Open-access Mapping knowledge on Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in the Amazon rainforest: a systematic review of diversity, distribution and symbiotic interactions

Mapeando o conhecimento sobre Fungos Micorrízicos Arbusculares na floresta amazônica: uma revisão sistemática da diversidade, distribuição e interações simbióticas

ABSTRACT

The Amazon rainforest is one of the main global biodiversity hotspots where its diverse plant community provides optimal conditions and habitats for several soil microorganisms. Among these, Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) establishes important symbiotic relationships with many species of plants. We carried out a systematic bibliometric review of AMF in the Amazon, the mycorrhizal status of plant species, and a detailed analysis of the distribution of studies and occurrences of AMF species in Amazonian countries. The 110 studies examined had substantial spatial disparity, with research initiatives clustered in particular regions of Brazil and Peru, while information was totally absent for many Amazonian regions, including some countries in their entirety. The compiled studies encompassed 164 sampling sites in only 22 of the 55 Amazonian ecoregions. Furthermore, our analysis identified that most research focus was on assessing root colonization, morphological diversity, and spore quantification. These studies documented 143 AMF species, with the family Acaulosporaceae being most prevalent, and we highlight the description of 12 new species and four new genera from the Amazon. Only 181 plant species in 55 families were evaluated for symbiotic potential, of which 49 species (most in the Lecythidaceae) had no mycorrhizal association. This review underscores the necessity for expanded geographical coverage in inventories of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi, implementation of molecular approaches to expedite diversity assessment, and increased focus on plant-fungal symbiotic interactions throughout the Amazon.

Keywords:
Amazonian ecosystems; AMF diversity; bibliometric review; Glomeromycota; mycorrhizal symbiosis

RESUMO

A Floresta Amazônica é um dos principais hotspots globais de biodiversidade, onde sua diversificada comunidade vegetal proporciona condições e habitats ideais para diversos microrganismos do solo. Entre eles, os Fungos Micorrízicos Arbusculares (FMA) estabelecem importantes relações simbióticas com a maioria das espécies de plantas. Nós conduzimos uma revisão bibliométrica sistemática sobre os principais tópicos de pesquisa em FMA na Amazônia, o status micorrízico das espécies vegetais e uma análise detalhada da distribuição dos estudos e da ocorrência de espécies de FMA nos países amazônicos. Os 110 estudos avaliados tiveram substancial disparidade espacial, com iniciativas de pesquisa predominantemente concentradas em regiões específicas do Brasil e do Peru, enquanto uma ausência completa de dados foi observada em muitos territórios amazônicos, incluindo alguns países em sua totalidade. Os estudos compilados abrangeram 164 locais de amostragem distribuídos em apenas 22 das 55 ecorregiões amazônicas. Além disso, nossa análise identificou um foco predominante de pesquisa na avaliação da colonização radicular, diversidade morfológica e quantificação de esporos. Estes estudos documentaram 143 espécies de FMA, com Acaulosporaceae sendo a família predominante, e destacamos a descrição de 12 novas espécies e quatro novos gêneros a partir de solos amazônicos. Apenas 181 espécies de plantas de 55 famílias foram avaliadas quanto ao potencial simbiótico, das quais 49 espécies (a maioria em Lecythidaceae) não apresentaram colonização micorrízica. Esta revisão ressalta a necessidade de ampliar a cobertura geográfica nos inventários de Fungos Micorrízicos Arbusculares, implementar abordagens moleculares para agilizar a avaliação da diversidade e aumentar o foco nas interações simbióticas entre plantas e fungos em toda a Amazônia.

Palavras-chave:
Ecossistemas amazônicos; diversidade de FMA; revisão bibliométrica; Glomeromycota; simbiose micorrízica

INTRODUCTION

The Amazon is the largest tropical rainforest on the planet, covering over 6 million km2 of South America and spanning nine countries: Brazil, Peru, Colombia, Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Guyana, Suriname, and French Guiana, with 60% of its total area in Brazil (RAISG 2015; Albert et al. 2021). Its extensive territory encompasses a highly diverse landscape, where vegetation patterns are primarily determined by climate and further influenced by soil, topography, and hydrology. These vary from savannas to dry and wet forests; from permanently to seasonally flooded or never flooded (terra-firme); from open campinas and campinaranas on poor white-sands to dense terra-firme forest on clay soils (IBGE 2004).

In addition, according to global terrestrial ecosystem frameworks (Olson et al. 2001; Dinerstein et al. 2017), the Amazon is divided into multiple ecoregions, large land units defined by distinctive combinations of environmental conditions, vegetation physiognomies, and associated biological communities. This heterogeneity sustains the greatest biodiversity on Earth and provides genetic resources and ecological services essential for the maintenance of several ecosystems around the world (Strand et al. 2018).

A taxonomically verified species list indicates that more than 14,000 plant species are found in the Amazon, while some estimates suggest as many as 50,000 (Cardoso et al. 2017). This plant diversity contributes to a complex belowground environment that supports rich and diverse microbial communities, including root-associated symbionts (Chen et al. 2019; Edy et al. 2022). Additionally, although Amazonian soils are highly heterogeneous, reflecting diverse geological origins and pedogenetic stages, vast areas, particularly in the central and eastern Amazon, are dominated by highly weathered and nutrient-poor soils (Quesada et al. 2010, 2011) that favor the establishment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), which play a key role in plant nutrient acquisition.

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi are the most abundant and crucial fungi for meeting the phosphorus (P) requirements of plants, a key nutrient regulating forest dynamics in the Amazon (Reichert et al. 2022). Phosphorus is mobilized by AMF directly through their extensive extraradical hyphae and may also interact with phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. AMF also facilitate nitrogen (N) uptake in the forms of ammonium, nitrate, and amino acids, promoting indirect organic matter mineralization by priming effect, and enhances the absorption of low-mobility trace elements (i.e., K, Ca, Mg, Cu, Zn, Fe, and Mn) in soils (Fall et al. 2022; Wu et al. 2024). Structurally, extraradical mycelia promote soil aggregation through physical entanglement and glomalin production, which increases water infiltration, reduces erosion, and improves the retention of nutrients (Demenois et al. 2018; Morris et al. 2019). In addition, AMF contribute to host resilience by providing protection against pathogens and mitigating abiotic stresses, such as drought, salinity, and heavy metal toxicity (Wahab et al. 2023). In return, AMF receive photosynthetically fixed carbon provided mainly as carbohydrates and lipids from their host plants (Jiang et al. 2017; Hammer et al. 2024).

Approximately 370 AMF species have been formally described (Hyde et al. 2024), along with many potentially new taxa identified by environmental DNA sequencing (Tedersoo et al. 2024). AMF occur across all climatic zones and ecosystems around the world (Davison et al. 2015), forming symbiotic relationships with about 72% of terrestrial plants (Brundrett and Tedersoo 2018). Nonetheless, the global distribution of AMF studies is heterogeneous and severely constrained by spatial bias and sampling effort, particularly in tropical forests where AMF diversity is presumably high (Stürmer et al. 2018; Stewart et al. 2025; Van Nuland et al. 2025).

