Along the past two or three decades, the international dimension has become an integral part of education activities and scientific research, giving rise to the notion of internationalization. In this article, the internationalization rationale and mechanisms implemented by the top graduate programs in Brazil those which have received scores 6 and 7 in the 2010 triennial evaluation of recognized graduate programs are examined. Graduate directors of 322 programs were asked to respond to a web questionnaire organized in three content sections that deal with different aspects of their internationalization efforts, namely: meaning(s) and justifications; strategies, initiatives and partners; and facilitating and inhibiting factors. After validation, 66 remained valid questionnaires and form the dataset used to develop the study. A prevalence of an activity-oriented conception of internationalization was detected amongst those programs. Outward mobility is seen as the main mechanism to boost international experience, network building and research collaboration. Albeit incipient, initiatives to attract foreign scholars and efforts towards “internationalization at home” are gaining momentum. The presence of faculty members who are trained abroad, and can mobilize their networks to establish scientific exchanges and partnerships, is considered a key condition for internationalization. However, the lack of a national strategy, appropriate administrative systems and institutional policies in most Brazilian higher education institutions hamper the development of those connections into more meaningful and sustained cooperation.
Graduate education in Brazil; Research training; Internationalization of higher education

Source: Survey data, June 2013.Notes: 1. States in the Southeast region are: São Paulo (SP), Minas Gerais (MG), Rio de Janeiro (RJ), and Espírito Santo (ES); 2. Except for PUC (system of Pontifical Catholic Universities), all other HEIs are public universities; 3. See Table 2S
Source: Survey data, June 2013. Note: Isolated nodes are not shown.
Source: Survey data, June 2013.Note: Each square in the figure corresponds to the number of EGPs who mentioned both the meaning and the justification to internationalize.
Source: Survey data, June 2013.
Source: Survey data, June 2013.
Source: Survey data, June 2013.
Source: Survey data, June 2013.Note: Some factors concerned with administrative systems and institutional policies affecting EGPs internationalization were listed in the survey questionnaire and the respondents were asked to rate them using a scale ranging from 1 (unsatisfactory) to 5 (fully satisfactory). Those factors rated 1 to 3 were interpreted as inhibiting factors and those rated 4 and 5 as facilitating factors. Respondents were allowed to include and rate additional factors they believe are relevant to their internationalization efforts.