Tripled and sustained change in pregnancy-related annual mortality rates with systemic lupus erythematosus involvement: a nationwide temporal trends study, Brazil, 2006–2022Keywords
Systemic lupus erythematosus; Epidemiologic trends; Pregnancy complications; Puerperium; Reproductive-age women; Maternal death
Keywords
Systemic lupus erythematosus; Epidemiologic trends; Pregnancy complications; Puerperium; Reproductive-age women; Maternal death
Significant progress has been made in recent decades in improving the survival and quality of life of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [1]. However, data on temporal trends in pregnancy-related mortality among women with SLE remain scarce [2], particularly in Brazil, where no such studies have been conducted. This ecological study aimed to assess the impact of SLE on mortality among women of childbearing age in Brazil due to pregnancy, childbirth, and puerperium (PCP)-related complications.
Mortality data for Brazil, covering the period from 2006 to 2022, were extracted from the Mortality Information System, linked to the Brazilian Ministry of Health (publicly available at https://datasus.saude.gov.br). For trend analysis, data on resident women aged 10–49 years were obtained from the same Brazilian government web-site and the United Nations Population Division. The 2014 world female population aged 10–49 years was selected as the standard for age adjustment, based on the 2022 revision (publicly available at https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd).
During this period, 31,867 deaths were identified among women aged 10 to 49 years, in which the underlying cause of death (UCD) was attributed to PCP-related complications (Chapter XV codes O00-O99, according to the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases [ICD-10]). Of these, the ICD-10 code for SLE (M32) was reported as a diagnostic mention or non-underlying cause in 273 cases (0.9%), hereafter referred to as "SLE-related cases" (see Supplementary spreadsheet).
Table 1 compares UCD distributions between all women of childbearing age and SLE-related cases based on pre-specified ICD-10 Chapter XV groupings. SLE-related cases were less frequent in all groupings except for "Other obstetric conditions, not elsewhere classified" (O94-O99), which includes the codes for late maternal deaths (O96-O97). Regarding late puerperium deaths, 68 cases (24.9%) were SLE-related versus 2,685 (8.4%) among all cases (p < 0.0001, Fisher's exact test).
Comparison of underlying cause of death by pre-specified ICD-10 chapter XV groupings (O00-O99: pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium) between SLE-related and total cases in women aged 10–49 years, Brazil, 2006–2022
For the temporal trend analysis (2006–2022), the join-point method calculated the annual percentage change (APC) in the age-adjusted mortality rate (per 100,000) of women aged 10–49 years due to PCP-related complications [3]. The APC was 2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0 to 4.0%) for all cases versus 5.6% (95% CI: 2.0–9.4%) for SLE-related cases (see supplementary files for detailed results of the APC calculation). No joinpoints, or significant inflection points where the trend changes direction, were identified (see Fig. 1).
Age-adjusted mortality rates per 100,000 due to pregnancy, childbirth, and puerperium (PCP)-related complications in: (a) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-related cases and (b) all cases among women aged 10–49 years in the Brazilian general population, 2006–2022
This study has limitations. As our analyses rely on secondary data, we cannot rule out the possibility of mis-classification or underreporting in mortality records, which may affect the true burden of SLE-related pregnancy mortality. Nevertheless, as the Mortality Information System is the official national database, it remains a valuable resource for population-based analyses.
In conclusion, this study demonstrated that (1) the APC for pregnancy-related deaths among women of child-bearing age was nearly tripled with SLE involvement, and (2) late puerperium deaths were disproportionately higher among SLE-related cases. These findings highlight the need for tailored care strategies for pregnant women with SLE in Brazil, with particular focus on the late puerperium. Given the study's ecological design, our results should be interpreted with caution and validated in prospective cohort studies.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s42358-025-00445-8.
Supplementary Material 1
Supplementary Material 2
Supplementary Material 3
-
Funding
None.
-
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participateThis study was based on publicly available, anonymized data from the Brazilian Mortality Information System and, according to resolution 510/2016 of the Brazilian National Health Council, does not require ethics committee approval.
-
Consent for publicationNot applicable.
-
Publisher's noteSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s42358-025-00445-8.
Supplementary Material 1
Supplementary Material 2
Supplementary Material 3
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
References
- 1 Yen EY, Shaheen M, Woo JMP, Mercer N, Li N, McCurdy DK, Karlamangla A, Singh RR. 46-Year trends in systemic lupus erythematosus mortality in the united States, 1968 to 2013: A nationwide Population-Based study. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(11):777–85.
- 2 Mehta B, Luo Y, Xu J, Sammaritano L, Salmon J, Lockshin M, Goodman S, Ibrahim S. Trends in maternal and fetal outcomes among pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus in the united States: A Cross-sectional analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(3):164–71.
- 3 Kim HJ, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med. 2000;19(3):335–51.
