PAYMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES: GUIDELINES FOR IDENTIFYING PRIORITY AREAS FOCUSING ON BIODIVERSITY*

PICHARILLO, CAROLINE; RANIERI, VICTOR EDUARDO LIMA

doi:10.1590/1809-4422asoc201703033vu2019L3AO

Tabla de contenido Anterior Actual Siguiente

Tabla de contenido

Original Article • Ambient. soc. 22 • 2019 • https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc201703033vu2019L3AO linkcopy

PAYMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES: GUIDELINES FOR IDENTIFYING PRIORITY AREAS FOCUSING ON BIODIVERSITY*

PAGO POR SERVICIOS AMBIENTALES: DIRECTRICES PARA LA IDENTIFICACIÓN DE ÁREAS PRIORITARIAS ENFOCADAS EN LA BIODIVERSIDAD

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

The economic tool of Payment for Environmental Services (PES) has been considered as an alternative for the conservation of the biodiversity and ecosystem services in private lands. To guide decision makers in implementing PES schemes, this paper aimed to identify in the scientific literature the important elements to prioritize areas in the implementation of PES-biodiversity schemes. It is claimed that the elements extracted from PES-biodiversity schemes must be used as a reference to guide the implementation of other PES schemes based on the recovery and maintenance of natural areas (e.g. water, carbon, environmental aesthetics conditions). Thus, the sustainability of PES schemes can be guaranteed over time.

Keywords:
Biodiversity; Economic tool; Environmental management

ID	Questions	Situation
ID	Questions	Selected	Excluded
(1)	Is this work about the prioritization of areas for the implementation of PES schemes that is exclusive for the biodiversity conservation or that also comprises other services?	Yes	No
(2)	Is this work about the biodiversity conservation in private lands, from where it is possible to extract elements for the prioritization process of areas for the implementation of payment schemes?*	Yes	No
(3)	Is this the kind of work that describes a practical case of PES-biodiversity, from where it is possible to extract elements for the prioritization process of areas for the implementation of payment schemes?	Yes	No

Groups	Prioritization Elements
Group I - Ecological elements of the landscape	Prioritize areas with the highest richness of species.
	Prioritize areas with the highest number of threatened, vulnerable, and rare species.
	Prioritize areas for the conservation of endemic species.
	Prioritize areas for the conservation of flagship species.
	Prioritize areas for the conservation of species with commercial or culture value.
	Prioritize areas for the conservation of medium and large carnivores.
	Prioritize the functional diversity of the species.
	Prioritize areas with more complementarity and representativeness of biodiversity in relation to the already existing system of reserves.
	Prioritize the areas required for persistence and survival of the species.
	Prioritize the areas with high degree of connectivity.
	Prioritize the areas located farther from highways and urban centers.
	Prioritize the conservation of threatened, vulnerable, and rare habitats.
	Prioritize the fragments of vegetation with high degree of naturalness.
	Prioritize habitat spots with less complex shape.
	Prioritize important areas for the restoration and recovery of habitats and forest coverage.
Group II - Socioeconomic and governance elements.	Prioritize the areas with the lowest land opportunity costs.
	Prioritize the areas with the highest additionality.
	Prioritize the areas with land tenure guarantee.
	Prioritize the areas with lower social development patterns.
	Prioritize the areas where there is integration of the concerned parties.
	Prioritize the areas where there are social organizations.
	Prioritize the areas with more political and institutional capacity.
	Prioritize the areas that adopt sustainable handling practices.
	Prioritize heterogeneous landscapes.
	Prioritize the areas with more spatial congruence between biodiversity conservation and other ecosystem services.

location_on

ANPPAS - Revista Ambiente e Sociedade Anppas / Revista Ambiente e Sociedade - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revistaambienteesociedade@gmail.com

rss_feed Acompañe los números de esta revista en su lector de RSS

[TFN1] Source: Own Elaboration.

[TFN2] Note: The asterisk (*) at the end and middle of the word allows the system to find derivations of the word. For example: for the term pay* the system finds pay, pays, paying, payment, payments, payoff; for the term priorit* finds priorities and priority; for the term target* finds target, targets, targeted and targeting; for the term prioriti*ation locates prioritization and prioritisation.

Pay*	AND	Environmental	AND	Services	AND	Biodiversity	AND	Priorit* areas
								OR
								Target*
		OR						OR
		Ecosystem						Prioriti*ation
								OR
								Design

Selected works	(ID)*
Barton et al. (2003)	(1)
Barton et al. (2009)	(1)
Bateman et al. (2015)	(2)
Bryan et al. (2011)	(2)
Chen et al. (2010)	(1)
Cimon-Morin, Darveau, and Poulin (2013)	(2)
Claassen, Cattaneo, and Johansson (2008)	(3)
Clements et al. (2013)	(3)
De Leeuw et al. (2014)	(3)
Dickman, Macdonald, and Macdonald (2011)	(3)
Duarte, Ribeiro, and Paglia (2016)	(2)
Egoh et al. (2010)	(2)
Egoh et al. (2011)	(2)
Hajkowicz et al. (2008)	(1)
Hily et al. (2015)	(1)
Klimek et al. (2008)	(3)
La Notte et al. (2014)	(1)
Larsen, Londoño-Murcia, and Turner (2011)	(2)
Narloch, Pascual, and Drucker (2011)	(3)
Nelson et al. (2008)	(2)
Pagiola et al. (2007)	(3)
Sierra and Russman (2006)	(3)
Ulber et al. (2011)	(3)
Von Haaren et al. (2012)	(1)
Wätzold and Drechsler (2014)	(1)
Wendland et al. (2010)	(1)
Wünscher and Engel (2012)	(1)
Wünscher, Engel, and Wunder (2006)	(1)
Wünscher, Engel, and Wunder (2008)	(1)
Zabel and Engel (2010)	(3)
Zhang and Pagiola (2011)	(1)