR |
M: 28 (82%) |
|
Resting time: 5 min |
|
BMI: NR |
|
Verbal stimulus: NR |
|
|
|
Participant positioning: standing with the shoulder adducted and rotated neutral, elbow joint kept in full extension and the forearm in a neutral position |
|
|
|
Equipment Position: palm |
| Dunn, 199316 |
To gather data on HG strength of typical children aged 3 to 7 years using MST, and to compare the HG strength of a preliminary sample of children with rheumatic disorders with the HG strength of typical children |
Population: children with rheumatic disorders and typical children |
Adaptation: bag |
Muscle group: HG |
| (cross-sectional) |
N=273 |
Equipment preparation: 20mmHg pre-inflation |
Familiarization with the test: the position was explained verbally and demonstrated as many times as necessary |
| Database/source |
Age: 3 to 7 years |
Calibration: Yes |
Number of repetitions: 3, analysis with arithmetic mean |
| (MEDLINE) |
Gender: F: 132 (48%); |
|
Contraction time: NR |
| Ethical approval NR |
M: 141 (52%) |
|
Resting time: 15s |
|
BMI: NR |
|
Verbal stimulus: Yes |
|
|
|
Participant positioning: child seated in a chair, hip joint flexed at 90° bilaterally, both feet resting on the floor before the chair. upper limbs adducted, elbows flexed at 90°, forearm supinated and wrist in neutral position |
|
|
|
Equipment position: palm |
| Koch and Simenson, 199233 |
To document how the muscles of the distal extremities of upper limbs may function as a primary resource for hand function, ADLs, and mobility in children with spinal muscular atrophy type II and to describe the natural history of the disease |
Population: children with spinal muscular atrophy type II |
Adaptation: NR |
Muscle group: HG |
| (prospective cohort) |
N=10 |
Equipment preparation: NR |
Familiarization with the test: NR |
| Database/source |
Age: NR |
Calibration: NR |
Number of repetitions: NR |
| (MEDLINE) |
Gender: NR |
|
Contraction time: NR |
| Ethical approval NR |
BMI: NR |
|
Resting time: NR |
|
|
|
Verbal stimulus: NR |
|
|
|
Participant positioning: NR |
|
|
|
Equipment Position: NR |
| Barden et al., 199515 |
To describe a physical therapy protocol for treating wrist subluxation in children with arthritis |
Population: children with arthritis |
Adaptation: NR |
Muscle group: HG |
| (case report) |
N=2 |
Equipment preparation: NR |
Familiarization with the test: NR |
| Database/source |
Age: 5 and 17 years |
Calibration: NR |
Number of repetitions: 3 (analysis with the highest value) |
| (MEDLINE) |
Gender: F: 1 (50%); |
|
Contraction time: 10s |
| Ethical approval NR |
M: 1 (50%) |
|
Resting time: NR |
|
BMI: NR |
|
Verbal stimulus: NR |
|
|
|
Participant positioning: NR |
|
|
|
Equipment Position: NR |
| Soares & Riedel, 199725 |
To compare the manual forceps of individuals affected by leprosy with healthy individuals using a neonatal sphygmomanometer |
Population: individuals with leprosy and unaffected |
Adaptation: bag (neonatal sphygmomanometer) |
Muscle group: palmar pinch, tree-point pinch, and lateral pinch |
| (cross-sectional) |
N=78 |
Equipment preparation: 20mmHg pre-inflation |
Familiarization with the test: NR |
| Database/source |
Age: 15 to 55 years |
Calibration: NR |
Number of repetitions: NR |
| (MEDLINE) |
Gender: NR |
|
Contraction time: NR |
| Ethical approval NR |
BMI: NR |
|
Resting time: NR |
|
|
|
Verbal stimulus: NR |
|
|
|
Participant positioning: NR |
|
|
|
Position of the equipment: palmar pinch: between the thumb and each of the fingers; lateral pinch: between the thumb and the side of the index finger; and three-point pinch: between the index and middle fingers, middle and ring fingers, ring and little fingers |
| Perossa et al., 199819 |
To investigate the intra-examiner reliability of manual shoulder and hip muscle assessment using MST |
Population: typical student volunteers |
Adaptation: none |
Muscle group: FLX, EXT, ABD, shoulder RI and RE, EXT, hip FLX and ABD |
| (cross-sectional) |
N=80 |
Equipment preparation: 20mmHg pre-inflation |
Familiarization with the test: the participant was allowed to practice the movements before performing the test |
| Database/source |
Age: 19 to 22 years |
Calibration: NR |
Number of repetitions: NR |
| (retrieved from Souza et al., 2013)6 |
