| Andreasen et al., 1970 |
Patients (n=108) Teeth (n=189) |
N/R |
Cross sectional |
1-12 yr (mean of 3.4 yr) |
Subluxation (n=78) Intrusive luxation (n=23) Extrusive Luxation (n=88) |
Subluxation (20/78) Intrusive luxation (1/23) Extrusive Luxation (21/88) |
22%PULP CANAL OBLITERATION (42/189) |
Pulp obliteration was significantly related to the variables stage of root development, type of luxation, and crown fracture. |
| Jacobsen et al., 1975 |
Patients (N/R) Teeth (n=51) |
6 - 21 yr |
Cross sectional |
Minimum 1 yr (mean of 6 yr) |
Root fracture: -Type 1 (n=15) -Type II (n=33) -Type III (n=3) |
Type I partial pulp canal obliteration (7/15) total pulp canal obliteration (1/15) Type II partial pulp canal obliteration (17/33) total pulp canal obliteration (16/33) Type III total pulp canal obliteration (3/3) Root fracture (44/51) |
86%PULP CANAL OBLITERATION (44/51) |
Two different patterns of pulp canal obliteration were observed: (1) partial in the apical fragments and the fracture area, and (2) progressive of the entire pulp cavity ending with almost total pulp canal obliteration. pulp necrosis did not develop as a sequel to progressive pulp canal obliteration in any case. |
| Rock et al., 1981 |
Patients (n=309) Teeth (n=517) |
5 – 21 yr (mean 8.4yr) |
Cross sectional |
At least 2 yr |
Luxation (n=133) Subluxation (n=379) |
Luxation (32/133) Subluxation (49/379) |
16% pulp canal obliteration (83/517) |
pulp canal obliteration occurred in 24% of luxated teeth and in only 13% subluxated teeth. |
| Oikarinen et al., 1987 |
Patients (n=76) Teeth (n=172) |
6 – 64 yr (mean 17.2 SD 12.3) |
Cross sectional |
6-32 months (mean 22 months) |
Subluxation (n=48) Lateral Luxation (n=42) Extrusive Luxation (n=32) Luxation with Fracture (n=25) Avulsion (n=25) |
Subluxation (12/48) Lateral Luxation (14/42) Extrusive Luxation 11/32 Luxation associated to Fracture 3/25 Avulsion 2/25 |
24% pulp canal obliteration (42/172) |
Pulp canal obliteration of the pulp was statistically related to the age of the patient (p< 0.001) and the stage of root formation (p<0.05) |
| Andreasen et al., 1989 |
Patients (n=485) Teeth (n=637) |
N/R |
Cross sectional |
11 years |
Concussion (n=178) Extrusion (n=53) Intrusion (n=61) Lateral Luxation (n=122) Subluxation (n=223) |
Concussion (n=9/178) Subluxation (n=23/223) Extrusion (n=24/53) Lateral luxation (n=34/122) Intrusion (n=3/61) |
14.6 % pulp canal obliteration (93/637) |
Pulp canal obliteration was more frequent among teeth with incomplete root development than among teeth in which root development was complete. pulp canal obliteration was more frequent after extrusion, lateral luxation and intrusion than after concussion and subluxation |
| Crona-Larsson et al., 1991 |
Patient (n=108) Teeth (n=171) |
6 – 19yr |
Cross sectional |
More than 1 yr |
Luxation injuries Subluxation (n=130) Extrusion (n=15) Intrusion (n=9) Lateral luxation (n=6) Exarticulated (avulsion) (n=15) |
Subluxation (3/130) Lateral Luxation 2/41 Avulsion 2/11 |
2.9% pulp canal obliteration (5/171) |
Low cases of pulp canal obliteration. |
| Cavalleri et al., 1995 |
Patient (n=55) Teeth (n=84) |
6 – 12 yr |
Cross sectional |
Annually until 5 yr |
Fracture of enamel and dentine without pulpal exposure (n=67) Fracture of enamel and dentine with pulp involvement (n=14) Fracture of enamel without pulp complications (n=3) |
Fracture of enamel (0/3) Fracture of enamel and dentine without pulpal exposure (1/67) Fracture of enamel and dentine with pulp involvement (0/14) |
1.5% pulp canal obliteration (without pulp involvement) (1/84) |
Low cases of pulp canal obliteration (1.5%) |
| Çaliskan et al., 1996 |
Patients (n=48) Teeth (n=56) |
8 – 40yr |
Cross sectional |
Range 2-6 yr |
Root fracture (n=56) |
Apical pulp obliteration (17/56) Coronal pulp obliteration (23/56) Root fracture (40/56) |
75% Pulp obliteration (42/56) |
High prevalence of pulp canal obliteration. Only 14 (25%) did not presented canal obliteration |
| Ebeleseder et al., 2000 |
Patient (N/R) Teeth (n=58) |