Compilations of AMF species have revealed a large species diversity in the Amazon. Winagraski et al. (2019) compiled data on AMF diversity in Brazilian forest ecosystems and reported 132 species in the Amazon; however, the authors included taxa that were not confirmed at the species level. Maia et al. (2020) compiled records of AMF occurrence across all Brazilian floristic domains and reported 94 species in the Brazilian Amazon, highlighting it as the least studied biome in this country. Vega-Herrera et al. (2022) reported 84 species in the Peruvian Amazon. Peña-Venegas et al. (2022) documented approximately 50 species in the Colombian Amazon. In a more comprehensive review of AMF diversity in South America, Cofré et al. (2019) provided a list of > 100 species occurring in the Amazon. Although these studies compiled relevant information and expanded the availability of data on AMF in the Amazon, their approaches reflected country-specific contexts and mostly prioritized only AMF species inventories. No efforts have yet been made to integrate this knowledge into a broader, cross-border perspective that systematically considers ecology and methodology.

In this study, we carried out a systematic bibliometric review of AMF across the entire extent of the Amazon, to provide information on (i) the distribution of studies, (ii) the richness and distribution of AMF species, (iii) the main methodological approaches used in the studies, (iv) the mycorrhizal status of plant species, and (v) the significant gaps in existing research, guiding future investigations towards under-studied areas and advancements in new research topics.

METHODS

We searched extensively in the Web of Science, Scopus and Scielo databases using keywords associated with AMF and Amazon. The search was filtered by the fields “title”, “abstract” and “keywords” and covered the period from January 1945 to December 2024. The keywords were used in four languages (English, Portuguese, Spanish, and French), the official languages of the countries within the Amazon domain. The search string used was as follows: (“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi” OR “Arbuscular mycorrhiza” or “Vesicular arbuscular mycorrhiza” OR “AM fungi” OR “Fungos Micorrízicos Arbusculares” OR “Micorriza arbuscular” OR “fungos micorrízicos vesículo arbusculares” OR “Hongos Micorrízicos Arbusculares” OR “Hongos Micorrízicos Vesículo Arbusculares” OR “Champignons mycorhiziens arbusculaires” OR “Mycorhize arbusculaire” OR “mycorhizes vésiculaires-arbusculaires” OR “Glomeromycota” OR “Glomeromycotina”) AND (“Amazon” OR “Amazonian” OR “Amazônia” OR “Amazônica” OR “Amazônico” OR “Amazonía” OR “Amazónica” OR “Amazónico” OR “Amazonie” OR “Amazonienne” OR “Amazonien”). In addition, a simplified search using pairs of aforementioned keywords was used in Google Scholar with the aim of identifying additional articles not included in the previously mentioned databases. Gray literature, including theses and dissertations, was not considered for the analysis due to the lack of centralized indexing, which hinders data retrieval from multiple national repositories across Amazonian countries, and the lack of standardized peer-reviewed formats.

We analyzed all articles for information on the country of study, plant and AMF species contained in those studies, and on methodology. Regarding methodology, studies were classified based on the type of data or analyses performed, i.e., assessments of root colonization, evaluation of AMF diversity through spore morphological identification or environmental DNA sequencing, quantification of soil spore density, glomalin content analysis, inoculation experiments, taxonomic description of new species, and less frequently approaches grouped as “others”. Graphs to represent this information were made with R software version 4.3.1 (R Core Team 2023). Two maps were built to illustrate the distribution of the studies: the first is their geographic distribution by country, and the second their occurrence within ecoregions. Both maps were produced in QGIS 3.31.36, using shapefiles from the Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE), the DATABASIN and the RESOLVE Ecoregions dataset (https://ecoregions.appspot.com/). For records lacking precise geographical coordinates, nearby localities were used as proxies. A checklist of AMF species occurrences for each country was compiled, and the species classification was updated following Hyde et al. (2024) and da Silva et al. (2024, 2025). Records without identification at the species level were not included. Species names of fungi, and their authors, are in accordance with the Mycobank database.

RESULTS

After filtering the search results to exclude studies that did not align with the purpose of this review, 110 articles were selected and analyzed (Table S1). The distribution of studies across the countries reflects, in part, the territorial extent of each nation within the Amazonian region (Figure 1). Brazil, which encompasses the largest portion of the Amazon, accounts for the most publications (60), followed by Peru (32), Colombia (9), Ecuador (4), and French Guiana (3). Meanwhile, Bolivia and Venezuela have only one study each in their Amazonian regions, and Guyana and Suriname had no published studies identified. This distribution also reveals an unequal focus within each country. In Brazil, for instance, the majority of studies are concentrated in the state of Amazonas, particularly around Manaus, while in Peru, most studies are concentrated in the San Martin region (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Geographic distribution of studies on AMF in countries, and Brazilian states, in the Amazon domain. Red dots may overlap when multiple studies were at the same location. When a single study evaluated two or more localities, each locality was plotted independently.

When considering AMF studies by ecoregion, only 22 of the 55 ecoregions of the Amazonian domain (Olson et al. 2001; Dinerstein et al. 2017) were included (Figure 2a). Altogether, the 110 studies encompassed 164 sampling sites, but the research efforts were uneven and focused in few ecoregions. The Ucayali Moist Forests (Figure 2b) contained the largest number of sampling sites (28), followed by the Uatumã-Trombetas Moist Forests (19) (Figure 2d, i) and the Peruvian Yungas (18) (Figure 2b). Together, these three ecoregions accounted for nearly 40% of all sampling locations, with two (Ucayali Moist Forests and Peruvian Yungas) entirely within Peru (Figure 2b).

Figure 2
Geographic distribution of studies on AMF across ecoregions within the Amazon domain, grouped following Olson et al. (2001) and Dinerstein et al. (2017). (A) Overview of all study sites across Amazon ecoregions. (B-I) Details indicating better-sampled locations. Isolated points are not shown to emphasize the main sampling areas within the ecoregions. (B) Ucayali Moist Forest and Peruvian Yungas, Peru. (C) Napo Moist Forest, Colombia. (D) Uatuma-Trombetas and Japurá-Solimões-Negro Moist Forests in Amazonas, Brazil. (E) Southwest Amazon Moist Forest in Acre, Brazil; Madeira-Tapajós Moist Forests and Monte Alegre Varzeá in Rondônia, Brazil; and Southwest Amazon Moist Forest, Bolivia. (F) Southwest Amazon Moist Forest in Amazonas, Brazil; Iquitos Varzeá and Solimões-Japurá Moist Forests, Colombia. (G) Tocantins/Pindaré Moist Forests in Pará, Brazil. (H) Guianan Moist Forests, Guyane. (I) Guianan Savanna and Uatuma-Trombetas Moist Forests in Roraima, Brazil.

