Open-access Lower content of cerebrospinal fluid chemokines in patients with cancer cachexia

ABSTRACT

Purpose:  Cancer-associated cachexia (CC) is characterized by involuntary weight loss and poor prognosis. Central nervous system (CNS) inflammation has been linked to CC symptoms. This study evaluated inflammatory mediators in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with CC.

Methods:  Volunteers were recruited in Santarém, PA, Brazil, and divided into three groups: patients undergoing herniorrhaphy or cholecystectomy (n = 43)—control; cancer without cachexia (CWC, n = 13); and CC (n = 49). Blood and CSF were collected before anesthetic injection.

Results:  CSF vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) levels were reduced in CC (p < 0.0001; p 0.00017) and CWC (p = 0.0269; p = 0.0421) compared to control. CSF IP-10 was lower in CC (p = 0.0048). In CWC, CSF MCP-1 correlated with serum C reactive protein (rs = 0.78, p = 0.0098), leukocytes (rs = 0.72, p = 0.0235), lymphocytes (rs = -0.67, p = 0.0390) and monocytes (rs = -0.82, p = 0.0058). In CC, CSF interleukin (IL)-8 correlated with leukocytes (rs = 0.48, p = 0.0032) and MCP-1 with neutrophils (rs = 0.36, p = 0.0265) and eosinophils (rs = -0.37, p = 0.0218). CC patients showed lower quality of life than CWC (functional scale p = 0.0087; symptoms scale p = 0.0386).

Conclusion:  Cancer was related to changes in CSF cytokine levels, indicating that both tumor presence and cachexia modulate central inflammatory signaling. Correlations between CSF chemokines and blood immune cells suggest systemic interaction between peripheral immunity and the CNS.

Key words
Neoplasms; Cachexia; Cerebrospinal Fluid; Chemokines; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Inflammation

Introduction

Cancer-associated cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome that leads to weight loss and contributes to a lower quality of life and mortality1. Patients with cancer cachexia experience an ongoing anorexia with a depletion of energy stores2. The administration of an agonist of ghrelin, a hormone secreted by the stomach, to patients with cancer showed an increase in food intake and body weight3. Animal studies have shown that ghrelin agonist modulates hypothalamic neurons that control appetite. These findings show that central nervous system (CNS) control of food intake has great potential to mitigate the effects of this syndrome. However, studies regarding the control of appetite in humans with cancer cachexia are lacking.

Increased inflammatory mediators in the brain are correlated symptoms of cachexia, as total food intake and muscle mass4. In animal models of cachexia, pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-1β and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, can induce a hypothalamic response that leads to anorexia and catabolism of peripheral tissues1. CNS control of appetite seems to be influenced by inflammatory proteins that can activate receptors in the pro-opiomelanocortin and Agouti-related protein neurons1. Moreover, IL-1β can activate the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis with consequently increase in muscle proteolysis1. Experimental studies have demonstrated that cancer cachexia is associated with central nervous system inflammation, including myeloid cell infiltration, activation of inflammatory signaling pathways, and alterations in feeding behavior and energy balance4-6.

Chemokines are a class of small proteins that are mainly known as chemotactic mediators in the immune system but also have several other homeostatic functions, which include the pro-inflammatory activation of peripheral immune cells7-9. In the CNS, chemokines have shown abilities related to neuromodulation, neuroendocrine regulation and acts as neurotransmitters and may be released by neurons, astrocytes, or microglia9,10.

Chemokine content in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been evaluated in several psychiatric conditions, as depression and Alzheimer’s disease11,12. Although its growing interest regarding its role in the CNS, chemokines are still not intensely studied in the context of cancer cachexia and the quality of life of patients with this syndrome13. We have previously reported that patients with cancer cachexia presented changes in the content of CSF chemokines13. Here, we aimed to evaluate the content of inflammatory mediators in the CSF of patients with cancer cachexia. Moreover, we deepened the analysis of these results and correlated these CSF chemokines with other relevant parameters associated this syndrome.

