Influence of a portable X-ray device in the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of a portable X-ray device on the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions. For that, radiographs of 40 human teeth with white spots or color changes in enamel and/or dentin were acquired using the Eagle X-ray portable device (Alliage, São Paulo, Brazil) set at 2.5 mA, 60 kVp and an exposure time of 0.5 s (1.25 mAs). Then, new radiographs of the teeth were acquired using the Focus X-ray wall-mounted device (Instrumentarium, Tuusula, Finland) set at 7 mA, 70 kVp, and exposure time of 0.16 s (1.12 mAs). Five oral and maxillofacial radiologists individually assessed the radiographs. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated from the responses of the five examiners and compared between the devices tested using Student’s t test. Significance level was set at 5% (α = 0.05). The weighted Kappa index evaluated the intra- and inter-examiner agreements for caries lesions diagnosis. The use of a portable X-ray device did not influence on AUC, sensitivity and specificity metrics for the diagnosis of caries lesions (p > 0.05). The intra- and inter-examiner agreements for the caries lesions diagnosis ranged from substantial to almost perfect (0.646–0.859) and moderate to substantial (0.491–0.617), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy for detecting proximal caries lesions is not impaired when using a portable X-ray device.

X-Rays; Radiography, Dental, Digital; Diagnostic Imaging; Dental Caries