A total of 143 AMF species were detected in the Amazon, in 17 families and 34 genera (Table S2). The most represented family is Acaulosporaceae (36 spp.), followed by Glomeraceae (20 spp.) and Sclerocystaceae (13 spp.) (Figure 3c). Among these, 12 new species, including four new genera, were originally described based on material collected in the Amazon: Acaulospora endographis (Goto et al. 2013), Sclerocarpum amazonicum (Jobim et al. 2019), Acaulospora aspera (Corazon-Guivin et al. 2019a), Funneliglomus sanmartinensis (Corazon-Guivin et al. 2019b), Microkamienskia peruviana (Corazon-Guivin et al. 2019c), Nanoglomus plukenetiae (Corazon-Guivin et al. 2019d), Rhizoglomus variabile (Song et al. 2019), Paraglomus occidentale (Corazon-Guivin et al. 2020), Acaulospora flava (Corazon-Guivin et al. 2021), Paraglomus peruvianum (Lebeuf et al. 2022), Acaulospora flavopapillosa (Corazon-Guivin et al. 2022a), and Rhizoglomus cacao (Corazon-Guivin et al. 2022b).

Figure 3
Overview of AMF diversity across Amazonian countries. (A) Total number of AMF species reported by country. (B) Venn diagram illustrating the overlap of AMF species among countries. (C) Species richness of AMF families recorded by country.

Consistent with many studies in these countries, Brazil and Peru had higher species richness. In Brazil, 105 species were recorded, followed by Peru (74), Colombia (26), and Ecuador (5) (Figure 3a,b). In French Guiana, three molecular studies have been conducted. One detected AMF sequences exclusively within Glomeraceae, with no species-level identification, although the data suggest potential new taxa (Brearley et al. 2016). Another quantified soil AMF biomass without assessing community composition (Soong et al. 2020), and a third reported Glomeromycota only at the phylum level (Boisseaux et al. 2024). In the Amazonian regions of Venezuela, Guyana, Suriname, and Bolivia, no specific AMF diversity studies were found.

The most-reported species in the Amazon were Acaulospora foveata (25 records), A. mellea (24), A. tuberculata (23), and Entrophospora etunicata (22) (Table S2). Overall, in addition to its high species richness, Acaulospora also was most geographically widespread in the Amazon region, with at least eight species having more than 10 occurrence records each, predominantly in the Brazilian and Peruvian Amazon (Figure 3c). Species from other genera also had notable distributions across the Amazon. For instance, Rhizoglomus clarum and Ambispora leptoticha were recorded 18 and 15 times, respectively, predominantly in Brazil and Colombia. Glomus macrocarpum (15) and Funneliformis geosporum (13) were also frequently identified in Brazil and Peru (Table S2).

The most common methodologies used in those studies included root colonization assessments, diversity inventories with species identification based on spore morphology, and soil-spore quantification (Figure 4). Many of the studies also focused on inoculation experiments, which utilized either prepared inocula or native soils as sources of AMF. These experiments examined the efficacy of AMF isolates in promoting growth and health of associated plant species with considerable economic and ecological importance in the Amazon region. For instance, inoculation with Rhizoglomus aggregatum increased leaf phosphorus concentration and dry matter accumulation in pejibaye palms (Clement and Habte 1995). In Schizolobium amazonicum, a fast-growing Amazonian tree commercially valuable for wood production, interaction among N-fixing bacteria and R. clarum, R. intraradices and Entrophospora etunicata enhanced plant growth, biomass, and wood production (Siviero et al. 2008), while native isolates of E. etunicata and Acaulospora sp. also improved wood productivity in Schizolobium parahyba (Cely et al. 2016). In Vigna unguiculata, a wide range of native isolates increased its phosphorus uptake and growth, with A. foveata, Glomus sp.1, and E. infrequens among the most efficient (Silva et al. 2009). In Piper aduncum, inoculation with R. clarum and E. etunicata altered secondary metabolite production (de Oliveira et al. 2019). In coffee, field soil inocula improved plant height and branching (Vallejos-Torres et al. 2019), while inoculation with R. variabile and Nanoglomus plukenetiae enhanced shoot, root, and total biomass (Corazon-Guivin et al. 2023).

Figure 4
Frequency and co-occurrence of methodologies used in AMF studies in the Amazon. Segments show approaches colored by frequency (number of articles). Connections indicate co-occurrences (>2) between methods in the same studies.

Additionally, some diversity studies employed metabarcoding, enabling fungal community characterization through environmental sequencing. Most of these focused on environmental sequencing of fungi, within which AMF were detected, although identification was often limited to Glomeromycota incertae sedis. Only eight studies specifically targeted AMF, allowing for the identification of environmental sequences at genus or species level (Brearley et al. 2016; Garcés-Ruiz et al. 2017; Peña-Venegas et al. 2019, 2021; Rodríguez-León et al. 2021; Arévalo-Granda et al. 2023; Braga et al. 2023; Pineda-Lázaro et al. 2024).

Multiple methodological approaches were frequently employed within individual studies. Chord diagram analysis (Figure 4) revealed co-occurrence patterns among different methodologies. The strongest co-occurrence was observed between inoculation and colonization studies, followed by colonization paired with morphological diversity inventories. Additionally, sporulation analysis demonstrated strong co-occurrence with both colonization assessments and morphological diversity studies.

The symbiotic profile of 181 plant species from 55 families were examined (Table S3, Figure 5), including native Amazonian species and cultivated crops. Of the total, two species were pteridophytes, one species a gymnosperm, while 178 are angiosperms, comprising 23 monocotyledons and 155 eudicotyledons. Families with the most studied species were Lecythidaceae (33) and Fabaceae (27). The majority of species were colonized by AMF, while 49 showed no evidence of mycorrhizal colonization. Most of these belong to Lecythidaceae, including 30 species that had only weakly attached hyphae on the roots, which led the authors to classify them as likely non-mycorrhizal (Moreira et al. 1997). Although studies have investigated areas dominated by other plant species, they did not directly assess the plants’ mycorrhizal status, i.e., the presence of fungi within the roots, focusing only on the soil of the rhizosphere.

Figure 5
Plant families studied for their symbiotic potential to form arbuscular mycorrhizal associations in the Amazon. Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of species investigated per family. Within Eudicotyledons and Monocotyledons, the category “Others” groups families represented by only one species reported in this review.