Methods

Patients

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical School of the Universidade de São Paulo (CAAE 78485517.4.3001.5467). Samples were collected from 105 patients of both sexes, aged between 18 and 85 years old. Participants were divided into three groups:

  • Control: subjects without cancer or cachexia who required herniorrhaphy or cholecystectomy (n = 43);

  • CWC: patients with cancer without cachexia (n = 13);

  • CC: patients with cancer and cachexia (n = 49).

The Suppl. Mat. 1 (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20835596) shows the types of surgery that the participants of the control group were submitted to. The types of cancer from the CWC and CC are presented in Suppl. Mat. 2 (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20835596).

The volunteers were recruited in the Hospital Regional do Baixo Amazonas Dr. Waldemar Penna (HRBA), Santarém, PA, Brazil. The study protocol had no interference with the therapeutic medical conduct. The patients were informed about the study, invited to participate, and included when the informed consent form was signed. At the time of surgery, during spinal anesthesia, CSF was collected from all patients preceding the injection of anesthetic.

The inclusion criteria were: age between 18 and 85; cancer patients with or without cachexia treated at HRBA; patients undergoing curative or palliative surgery with the possibility of collecting CSF during anesthesia; patients that agreed to participate and signed the informed consent form. For the control group, the inclusion criteria were: patients undergoing elective herniorrhaphy or cholecystectomy; between 18 and 85 years old; with no history of current weight loss; and no associated inflammatory condition.

The exclusion criteria were: the presence of sepsis (defined according to the criteria of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and American College of Chest Physicians14); the presence of severe coagulopathy with international normalized ratio > 2 or thrombocytopenia < 40,000; decompensated heart failure; primary hematologic diseases; moderate renal failure (creatinine above 2 mg/dL); dependence on circulatory or ventilatory support; pregnancy; chronic use of anti-inflammatory drugs; participation in another study; use of chemotherapy in the last three months; puncture accident with compromise of the CSF sample; use of anticoagulant medication; increased CSF pressure due to any etiology; infectious disease or previous CNS surgery.

General parameters

Complete blood count, albumin, and C reactive protein (CRP) data were obtained from the medical records. All these analyses were performed in the hospital itself, prior to the surgery. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) was performed on patients with cancer15.

Criteria for diagnosing cachexia

Cachexia was identified based on the criteria proposed by Evans et al.16. To its identification, changes were considered in body weight, as involuntary weight loss in the last six months greater than or equal to 5% of the initial body mass; body mass index (BMI) less than 20 kg/m2 for patients under 65 years old and less than 22 kg/m2 for patients aged 65 older, and at least three of the following criteria: decreased muscle strength; the presence of fatigue; anorexia; low fat-free body mass index; serum albumin less than 35 g/dL; serum CRP concentration higher than 5mg/L; and anemia (Hb < 12 g/dL).

Cerebrospinal fluid collection

Two mL of CSF were collected and aspirated by subarachnoid puncture during the anesthetic procedure, before the infusion of any drug through this route. The routine preparation for spinal anesthesia included fasting for 12 hours before the procedure, and an empty bladder immediately before anesthesia. In the surgical center, the patient received intravenous sedation. Then, lying in lateral decubitus and bent forward, a fine needle was inserted into his back, after anesthetizing the skin and subcutaneous tissue with lidocaine, in the area between the last lumbar vertebrae (L3/L4; L4/L5), up to the spinal canal. After CSF collection, the anesthetic was injected within the same puncture. The samples were stored in liquid nitrogen and in a -80°C freezer.

Quantification of inflammatory proteins and growth factors in cerebrospinal fluid

Inflammatory cytokines were quantified in the CSF with the Multiplex system using the Human Cytokine/Chemokine Magnetic Bead Panel Cat. HCYTMAG-60 K-PX30 (Merck-Millipore) is designed to analyze: interferon (IFN)-α2, IFN-γ, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-1ra, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p40, IL-12p70, IL-13, IL-15, IL-17A, interferon gamma-induced protein-10 (IP-10, also known as C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10), TNF-α, TNF-β, granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 [MCP-1, also known as chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2—CCL2], macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α (also known as chemokine (C-C motif) ligands 3—CCL3), MIP-1β (also known as chemokine (C-C motif) ligands 4—CCL4), C-C motif chemokine 11 (CCL11). Only IL-8, IP-10, VEGF, MCP-1, and MIP-1β were satisfactorily quantified in the CSF.

