| Access to medicines and supplies in the SUS |
Regarding women experiencing homelessness [...] for the subdermal implant, Service X is the one that has the project. However, she points out that the amount is small. Together with the Ministry of Health, she reinforces that they have tried several times to include both Implanon and the Mirena IUD, and they can't - CONITEC always blocks it, not including these methods, which is one of the things she considers fundamental to be in the range of reproductive planning options (CE16). There is a lawsuit asking for the trade name of a medicine, when we are prohibited from bidding with the trade name. [...] She believes that there is a deviation from the judicialization process when a person takes this route to guarantee a right that is not for everyone, but only for her. A right is valid when it is for everyone. When a trick is used so that it only serves me, a problem is created (CE6). |
| Acquisition and shortage of medicines and supplies |
Councilor U2 says she is happy with the presentation [made by management], but has in hand a list of the 28 medicines that are missing. She understands that there is a whole process, but the medicine that has been missing for two or three months, elderly users travel a distance to get there, and have to return. This communication is not happening, and the user is having to buy the medicine (CE11). [...] He adds that last Friday, he and the State Secretary of Health were at the first meeting of the Northeastern Consortium of State Health Secretaries, and that the proposals are quite interesting - to standardize some procedures, such as the issue of acquiring medicines and necessary supplies, expanding the potential for acquisition to obtain better prices and advantageous purchases (CE16). |
| Pharmaceutical Services Committee or Working Group |
Councilor U1 calls on the Council to reactivate the Pharmaceutical Services Committee [...], and says that these situations may be the result of some irresponsibility on the subject, recalling that the committee ceased to exist in 2010. Councilor P1 puts the proposal to reactivate the Pharmaceutical Services Committee to a vote, which is approved with only one abstention (CE20). Councilor P5 recommends that the Municipal Council prioritize Pharmaceutical Services more frequently, with a committee solely to address this demand. He concludes by saying that the lack of medicines is a Public Health issue and, as such, should be addressed. Social Participation is responsible for this process (CM16). |
| Financing and management tools of the SUS |
Councilor G3 says, "I can speak authoritatively about the rural region. However, I can say the following: the process of debt credits for Pharmaceutical Services in the capital and the rural region was handled in different processes [...]. So even though it is less time, the municipalities had already been 4 years without receiving the Pharmaceutical Services' funds from the State. Now, in the last CIB, we approved and are transferring two years at once of these delayed funds [...] (CE4). In Guideline VIII - Qualification of pharmaceutical services, management of the logistics of acquisition, storage, and distribution of health supplies, Councilor P2 said that the mandatory demands and supply of the units served, the medicines for linked programs, and specific, acute, or chronic conditions served. The number of users served in the specialized component of pharmaceutical services left something to be desired when the low financial investments for this guideline were seen (CE2). |
| Organization of services and access to medicines and supplies during the COVID-19 pandemic |
Councilor P1 mentions that in May, shortages of anesthetic and sedative medicines, necessary for intubating patients, began to emerge. [...] Councilor P3 also asks that the government respect science, as it is disrespectful for the federal government to insist on medicines that have not been proven to combat COVID-19 (CE20). People were asked to wait or return a few hours later to pick up some medicines [...] Azithromycin was out of stock at the UPA for a few hours, but this is not a lack of medicines in the city; it was a logistical issue due to increased demand. The demand for this medicine was reviewed, as its use was considered unnecessary for what was being prescribed [for early treatment of COVID-19] (CE11). |
| Health services management |
We know that some Social Organizations (OSS) in our municipality have been receiving money for some time to manage municipal Public Health [...]. The big problem with OSS is that they run rampant, they do what they want, because most managers, when they hire an OSS, are outsourcing the problem because they have difficulty managing people, managing the purchase of supplies, equipment, medicines, and the like, which should follow the rules of the legislation [bidding, public competition] (CM6). [...] He suggested that the conditions under which the operator has to perform the service should be analyzed before implementation. He used as an example a case of the warehouse, in which the medicines spoiled due to the lack of a cold storage chamber (CM23). |
| Pharmaceutical services |
[...] At the time of the visit, we did not have the physical structure and sufficient pharmacists, so we decided that the implementation of the Project would begin at the Pharmacy School of University X, which has an agreement with the SES for the provision of the Specialized Component of Pharmaceutical Services (CE11). [...] Regarding Pharmaceutical Services and Mental Health, some planned actions involve expanding pharmacies, increasing the number of pharmacists, and other management aspects [...] (CM23). |
| Integrative and Complementary Practices (ICPs) |
Councilor P4 reports that the Call for Proposals for the implementation of living pharmacies is open at the Ministry of Health and that this call for proposals occurs annually. In 2013, the Municipal Health Secretariat submitted a project that was approved but has not yet yielded results, and one of the requirements to participate in subsequent calls for proposals is that the project has had results [...]. It also questions why these resources are not being used; consequently, phytotherapy is not progressing in the municipality (CM14). The Local Productive Arrangement Project, known as Living Pharmacy, which produces phytotherapeutic plants, which are medicines made from medicinal plants, is accompanied by manipulation, production, and dispensing. It is an instrument of the SUS of the municipality, and consequently, the sale will be prohibited, as the Health network itself produces it. He also says that it is a project that has been in place since 2014, where there were many difficulties in moving forward, because the inputs are very uncommon, which hinders procurement (CM16). |