DISCUSSION

Surprisingly, few studies (110) in fewer than half of the ecoregions (22 of 55) of the Amazon indicate an important gap in understanding Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF). This gap is even more important when we consider the omnipresence of AMF associated with Amazonian (and other) plants. Despite the largest territorial extent of the Amazon being in Brazil, the Amazon remains the least-studied Brazilian biome for AMF diversity, with only 10 inventories that identified 97 species (Maia et al. 2020). Meanwhile, smaller biomes are more comprehensively inventoried, such as the Atlantic Forest (153 species in 23 surveys), Cerrado (140 in 16), and Caatinga (120 in 14). Despite the fewer studies, more than 50% of all AMF species identified in Brazil were found in the Amazon (Maia et al. 2020 and updated in this review).

Most AMF studies in the Brazilian Amazon were in the state of Amazonas (AM), particularly near Manaus and the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), an important research center that provides crucial infrastructure and logistical support for sample collection and processing compared to more remote regions. In contrast, Brazilian states including Mato Grosso (MT) and Amapá (AP) remain completely unstudied (Figure 1). Leite-Júnior et al. (2022) reviewed fungi in the Mato Grosso portion of the Amazon and showed that data are scarce and some groups, such as AMF, have never been investigated.

The absence of studies in these regions is particularly alarming given the ongoing environmental degradation throughout the Brazilian Amazon. According to the most recent MapBiomas report (2024), the conversion of pristine ecosystems into agriculture and mining are the main drivers of deforestation. As a result, the Amazon biome alone accounted for 25% of the total deforestation of Brazil in 2023, with almost 5,000 km² of native vegetation lost. The states of Pará (1,665.8 km²), Mato Grosso (974.1 km²), and Amazonas (877.6 km²) lost the largest areas to deforestation. In Mato Grosso specifically, protected areas are facing critical threats, with a particularly urgent case proposal to revoke the protected status of Cristalino II State Park, recognized as the most biodiverse conservation unit in southern Amazonia, due to recent, illegitimate, land claims (Rodrigues et al. 2025).

The 164 sampling sites compiled in this study encompass only 22 of the 55 ecoregions recognized in the Amazon. This restricted coverage mirrors the global scenario where among the 848 terrestrial ecoregions, 73% remain completely unsampled for AMF in the largest dataset of AMF environmental DNA sequences (Stewart et al. 2025). This undersampling applies to many tropical forests, and even among the sampled ecoregions, representation is low, with an average of fewer than five samples per ecoregion. Expanding research efforts to the remaining 60% of Amazonian ecoregions is essential for obtaining a more comprehensive understanding of AMF and should encompass not only species distributions but also associations, which are crucial for understanding the roles of AMF in ecosystems as well as to guide conservation efforts.

Additionally, the geographic concentration of researchers specializing in specific topics is an important source of spatial bias in AMF studies, as in Peru, where most AMF research is in the San Martín region. This concentration is probably the consequence of the Universidad Nacional de San Martín, with scientists working on AMF ecology and taxonomy, and whose efforts resulted in the description of new AMF species from the Amazon (Corazon-Guivin et al. 2019a, b, c, d; 2020; 2021; 2022a, b; Song et al. 2019; Lebeuf et al. 2022).

With the data we compiled in this review we showed more than 140 AMF species in the Amazon, in 17 families of the known 22 (77%) and 34 genera of the known 52 (65%) within Glomeromycota (da Silva et al. 2024, 2025; Goto et al. 2024; Błaszkowski et al. 2025a, b), likely represent important underestimates of the associations that exist in the Amazon. While species richness is substantial, coupled with the description of new taxa, including 12 species and four new genera, the limited scope of investigations conducted to date, highlights the remarkable potential of the Amazon as a reservoir for even greater undiscovered AMF diversity.

The Acaulosporaceae, represented by the genus Acaulospora, had the highest species richness (36 spp.), with more than 50% of all its reported species. Acaulospora has a cosmopolitan distribution and tolerates numerous stressful environmental conditions, usually producing copious spores (da Silva et al. 2022). The high richness and number of occurrences in the Amazon, mainly in Brazil and Peru, corroborate previous checklists that identified this genus as the most widely distributed in Brazilian biomes (Maia et al. 2020) and as having the highest richness throughout the Peruvian Amazon (Vega-Herrera et al. 2022).

While we found greater species richness of Acaulosporaceae, this was due to morphological spore identification, while molecular identification consistently shows that Glomeraceae and Sclerocystaceae are dominant, particularly the genera Glomus and Rhizoglomus, in root and soil DNA samples from the Amazon (Peña-Venegas et al. 2019, 2021; Rodríguez-León et al. 2021). AMF species have different life strategies and may be differentially detected depending on the methodology employed. Morphological approaches are particularly effective for identifying spore-producing species, although spore production can be influenced by biotic and abiotic factors, while molecular techniques, capable of capturing DNA from both spores and mycelium, can be more suited for detecting species that predominantly invest in mycelial networks (Öpik et al. 2014). Therefore, integrating both methods is essential for obtaining a comprehensive and accurate assessment of AMF diversity.

Gaps in information about AMF biogeography are also a consequence of the challenges of AMF taxonomy (Goto et al. 2024). In the Amazon, most studies rely only on morphological identification, leading to an underrepresentation because of (i) ambiguity due to spore quality when obtained directly from field soil samples, and (ii) the limited characters used for spore identification. Environmental sequencing approaches, such as Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) and Single Molecule Real Time sequencing (SMRT, Pacific Biosciences), are important complementary tools for accelerating diversity documentation in inventories (Öpik et al. 2014; Kolaříková et al. 2021). The former has gained remarkable attention for characterizing AMF communities, with an expanding repository of environmental sequences (many of which belong to undescribed lineages) available in public databases that reveal novel taxa even at the family or order level (Tedersoo et al. 2024). However, only a limited number of studies employing NGS have been conducted in the Amazon, most of which focused on general fungal communities using low resolution (and which can miss the Glomeromycota) universal primer sets targeting the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) (Mueller et al. 2014; 2016a; Cerqueira et al. 2018; Soong et al. 2020; Vasco-Palacios et al. 2020; Boisseaux et al. 2024). More specific molecular strategies have been developed to improve detection of this group. The 18S rRNA gene (small subunit, SSU) has been widely used in AMF community studies, especially with primer pairs such as AML and WANDA (Lee et al. 2008; Dumbrell et al. 2011; Bukovská et al. 2021). Nevertheless, SSU marker have limited resolution for closely related species. Alternatively, the 28S rRNA gene (large subunit, LSU), especially its hypervariable D2 domain, improved resolution at the genus and species levels and is becoming increasingly used in AMF community studies (Mueller et al. 2016b; Delavaux et al. 2022; Malicka et al. 2022). These markers, along with more targeted sequencing techniques, are promising tools for future studies to accurately measure AMF diversity in Amazonian ecosystems.