Statistical analysis

A preliminary analysis was performed to verify that the normality assumptions were not violated (Shapiro-Wilk’s test). Kruskal-Wallis’ tests followed by Dunn’s test were used to compare non-parametrical. Unpaired T-test was used to compare parametrical data (QLQ-C30 functional and symptoms scales). Significance was considered at p < 0.05. The results obtained were expressed as median (first quartile; third quartile) when non-parametrical and mean and standard deviation when data presented parametrical distribution and analyzed with GraphPad Prism Software (version 8.4.3 Copyright©, 1992–2020).

Results

The CC group was composed of 49 individuals, with 22 female participants; the CWC group presented 13 participants, with seven women; and the control group comprised 43 individuals, with 23 females. No difference was observed for the sex distribution in the three groups. The CC group was older and had a lower BMI than the control group, as shown in Table 1. CC and CWC presented lower hemoglobin compared to the control. CC showed more inflammation with higher CRP, neutrophils, and lymphocytes than the control and CWC groups. Moreover, CC had lower albumin than the control and CWC groups, and higher platelets compared to the control.

Table 1
General parameters of the three groups<tfn href="tfn01">*</tfn>.

The CSF of patients with cancer—CWC and CC groups—showed lower content of VEGF and MCP-1 compared to the control group, as indicated in Fig. 1. CSF IP-10 was lower in the CC group compared to the control group. The correlation analysis in the CWC group demonstrated that CSF MCP-1 was positively associate with serum CRP and total leucocytes and negatively correlated with the percentage of lymphocytes and monocytes, as shown in Fig. 2.

Figure 1
VEGF and chemokines in cerebrospinal fluid of the control, CWC, and CC groups. (a) VEGF; (b) IL-8; (c) IP-10; (d) MCP-1; (e) MIP-1β. Comparisons were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis’ test followed by Dunn’s post-hoc test.
Figure 2
Correlations between chemokines in cerebrospinal fluid and serum CRP and blood immune cells in CWC and CC groups. (a) CRP and MCP-1 in CWC; (b) leucocytes and MCP-1 in CWC; (c) lymphocytes and MCP-1 in CWC; (d) monocytes and MCP-1 in CWC; (e) leucocytes and IL-8 in CC; neutrophils and MCP-1 in CC; eosinophils and MCP-1 in CC. Comparisons were performed using the Spearman’s correlation test.

Regarding the CC group, circulating leucocytes and neutrophils were positively associated with CSF IL-8 and MCP-1, respectively, and eosinophils were negatively associated with CSF MCP-1. No significant correlations were found for the control group, as seen in Suppl. Mat. 3 (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20835596).

Associations between EORT QLQ-C30 scales and the other variables were also analyzed. Only the CC group presented significant correlations. QLQ-C30 functional scale was positively associated with leucocytes, and QLQ-C30 symptoms scale was negatively associated with leucocytes. These results indicate that CC patients with higher functionality presented more circulating leucocytes and CC patients with high levels of symptomatology presented lower blood leucocytes, as shown in Fig. 3.

Figure 3
Association of EORT QLQ-C30 scales with leucocytes in the CC group. (a) Leucocytes and QLQ-C30 functional scale. (b) Leucocytes and QLQ-C30 symptoms scale. Comparisons were performed using the Spearman’s correlation test.

Discussion

Patients with CC presented lower content of CSF VEGF, IP-10, and MCP-1 compared to the control group, and patients with CWC showed lower amounts of CSF VEGF and MCP-1 compared to the control group. These results indicate that a tumor’s presence altered the signaling protein content in the CSF. We have previously reported similar results with lower CSF VEGF and MCP-1 content in CC and CWC groups compared to control patients13. Furthermore, in our study, patients with cachexia showed a lower quality of life with a higher presence of symptoms measured by the QLQ-C30.

