person Kátia Marie Simões e Senna
schoolInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.Instituto Nacional de CardiologiaBrasilRio de Janeiro, BrasilInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
person Flavia Mori Sarti
schoolUniversidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.Universidade de São PauloBrasilSão Paulo, BrasilUniversidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.
person Márcia Gisele Santos da Costa
schoolInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.Instituto Nacional de CardiologiaBrasilRio de Janeiro, BrasilInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
person Marcelo Eidi Nita
schoolUniversidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.Universidade de São PauloBrasilSão Paulo, BrasilUniversidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.
person Marisa da Silva Santos
schoolInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.Instituto Nacional de CardiologiaBrasilRio de Janeiro, BrasilInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
person Bernardo Rangel Tura
schoolInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.Instituto Nacional de CardiologiaBrasilRio de Janeiro, BrasilInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
person Marcelo Goulart Correia
schoolInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.Instituto Nacional de CardiologiaBrasilRio de Janeiro, BrasilInstituto Nacional de Cardiologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
personCorrespondence K. M. S. Senna Rua Soares Cabral 21, apto. 206, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 2224-070, Brasil. kmsenna@gmail.com
Contributors
K. M. S. Senna was responsible for the study conception, data collection, analysis and interpretation of the results, writing of the initial version, and approval of the final version. F. M. Sarti was responsible for the analysis and interpretation of the results, writing of the draft in English, and approval of the final version. M. G. S. Costa was responsible for the study conception, data collection, analysis and interpretation of the results, and writing and approval of the final version. M. E. Nita was responsible for the analysis and interpretation of the results and writing and approval of the final version. M. S. Santos was responsible for the study conception, data analysis, interpretation of the results, and approval of the final version. B. R. Tura was responsible for the literature review, data analysis, interpretation of the results, and approval of the final version. M. G. Correia was responsible for the literature review, data analysis, and approval of the final version.