| Chen et al.(23), Taiwan |
Investigating whether previous musical training improves pitch perception in implanted children. |
27 pre-lingual deaf children (5–14 years). |
Training in listening, singing, reading sheet music, and playing a musical instrument. |
Auditory discrimination test with sequential piano tones. |
Auditory discrimination increases with musical experience, and the longer the musical training, the better the results are for this auditory skill. |
| Strait et al.(24), USA |
To define associations between musical training during early childhood and subcortical speech coding in silence and noise, speech perception in noise, and memory and attention. |
31 children with normal hearing (7–13 years). |
Musical experience in early childhood (children who have practiced consistently for at least four years musical activities, with at least 20 minutes at least five days a week) |
Words in noise test; the hearing in noise test; frequency-following response with and without noise; auditory and visual memory tests |
Musically trained children have better speech perception in competitive noise, as well as in auditory working memory and auditory and visual attention tasks. Neural coding of speech, in both silence and noise, is also better in this group. |
| Putkinen et al.(25), Finland |
To longitudinally investigate the development of auditory discrimination skills in musically trained and untrained individuals. |
133 children with normal hearing (7–13 years). |
Playing a musical instrument, practicing choir and orchestra, and studying music theory from the age of seven as part of the daily school curriculum. |
Mismatch negativity and P3a. |
The study provides strong evidence that musical training increases neural auditory discrimination and attention. |
| Slater et al.(26), USA |
Longitudinal evaluation of the effect of group auditory training on speech perception in noise. |
38 children with normal hearing (average of 8 years). |
Musical training with activities to develop fundamental skills in tuning and rhythm, vocal performance, and musical instrument practice, among others, was carried out twice a week, for 1 hour, for over 2 years. |
The hearing in noise test. |
Long-term musical auditory training provided clinically significant results in understanding speech in noise. |
| Petersen et al.(27), Denmark |
Evaluating the benefits of a short, intense musical training program for adolescent cochlear implant users. |
11 pre-lingual deaf adolescents (15.6–18.8 years). |
The music training program combines computerized exercises with rhythm training, singing, and ear training activities (20 hours, scheduled over six days and spread over two weeks). |
Multi-feature music discrimination test, Dantale II test (lists of sentences in noise adapted for the Danish language), and mismatch negativity. |
No neuronal and behavioral discrimination improvement was observed after the proposed musical training. |
| Habibi et al.(15), USA |
To investigate the effects of a musical training program on the auditory development of children compared to children with sports training and no training in a longitudinal way. |
37 children with normal hearing (6–7 years). |
Musical training (six to seven hours a week for two years). |
Long latency auditory evoked potentials. |
The musically trained children showed a greater ability to detect changes in the tonal environment and accelerated maturation of auditory processing compared to those in the other two non-musically trained groups. |
| Putkinen et al.(17), Finland |
To examine the maturation of selective attention in musically trained and untrained children and adolescents. |
146 children and adolescents with normal hearing (10–17 years). |
Individual instrument lessons, group music lessons, and music theory from age 7. |
Mismatch negativity and P3a |
The results provide new convergent behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of an intermodal paradigm for the accelerated maturation of selective attention in musically trained children and adolescents. |