CSF chemokines were associated with blood immune cells in patients with cancer with and without cachexia, but differently in each group. Patients with CC had a positive association of CSF IL-8 with leukocytes and CSF MCP-1 with neutrophils and a negative association of CSF MCP-1 and eosinophils. Furthermore, only patients with CC showed an association between blood immune cells and the EORT QLQ questionnaire, with blood leukocytes being positively associated with the functional scale and negatively associated with the symptoms scale. Therefore, in this study, higher blood leukocytes were associated with higher quality of life in patients with cancer cachexia. Patients with cancer without cachexia presented a positive association of CSF MCP-1 with serum CRP and blood leukocytes and a negative association of CSF MCP-1 with lymphocytes and monocytes.

MCP-1 can induce migration and proliferation of microglia without directly inducing a pro-inflammatory state17. When injected, MCP-1 can induce mechanical allodynia showing its role in nociception18. Patients with malignant glioma presented higher CSF MCP-1 compared to patients with benign glioma and control subjects19. Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia showed an increase in CSF IL-6 and MCP-1 after chemotherapy induction treatment and increased CSF IL-6, MCP-1, and TNF-α during the consolidation phase compared to the levels measured at the diagnosis20. Moreover, MCP-1 has been implicated in CNS inflammation after injury of axons, ischemia, and dorsal root ganglion chronic compression8.

CSF IP-10 was lower in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and in patients with subjective cognitive decline compared to patients with mild cognitive impairment21. IP-10 is involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory demyelinating neuropathies, as showed by its increased expression in the peripheral nervous system of patients with Gillain-Barré syndrome and patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy22. Patients with cancer cachexia have shown higher plasma levels of IP-10 compared to patients with cancer without cachexia23. In a mouse model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), IP-10 gene expression was downregulated in the area postrema and upregulated in the hippocampus, and this same work showed that culture of microglia exposed to PDAC conditioned media did not increase IP-10 gene expression4. However, the role of CSP IP-10 or even CNS IP-10 in patients with cancer cachexia has not been fully explored so far.

In the CNS, chemokines are important mediators of the homeostatic crosstalk between brain cells24. It has been reported an increase in the CNS chemokines and cytokines after lipopolysaccharides (LPS) injection together with a decrease in food intake in mice6. Post-mortem analysis of brains from patients with cancer cachexia showed increased microglia density in the hypothalamus and a higher phagocytic activity in the caudate nucleus microglia compared to patients with cancer without cachexia25. Therefore, there is evidence of increased CNS inflammation related to cancer cachexia. The data presented here showed that CSF MCP-1 and IP-10 were lower in the CC group compared to control individuals. Blood leucocytes and neutrophils were positively associated with IL-8 and MCP-1, respectively, in patients with cancer cachexia. The lower CSF chemokine content in patients with cachexia is a new finding only reported by another study of our research group with a subset of the same cluster of patients13. These new finds indicate that CSF chemokines may be sequestrated to peripheral tissues due to the presence of a tumor or that chronic high-grade inflammation may lead to a compensatory downregulation of chemokine production in the CNS.

CSF chemokines—eotaxin-1, MIP-1β, MCP-1, MCP-4, and thymus and activation-regulated chemokine—have been previously reported to be low in patients with psychiatric disorders in conjunction with a suicide attempt compared to control subjects11. In this study, authors found a correlation between low CSF chemokine and pain11. Lower CSF chemokine content seems associated with cognitive alterations, which may impact the disease perception and quality of life. Regarding VEGF, higher CSF levels of this growth factor are associated with a less executive function decline over time, less hippocampal atrophy, and more optimal brain aging in individuals with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease26.

Conclusion

Patients with cancer cachexia presented lower CSF VEGF, MCP-1 and IP-10 compared to control subjects, and patients with CWC had lower CSF VEGF and MCP-1 compared to the control group. These results suggest that the presence of tumor was able to interfere with the content of inflammatory mediators in the CSF. The potential mechanisms leading to lower CSF chemokines in cancer patients need further research. CSF chemokines in both groups were correlated with blood immune cells, suggesting a systemic interaction between peripheral immune cells and the CNS.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Instituto de Pesquisa e Ensino em Saúde da Amazônia.