Amazonian biodiversity is estimated at over 50,000 plant species, of which only 14,000 have been formally catalogued (Cardoso et al. 2017). Our survey revealed a significant gap in knowledge about mycorrhizal associations in this biome, as only 181 species (less than 2% of the catalogued flora) have been investigated for their symbiotic interactions with AMF. This deficit is particularly notable considering the importance of fungi associations (Brundrett and Tedersoo 2018). It is important to mention that colonization studies have predominantly focused on agroforestry species or those with other economic interests, leaving the mycorrhizal status of the vast majority of native trees uninvestigated. Increased knowledge about symbiotic relationships between AMF and native plants will reveal crucial adaptive strategies of plants in nutritionally poor soils, elucidate mechanisms of resistance to environmental stresses, guide more efficient reforestation programs, and provide insights into the functional diversity of AMF in the region. Furthermore, such knowledge is essential for the development of specific bioinoculants that will enhance recovery of degraded areas and contribute to sustainable productivity in Amazonian systems.

For future advancement, we recommend: (i) including geographic areas not yet investigated; (ii) increasing the use of molecular techniques to identify taxonomic and functional diversity of Amazonian AMF as complementary tools for morphological identification; (iii) increasing study of the mycorrhizal associations with native plant species; (iv) studies of temporal dynamics of this symbiosis in the face of climate change and increasing anthropization of the region; and (v) applied investigations on the biotechnological potential of native AMF for ecological restoration and sustainable agroforestry systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review demonstrates that current knowledge on AMF in the Amazon remains markedly limited. Despite harboring high AMF diversity with several newly described taxa, most studies remain focused on traditional morphological assessments of colonization and spore-based diversity. The concentration of studies in specific regions and the fact that less than 2% of the Amazonian flora has been evaluated for mycorrhizal associations highlight a significant gap between the ecological relevance of AMF and the evidence available to understand their roles in this biome.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for awarding the research grant to B. T. Goto (grant 311945/2019-8 and 409181/2024-2), for providing the scientific initiation scholarship to A. R. Assunção (grant 142629/2022-7), and for funding a research project conducted by this group of researchers in the Amazon region (grant 406896/2021-6; 409181/2024-2; SPUN-UE-Goto23-2). We also thank the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for granting masters scholarships to J. R. B. Felix (grant 88887.002657/2024-00). This study was financed in part by the CAPES - Finance Code 001.