Mid-term group (14.41 years) Short-term group (12.4 years) |
Cross sectional |
19-73 months (mean 40 months) |
Intrusion (n=58) Short tem results Mid term results (n=29) |
mid-term results 9/29 short-term results 6/29 Intrusion (15/58) |
27% pulp canal obliteration 15/58 |
Teeth with pulp canal obliteration can develop pulp necrosis. |
| Robertson et al., 2001 |
Patients (N/R) Teeth (n=455) |
5.3-61.3 yr |
Cross sectional |
6 months -17 yr |
A:Uncomplicated Crown fracture without pulpal exposure/no luxation (n=106) B:Uncomplicated Crown fracture without pulp exposure associated to luxation (n=246) C:Complicated Crown fracture with pulp exposure/no luxation (n=34) D:Complicated Crown fracture with pulp exposure associated to luxation (n=69) |
Crown fracture (uncomplicated or complicated without luxation (1/139) Crown fracture uncomplicated or complicated with luxation (16/315) |
3.7% pulp canal obliteration (17/455) |
Isolated crown fracture is rarely followed by pulp canal obliteration. crown fractures+ luxation is associated pulp canal obliteration |
| Lee et al., 2003 |
Patients (n=35) Teeth (n=55) |
7.1 - 17.8 yr mean 10.6yr |
Cross sectional |
3, 6 months and than annually |
Extrusion (n=55) |
Extrusion 19/55 |
35% pulp canal obliteration (19/55) |
The degree of extrusion (p = 0.03 0.14 (0.02-0.82) was proven to be significantly associated with the development of pulp canal obliteration |
| Nikoui et al., 2003 |
Patients (n=42) Teeth (n=58) |
6.3 – 17.8yr (means11.4y) |
Cross sectional |
3, 6 months and than annually |
Lateral Luxation (n=58) |
Lateral luxation 23/58 |
40% pulp canal obliteration (23/58) |
Extension of lateral luxation did not influenced the pulp canal obliteration occurrence (p=0.86) 0.89 (0.14-5.39) |
| Oginni et al., 2007 |
Patients (n=165) Teeth (n=168) |
20-56 yr (mean age ± SD 31.3 ± 8.6 yr) |
Cross sectional |
N/R |
Concussion (n=53) Fracture of the dental hard tissues (n=38) Subluxation (n=77) |
Pulp canal obliteration (53/133) Fracture (14/38) concussion (48/53) subluxation (71/77 ) |
79.2% pulp canal obliteration (133/165) |
Concussion and subluxation injuries resulted more in pulp canal obliteration. |
| Ferrazzini et al., 2008 |
Patients (n=26) Teeth (n=47) |
7 – 59 yr |
Cohort |
4 yr |
Lateral luxation (n=47) |
Apical foramen<1 (7/47) Apical foramen ≥1 (2/47) Lateral Luxation 9/47 |
24.3% pulp canal obliteration (9/47) |
The most frequent complication was pulp necrosis that was only seen in teeth with closed apices |
| Neto et al., 2009 |
Patient (n=12) Teeth (n=15) |
7 – 14yr |
Cross sectional |
10-51 months (mean 26.6 months) |
Intrusion (n=15) |
NR Intrusion 4/15 |
26.7% pulp canal obliteration (4/15) |
The immature teeth had six times more chances of presenting pulp canal obliteration. |
| Lin et al., 2016 |
Patients (n=166) Teeth (n=287) |
6-69 yr (14.34±10.0) |
Cross sectional |
At least 1 yr |
Uncomplicated fracture (n=47) Complicated crown fracture (n=27) Oblique fracture (n=5) Horizontal root fracture (n=8) Concussion (n=16) Subluxation (n=27) Extrusion (n=34) Lateral luxation (n=62) Intrusion (n=22) Alveolar fracture (n=6) Avulsion (n=74) |
NR |
4.2% pulp canal obliteration (12/287) |
Pulp canal obliteration was related to time from injury to the diagnosis. |
| Spinas et al., 2020 |
Patients (n=10) Teeth (n=13) |
8-16 yr |
Cross sectional |
5 yr |
Extrusive Luxation (n=13) |
Mild extrusion (n=3) Moderate extrusion (n=5) Severe extrusion (n=1) |
69.23 %pulp canal obliteration 9/13 |
Prophylactic endodontic treatment is not appropriate for immature teeth affected by extrusive luxation injuries, given the extreme rarity of pulp necrosis in teeth already affected by pulp obliteration. |
| Bratteberg et al., 2020 |
Patients (n=338) Teeth (n=571) |
16 yr |
Cross sectional |
NR |
Moderate/Severe TDI (n=571) |
NR |
2.8% pulp canal obliteration 159/571 |
Moderate and severe TDI were more at risk of developing pulpal complications and hard tissue injuries were at higher risk of developing pulp necrosis with infection. |