  • Research performed at the Postgraduate Program in Anesthesiology, Surgical Sciences and Perioperative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Part of PhD degree thesis. Tutor: Prof. Dr. José Pinhata Otoch.
  • Funding
    Not applicable.
  • Declaration of use of artificial intelligence tools
    The authors declare that no artificial intelligence tools were used in the conception, design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of results, or writing of this manuscript.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available within the article and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1 Baracos VE, Martin L, Korc M, Guttridge DC, Fearon KCH. Cancer-associated cachexia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:17105. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.105
    » https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.105
  • 2 Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, Bosaeus I, Bruera E, Fainsinger RL, Jatoi A, Loprinzi C, MacDonald N, Mantovani G, Davis M, Muscaritoli M, Ottery F, Radbruch L, Ravasco P, Walsh D, Wilcock A, Kaasa S, Baracos VE. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(5):489–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70218-7
  • 3 Garcia JM, Boccia RV, Graham CD, Yan Y, Duus EM, Allen S, Friend J. Anamorelin for patients with cancer cachexia: an integrated analysis of two phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(1):108–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71154-4
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71154-4
  • 4 Burfeind KG, Zhu X, Norgard MA, Levasseur PR, Huisman C, Buenafe AC, Olson B, Michaelis KA, Torres ER, Jeng S, McWeeney S, Raber J, Marks DL. Circulating myeloid cells invade the central nervous system to mediate cachexia during pancreatic cancer. Elife. 2020;9:e54095. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54095
    » https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54095
  • 5 Michaelis KA, Zhu X, Burfeind KG, Krasnow SM, Levasseur PR, Morgan TK, Marks DL. Establishment and characterization of a novel murine model of pancreatic cancer cachexia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2017;8(5):824–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12225
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12225
  • 6 Burfeind KG, Zhu X, Levasseur PR, Michaelis KA, Norgard MA, Marks DL. TRIF is a key inflammatory mediator of acute sickness behavior and cancer cachexia. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;73:364–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2018.05.021
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2018.05.021
  • 7 Baggiolini M. Chemokines and leukocyte traffic. Nature. 1998;392:565–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/33340
    » https://doi.org/10.1038/33340
  • 8 Mélik-Parsadaniantz S, Rostène W. Chemokines and neuromodulation. J Neuroimmunol. 2008;198(1–2):62–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.04.022
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.04.022
  • 9 Stuart MJ, Singhal G, Baune BT. Systematic review of the neurobiological relevance of chemokines to psychiatric disorders. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:357. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00357
    » https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00357
  • 10 Wojcieszak J, Kuczyńska K, Zawilska JB. Role of chemokines in the development and progression of Alzheimer’s disease. J Mol Neurosci. 2022;72:1929–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-022-02047-1
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-022-02047-1
  • 11 Janelidze S, Ventorp F, Erhardt S, Hansson O, Minthon L, Flax J, Samuelsson M, Traskman-Bendz L, Brundin L. Altered chemokine levels in the cerebrospinal fluid and plasma of suicide attempters. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013;38(6):853–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.09.010
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.09.010
  • 12 Corrêa JD, Starling D, Teixeira AL, Caramelli P, Silva TA. Chemokines in CSF of Alzheimer’s disease patients. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2011;69(3):455–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-282x2011000400009
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-282x2011000400009
  • 13 Fortes GN, Fortes MF, Fortes MN, Gomes FC, Seelaendar MCL, Pinho AMS, Jesus JCR, Otoch JP. Mood, anxiety, and cognitive alterations in cancer patients. J Surg Oncol. 2024;130(4):965–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27912
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27912
  • 14 Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, Schein RM, Sibbald WJ. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Chest. 1992;101(6):1644–55. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.101.6.1644
    » https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.101.6.1644
  • 15 EORTC – Quality of Life. Quality of Life of Cancer Patients [Internet]. EORTC – Quality of Life [cited 2024 Dec 18]. Available at: https://qol.eortc.org/questionnaire/eortc-qlq-c30/