Gender: F: 40 (50%); |
|
Contraction time: NR |
| Ethical approval NR |
M: 40 (50%) |
|
Resting time: 30 to 35s |
|
BMI: NR |
|
Verbal stimulus: NR |
|
|
|
Participant positioning: Shoulder FLX: seated, shoulder flexed at 30°; |
|
|
|
Shoulder EXT: seated, shoulder extended at 20°; |
|
|
|
Shoulder ABD: seated, shoulder abducted at approximately 35°; |
|
|
|
RI: seated, elbow flexed at 90°; |
|
|
|
RE: seated, elbow flexed at 90°; |
|
|
|
Hip EXT: prone position, equipment behind the knee. Participant bent their leg at 90º and raised their thigh 15º to 20º from the table; |
|
|
|
Hip FLX: supine position, with thigh and knee bent at 90º. Equipment positioned in the anterior region near the knee; |
|
|
|
Hip ABD: LD, equipment on the side of the knee, instructed to initiate the action by pushing upwards |
|
|
|
Equipment Position: Shoulder FLX: on the forearm above the elbow; |
|
|
|
EXT of shoulder: on the inside of the forearm; |
|
|
|
Shoulder ABD: in the middle of the forearm; |
|
|
|
Shoulder RI: NR; |
|
|
|
Shoulder RE: above the outside of the wrist; |
|
|
|
Hip EXT: behind the knee; |
|
|
|
Hip FLX: in front of the knee; |
|
|
|
Hip ABD: on the side of the knee |
| Suresh et al., 200826 |
To evaluate hand muscle weakness using dynamometry as an indicator of alteration in motor nerve function detected by the voluntary test of muscles innervated by the ulnar and median nerves |
Population: individuals newly diagnosed with multibacillary leprosy |
Adaptation: cuff |
Muscle group: HG, palmar pinch, and lateral pinch |
| (prospective cohort) |
N=303 |
Equipment preparation: 20mmHg pre-inflation |
Familiarization with the test: all test procedures were described in detail in a procedure manual |
| Database/source |
Age: 12 to 60 years old (mean of 32.8) |
Calibration: NR |
Number of repetitions: 3, analysis with arithmetic mean |
| (MEDLINE) |
Gender: F: 83 (27%) |
|
Contraction time: NR |
| Ethical approval |
M: 220 (73%) |
|
Resting time: NR |
| Indian Council of Medical Research and the Research Ethics Committee of the JALMA Central Institute of Leprosy in Agra |
BMI: NR |
|
Verbal stimulus: Yes |
|
|
|
Participant positioning: seated in a chair whose arms served as support for the upper limbs, feet resting on the floor. Palmar pinch: forearm in neutral position, wrist slightly extended, finger joints slightly flexed, thumb between flexion and opposition, interphalangeal joint extended; lateral pinch: UL close to the trunk, elbow flexed, forearm pronated, wrist extended, metacarpophalangeal joint of the index finger flexed, interphalangeal joints extended, thumb in opposition. HG: shoulder abducted, elbow flexed at 90°, forearm in neutral position, wrist extended |
|
|
|
Equipment Position: NR |
| Malliaras et al., 200918 |
To identify reliable hip flexibility and strength measures among junior elite soccer players with and without groin pain |
Population: soccer players |
Adaptation: none |
Muscle group: Hip ABD |
| (prospective cohort) |
N=29 |
Equipment preparation: 10mmHg pre-inflation |
Familiarization with the test: measurements were taken after a trial, for familiarization |
| Database/source |
Age: 15 to 21 years |
Calibration: NR |
Number of repetitions: NR |
| (retrieved from Toohey et al., 201514)29 |
Gender: M: 29 (100%) |
|
Contraction time: NR |
| Ethical approval |
BMI: NR |
|
Resting time: NR |
| La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia |
|
|
Verbal stimulus: NR |
|
|
|
Participant positioning: supine position, three angles of hip flexion: 0°, 30° and 45° |
|
|
|
Equipment position: between the player’s knees |
| Delahunt et al., 201127 |
To evaluate the intra-rater reliability of a commercially available sphygmomanometer to measure ADD compression values in Irish soccer athletes and to determine if different compression values are associated with the three commonly used test positions |
Population: Irish soccer athletes |
Adaptation: none |
Muscle group: Hip ABD |
| (cross-sectional) |
N=18 |
Equipment preparation: 10mmHg pre-inflation |
Familiarization with the test: 3 practical trials were allowed in each test position for familiarization with the protocol |
| Database/source (retrieved from Hodgson et al., 201428) |
Age: 21.11±2.53 years |