REFERENCES

  • Albert, J.; Hoorn, C.; Malhi, Y.; Phillips, O.; Encalada, A.C.; Steegee, H.; et al 2021. The multiple viewpoints for the Amazon: geographic limits and meanings. Amazon Assessment Report((https://www.theamazonwewant.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/220105_The-multiple-viewpoints-for-the-Amazon-formatted-and-reviewed-050122.pdf ). Accessed on 13 Feb 2025.
    » https://www.theamazonwewant.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/220105_The-multiple-viewpoints-for-the-Amazon-formatted-and-reviewed-050122.pdf
  • Arévalo-Granda, V.; Hickey-Darquea, A.; Prado-Vivar, B.; Zapata, S.; Duchicela, J.; van ‘t Hof, P. 2023. Exploring the mycobiome and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with the rhizosphere of the genus Inga in the pristine Ecuadorian Amazon. Frontiers in Fungal Biology 4: 1086194.
  • Błaszkowski, J.; Zubek, S.; Milczarski, P.; Malinowski, R.; Niezgoda, P.; Goto, B.T. 2025a. New taxa and a combination in Glomerales (Glomeromycota, Glomeromycetes). MycoKeys 112: 253-276.
  • Błaszkowski, J.; Goto, B.T.; Zubek, S.; Milczarski, P.; Malinowski, R.; Niezgoda, P.; et al 2025b. Paracorymbiglomus gen. nov., Diversispora conica sp. nov., and new combinations in Diversisporaceae (Glomeromycota). MycoKeys 117: 171-190.
  • Boisseaux, M.; Troispoux, V.; Bordes, A.; Cazal, J.; Cazal, S-O; Sabrina Coste, S.; et al 2024. Are plant traits drivers of endophytic communities in seasonally flooded tropical forests? American Journal of Botany 111: e16366.
  • Braga, J.G.B.; de Novais, C.B.; Diniz, P.P.; Aragão, O.O.S.; Saggin-Júnior, O.J.; Jesus, E.C. 2023. Association of mycoheterotrophic Gentianaceae with specific Glomus lineages. Mycorrhiza 33: 249-256.
  • Brearley, F.Q.; Elliott, D.R.; Iribar, A.; Sen, R. 2016. Arbuscular mycorrhizal community structure on co-existing tropical legume trees in French Guiana. Plant and Soil 403: 253-265.
  • Brundrett, M.C.; Tedersoo, L. 2018. Evolutionary history of mycorrhizal symbioses and global host plant diversity. New Phytologist 220: 1108-1115.
  • Bukovská, P.; Rozmoš, M.; Kotianová, M.; Gančarčíková, K.; Dudáš, M.; Hršelová, H.; et al 2021. Arbuscular mycorrhiza mediates efficient recycling from soil to plants of nitrogen bound in chitin. Frontiers in Microbiology 12: 574060.
  • Cardoso, D.; Särkinen, T.; Alexander, S.; Amorim, A.M.; Bittrich, V.; Celis, M.; et al 2017. Amazon plant diversity revealed by a taxonomically verified species list. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114: 10695-10700.
  • Cely, M.V.T.; Siviero, M.A.; Emiliano, J.; Spago, F.R.; Freitas, V.F.; Barazetti, A.R.; et al 2016. Inoculation of Schizolobium parahyba with mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria increases wood yield under field conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 1708.
  • Cerqueira, A.E.S.; Silva, T.H.; Nunes, A.C.S.; Nunes, D.D.; Lobato, L.C.; Veloso, T.G.R.; et al 2018. Amazon basin pasture soils reveal susceptibility to phytopathogens and lower fungal community dissimilarity than forest. Applied Soil Ecology 131: 1-11.
  • Chen, C.; Chen, H.Y.H.; Chen, X.; Huang, Z. 2019. Meta-analysis shows positive effects of plant diversity on microbial biomass and respiration. Nature Communications 10: 1332.
  • Clement, C.R.; Habte, M. 1995. Genotypic variation in vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal dependence of the pejibaye palm. Journal of Plant Nutrition 18(9): 1907-1916.
  • Cofré, M.N.; Soteras, F.; Iglesias, M.R.; Velázquez, S.; Abarca, C.; Ontivero, E.; et al 2019. Biodiversity of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in South America: a review. In: Pagano, M.C.; Lugo, M.A. (Eds.). Mycorrhizal Fungi in South America Springer, Switzerland. p. 49-72.
  • Corazon-Guivin, M.A.; Mendoza, A.C.; Guerrero-Abad, J.C.; Vallejos-Tapullima, A. 2019a. Acaulospora aspera, a new fungal species in the Glomeromycetes from rhizosphere soils of the inka nut (Plukenetia volubilis L.) in Peru. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality 92: 250-257.
  • Corazon-Guivin, M.A.; Mendoza, A.C.; Guerrero-Abad, J.C.; Vallejos-Tapullima, A.; Carballar-Hernández, S.; da Silva, G.A.; et al 2019b. Funneliglomus, gen. nov., and Funneliglomus sanmartinensis, a new arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus from the Amazonia region in Peru. Sydowia 71: 17-24.
  • Corazon-Guivin, M.A.; Mendoza, A.C.; Guerrero-Abad, J.C.; Vallejos-Tapullima, A.; Carballar-Hernández, S.; da Silva, G.A.; et al 2019c. Microkamienskia gen. nov. and Microkamienskia peruviana, a new arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus from Western Amazonia. Nova Hedwigia 109: 355-368.
  • Corazon-Guivin, M.A.; Cerna-Mendoza, A.; Guerrero-Abad, J.C.; Vallejos-Tapullima, A.; Carballar-Hernández, S.; da Silva, G.A.; et al 2019d. Nanoglomus plukenetiae, a new fungus from Peru, and a key to small-spored Glomeraceae species, including three new genera in the “Dominikia complex/clades”. Mycological Progress 8: 1395-1409.
  • Corazon-Guivin, M.A.; Cerna-Mendoza, A.; Guerrero-Abad, J.C.; Vallejos-Tapullima, A.; Ríos-Ramírez, O.; Vallejos-Torres, G.; et al 2020. Paraglomus occidentale, a new arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus from the sources of the Amazon river in Peru, with a key to the Paraglomeromycetes species. Sydowia 72: 85-94.
  • Corazon-Guivin, M.A.; Vallejos-Tapullima, A.; Sota-Ricaldi, A.M.; Cerna-Mendoza, A.; Guerrero-Abad, J.C.; Santos, V. 2021. Acaulospora flava, a new arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus from Coffea arabica and Plukenetia volubilis plantations at the sources of the Amazon river in Peru. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality 94: 116-123.
  • Corazon-Guivin, M.A.; Vallejos-Tapullima, A.; de la Sota-Ricaldi, A.M.; Vallejos-Torres, G.; Ruíz-Sánchez, M.E.; Santos, V.M.; et al 2022a. Acaulospora flavopapillosa, a new fungus in the Glomeromycetes from a coffee plantation in Peru, with an updated key for the identification of Acaulosporaceae species. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality 95: 6-16.
  • Corazon-Guivin, M.A.; Vallejos-Torres, G.; Vallejos-Tapullima, A.; Tenorio-Cercado, M.A.; Caballero, W.M.; Marín, C.; et al 2022b. Rhizoglomus cacao, a new species of the Glomeraceae from the rhizosphere of Theobroma cacao in Peru, with an updated identification key for all species attributed to Rhizoglomus Nova Hedwigia 115: 99-115.
  • Corazon-Guivin, M.A.; Romero-Cachique, G.; Del Aguila, K.M.; Padilla-Domínguez, A.; Hernández-Amasifuen, A.D.; Cerna-Mendoza, A.; et al 2023. Rhizoglomus variabile and Nanoglomus plukenetiae, native to Peru, promote coffee growth in western Amazonia. Microorganisms 11: 2883.
  • da Silva, G.A.; de Assis, D.M.A.; Sieverding, E.; Oehl, F. 2024. Four New Families of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Within the Order Glomerales. Taxonomy 4: 761-779.
  • da Silva, G.A.; Sieverding, E.; Assis, D.M.A.; Goto, B.T.; Corazon-Guivin, M.A.; Oehl, F. 2025. Revision of Entrophosporales, with three genera and an identification key for all species currently attributed to this order. Journal of Fungi 11: 97.
  • da Silva, K.J.G.; Fernandes, J.A.L.; Magurno, F.; Leandro, L.B.A.; Goto, B.T.; Theodoro, R.C. 2022. Phylogenetic Review of Acaulospora (Diversisporales, Glomeromycota) and the Homoplasic Nature of Its Ornamentations. Journal of Fungi 8: 892.