    » https://qol.eortc.org/questionnaire/eortc-qlq-c30/
  • 16 Evans WJ, Morley JE, Argilés J, Bales C, Baracos V, Guttridge D, Jatoi A, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Lochs H, Mantovani G, Marks D, Mitch WE, Muscaritoli M, Najand A, Ponikowski P, Fanelli FR, Schambelan M, Schols A, Schuster M, Thomas D, Wolfe R, Anker SD. Cachexia: a new definition. Clin Nutr. 2008;27(6):793–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2008.06.013
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2008.06.013
  • 17 Hinojosa AE, Garcia-Bueno B, Leza JC, Madrigal JL. CCL2/MCP-1 modulation of microglial activation and proliferation. J Neuroinflammation. 2011;8:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-8-77
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-8-77
  • 18 Tanaka T, Minami M, Nakagawa T, Satoh M. Enhanced production of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in the dorsal root ganglia in a rat model of neuropathic pain: possible involvement in the development of neuropathic pain. Neurosci Res. 2004;48(4):463–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2004.01.004
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2004.01.004
  • 19 Kuratsu J, Yoshizato K, Yoshimura T, Leonard EJ, Takeshima H, Ushio Y. Quantitative study of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in cerebrospinal fluid and cyst fluid from patients with malignant glioma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(22):1836–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/85.22.1836
    » https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/85.22.1836
  • 20 Protas PT, Holownia A, Muszynska-Roslan K, Wielgat P, Krawczuk-Rybak M, Braszko JJ. Cerebrospinal fluid IL-6, TNF-α and MCP-1 in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia during chemotherapy. Neuropediatrics. 2011;42(6):254–6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1295477
    » https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1295477
  • 21 Daniilidou M, Holleman J, Hagman G, Kåreholt I, Aspö M, Brinkmalm A, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Solomon A, Kivipelto M, Sindi S, Matton A. Neuroinflammation, cerebrovascular dysfunction and diurnal cortisol biomarkers in a memory clinic cohort: Findings from the Co-STAR study. Transl Psychiatry. 2024;14(1):364. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-024-03072-x
    » https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-024-03072-x
  • 22 Kieseier BC, Tani M, Mahad D, Oka N, Ho T, Woodroofe N, Griffin JW, Toyka KV, Ransohoff RM, Hartung HP. Chemokines and chemokine receptors in inflammatory demyelinating neuropathies: a central role for IP-10. Brain. 2002;125(4):823–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf070
    » https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf070
  • 23 Lerner L, Tao J, Liu Q, Nicoletti R, Feng B, Krieger B, Mazsa E, Siddiquee Z, Wang R, Huang L, Shen L, Lin J, Vigano A, Chiu MI, Weng Z, Winston W, Weiler S, Gyuris J. MAP3K11/GDF15 axis is a critical driver of cancer cachexia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016;7(4):467–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12077
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12077
  • 24 Trettel F, Di Castro MA, Limatola C. Chemokines: key molecules that orchestrate communication among neurons, microglia and astrocytes to preserve brain function. Neuroscience. 2020;439:230–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.07.035
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.07.035
  • 25 Simões E, Uchida R, Nucci MP, Duran FLS, Lima JDCC, Gama LR, Costa NA, Otaduy MCG, Bin FC, Otoch JP, Alcantara P, Ramos A, Laviano A, Diaz MB, Esiri MM, DeLuca GC, Herzig S, Busatto Filho G, Seelaender M. Cachexia alters central nervous system morphology and functionality in cancer patients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2025;16(1):e13742. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.13742
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.13742
  • 26 Hohman TJ, Bell SP, Jefferson AL; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in neurodegeneration and cognitive decline: exploring interactions with biomarkers of Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(5):520–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4761
    » https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4761
  • 27 Fortes MF, Fortes GN. Supplementary material for: Lower content of cerebrospinal fluid chemokines in patients with cancer cachexia. Zenodo. 2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20835596
    » https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20835596

Edited by

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    03 Aug 2026
  • Date of issue
    2026

History

  • Received
    26 Nov 2025
  • Accepted
    08 June 2026
location_on
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia https://actacirbras.com.br/ - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: actacirbras@gmail.com
rss_feed Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
Ir para o topo Reportar erro