Calibration: NR |
Number of repetitions: 3, considering the higher value |
| Ethical approval |
Gender: M: 18 (100%) |
|
Contraction time: NR |
| College Dublin University |
BMI: NR |
|
Resting time: 2 min |
|
|
|
Verbal stimulus: NR |
|
|
|
Participant positioning: supine position with arms crossed and head resting on a cushion. Hip joints were kept in neutral rotation in each of the test positions. Three angles: 0º, 45º and 90º hip flexion |
|
|
|
Position of the equipment: between the knees at the most prominent point of the medial femoral condyles |
| Delahunt et al., 201127 |
To investigate adductor muscle activity and concomitant pressure values while performing hip ADD compression test at 0°, 45° and 90° hip flexion of Irish soccer athletes without any history of groin injury |
Population: Irish soccer athletes |
Adaptation: none |
Muscle group: Hip ABD |
| (cross-sectional) |
N=18 |
Equipment preparation: 10mmHg pre-inflation |
Familiarization with the test: three attempts at submaximal practice were allowed in each test position for familiarization with the procedures. |
| Database/source |
Age: 21.11±2.53 years |
Calibration: NR |
Number of repetitions: 3, considering the higher value |
| (MEDLINE) |
Gender: M: 18 (100%) |
|
Contraction time: 5s |
| Ethical approval College Dublin University |
BMI: NR |
|
Resting time: NR |
|
|
|
Verbal stimulus: NR |
|
|
|
Participant positioning: at 0° the hip joint was kept in a neutral rotation position. For the 45° and 90° hip flexion test positions, the knee joint was held at 90° flexion |
|
|
|
Equipment position: the sphygmomanometer cuff was placed between the knees |
| Coughlan et al., 201432 |
To establish normative values of the ADD compression test in asymptomatic junior elite rugby players and to investigate whether there are differences between the player’s position on the field and the category |
Population: asymptomatic rugby players |
Adaptation: none |
Muscle group: Hip ABD |
| (cross-sectional) |
N=104 |
Equipment preparation: 10mmHg pre-inflation |
Familiarization with the test: before the validity test, each participant became familiar with the protocol, was informed about the test procedure and allowed to perform three submaximal efforts in each of the test positions |
| Database/source |
Age: 17.56±0.54 years |
Calibration: NR |
Number of repetitions: 3, considering the higher value |
| (retrieved from Souza et al., 201634)6 |
Gender: M: 104 (100%) |
|
Contraction time: NR |
| Ethical approval |
BMI: NR |
|
Resting time: 15s between each rep and a 45s rest between each test position |
| College Dublin University |
|
|
Verbal stimulus: NR |
|
|
|
Participant positioning: supine position, with the head resting on the stretcher and the arms on the chest. Three angles: 0º, 45º and 90º hip flexion |
|
|
|
Equipment position: the cuff was positioned so that the middle third rested at the most prominent point of the medial femoral condyles |
| Hodgson et al., 201428 |
To determine the normative values of hip ADD strength in professional rugby players using a sphygmomanometer cuff in different test positions |
Population: rugby players |
Adaptation: none |
Muscle group: Hip ABD |
| (cross-sectional) |
N=81 |
Equipment preparation: 20mmHg pre-inflation |
Familiarization with the test: all participants were familiar with the tests and had received training in their use to improve inter-rater reliability |
| Database/source (Embase) |
Age: <18 to >30 years |
Calibration: NR |
Number of repetitions: NR |
| Ethical approval NR |
Gender: M: 81 (100%) |
|
Contraction time: 2 to 3s |
|
BMI: 29.0kg/m2 (3.0kg/m2) |
|
Resting time: NR |
|
|
|
Verbal stimulus: NR |
|
|
|
Participant positioning: 0° test: athlete in SP on the pedestal with the ankles together. 60° test: athlete in SP and then flexing the knee and hip until the heel of the foot aligned with the medial joint line of the opposite knee, the other foot was brought to mirror this position, providing approximately 60° of hip flexion. 90° test with support, the athletes were instructed to place their legs in 90° hip and knee flexion and the examiner made the corrections relevant to the position while resting their arms under the athletes’ knees and instructing them to relax to perform the test. For the 90° test without support, the athlete maintained this position without support of the examiner |