  • Davison, J.; Moora, M.; Öpik, M.; Adholeya, A.; Ainsaar, L.; Bâ, A.; et al 2015. Global assessment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus diversity reveals very low endemism. Science 349: 970-973.
  • Delavaux, C.S.; Ramos, R.J.; Sturmer, S.L.; Bever, J.D. 2022. Environmental identification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi using the LSU rDNA gene region: an expanded database and improved pipeline. Mycorrhiza 32: 145-153.
  • Demenois, J.; Rey, F.; Ibanez, T.; Stokes, A.; Carriconde, F. 2018. Linkages between root traits, soil fungi and aggregate stability in tropical plant communities along a successional vegetation gradient. Plant and Soil 424: 319-334.
  • Dinerstein, E.; Olson, D.; Joshi, A.; Vynne, C.; Burgess, N.D.; Wikramanayake, E.; et al 2017. An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. BioScience 67: 534-545.
  • de Oliveira, J.S.F.; Xavier, L.P.; Lins, A.; Andrade, E.H.A.; Maia, J.G.S.; Mello, A.H.; et al 2019. Effects of inoculation by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the composition of the essential oil, plant growth, and lipoxygenase activity of Piper aduncum L. AMB Express 9: 29.
  • Dumbrell, A.J.; Ashton, P.D.; Aziz, N.; Feng, G.; Nelson, M.; Dytham, C.; et al 2011. Distinct seasonal assemblages of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi revealed by massively parallel pyrosequencing. New Phytologist 190: 794-804.
  • Edy, N.; Barus, H.N.; Finkeldey, R.; Polle, A. 2022. Host plant richness and environment in tropical forest transformation systems shape arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal richness. Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 1004097.
  • Fall, A.F.; Nakabonge, G.; Ssekandi, J.; Founoune-Mboup, H.; Apori, S.O.; Ndiaye, A.; et al 2022. Roles of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Soil Fertility: Contribution in the Improvement of Physical, Chemical, and Biological Properties of the Soil. Frontiers in Fungal Biology 3: 723892.
  • Garcés-Ruiz, M.; Senés-Guerrero, C.; Declerck, S.; Cranenbrouck, S. 2017. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community composition in Carludovica palmata, Costus scaber and Euterpe precatoria from weathered oil ponds in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Frontiers in Microbiology 8: 2134.
  • Goto, B.T.; Pereira, C.M.R.; Nobre, C.P.; Zatorre, N.P.; Covacevich, F.; Berbara, R.L.L.; et al 2013. Acaulospora endographis (Glomeromycetes), a new fungus with a complex spore wall. Mycotaxon 123: 403-408.
  • Goto, B.T.; Queiroz, M.B.; Magurno, F.; Souza, F.A.; Błaszkowski, J. 2024. How far have we progress in Glomeromycota taxonomy and systematic? IMS Newsletter 5: 18-24.
  • Hammer, E.C.; Arellano-Caicedo, C.; Mafla-Endara, P.M.; Kiers, E.T.; Shimizu, T.; Ohlsson, P.; et al 2024. Hyphal exploration strategies and habitat modification of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus in microengineered soil chips. Fungal Ecology 67: 101302.
  • Hyde, K.D.; Noorabadi, M.T.; Thiyagaraja, V.; He, M.Q.; Johnston, P.R.; Wijesinghe, S.N.; et al 2024. The 2024 Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere 15: 5146-6239.
  • Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. IBGE. 2004. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Mapa de vegetação do Brasil. https://geoftp.ibge.gov.br/informacoes_ambientais/vegetacao/mapas/brasil/vegetacao.pdf Accessed on 07 Nov 2025.
    » https://geoftp.ibge.gov.br/informacoes_ambientais/vegetacao/mapas/brasil/vegetacao.pdf
  • Jiang, Y.; Wang, W.; Xie, Q.; Liu, N.; Wang, D.; Zhang, X.; et al 2017. Plants transfer lipids to sustain colonization by mutualistic mycorrhizal and parasitic fungi. Plant Science 356: 1172-1175.
  • Jobim, K.; Błaszkowski, J.; Niezgoda, P.; Kozłowska, A.; Zubek, S.; Mleczko, P.; et al 2019. New sporocarpic taxa in the phylum Glomeromycota: Sclerocarpum amazonicum gen. et sp. nov. in the family Glomeraceae (Glomerales) and Diversispora sporocarpia sp. nov. in the Diversisporaceae (Diversisporales). Mycological Progress 18: 369-384.
  • Kolaříková, Z.; Slavíková, R.; Krüger, C.; Krüger, M.; Kohout, P. 2021. PacBio sequencing of Glomeromycota rDNA: a novel amplicon covering all widely used ribosomal barcoding regions and its applicability in taxonomy and ecology of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist 231: 490-499.
  • Lebeuf, R.; Alexandrova, A.V.; Cerna-Mendoza, A.; Corazon-Guivin, M.A.; Silva, G.A.; de la Sota-Ricaldi, A.M.; et al 2022. Fungal Systematics and Evolution: FUSE 8. Sydowia 74: 193-249.
  • Lee, J.; Lee, S.; Young, J.P.W. 2008. Improved PCR primers for the detection and identification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 65: 339-349.
  • Leite-Júnior, D.P.; Tadano, T.; Pereira, R.S.; Souza, J.V.R.; Yamamoto, A.C.A. 2022. Neotropical Micodiversity of Mato Grosso, Central Region of Brazil: Ethnomicological Aspects and Systematic Research of the Literature. International Journal of Tropical Disease & Health 43: 1-47.
  • Maia, L.C.; Passos, J.H.; Silva, J.A.; Oehl, F.; Assis, D.M.A. 2020. Species diversity of Glomeromycota in Brazilian biomes. Sydowia 72: 181-205.
  • Malicka, M.; Magurno, F.; Piotrowska-Seget, Z. 2022. Phenol and Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Are Stronger Drivers Than Host Plant Species in Shaping the Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Component of the Mycorrhizosphere. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23: 12585.
  • MapBiomas. 2024. RAD2023: Relatório Anual do Desmatamento no Brasil 2023. São Paulo, Brasil. 154p. ( (http://alerta.mapbiomas.org ). Accessed on 16 Apr 2025.
    » http://alerta.mapbiomas.org
  • Moreira, F.W.; de Oliveira, L.A.; Becker, P. 1997. Ausência de micorrizas vesículo-arbusculares efetivas em Lecythidaceas numa área de floresta primária da Amazônia central. Acta Amazonica 27: 3-8.
  • Morris, E.K.; Morris, D.J.P.; Vogt, S.; Gleber, S.C.; Bigalke, M.; Wilcke, W.; Rillig, M.C. 2019. Visualizing the dynamics of soil aggregation as affected by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. The ISME Journal 13: 1639-1646.
  • Mueller, R.C.; Paula, F.S.; Mirza, B.S.; Rodrigues, J.L.M.; Nüsslein, K.; Bohannan, B.J.M. 2014. Links between plant and fungal communities across a deforestation chronosequence in the Amazon rainforest. The ISME Journal 8: 1548-1550.
  • Mueller, R.C.; Rodrigues, J.L.M.; Nüsslein, K.; Bohannan, B.J.M. 2016a. Land use change in the Amazon rainforest favours generalist fungi. Functional Ecology 30: 1845-1853.
  • Mueller, R.C.; Gallegos-Graves, L.V.; Kuske, C.R. 2016b. A new fungal large subunit ribosomal RNA primer for high-throughput sequencing surveys. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 92: 153.
  • Olson, D.M.; Dinerstein, E.; Wikramanayake, E.D.; Burgess, N.D.; Powell, G.V.; Underwood, E.C.; et al 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: A new map of life on earth. BioScience 51: 933-938.
  • Öpik, M.; Davison, J.; Moora, M.; Zobel, M. 2014. DNA-based detection and identification of Glomeromycota: the virtual taxonomy of environmental sequences. Botany 92: 135-147.
  • Peña-Venegas, C.P.; Kuyper, T.W.; Davison, J.; Jairus, T.; Vasar, M.; Stomph, T.J.; et al 2019. Distinct arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities associate with different manioc landraces and Amazonian soils. Mycorrhiza 29: 263-275.