|
|
|
Equipment Position: NR |
| Roe et al., 201634 |
Firstly, to investigate the magnitude of the change in ADD strength after a match in rugby players using the ADD compression test. Secondly, to examine the relation between game displacement demands and changes in ADD strength |
Population: rugby players |
Adaptation: none |
Muscle group: Hip ABD |
| (prospective cohort) |
N=14 |
Equipment preparation: 10mmHg pre-inflation |
Familiarization with the test: NR |
| Database/source |
Age: 17.4±0.8 years |
Calibration: NR |
Number of repetitions: 3, considering the higher value |
| (retrieved from Tiernan et al., 201930) |
Gender: M: 14 (100%) |
|
Contraction time: NR |
| Ethical approval |
BMI: NR |
|
Resting time: 30s |
| Leeds Beckett University |
|
|
Verbal stimulus: NR |
|
|
|
Participant positioning: SP with hip joints positioned in neutral rotation |
|
|
|
Equipment position: between the knees at the most prominent point of the medial condyles |
| Toohey et al., 201829 |
To investigate sphygmomanometer intra- and inter-rater reliability for assessing ADD compression test and isometric strength of the hip ABD muscles and to establish its concurrent validity for evaluating the same measurements compared with the reference standard of portable dynamometry |
Population: soccer players |
Adaptation: cuff |
Muscle group: Hip ADD and ABD |
| (prospective cohort) |
N=32 |
Equipment preparation: 10mmHg pre-inflation |
Familiarization with the test: NR |
| Database/source |
Age: 23.9±4.5 years |
Calibration: Yes |
Number of repetitions: NR |
| (MEDLINE) |
Gender: M: 32 (100%) |
|
Contraction time: 5s |
| Ethical approval |
BMI: NR |
|
Resting time: 60s |
| La Trobe University (FHEC13/064) |
|
|
Verbal stimulus: NR |
|
|
|
Participant positioning: LD with the tested LL positioned superiorly at 0° flexion and abduction at the hip and full knee extension. Knee of the LL positioned inferiorly was flexed at 90° to provide stability |
|
|
|
Equipment position: the center of the device was placed 5cm proximal to the lateral malleolus |
| Tiernan et al., 201930 |
To investigate the relation between ADD compression force values, subjective markers of recovery, and training load in elite rugby players |
Population: elite rugby players |
Adaptation: none |
Muscle group: Hip ABD |
| (prospective cohort) |
N=19 |
Equipment preparation: 10mmHg pre-inflation |
Familiarization with the test: players were familiar with all testing protocols as a result of previous years of monitoring |
| Database/source |
Age: 19.7±1.1 years |
Calibration: NR |
Number of repetitions: 1 |
| (MEDLINE) |
Gender: M: 19 (100%) |
|
Contraction time: 2 to 3s. |
| Ethical approval |
BMI: NR |
|
Resting time: NR |
| University of Limerick |
|
|
Verbal stimulus: NR |
|
|
|
Participant positioning: players lay on the floor with their hips held in a neutral position, knees bent at 90°, and hips flexed at 45° |
|
|
|
Equipment position: between the knees with the middle third of the cuff located at the most prominent point of the medial femoral condyles |
| Vishesh et al., 202031 |
To measure dominant HG strength with a modified sphygmomanometer and Its association with various hand and forearm anthropometric measurements in basketball and volleyball players |
Population: basketball and volleyball players |
Adaptation: cuff |
Muscle group: HG |
| (cross-sectional) |
N=60 |
Equipment preparation: 20mmHg pre-inflation |
Familiarization with the test: NR |
| Database/source |
Age: 15 to 20 years |
Calibration: NR |
Number of repetitions: 3 |
| (Embase) |
Gender: F: 16 (27%) |
|
Contraction time: NR |
| Ethical approval NR |
M: 44 (73%) |
|
Resting time: 5s |
|
BMI: 18.57±2.33 |
|
Verbal stimulus: NR |
|
|
|
Participant positioning: players were positioned in a straight-backed chair, with both feet fully supported on the floor. Each player was instructed to place their left hand on the right thigh and assume the position with adducted shoulders in neutral rotation. For the arm tested, the elbow was flexed up to 90°, the forearm and wrist were in a neutral position, and the fingers were flexed |
|
|
|
Equipment Position: NR |