  • Peña-Venegas, C.P.; León, D.; Bueno, C.G. 2022. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in the Colombian Amazon: A Historical Review. In: Lugo, M.A., Pagano, M.C. (Eds). Mycorrhizal Fungi in South America Fungal Biology Springer. p.79-106.
  • Peña-Venegas, C.P.; Sterling, A.; Andrade-Ramírez, T.K. 2021. Arbuscular mycorrhization in Colombian and introduced Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) genotypes cultivated on degraded soils of the Amazon region. Agriculture 11: 361.
  • Pineda-Lázaro, A.J.; Vallejos-Tapullima, A.; Hernández-Amasifuen, A.D.; Carballar-Hernández, S.; Imán-Correa, S.A; Carvajal-Vallejos, F.M.; et al 2024. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Myrciaria dubia in the Amazonia Region, Peru. Advances in Agriculture 4: 1-8.
  • Quesada, C.A.; Lloyd, J.; Schwarz, M.; Patiño, S.; Baker, T. R.; Czimczik, C.; et al 2010. Variations in chemical and physical properties of Amazon forest soils in relation to their genesis. Biogeosciences 7: 1515-1541.
  • Quesada, C.A.; Lloyd, J.; Anderson, L.O.; Fyllas, N.M.; Schwarz, M.; Czimczik, C.I. 2011. Soils of Amazonia with particular reference to the RAINFOR sites. Biogeosciences 8: 1415-1440.
  • RAISG. 2015. Deforestation in the Amazonia (1970-2013). 48p. ( (https://www.raisg.socioambiental.org ). Accessed on 20 Feb 2025.
    » https://www.raisg.socioambiental.org
  • R Core Team. 2023. R (Version 4.3. 1): A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria. ( (https://www.R-project.org/ ). Accessed on 4 Mar 2025.
    » https://www.R-project.org/
  • Reichert, T.; Rammig, A.; Fuchslueger, L.; Lugli, L.F.; Quesada, C.A.; et al 2022. Plant phosphorus-use and -acquisition strategies in Amazonia. New Phytologist 234: 1126-1143.
  • Rodrigues, D.J.; Sobral-Souza, T.; Toma, T.S.P.; Guimaraes, A.G.; Izzo, T.J.; Penhacek, M.; et al 2025. Passando a boiada: Degazettement and downsizing threaten protected areas in the Brazilian Amazon. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation 23: 1-5.
  • Rodríguez-León, C.H.; Peña-Venegas, C.P.; Sterling, A.; Muñoz-Ramirez, H.; Virguez-Díaz, Y.R. 2021. Changes in soil-borne communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi during natural regrowth of abandoned cattle pastures are indicative of ecosystem restoration. Agronomy 11: 2468.
  • Silva, G.A.; Siqueira, J.O.; Stürmer, S.L. 2009. Eficiência de fungos micorrízicos arbusculares isolados de solos sob diferentes sistemas de uso na região do Alto Solimões na Amazônia. Acta Amazonica 39: 477-488.
  • Siviero, M.A.; Motta, A. M.; Lima, D.S.; Birolli, R.R.; Huh, S.Y.; Santinoni, I.A.; et al 2008. Interaction among N-fixing bacteria and AM fungi in Amazonian legume tree (Schizolobium amazonicum) in field conditions. Applied Soil Ecology 39: 144-152.
  • Song, J.; Liang, J.F.; Mehrabi-Koushki, M.; Krisai-Greilhuber, I.; Ali, B.; Bhatt, V.K.; et al 2019. Fungal Systematics and Evolution: FUSE 5. Sydowia 71:141-245.
  • Soong, J.L.; Janssens, I.A.; Grau, O.; Margalef, O.; Stahl, C.; Van Langenhove, L.; et al 2020. Soil properties explain tree growth and mortality, but not biomass, across phosphorus-depleted tropical forests. Scientific Reports 10: 2302.
  • Stewart, J.D.; Corrales, A.; Canteiro, C.; Qin, C.; Gupta, M.M.; Otgonsuren, B.; et al 2025. Advancing knowledge on the biogeography of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to support Sustainable Development Goal 15: Life on Land. FEMS Microbiology Letters 372: fnaf055.
  • Strand, J.; Soares-Filho, B.; Costa, M.H.; Oliveira, U.; Ribeiro, S.C.; Pires, G.F.; et al 2018. Spatially explicit valuation of the Brazilian Amazon Forest’s Ecosystem Services. Nature sustainability 1: 657-664.
  • Stürmer, S.L.; Oliveira, L.Z.; Morton, J.B. 2018. Gigasporaceae versus Glomeraceae (phylum Glomeromycota): A biogeographic tale of dominance in maritime sand dunes. Fungal Ecology 132: 49-56.
  • Tedersoo, L.; Magurno, F.; Alkahtani, S.; Mikryukov, V. 2024. Phylogenetic classification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: new species and higher-ranking taxa in Glomeromycota and Mucoromycota (class Endogonomycetes). MycoKeys 107: 249-271.
  • Vallejos-Torres, G.; Arévalo, L.; Iliquin, I.; Solis, R. 2019. Respuesta en campo de clones de café a la inoculación con consorcios de hongos micorrízicos arbusculares en la región Amazonas, Perú. Información Tecnológica 30: 73-84.
  • Van Nuland, M.E.; Averill, C.; Stewart, J.D.; Prylutskyi, O.; Corrales, A.; van Galen, L.G.; et al 2025. Global hotspots of mycorrhizal fungal richness are poorly protected. Nature 645: 414-422
  • Vasco-Palacios, A.M.; Bahram, M.; Boekhout, T.; Tedersoo, L. 2020. Carbon content and pH as important drivers of fungal community structure in three Amazon forests. Plant and Soil 450: 111-131.
  • Vega-Herrera, S.S.; Stürmer, S.L.; Damiani, C.R. 2022. Glomeromycota in Peru: an overview and future approaches. Sydowia 75: 87-101.
  • Wahab, A.; Muhammad, M.; Munir, A.; Abdi, G.; Zaman, W.; Ayaz, A.; et al 2023. Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Regulating Growth, Enhancing Productivity, and Potentially Influencing Ecosystems under Abiotic and Biotic Stresses. Plants 29: 3102.
  • Winagraski, E.; Kaschuk, G.; Monteiro, P.H.R.; Auer, C.G.; Higa, A.R. 2019. Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in forest ecosystems of Brazil: A review. Cerne 25: 25-35.
  • Wu, S.; Fu, W.; Rillig, M.C.; Chen, B.; Zhu, Y.G.; Huang, L. 2024. Soil organic matter dynamics mediated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-an updated conceptual framework. New Phytologist 242: 1417-1425.
  • CITE AS:
    Queiroz, M.B.; Felix, J.R.B.; Assunção, A.R.; Goto, B.T. 2026. Mapping knowledge on Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in the Amazon rainforest: a systematic review of diversity, distribution and symbiotic interactions. Acta Amazonica 56: e56bc25110.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study were published in this article and in its attached Supplementary Material section.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Queiroz et al. Mapping knowledge on Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in the Amazon rainforest: a systematic review of diversity, distribution and symbiotic interactions

Table S1
Chronological list of the publications used in the analyses of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in the Amazon.

Table S2
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi species list from Amazonian countries, based on published studies. The numbers in the table cells correspond to the reference codes in Table S1.

Table S3
Plant species list studied for their symbiotic profiles with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in the Amazon region. The table indicates the observed AMF structures: H = hyphae, V = vesicles, S = spores, A = arbuscules. The “+” symbol denotes observed colonization without specification of the structures, while “-” indicates that no arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization was observed. The numbers correspond to the reference codes in Table S1.

Edited by

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    11 May 2026
  • Date of issue
    2026

History

  • Received
    05 May 2025
  • Accepted
    25 Nov 2025
location_on
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia Av. André Araujo, 2936 Aleixo, 69060-001 Manaus AM Brasil, Tel.: +55 92 3643-3030, Fax: +55 92 643-3223 - Manaus - AM - Brazil
E-mail: acta@inpa.gov.br
rss_feed Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
Ir para o topo Reportar erro